Early Dura Ace hub bearing count
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times
in
397 Posts
Early Dura Ace hub bearing count
I am working on a set of wheels that came to me on a very well used bike of which I know no history. They are very early low flange 36 hole, and perhaps model 7100/7110. Replacing bearings, out came 11 of 3/16”. I put 11 new ones back in but thought 10 was the normal, but all seemed well. Looking later at Velo base, it does say 10. I assume even though it spins smooth and went together fine, I should go with 10. Does anyone know if any took 11?
Early, low flange 36 hole
Early, low flange 36 hole
#2
Senior Member
I thought 10 balls per side. I would take it apart again and see if the balls are packed too tight.
Wrenching at our local bike Co-op, I've run into a few cases where a hub exhibits strange behavior, in that it alternately seems loose, and every few revolutions it locks up. This is evidence of too many balls, or the balls not seated correctly in the cups. I've also seen cases where the hubs were packed with the wrong sized balls, or a seemingly random collection of mis-matched balls. Go figure.
Wrenching at our local bike Co-op, I've run into a few cases where a hub exhibits strange behavior, in that it alternately seems loose, and every few revolutions it locks up. This is evidence of too many balls, or the balls not seated correctly in the cups. I've also seen cases where the hubs were packed with the wrong sized balls, or a seemingly random collection of mis-matched balls. Go figure.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I can't speak to that particular hub set but several newer Shimano front hubs I've dealt with have indeed used 11 x 3/16" balls per side.
#4
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,244
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6338 Post(s)
Liked 4,933 Times
in
3,396 Posts
IMO, you are better off with one less than the correct number of bearings. With one too many the bearings will likely be rubbing against each and not spinning freely.
#5
Senior Member
Shimano's exploded view for the HB-7110-F (small flange) and HB-7120-F (large flange) Dura Ace front hubs appear to show both using a total of 11 3/16" bearing balls per side.
https://si.shimano.com/en/manual/search?model=HB-7110-F
https://si.shimano.com/en/manual/search?model=HB-7110-F
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times
in
397 Posts
Thanks for the replies already. I did take out 1 per side although it didn’t look crowded with 11. I believe it spun better with 11, so as per Hondo6 I think I will go back to 11. It did spin SO nice with 11, and the quality of the cups and cones and whole hub is impressive.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,438
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 524 Post(s)
Liked 465 Times
in
350 Posts
Thanks for the replies already. I did take out 1 per side although it didn’t look crowded with 11. I believe it spun better with 11, so as per Hondo6 I think I will go back to 11. It did spin SO nice with 11, and the quality of the cups and cones and whole hub is impressive.
Likes For oldbobcat:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,959
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3621 Post(s)
Liked 3,046 Times
in
1,842 Posts
Likes For smd4:
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times
in
397 Posts
Info found
Better searching shows these to be first generation and HS-731/831 hub set. 11 balls in front. I should have searched a bit more.
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...f-35b1fba54611
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...f-35b1fba54611
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,147
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4233 Post(s)
Liked 3,952 Times
in
2,352 Posts
IME the symptom of one too many balls in a hub is the axle is no longer coaxial to the rim. If done on one side only the axle end on the side with the correct number will be pretty much centered. But the other side/axle end is off center. As this wheel rotates the off centeredness will rotate by 1/2 (usually) the sped that the rim does. So the rim will "look" to be out of true at one spot (say at the valve) and a revolution later look to be off at the seam (opposing the valve). The bearing with it's one too many balls rotates at half the pace the wheel does. When both sides have a ball to may it gets a bit more complex as the two off axis cones are now also off from each other by wherever the two "lifted" balls are positioned. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,987
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5924 Post(s)
Liked 2,814 Times
in
1,572 Posts
It's easy to ensure the correct ball count if you let the hub tell you.
Apply grease to the cup and load balls into a circle so that the ID is slightly greater that the OD of the con's small end. Generally, you'll have a sense of correct placement by eye, but can also pit the cone into place twist slowly then gingerly remove it and look at the balls where they'll be in use. They should appear to be filing the space and just about touching, yet not look crowded.
In most cases overloading the bearing will push the cone off center and cause the axle to wobble when turning.
As mentioned before, one too few doesn't matter much, while one too many does, so (only if you must) err low.
Apply grease to the cup and load balls into a circle so that the ID is slightly greater that the OD of the con's small end. Generally, you'll have a sense of correct placement by eye, but can also pit the cone into place twist slowly then gingerly remove it and look at the balls where they'll be in use. They should appear to be filing the space and just about touching, yet not look crowded.
In most cases overloading the bearing will push the cone off center and cause the axle to wobble when turning.
As mentioned before, one too few doesn't matter much, while one too many does, so (only if you must) err low.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I think all of these comments are moot. According to the Shimano data, it requires 11 x 3/16" balls per side and that is not unprecedented with other Shimano hubs.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SFBay
Posts: 2,334
Bikes: n, I would like n+1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 133 Times
in
108 Posts
Some exceptions abound, generally around trying to make a ruined headset mostly useable, but for others reading this, follow the manufacturer's guidance.
If you're swapping caged to full complement or vice versa that's a different thing than simply not putting all of the parts back in.
#14
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,244
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6338 Post(s)
Liked 4,933 Times
in
3,396 Posts
So you think a cost sensitive industry that makes parts by the million is paying for an extra part that makes their product worse?
Some exceptions abound, generally around trying to make a ruined headset mostly useable, but for others reading this, follow the manufacturer's guidance.
If you're swapping caged to full complement or vice versa that's a different thing than simply not putting all of the parts back in.
Some exceptions abound, generally around trying to make a ruined headset mostly useable, but for others reading this, follow the manufacturer's guidance.
If you're swapping caged to full complement or vice versa that's a different thing than simply not putting all of the parts back in.
However to get back to the original thought. One too many bearings will usually not work at all. The bearings will not sit correctly in the race and will rub each other if they even turn at all. For most any application of loose ball bearing on a bicycle, hub, headset or BB, you'll get away with as little as only 66% of the maximum number of bearings required.
Will it wear faster? Maybe. But not as fast as one too many.
#15
Senior Member
I'm not too sure that ball bearings are the thing you want to pin your cost saving ideas of manufacturing on. Ball bearings are some of the least expensive things there are since their production was perfected many years ago.
However to get back to the original thought. One too many bearings will usually not work at all. The bearings will not sit correctly in the race and will rub each other if they even turn at all. For most any application of loose ball bearing on a bicycle, hub, headset or BB, you'll get away with as little as only 66% of the maximum number of bearings required.
Will it wear faster? Maybe. But not as fast as one too many.
However to get back to the original thought. One too many bearings will usually not work at all. The bearings will not sit correctly in the race and will rub each other if they even turn at all. For most any application of loose ball bearing on a bicycle, hub, headset or BB, you'll get away with as little as only 66% of the maximum number of bearings required.
Will it wear faster? Maybe. But not as fast as one too many.
#16
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,244
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6338 Post(s)
Liked 4,933 Times
in
3,396 Posts
My only purpose here was to say it's much better to have less than one too many. So any that are in too big a hurry to look up the correct number can just fill the race with balls and then just remove a few to ensure that the balls won't be pressed against each other. Or if balls spill on the floor and one or two can't be found then you can still ride you bike that same day and not have to wait till you get new ball bearings.
The bike isn't going to blow up or get damaged as long as about 66% of the race is filled with bearings.
#17
Senior Member
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SFBay
Posts: 2,334
Bikes: n, I would like n+1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 133 Times
in
108 Posts
I'm not too sure that ball bearings are the thing you want to pin your cost saving ideas of manufacturing on. Ball bearings are some of the least expensive things there are since their production was perfected many years ago.
However to get back to the original thought. One too many bearings will usually not work at all. The bearings will not sit correctly in the race and will rub each other if they even turn at all. For most any application of loose ball bearing on a bicycle, hub, headset or BB, you'll get away with as little as only 66% of the maximum number of bearings required.
Will it wear faster? Maybe. But not as fast as one too many.
However to get back to the original thought. One too many bearings will usually not work at all. The bearings will not sit correctly in the race and will rub each other if they even turn at all. For most any application of loose ball bearing on a bicycle, hub, headset or BB, you'll get away with as little as only 66% of the maximum number of bearings required.
Will it wear faster? Maybe. But not as fast as one too many.
I also disagree that you could get away with 66% fill in a loose bearing situation. Using the OP's case as an example, 66% of 11 bearings is roughly 7 bearings. Using a half bearing excess as an example, the contact angle once all the bearings push to the top will be such that the forces will be more than 10x what they should be.
Once the bearings slip around to the top, which they will given any operating clearance, you'll end up with the attached image. This doesn't look like it should be supporting much on the bottom half. This example was drawn with 1/4" bearings and I didn't put in the actual contact angles as the races don't contact at the midplane, but neither of those changes this conclusion. I've seen bikes ride in to the local co-op like this and it ends up as the axle riding on the inside of the hub, race riding on the dust seal, not the cone on the balls.
Round up 3/4 of a ball instead of down by 1/4 ball so that it's 8/11 instead of 7/111 and I agree that it'll get you home, and even survive a while, but I don't know why there would be occasion to knowingly reassemble a hub that way for more than a parts run to the LBS.
Last edited by jccaclimber; 10-25-22 at 11:46 PM.
#19
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,244
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6338 Post(s)
Liked 4,933 Times
in
3,396 Posts
In this post you're comparing too many vs. too few. In that I agree, but that isn't the same. Knowing that 11 is the correct number, we both agree that 10 is better than 12, but 10 is not better than 11.
I also disagree that you could get away with 66% fill in a loose bearing situation. Using the OP's case as an example, 66% of 11 bearings is roughly 7 bearings. Using a half bearing excess as an example, the contact angle once all the bearings push to the top will be such that the forces will be more than 10x what they should be.
I also disagree that you could get away with 66% fill in a loose bearing situation. Using the OP's case as an example, 66% of 11 bearings is roughly 7 bearings. Using a half bearing excess as an example, the contact angle once all the bearings push to the top will be such that the forces will be more than 10x what they should be.
Though I may have made a mistake saying it as 66% the number of balls. I think it was 66% of the arc that the balls make contact with on the races. And even 66% might be an error of my memory. However there was a pretty detailed article about it in a industry magazine 15 to 20 or so years ago discussing what the minimum amount of balls should be for applications such as this. I doubt I'd ever find it again, however 66% is what I remember.