Bike frame material rankings!
#26
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,574
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Liked 2,364 Times
in
1,571 Posts
We all know the direction this thread is going…and it’s not to a good place. Thread closed
Likes For StanSeven:
#27
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,574
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Liked 2,364 Times
in
1,571 Posts
After more thought among the moderator staff, the thread is reopened. Have fun but keep BillyD’s message in mind.
#28
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,634
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Liked 9,565 Times
in
4,422 Posts
#29
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 11,650
Bikes: Madone, Emonda, 5500, Ritchey Breakaway
Liked 5,580 Times
in
2,383 Posts
personally I prefer paper over plastic. Takes me back to my youth.
#31
Senior Member
If you're using modern wheels that are hookless and wider, so you can use 50-70 psi tire pressure, the frame material makes little difference.
#32
Senior Member
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,886
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Liked 554 Times
in
380 Posts
I feel like people bash aluminum bikes because there's a lot of entry level aluminum bikes out there, but a good aluminum bike rides just as well as a carbon bike. I've ridden mid-level steel and titanium bikes and they were fine but not "magical". Most fancy bespoke bikes are steel but that's only because steel is the easiest to work with. Carbon is nice but they all kind of look the same and make me feel like a wannabe racer (not that it's a bad thing). At the end of the day, geometry, weight, and tire clearance are the important things to figure out, and frame material just happens to be a constraint due to what's readily available in the market.
#34
Likes For PeteHski:
Likes For znomit:
#36
Given your above rankings (particularly comfort), how would you rank those same materials for making forks, seatposts and bars? I ask because most modern high-end steel and titanium bikes are paired with carbon forks, seatposts and bars.
Likes For PeteHski:
#37
Senior Member
For me, it is a toss up between magnesium and carbon. Magnesium takes abuse better and damps very well but so can carbon. I have to say my two magnesium bikes are my favorite material but carbon is nice, too. I would not use carbon touring in remote areas, any of the metals would be better from an abuse perspective.
#38
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,733
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Liked 4,336 Times
in
1,525 Posts
I came here looking for bamboo frame love. It tops the missing sustainability category and is oh so chic. It’s also the obvious favorite for pandas.
Likes For MattTheHat:
#40
Senior Member
Likes For Trakhak:
#41
#42
P.S. That's a ceramic finish, not paint, and you cannot see the LOVE statue decal nor get a sense of varying tubing sizes and the seductive curves of the stays from the photo.
Last edited by indyfabz; 11-02-22 at 08:18 AM.
Likes For indyfabz:
#43
A quick glance down this compilation of top 10 Ti bikes of 2022 shows very little variation. If you removed the names it would be very hard to identify them. I'm not saying it would be much easier with carbon bikes, but I could easily spot say a Trek Madone from a Specialized Tarmac or a Bianchi without relying on the paint job.
https://www.bikeradar.com/advice/buy...um-road-bikes/
Last edited by PeteHski; 11-02-22 at 08:36 AM.
Likes For PeteHski:
#44
Senior Member
I'd put Carbon in last place simply because I'm having trouble coming up with a cool sounding rhyme that it goes with:
Steel is real
Ti is fly
Any of the "nums" go with yum or ho hum
Bamboo is new
Carbon is.................assplosive?
Carbon fiber is..........assplosive?
Definitely carbon is the worst.
Steel is real
Ti is fly
Any of the "nums" go with yum or ho hum
Bamboo is new
Carbon is.................assplosive?
Carbon fiber is..........assplosive?
Definitely carbon is the worst.
Last edited by seypat; 11-02-22 at 08:49 AM.
#45
Senior Member
#46
Senior Member
Since we're talking about Titanium, if you can't afford a ceramic finish I guess you could put a Kaitoke wrap on to give it some color. Hot!
https://www.vinylfrog.com/products/m...een-vinyl-wrap
https://www.vinylfrog.com/products/m...een-vinyl-wrap
#47
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,630
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Liked 1,458 Times
in
787 Posts
Also way more fun when it burns! How would OP rank the other frame materials in terms of incendiary entertainment value?
"Carbon gives me a hardon"
You're welcome.
You're welcome.
Likes For Bob Ross:
#48
Senior Member
#49
Senior Member
I think the magnesium is mixed with some other crap. The mg welding takes expensive craftsmen vs carbon frames. So, not really a commercially viable material for a bike frame. Pinarello AK61 is a grail bike.
Likes For GhostRider62:
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,886
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Liked 554 Times
in
380 Posts
I see your point and agree that each material (including carbon) tend to conform to certain tube profiles. I guess I would argue that there's more room for creativity (and what the market find acceptable) for the metal bikes. What comes to mind are the custom/weird bespoke steel frames out there to keep things interesting, or the helix tube titanium frame, or even how different a Caad looks from an Allez Sprint. I get there are carbon aero bikes vs. lightweight climbers but to me the fat tubes kind of look similar, especially now that there's a trend towards carbon bikes designed to be both light and aero - Tarmac SL7 comes to mind.