Don't Be a Jerk on the Bike
#26
Member
Thread Starter
How and when did I say that? I've said MANY TIMES now that drivers are mostly at fault. I don't know how that equates to "appeasing" motorists. I feel like people are only reading what they want to read, rather than what I'm actually saying. Please point to a single instance of me saying or otherwise implying that we should appease drivers,
#27
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,853
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2137 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
831 Posts
Sometimes breaking the law is the most respectful thing I can do for motorists, and it can enhance my safety as well. Motorists who are not cyclists are too ignorant to realize this. They are often the most vocal with their complaints.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#28
Member
Thread Starter
I believe riding through an intersection against a red light would qualify. And I also said that if safety is a concern, riding two abreast is fine. You seem to be purposely ignoring anything that doesn't fit the narrative you're pushing here, which is that I'm saying it's all cyclists' fault. I'm not sure how else to read your comments, to be honest.
#29
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,853
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2137 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
831 Posts
How and when did I say that? I've said MANY TIMES now that drivers are mostly at fault. I don't know how that equates to "appeasing" motorists. I feel like people are only reading what they want to read, rather than what I'm actually saying. Please point to a single instance of me saying or otherwise implying that we should appease drivers,
"I also believe that we can raise the public’s perception of cyclists, so that they won’t automatically hate seeing someone hunched over their handlebars. We can do this by being specially considerate, obeying all traffic laws"
I often break the law to enhance my safety. If I won't break the law to enhance my safety in an effort to "raise the public's perception" that is the very definition of appeasement.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#30
Member
Thread Starter
And when this is called for, absolutely we should do that. Cyclists are much more at risk than drivers in every situation. Our lives are at stake, not theirs. I have never said anything to the contrary.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,954
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2629 Post(s)
Liked 1,979 Times
in
1,238 Posts
I wonder if OP is a cyclist, or if he (or she) just likes to stir the pot.
This is something akin to posting on an NRA site, "I saw on the news last night that someone was killed or injured when they were shot. Fellow gun owners, we have to be better. Check out my blog and post back here whether you agree or not."
This is something akin to posting on an NRA site, "I saw on the news last night that someone was killed or injured when they were shot. Fellow gun owners, we have to be better. Check out my blog and post back here whether you agree or not."
Likes For pdlamb:
#32
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,703
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11050 Post(s)
Liked 7,598 Times
in
4,237 Posts
It appears others have managed to get you to comment here, since the topic is here.
As for cyclists being jerks, yeah I agree they shouldnt be jerks. Drivers shouldnt be jerks. Nobody should be jerks.
I roll thru 4 way stops when there is nobody approaching. Am I a jerk or have I properly evaluated the situation for safety and clear communication, and determined it is OK to continue riding?
I have ridden thru red lights when the light wont change even though there are no cars in either direction, presumably because the traffic system doesnt recognize I am there. Am I a jerk for that?
I dont know if I am a jerk and dont really care.
If cyclists are running red lights in that they never even slow down, that is dangerous and selfish. Thats a whole other issue and I hope they dont hurt themselves or others in the process. There are always jerks in life though. That poor decision making probably wont lead to a lot of others wanting to do the same thing because most people recognize stupid actions and choose not to partake.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#33
Member
Thread Starter
[QUOTE=Paul Barnard;21948264]Your words:
"I also believe that we can raise the public’s perception of cyclists, so that they won’t automatically hate seeing someone hunched over their handlebars. We can do this by being specially considerate, obeying all traffic laws"
I often break the law to enhance my safety. If I won't break the law to enhance my safety in an effort to "raise the public's perception" that is the very definition of appeasement. [/QUOTE
Not at all. Not. At. All. In those cases, it's obviously more important to be safe. But being courteous and respectful when we can is not appeasement! It's simply treating the other person right. And when we do that, chances are enhanced that that driver might not react as angrily in their next encounter with a cyclist -- whether it's you, me, or someone else. I never said roll over and let drivers do whatever they want.
"I also believe that we can raise the public’s perception of cyclists, so that they won’t automatically hate seeing someone hunched over their handlebars. We can do this by being specially considerate, obeying all traffic laws"
I often break the law to enhance my safety. If I won't break the law to enhance my safety in an effort to "raise the public's perception" that is the very definition of appeasement. [/QUOTE
Not at all. Not. At. All. In those cases, it's obviously more important to be safe. But being courteous and respectful when we can is not appeasement! It's simply treating the other person right. And when we do that, chances are enhanced that that driver might not react as angrily in their next encounter with a cyclist -- whether it's you, me, or someone else. I never said roll over and let drivers do whatever they want.
Likes For YellaFella:
#34
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,853
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2137 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
831 Posts
I believe riding through an intersection against a red light would qualify. And I also said that if safety is a concern, riding two abreast is fine. You seem to be purposely ignoring anything that doesn't fit the narrative you're pushing here, which is that I'm saying it's all cyclists' fault. I'm not sure how else to read your comments, to be honest.
You would advocate that I wait at the light to "raise the public's perception" while doing so costs motorists time and compromises my safety. I don't engage in that kind of appeasement.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#36
Member
Thread Starter
I wonder if OP is a cyclist, or if he (or she) just likes to stir the pot.
This is something akin to posting on an NRA site, "I saw on the news last night that someone was killed or injured when they were shot. Fellow gun owners, we have to be better. Check out my blog and post back here whether you agree or not."
This is something akin to posting on an NRA site, "I saw on the news last night that someone was killed or injured when they were shot. Fellow gun owners, we have to be better. Check out my blog and post back here whether you agree or not."
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,680
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 776 Times
in
402 Posts
I recently watched a single YouTube video of two joggers crossing in the middle of the street.
I immediately went onto a large running forum and asked everyone there to not be a jerk when running.
I feel better about myself for doing this.
I in fact believe that what I did could be considered almost heroic.
I’m even thinking of blogging about it
I immediately went onto a large running forum and asked everyone there to not be a jerk when running.
I feel better about myself for doing this.
I in fact believe that what I did could be considered almost heroic.
I’m even thinking of blogging about it
Likes For downhillmaster:
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,047
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7089 Post(s)
Liked 11,207 Times
in
4,784 Posts
I don't come here to be scolded.
Likes For Koyote:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,490
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 891 Post(s)
Liked 2,324 Times
in
1,301 Posts
No, I meant IS very dangerous, and blowing through , as I meant it , is ignoring the stop sign or light. Failure to stop at a stop sign or red light in California, even if one doesn't care about the safety aspect, is against the law and a ticket in California ain't cheap. I had a friend get a ticket for riding on the wrong side of the street.
#40
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,853
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2137 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
831 Posts
Advocacy vs appeasement.
Advocacy: "Cyclists may break the law at times in a way that enhances their safety and the overall flow of traffic."
Appeasement: We should "not be jerks and obey all laws."
Advocacy: "Cyclists may break the law at times in a way that enhances their safety and the overall flow of traffic."
Appeasement: We should "not be jerks and obey all laws."
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,954
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2629 Post(s)
Liked 1,979 Times
in
1,238 Posts
Likes For pdlamb:
#42
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,853
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2137 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
831 Posts
If by ignoring it, you mean proceed without caution, then I agree. If you mean not remaining at a red light until it turns green IS dangerous, rather than MAY BE dangerous, then you are wrong.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,490
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 891 Post(s)
Liked 2,324 Times
in
1,301 Posts
You can tell that to the judge when you contest the ticket, I will wait until it is green.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,504
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18529 Post(s)
Liked 15,890 Times
in
7,459 Posts
Even in jurisdictions that have adopted the Idaho rule? A couple of years ago I had to chuckle at myself when I realized I was waiting for a green light in a small Idaho town when there was no traffic around. Then I thought of all the the stop signs I had stopped for earlier. In my defense, I had just crossed the border from Montana a few hours earlier and forgot about the state's law.
Likes For indyfabz:
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,504
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18529 Post(s)
Liked 15,890 Times
in
7,459 Posts
IKR. Back in 2017 I was riding the GAP trail in PA. I was in the town of W. Newton walking my bike. Wanted to cross a street and waited at the intersection for the light to turn green, like a good citizen. Light turns green and I enter the crosswalk. "Karen" nearly hits me trying to make a left turn. She yells profanity at me. The only thing she could have been pissed at was that I hadn't crossed on red and thus got in her way.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,490
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 891 Post(s)
Liked 2,324 Times
in
1,301 Posts
Even in jurisdictions that have adopted the Idaho rule? A couple of years ago I had to chuckle at myself when I realized I was waiting for a green light in a small Idaho town when there was no traffic around. Then I thought of all the the stop signs I had stopped for earlier. In my defense, I had just crossed the border from Montana a few hours earlier and forgot about the state's law.
Likes For Kabuki12:
#47
Full Member
A couple of years ago, my son and I monitored traffic at a four-way stop. We scored how well a vehicle made a legal stop if it was the only vehicle at the intersection. About 15% made no stop at all. Mainly they were making a right turn. About 25% made a full stop with a 2-3 second duration and did not enter the crosswalk before they made the stop. The rest was a mix of rolling stops and/or stops made in the crosswalk or bicycle lane. We only saw one bicycle rider (he rolled thru a right turn). There was another family of bicycle riders. The Dad took half the kids on a box turn in one direction and the Mom took the other group in a box turn in the other direction. I would have liked to been able to score more bicycle riders. I ride on that same street and sometime count the cars coming from side streets. I think it more like a 50-50 chance to see a car stop. I am surprised. This is Arizona, and the weather is nice enough that there is always someone out walking, running, or bicycle riding in our subdivision.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,504
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18529 Post(s)
Liked 15,890 Times
in
7,459 Posts
I think another state recently adopted the saw laws. You can treat stop signs as yield signs. You have to come to a complete stop and red lights, but then you can proceed through is it's safe to do so. When Idaho first adopted it, car/bike accidents dropped then leveled off.
I take the same approach here in Philly. Makes total sense because the city has so many narrow streets. Allows a cyclist to stay ahead of auto traffic when there is no bike lane.
I take the same approach here in Philly. Makes total sense because the city has so many narrow streets. Allows a cyclist to stay ahead of auto traffic when there is no bike lane.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,490
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 891 Post(s)
Liked 2,324 Times
in
1,301 Posts
Likes For Kabuki12: