Tektro 539/559, on the edge of both
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,521
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 706 Times
in
399 Posts
Tektro 539/559, on the edge of both
On a 1982 Trek 412, I recently switched from the stock 27” rims to 700c. I was still able to run some Weinmann 610 center pulls. They have the pads near the bottom with the rear slightly less so. My main gripe was having the center pulls not opening wide enough to take out the 35mm tires I have on it. This even with a QR on the hanger and another on the lever.
I got some Tektro 559s and just put them on. They seemed very nice, but the pads were at nearly the tops of the slots. Plenty of tire removal clearance now with the Tektro QR plus the one on the lever. I was then thinking perhaps the 539s at the bottom of the pad slot would look better. It kinda looks like either would work.
So the question is wether it’s better to have the pads at the top of the slot on the 559s, or the bottom of the slots on the 539s? That also brings up the question of if the 539s will open as wide as the 559s? This condition is exacerbated because my Weinmann concave rims are the narrower 20mm OD version and not the wider ones.
I got some Tektro 559s and just put them on. They seemed very nice, but the pads were at nearly the tops of the slots. Plenty of tire removal clearance now with the Tektro QR plus the one on the lever. I was then thinking perhaps the 539s at the bottom of the pad slot would look better. It kinda looks like either would work.
So the question is wether it’s better to have the pads at the top of the slot on the 559s, or the bottom of the slots on the 539s? That also brings up the question of if the 539s will open as wide as the 559s? This condition is exacerbated because my Weinmann concave rims are the narrower 20mm OD version and not the wider ones.
#2
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,148
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 1,463 Times
in
833 Posts
I have used both models, but on different bikes. Both sets work well, but if I knew the mid reach 539’s would fit the rims, I would choose those over the 559. Pretty sure the shorter arms will provide better feel and stopping power.
Likes For delbiker1:
#3
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,644
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,583 Posts
On a 1982 Trek 412, I recently switched from the stock 27” rims to 700c. I was still able to run some Weinmann 610 center pulls. They have the pads near the bottom with the rear slightly less so. My main gripe was having the center pulls not opening wide enough to take out the 35mm tires I have on it. This even with a QR on the hanger and another on the lever.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,167
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4239 Post(s)
Liked 3,975 Times
in
2,363 Posts
To answer your question best I can- I suspect the caliper that has the longer arms to the cable anchor and casing stop will have the greater "power". This assumes that the other lever arms in play (and that's all non cammed systems are WRT the base mechanics), the two both have the pads positioned in the slots to contact the rim and the location of the arm pivots relative to all this would be the same. For a single pivot caliper there's only one pivot and it's distance from the rim brake track center is the same for both sides/pads/arms. Thus with a single pivot caliper the one with the longer cable acting arms are the greater the leverage. But with two different dual pivot calipers the dimensional assumptions can cause real life being different as all the real lever lengths are measured and compared. I'll also say that rider perception is not always in agreement with the measured numbers.
As far as pads not opening enough for wide tires goes- On my 32 and narrower tired road bikes I run Shimano R600 calipers with their QR and Ergo levers with that QR too. On my touring rig, the tandem and the Mongoose Tomac MtB I have cantis, thank you. In all seriousness consider wider rims the next time around as the QR range starts only after the brake is adjuster properly and the wide tire and narrow rim combo will exceed this most every time (or for the calipers designed when 23/25 wide tires were the cat's meow, note I don't say when sold...). Of course the annoying solution is to deflate the tires and/or use your hand as a hammer and hope the pads stay put. Andy
As far as pads not opening enough for wide tires goes- On my 32 and narrower tired road bikes I run Shimano R600 calipers with their QR and Ergo levers with that QR too. On my touring rig, the tandem and the Mongoose Tomac MtB I have cantis, thank you. In all seriousness consider wider rims the next time around as the QR range starts only after the brake is adjuster properly and the wide tire and narrow rim combo will exceed this most every time (or for the calipers designed when 23/25 wide tires were the cat's meow, note I don't say when sold...). Of course the annoying solution is to deflate the tires and/or use your hand as a hammer and hope the pads stay put. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Last edited by Andrew R Stewart; 01-17-24 at 04:05 PM. Reason: first was clairity, second due to censor
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,521
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 706 Times
in
399 Posts
Thanks on the replies. On taking the cables out of the straddle yoke, I have found that to generally be a major pain, but I do understand.
Yes, wider rims would be a nicer solution too, but I already have the nice looking concaves. The 559s do seem that they will be fine and no new parts would be needed. I guess I was trying to think what would be perfect while cooped up in the winter deep freeze. Those Tektros do seem nicely made and very user friendly to set up. I can understand why they are often recommended. If I ever see a set of 539s at a swap though I will jump on them. Can’t have too many spare parts.
Yes, wider rims would be a nicer solution too, but I already have the nice looking concaves. The 559s do seem that they will be fine and no new parts would be needed. I guess I was trying to think what would be perfect while cooped up in the winter deep freeze. Those Tektros do seem nicely made and very user friendly to set up. I can understand why they are often recommended. If I ever see a set of 539s at a swap though I will jump on them. Can’t have too many spare parts.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,023
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4891 Post(s)
Liked 4,058 Times
in
2,630 Posts
To answer your question best I can- I suspect the caliper that has the longer arms to the cable anchor and casing stop will have the greater "power". This assumes that the other lever arms in play (and that's all non cammed systems are WRT the base mechanics), the two both have the pads positioned in the slots to contact the rim and the location of the arm pivots relative to all this would be the same. For a single pivot caliper there's only one pivot and it's distance from the rim brake track center is the same for both sides/pads/arms. Thus with a single pivot caliper the one with the longer cable acting arms are the greater the leverage. But with two different dual pivot calipers the dimensional assumptions can cause real life being different as all the real lever lengths are measured and compared. I'll also say that rider perception is not always in agreement with the measured numbers.
As far as pads not opening enough for wide tires goes- On my 32 and narrower tired road bikes I run Shimano R600 calipers with their QR and Ergo levers with that QR too. On my touring rig, the tandem and the Mongoose Tomac MtB I have cantis, thank you. In all seriousness consider wider rims the next time around as the QR range starts only after the brake is adjuster properly and the wide tire and narrow rim combo will exceed this most every time (or for the calipers designed when 23/25 wide tires were the cat's meow, note I don't say when sold...). Of course the annoying solution is to deflate the tires and/or use your hand as a hammer and hope the pads stay put. Andy
As far as pads not opening enough for wide tires goes- On my 32 and narrower tired road bikes I run Shimano R600 calipers with their QR and Ergo levers with that QR too. On my touring rig, the tandem and the Mongoose Tomac MtB I have cantis, thank you. In all seriousness consider wider rims the next time around as the QR range starts only after the brake is adjuster properly and the wide tire and narrow rim combo will exceed this most every time (or for the calipers designed when 23/25 wide tires were the cat's meow, note I don't say when sold...). Of course the annoying solution is to deflate the tires and/or use your hand as a hammer and hope the pads stay put. Andy
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,023
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4891 Post(s)
Liked 4,058 Times
in
2,630 Posts
Thanks on the replies. On taking the cables out of the straddle yoke, I have found that to generally be a major pain, but I do understand.
Yes, wider rims would be a nicer solution too, but I already have the nice looking concaves. The 559s do seem that they will be fine and no new parts would be needed. I guess I was trying to think what would be perfect while cooped up in the winter deep freeze. Those Tektros do seem nicely made and very user friendly to set up. I can understand why they are often recommended. If I ever see a set of 539s at a swap though I will jump on them. Can’t have too many spare parts.
Yes, wider rims would be a nicer solution too, but I already have the nice looking concaves. The 559s do seem that they will be fine and no new parts would be needed. I guess I was trying to think what would be perfect while cooped up in the winter deep freeze. Those Tektros do seem nicely made and very user friendly to set up. I can understand why they are often recommended. If I ever see a set of 539s at a swap though I will jump on them. Can’t have too many spare parts.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,167
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4239 Post(s)
Liked 3,975 Times
in
2,363 Posts
The Campy (and Sachs, I have a few) Ergo brake levers do have a QR function. Like Tektros and Cane Creeks (that are not brifters too) there's a sliding post just ahead of the pivot at the top of the brake blade. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,023
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4891 Post(s)
Liked 4,058 Times
in
2,630 Posts
Thanks! I knew there was good reason to go Campy standard when I went 130 spacing and 9-speed on my custom. And a ti-welded "braze-on" for the top-mounted DT friction shifters. Dave Levy also put cable stops on the HT in case I changed my mind. (The real driving forces were never, ever putting those goofy horizontal brifter cables out in space a la early Shimano. That and the knowledge that the day would come that I would accidentally shift as I went for a WB or jersey pocket as I have been steadying the bike with my fingers on the side of the brake lever forever as I go one-handed.)
#10
...
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Whitestone and Rensselaerville, New York
Posts: 1,579
Bikes: Bicycles? Yup.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 506 Post(s)
Liked 1,700 Times
in
776 Posts
My 539s are going on a 27 > 700c conversion and they open up to 32mm. Pads are not quite bottomed out on my setup.
#11
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,709
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3946 Post(s)
Liked 6,637 Times
in
3,283 Posts
Originally Posted by sd5728
the question is whether it’s better to have the pads at the top of the slot on the 559s, or the bottom of the slots on the 539s?
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,521
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 706 Times
in
399 Posts
I do agree wholeheartedly on this, and will be on the lookout for some 539s too. I at least have to try out the feel of this setup first. You purists will be offended by the turkey levers anyhow, but my age and flexibility dictates riding on the tops mostly. You will get there some day too if you are lucky.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 836
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 409 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 433 Times
in
288 Posts
If we assume that the slotted portion of the caliper arm is the most flexible part, (because it's got a big hole in the middle of it,) then it follows that minimizing the amount of hole between the pad and the top of the hole would minimize bending between those two points.
I can't see how anything below the pad attachment point could possibly matter... unstressed aluminum, just along for the ride.
In reality?
Which ever one looks better is the right answer, because there's unlikely to be any functional difference that matters.
--Shannon
I can't see how anything below the pad attachment point could possibly matter... unstressed aluminum, just along for the ride.
In reality?
Which ever one looks better is the right answer, because there's unlikely to be any functional difference that matters.
--Shannon