Hoping this makes it to the US....
#1
#2
I don't think this technology is a bad thing, but it's a lot of R&D money for something that only requires a low-tech solution. Plus, this warning system doesn't physically prevent the door from being opened. I think the most effective solution from a practicality and cost standpoint is for cyclists to ride outside the door zone, and in tandem the legal system should provide them a lot of leeway for doing so.
#3
Senior Member
I don't think this technology is a bad thing, but it's a lot of R&D money for something that only requires a low-tech solution. Plus, this warning system doesn't physically prevent the door from being opened. I think the most effective solution from a practicality and cost standpoint is for cyclists to ride outside the door zone, and in tandem the legal system should provide them a lot of leeway for doing so.
Likes For Rick:
#4
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,143
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,404 Times
in
3,729 Posts
Considering that the current and existing vehicles on the road won't be banned from the road, it's not going to keep dooring from happening or significantly reduce it's numbers anytime soon even if it was required on all new cars tomorrow.
This sort of thing was actually talked about quite a few years ago. I think it was here on BF along with other things that could be done to add technology to cars that will impact cycling safety in a good way. But still, the actual impact of them will be like trying to eek out the difference between DuraAce and Ultegra. Only that one person that would have been doored otherwise if it hadn't been for the sensor, or that one person that needed the marginal gain to get over the line first with the DuraAce will benefit.
This sort of thing was actually talked about quite a few years ago. I think it was here on BF along with other things that could be done to add technology to cars that will impact cycling safety in a good way. But still, the actual impact of them will be like trying to eek out the difference between DuraAce and Ultegra. Only that one person that would have been doored otherwise if it hadn't been for the sensor, or that one person that needed the marginal gain to get over the line first with the DuraAce will benefit.
#5
Senior Member
My car, 2016 VW Golf already has the needed sensors. All that would be necessary would be to update the car's software. When I back out of a parking space in a parking lot, the car warns me if there is a car or pedestrian passing by.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
given the times, it needs to start at some point...
so just roll out the tech & the law changes all at once. double down.
so just roll out the tech & the law changes all at once. double down.
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#7
I don't think this technology is a bad thing, but it's a lot of R&D money for something that only requires a low-tech solution. Plus, this warning system doesn't physically prevent the door from being opened. I think the most effective solution from a practicality and cost standpoint is for cyclists to ride outside the door zone, and in tandem the legal system should provide them a lot of leeway for doing so.
Interesting that the article is about this going into effect in Australia...and the stock photo used shows left-hand driver placement. Ah, well.
Likes For rlmalisz:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
i would even add a haptic feedback to the inside door lever that will inherently draw the attention to look towards that direction which happens to be in a view of the side mirror too...
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,768
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,844 Times
in
1,182 Posts
I once quietly and politely held my breath at a conference as my wife squashed my elbow to prevent me from mouthing off.
I was listening to someone complain about the cost of the damage to their inner car door after some fool bicyclist slammed into them...
You Idiot!
I was listening to someone complain about the cost of the damage to their inner car door after some fool bicyclist slammed into them...
You Idiot!
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
Likes For zandoval:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,643
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,480 Times
in
1,911 Posts
I was doored for the first and last time in 1966. Since then, I've managed to avoid the hazard despite 10s of thousands of miles in NYC (before bike lanes) and the burbs.
Avoiding the door zone is often impossible in NYC, so I use a variety of tactics. Keep LEFT on all one way streets. Watching ahead and noting any cars parking. Checking, when possible for occupied cars, especially cabs.
Technology is welcome, but I won't be relying on it. It can also be counter-productive as drivers come to rely on it, and reduce their attentiveness.
Also keep in mind that it takes over 10 years for 80% of the b fleet to turn over, and much longer for the rest.
Avoiding the door zone is often impossible in NYC, so I use a variety of tactics. Keep LEFT on all one way streets. Watching ahead and noting any cars parking. Checking, when possible for occupied cars, especially cabs.
Technology is welcome, but I won't be relying on it. It can also be counter-productive as drivers come to rely on it, and reduce their attentiveness.
Also keep in mind that it takes over 10 years for 80% of the b fleet to turn over, and much longer for the rest.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#12
The Wheezing Geezer
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Espańola, NM
Posts: 1,266
Bikes: 1976 Fredo Speciale, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr., Libertas mixte
Liked 1,140 Times
in
542 Posts
I hope the tech makes it over here, too.
But, there should be an exception for big pickup trucks, as long as the rider can pass safely under the door...
But, there should be an exception for big pickup trucks, as long as the rider can pass safely under the door...
#13
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,339
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Liked 1,871 Times
in
1,062 Posts
Finland cut traffic deaths to zero a few years ago. All they did was slow down the cars and seperate traffic out by mode.
Just throwin' it out there.
Just throwin' it out there.
Likes For base2:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,768
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,844 Times
in
1,182 Posts
#15
Senior Member
I was doored for the first and last time in 1966. Since then, I've managed to avoid the hazard despite 10s of thousands of miles in NYC (before bike lanes) and the burbs.
Avoiding the door zone is often impossible in NYC, so I use a variety of tactics. Keep LEFT on all one way streets. Watching ahead and noting any cars parking. Checking, when possible for occupied cars, especially cabs.
Technology is welcome, but I won't be relying on it. It can also be counter-productive as drivers come to rely on it, and reduce their attentiveness.
Also keep in mind that it takes over 10 years for 80% of the b fleet to turn over, and much longer for the rest.
Avoiding the door zone is often impossible in NYC, so I use a variety of tactics. Keep LEFT on all one way streets. Watching ahead and noting any cars parking. Checking, when possible for occupied cars, especially cabs.
Technology is welcome, but I won't be relying on it. It can also be counter-productive as drivers come to rely on it, and reduce their attentiveness.
Also keep in mind that it takes over 10 years for 80% of the b fleet to turn over, and much longer for the rest.
It took once for me to figure it out also. I just don't ride in the door zone. there is no penalty for opening a car door into traffic. There are laws but they are not enforced. The chances that even with the new tech that people will pay attention are slim to none. I will just keep not riding in the door zone.
#16
Must be symmetrical
I had to redo my driver's license when i moved to Germany from the US; technically just take the tests, but i paid for a bit of behind the wheel training since it is different enough here that I would probably have failed without it.
And from the first lesson, you are trained to look behind you when turning right at an intersection, and when opening your door. And if you don't do it in your test, like really make a point of doing it, you fail. I was specifically told this by my instructor.
Proper training is the key, not technology. Technology leads to operator dependency. For instance , I really like my parking sensor for backing up, but I bet I am not as good at parallel parking anymore if it were to die. And then there was the time one of my kids turned it off by accident. I realized it just in time.
And from the first lesson, you are trained to look behind you when turning right at an intersection, and when opening your door. And if you don't do it in your test, like really make a point of doing it, you fail. I was specifically told this by my instructor.
Proper training is the key, not technology. Technology leads to operator dependency. For instance , I really like my parking sensor for backing up, but I bet I am not as good at parallel parking anymore if it were to die. And then there was the time one of my kids turned it off by accident. I realized it just in time.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,643
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,480 Times
in
1,911 Posts
This. There are countless examples. All too often it becomes zero sum as the technical improvement is offset by operator complacency and skill loss. Sometimes, the net result is negative.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Likes For FBinNY:
#18
Senior Member
Unless the system prevents the door from being opened, I see it as close to useless. Drivers, turn off their engines and immediately open a door. All in a few seconds, if not faster, or if not my wife who seems to have to fumble around for multiple things in her purse for several minutes. I don't think a warning light or alarm will help. Mostly because it will happen so rarely for most drivers, they wouldn't even know what it's for when it does happen.
Obviously, keeping the door from being opened, has its own risks, so is not likely to be implemented.
I think this is one of those things where the infrastructure and road laws need to be designed to NOT put cyclist in these inherently dangerous positions.
Obviously, keeping the door from being opened, has its own risks, so is not likely to be implemented.
I think this is one of those things where the infrastructure and road laws need to be designed to NOT put cyclist in these inherently dangerous positions.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,643
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,480 Times
in
1,911 Posts
OTOH- cars already have a number of alarms, and experience shows that drivers are more than able to tune them out. So, this may be of some limited use for a conscientious driver, but will have minimal effect on the vast majority that simply don't give a hoot.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#20
Senior Member
Not arguing about whether drivers will actually respond to the warnings. However I believe (believe, not know) that these systems remain alive for a few minutes after the engine is turned off. So, the sequence as drivers park and exit won't matter.
OTOH- cars already have a number of alarms, and experience shows that drivers are more than able to tune them out. So, this may be of some limited use for a conscientious driver, but will have minimal effect on the vast majority that simply don't give a hoot.
OTOH- cars already have a number of alarms, and experience shows that drivers are more than able to tune them out. So, this may be of some limited use for a conscientious driver, but will have minimal effect on the vast majority that simply don't give a hoot.
#21
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 426
Bikes: '00 LS Vortex/Chorus 12/Campag Zondas, '98 LS Classic/Chorus 10/Rolf Vector Pros
Liked 365 Times
in
208 Posts
There is something called the "Dutch Maneuver" or "Dutch Reach" (don't know if it originated in The Netherlands, but it's the sort of sensible approach that those hell-bound socialists would adopt) - basically it involves training people to open their door with their "off" hand - so in the US, opening the door with the right hand. This forces one to rotate in their seat, making it easier to look behind before pushing open the door.
Can't imagine US drivers twisting in their seats, though - sounds too much like exercise. I won't be depending on pinging alerts or Dutch Reaches - I'll just assume that any door could open into me, and give cars distance.
Likes For 13ollocks: