Pirelli P Zero Smartube - quick review
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I was happy with them for a while... Then, I got a puncture, and then another one. Went back to regular tubes because I was too lazy to repair them and didn't want to fork out more money for new ones. Also, converted one of my other bikes to tubeless, which IMO is the best option nowadays...
Likes For Caliwild:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,811
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Liked 2,000 Times
in
878 Posts
I was happy with them for a while... Then, I got a puncture, and then another one. Went back to regular tubes because I was too lazy to repair them and didn't want to fork out more money for new ones. Also, converted one of my other bikes to tubeless, which IMO is the best option nowadays...
![Smilie](images/smilies/smile.gif)
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#30
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,012
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Liked 3,066 Times
in
1,657 Posts
I tried one because the shop didn't have any latex tubes in stock.
1. It is pretty light, and a lot of people carry them as a spare because they're so light (folks who don't like saddle bags for ex.)
2. It was hard to install - tuck it in here, and a piece comes out over there - could be frustrating on the side of the road.
3. Holds pressure far better than latex... maybe better than butyl.
4. Takes a set - I pinched it on the install, and when uninstalled it looks kinked even though it's fine.
5. It's not stretchy at all - probably need to match size to tire width more exactly than butyl or latex.
6. I conclude fine but too expensive. In fact, I think I'd still go with latex even if Pirelli were the price of butyl.
![](https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikeforums.net-vbulletin/950x713/pirelli_3ad7f5f0a3bfcaa529464fb5eff7eed4c1c1aa81.jpg)
P-Zero
1. It is pretty light, and a lot of people carry them as a spare because they're so light (folks who don't like saddle bags for ex.)
2. It was hard to install - tuck it in here, and a piece comes out over there - could be frustrating on the side of the road.
3. Holds pressure far better than latex... maybe better than butyl.
4. Takes a set - I pinched it on the install, and when uninstalled it looks kinked even though it's fine.
5. It's not stretchy at all - probably need to match size to tire width more exactly than butyl or latex.
6. I conclude fine but too expensive. In fact, I think I'd still go with latex even if Pirelli were the price of butyl.
![](https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikeforums.net-vbulletin/950x713/pirelli_3ad7f5f0a3bfcaa529464fb5eff7eed4c1c1aa81.jpg)
P-Zero
#31
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,651
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Liked 1,840 Times
in
1,106 Posts
Seems weird behavior for TPU, particularly coming from someone with latex experience, because TPU is inherently, I thought, more low-pressure stable than latex, which can be a floppy mess when trying to install. Giving TPU a little shape-up, in my experience with Aerothan, makes installation a breeze.