Campy dropouts?
#1
Campy dropouts?
Hi all. I like to scan eBay and other sites for good deals on older frames and often come across the description "Campagnolo Dropouts". It's something I always wondered about. I understand what the dropouts are and do, buy why the distinction by citing that a particular frame has Campy Dropouts? Is there something I need to be aware of if I wish to mount a Shimano or Sram rear derailleurs to a Campy dropout? Maybe such dropouts will limit a frame builder in some fashion that I'm unaware of? Learn me here please....
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,321
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,332 Times
in
2,788 Posts
Dropouts. No, Campy dropouts are not magic. But in the '70s and before, there was more than one standard as to where the "B-screw" stop should be located, the threads for mounting the derailleur and to a lesser degree, the overall shape. Notably the French Simplex and Huret dropouts. In the '70s, the Japanese basically copied the Campys. Styles were a little different but the threads were nominally the same and the stop similarly located so Campy derailleurs worked on the Japanese dropouts and vice versa.
The Campy dropouts were a long horizontal dropout in the '60s. In the '70s the long ones became less common and a slightly shorter, still horizontal one dominated. In the mid-'70s, the vertical dropout appeared. The Japanese basically followed that trend. In the '80s, it was short horizontal or vertical for both Campy and the Japanese. (This is based on my observations, not formal study. My eyes stared opening to this in the early '70s.)
I've owned: Lambert, Campy late '70s horizontal, Huret horizontal that I had a framebuilder modify to the Campy derailleur stop standard, SunTour and Shimano horizontal and titanium vertical on a custom build. All are quality dropouts. I'm betting framebuilders had their preferences and felt certain ones suited their processes and tastes better but all can be part of a first class frame. The ones I have had issues with have been the plate dropouts on my Peugeot UO-8. But I cannot separate that into dropout quality/strength vs the Simplex derailleur I put into the spokes several times!
Edit: Campy dropouts tend to drive a higher price on the frame/bike market.
The Campy dropouts were a long horizontal dropout in the '60s. In the '70s the long ones became less common and a slightly shorter, still horizontal one dominated. In the mid-'70s, the vertical dropout appeared. The Japanese basically followed that trend. In the '80s, it was short horizontal or vertical for both Campy and the Japanese. (This is based on my observations, not formal study. My eyes stared opening to this in the early '70s.)
I've owned: Lambert, Campy late '70s horizontal, Huret horizontal that I had a framebuilder modify to the Campy derailleur stop standard, SunTour and Shimano horizontal and titanium vertical on a custom build. All are quality dropouts. I'm betting framebuilders had their preferences and felt certain ones suited their processes and tastes better but all can be part of a first class frame. The ones I have had issues with have been the plate dropouts on my Peugeot UO-8. But I cannot separate that into dropout quality/strength vs the Simplex derailleur I put into the spokes several times!
Edit: Campy dropouts tend to drive a higher price on the frame/bike market.
Likes For 79pmooney: