Simple budget AA/AAA battery run GPS for touring
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Simple budget AA/AAA battery run GPS for touring
Hi ,
Apologies for posting yet another GPS thread. I am lost in a sea of information and I am not too tecchy/computer literate . I am looking for a simple GPS for navigating on tour , idealy I hope to find one that ......
takes conventional batteries so that I can carry rechargeable spares and a plug in battery charger
has a display that can blank to save battery while it is in use if needed
will accept downloaded maps/gpx files with pre planned routes
audio directions or cues at intersections would be nice but not a dealbreaker
I really dont need any other bells or whistles.
Is it possible to pick up a simple machine like this ? Any suggestions much appreciated
J
Apologies for posting yet another GPS thread. I am lost in a sea of information and I am not too tecchy/computer literate . I am looking for a simple GPS for navigating on tour , idealy I hope to find one that ......
takes conventional batteries so that I can carry rechargeable spares and a plug in battery charger
has a display that can blank to save battery while it is in use if needed
will accept downloaded maps/gpx files with pre planned routes
audio directions or cues at intersections would be nice but not a dealbreaker
I really dont need any other bells or whistles.
Is it possible to pick up a simple machine like this ? Any suggestions much appreciated
J
#2
Senior Member
The Garmin Oregon does all those things. Will run all day on a freshly charged set of AA batteries, has an optional handlebar clip and is waterproof. They've added a bunch of fitness crap and other gimmicks to the software recently but the core features of just overlaying a gpx on the map and showing you where you are are still there and work pretty well.
Likes For guy153:
#3
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Lisle, IL
Posts: 408
Bikes: 2003 Litespeed Vortex, 2017 All-City Mr. Pink, ~1997 Trek Multitrack 700
Liked 97 Times
in
59 Posts
I've been using a Garmin eTrek 20x for several years now to do all you are looking for. Uses 2 AA batteries which have lasted through an entire 300K. I use the RAM Mounts system to keep it secure on my handlebars. I download the routes from RWGPS (.GPX files) via Basecamp to the unit. I download my maps (free) from GPSFileDepot.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,334
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Liked 1,500 Times
in
1,172 Posts
I have been using the Garmin 64.
Garmin makes lots of models that would fit your criteria. Size, button placement, type of handlebar backet, etc., are things to check out.
On my Garmin 64 there were a couple of occasions that I did not get the GPS in the mount quite right (user error) and it fell out of the bracket while I was riding, but I always use a small cord to the handlebar, so if it slips off it won't completely fall off the bike.
I run mine on Ikea Ladda Low Discharge rechargeable NiMH batteries. I have also used Eneloops but lately I have had better luck with the Ikea ones. Ikea sells two grades of NiMH batteries, the white more expensive ones are the ones I use.
Garmin makes lots of models that would fit your criteria. Size, button placement, type of handlebar backet, etc., are things to check out.
On my Garmin 64 there were a couple of occasions that I did not get the GPS in the mount quite right (user error) and it fell out of the bracket while I was riding, but I always use a small cord to the handlebar, so if it slips off it won't completely fall off the bike.
I run mine on Ikea Ladda Low Discharge rechargeable NiMH batteries. I have also used Eneloops but lately I have had better luck with the Ikea ones. Ikea sells two grades of NiMH batteries, the white more expensive ones are the ones I use.
#5
Senior Member
I've been using a Garmin eTrek 20x for several years now to do all you are looking for. Uses 2 AA batteries which have lasted through an entire 300K. I use the RAM Mounts system to keep it secure on my handlebars. I download the routes from RWGPS (.GPX files) via Basecamp to the unit. I download my maps (free) from GPSFileDepot.
Are you saying that one set of batteries lasted you 300,000 kms?
or
300kms?
#7
Senior Member
I own and have used a Garmin Oregon 600, eTrex 20/30, and a GPSMAP 62s/64. I like the eTrex 20/30 the best - very small and low profile on the handlebar compared to the others and better battery life. The GPSMAP 62/64 units have a much better joystick, but the eTrex works just fine. The Oregon has a touch-screen interface, which was nice at times, but horrible on really dusty roads or in the rain. The eTrex is just as reliable as the rest, but less expensive - its the winner for me. Its also what most of the bike packing community seems to gravitate to eventually.
#8
Pining for the fjords
Another vote for the eTrex series. I do 3 and a half days with a set of eneloop batteries.
Plus: 2 sets of rechargeable batteries and it'll last over a week. Very robust: mine was catapulted off the bike a few times (pothole) and bounced over the asphalt like a pingpong ball — not a scratch. Price.
Minus: keeps getting slower with each new map version, which can be annoying if you also have maps/ navigation on your phone ( "lightning speed" by comparison). The small joy stick is the weak point, apparently. I've lost an eTrex 20x because there was a small tear in the rubber covering it and water got in.
Plus: 2 sets of rechargeable batteries and it'll last over a week. Very robust: mine was catapulted off the bike a few times (pothole) and bounced over the asphalt like a pingpong ball — not a scratch. Price.
Minus: keeps getting slower with each new map version, which can be annoying if you also have maps/ navigation on your phone ( "lightning speed" by comparison). The small joy stick is the weak point, apparently. I've lost an eTrex 20x because there was a small tear in the rubber covering it and water got in.
Likes For CMAW:
#10
Senior Member
I have to say I don't quite understand a desire to use rechargeable AA/AAA batteries and charger. If you're going to do that, you'd be better off, power and space wise, using a GPS that charges via micro usb and a power bank. The power bank requires no charger(self contained) and packs more battery power for the same amount of space taken up by AA/AAA batteries. They'll also charge faster, I believe. One large power bank would charge fairly quickly with a modern 2A or higher charging base and last you days(or longer?) of GPS use. It's also easier to make a rechargeable device reliably waterproof if it has a micro usb flap vs. battery slot, and rechargeable GPS units are generally a bit smaller and more compact. As another plus, you can charge multiple other devices from the power bank. Just get one decent sized one and basically never have to worry about any of your devices going dead. Or if you don't have many devices, get a smaller one and never really have to worry about the one or two devices going dead.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,334
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Liked 1,500 Times
in
1,172 Posts
I have to say I don't quite understand a desire to use rechargeable AA/AAA batteries and charger. If you're going to do that, you'd be better off, power and space wise, using a GPS that charges via micro usb and a power bank. The power bank requires no charger(self contained) and packs more battery power for the same amount of space taken up by AA/AAA batteries. They'll also charge faster, I believe. One large power bank would charge fairly quickly with a modern 2A or higher charging base and last you days(or longer?) of GPS use. It's also easier to make a rechargeable device reliably waterproof if it has a micro usb flap vs. battery slot, and rechargeable GPS units are generally a bit smaller and more compact. As another plus, you can charge multiple other devices from the power bank. Just get one decent sized one and basically never have to worry about any of your devices going dead. Or if you don't have many devices, get a smaller one and never really have to worry about the one or two devices going dead.
I can't speak for others, but I want to be able to use the same GPS for backpacking, kayaking, canoeing, and cycling. I prefer AA batteries for when I don't have a way to plug into an outlet for a couple of weeks.
And using NiMH rechargeables is greener than disposable batteries. I have not bought any AA or AAA non-rechargeable batteries in over a decade with one exception, my taillight batteries were dead and I was riding home in the dark so I bought a small pack of AAA at a Walgreens to use to get home about eight years ago.
But I can charge my GPS AA batteries from the dynohub with a USB charger and pass through cache battery, I have no reason to have a dedicated cycling GPS in addition to a general recreation GPS for other activities. I should clarify here that Garmin will say you can only charge their proprietary battery pack in a Garmin 64, can't recharge NiMH batteries in it, but there is a work around that I use to do it, thus I can use the same AA batteries in my GPS as in my headlamp (for my head in the campsite) that uses one AA battery.
#12
Senior Member
How do you recharge the AA batteries when you're out backpacking, etc? If you simply carry enough to last the duration of the trip, wouldn't a power bank hold the amount of power of the AA, but in a more compact package, and be faster to recharge than a bunch of AA when you do have that option? I'm genuinely asking, as I haven't used AA batteries in a very long time. Just based on my general knowledge of batteries, I'm pretty sure my thoughts are correct since lithium holds the most power compared to other battery compositions. You could also more easily charge a power bank from a dynamo. You just plug it in to your power converter and you're done. It's like if you could just plug your AA directly into the dynamo to charge. Am I genuinely missing something, or is it strictly a preference thing?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,916
Bikes: Trek Domane SL6 Gen 3, Soma Fog Cutter, Focus Mares AL, Detroit Bikes Sparrow FG, Volae Team, Nimbus MUni
Liked 2,129 Times
in
1,123 Posts
I've been using the eTrex 20x for several seasons of randonneuring, including several 1200km brevets. I think it checks all your boxes.
Note that I use mine without any turn-by-turn directions and without any map in the background - just the navigation line and a dot showing my location.
Cons: I find that with a map turned on, the nav line gets lost - there's not enough contrast difference between nav line and map lines. Although it has some turn-by-turn capability, I've not found it useful. In bright sunlight, even the lone nav line can get washed out. Lacking bluetooth connectivity, it's not possible to push route updates to the device without a PC.
Pros: Ruggedness. Seemingly impervious to rain. Robustness of software (only a topic because of the flakiness of so many higher end GPS units). Replaceable batteries (a plus for me, a plus for the OP, and evidently not a plus for the biggest segment of the GPS market).
Note that I use mine without any turn-by-turn directions and without any map in the background - just the navigation line and a dot showing my location.
Cons: I find that with a map turned on, the nav line gets lost - there's not enough contrast difference between nav line and map lines. Although it has some turn-by-turn capability, I've not found it useful. In bright sunlight, even the lone nav line can get washed out. Lacking bluetooth connectivity, it's not possible to push route updates to the device without a PC.
Pros: Ruggedness. Seemingly impervious to rain. Robustness of software (only a topic because of the flakiness of so many higher end GPS units). Replaceable batteries (a plus for me, a plus for the OP, and evidently not a plus for the biggest segment of the GPS market).
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,334
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Liked 1,500 Times
in
1,172 Posts
How do you recharge the AA batteries when you're out backpacking, etc? If you simply carry enough to last the duration of the trip, wouldn't a power bank hold the amount of power of the AA, but in a more compact package, and be faster to recharge than a bunch of AA when you do have that option? I'm genuinely asking, as I haven't used AA batteries in a very long time. Just based on my general knowledge of batteries, I'm pretty sure my thoughts are correct since lithium holds the most power compared to other battery compositions. You could also more easily charge a power bank from a dynamo. You just plug it in to your power converter and you're done. It's like if you could just plug your AA directly into the dynamo to charge. Am I genuinely missing something, or is it strictly a preference thing?
Canoeing and kayaking, I do not want my GPS to die while on the water, so I change the batteries more frequently, do not run them to empty. But otherwise pretty much the same as backpacking. But, canoeing and kayaking, a few more pounds in the boat is not a problem, so carrying a couple weeks of food, batteries, etc., is not a problem. Canoeing and kayaking, I also carry a marine band radio, mostly for weather reports, but kayaking in places like Lake Superior, it is a good idea to have a marine band radio,especially when you are may miles from the nearest cell phone coverage. Mine radio uses six AA batteries, but it is turned on so rarely that I never need to swap out the batteries on a two week trip. Some trips I used AAA batteries instead of AA to make it lighter, but that cuts the number of hours I can use the radio.
I bought a solar panel and tried charging up AA batteries on a two week kayak trip, when I got home I concluded that the solar panel and the USB powered AA charger weighed as much as the AA batteries that I charged during the trip, plus that runs the risk of not having good sunlight during your trip, so no longer carry solar panel. I usually do my kayaking and canoeing trips in Sep and Oct, thus shorter days, more battery consumption for light in the campsite, plus then I am inclined to bring a brighter headlamp that runs on four AAA batteries instead of the one that uses one AA battery.
A friend of mine did Southern Tier a few years ago with some friends. They stayed in motels every night, no camping, they had a van to haul luggage, one of the riders drove the van each day. Thus, recharging GPS each night was easy to do from an outlet. A few times he forgot to charge up his cycling GPS at night and it died during the next day. He was perturbed that he did not have one like mine that runs on batteries that you could swap out.
Last point, a cycling GPS lives on your handlebar. A GPS for backpacking is in your hand or a pocket or belt case. A GPS for canoeing and kayaking is probably sitting somewhere loose where you can see it when it is not in a pocket. Thus, I want a GPS that is easy to handle and use, not one that was designed to be clipped onto a handlebar. And I want one that is robust enough to be knocked around with your camping gear, dropped occasionally onto rocks, etc. Cycling GPS units that I have seen are not that robust.
I am a retired Geological Engineer. Every day of my professional career, I worked with maps. Thus, I am probably more inclined to want the best equipment for outdoor activities that require location data. When your occupation requires that you have the best location data available, the way you think about location data reflects that. Maybe that is why I have upgraded my GPS tools as often as I have. Before GPS I of course used paper maps and compass, I probably have a dozen compasses, including some professional quality ones that are called pocket transits in storage somewhere.
A couple years ago I started out one morning in my kayak in clear weather from a campsite on Isle Royale on Lake Superior, first photo you can see the sun just starting to rise, within two hours the heavy fog had set in, second photo. That is the kind of day you really want to make sure you had fresh batteries in your GPS in the morning so you know where you are and which way to go.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,334
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Liked 1,500 Times
in
1,172 Posts
I've been using the eTrex 20x for several seasons of randonneuring, including several 1200km brevets. I think it checks all your boxes.
Note that I use mine without any turn-by-turn directions and without any map in the background - just the navigation line and a dot showing my location.
Cons: I find that with a map turned on, the nav line gets lost - there's not enough contrast difference between nav line and map lines. Although it has some turn-by-turn capability, I've not found it useful. In bright sunlight, even the lone nav line can get washed out. Lacking bluetooth connectivity, it's not possible to push route updates to the device without a PC.
Pros: Ruggedness. Seemingly impervious to rain. Robustness of software (only a topic because of the flakiness of so many higher end GPS units). Replaceable batteries (a plus for me, a plus for the OP, and evidently not a plus for the biggest segment of the GPS market).
Note that I use mine without any turn-by-turn directions and without any map in the background - just the navigation line and a dot showing my location.
Cons: I find that with a map turned on, the nav line gets lost - there's not enough contrast difference between nav line and map lines. Although it has some turn-by-turn capability, I've not found it useful. In bright sunlight, even the lone nav line can get washed out. Lacking bluetooth connectivity, it's not possible to push route updates to the device without a PC.
Pros: Ruggedness. Seemingly impervious to rain. Robustness of software (only a topic because of the flakiness of so many higher end GPS units). Replaceable batteries (a plus for me, a plus for the OP, and evidently not a plus for the biggest segment of the GPS market).
In the photo which is unfortunately not a very good photo, on my Garmin map you can see a curvy purple (fuchsia?) line trending to the right and ahead. It is easier to see in person than in the photo.That purple line is the track I want to follow.
The above photo is from a bike tour I was on, but I use the same GPS for brevets. I download the GPX track to my computer and put that into my GPS. I have a map showing on the GPS screen. If I glance down and see that I am not on the purple line, I know I need to turn around and get back on the line. I do not get any turn by turn audible voices or beeps or anything like that when I am following a track. I want that background map turned on so that when I am riding through a town, I can see how many road intersections I go through before the next turn.
The photo below is also from a bike tour, not a brevet, but in a situation like that I really like to see on my GPS map how my planned route looks so I can see how far I have to go around the round about before I get to it. When on the round about, I am so busy watching the traffic that I do not have much time to look at the road signs or GPS map, so I want to have it all figured out before I get to it. I need the map turned on for that.