Sage advice, or lunacy? Hmmm...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,564
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,577 Times
in
1,533 Posts
Sage advice, or lunacy? Hmmm...
Likes For eduskator:
#3
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 2,068
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night, '89 Marinoni
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 889 Times
in
463 Posts
huh.
#4
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
I'm sure this thread will be civil and full of productive, polite discussion.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 11,301
Bikes: Madone, Emonda, 5500, Ritchey Breakaway
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10268 Post(s)
Liked 5,240 Times
in
2,244 Posts
Sounds like he doesn’t make enough working for outside to afford a carbon fiber bike.
I recently flew with a captain that was an engineer designing high end sail boats out of carbon fiber in his previous life. The only thing he brought up, which I could see as a draw back and is not talked about. When you crash a carbon fiber bike unless you have noticeable structural damage, chances are you think it’s good. I know I do. The only way to know for sure if the carbon fiber is structurally sound is to apply it to high heat and look at it with a microscope. The cracks are small and usually can’t be seen with a naked eye, not too mention the paint does a good job at hiding them.
I recently flew with a captain that was an engineer designing high end sail boats out of carbon fiber in his previous life. The only thing he brought up, which I could see as a draw back and is not talked about. When you crash a carbon fiber bike unless you have noticeable structural damage, chances are you think it’s good. I know I do. The only way to know for sure if the carbon fiber is structurally sound is to apply it to high heat and look at it with a microscope. The cracks are small and usually can’t be seen with a naked eye, not too mention the paint does a good job at hiding them.
#7
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,193
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 561 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22715 Post(s)
Liked 9,077 Times
in
4,217 Posts
Many materials are viable for making a bike frame: Steel, Ti, Carbon Fiber, Aluminum, Bamboo, Wood....
It's really up to the consumer to decide what makes most sense for him/her. I think a well-made frame from ANY material that fits the rider is better than a not-so-well made and/or poorly fitting one made of wonderful material.
It's really up to the consumer to decide what makes most sense for him/her. I think a well-made frame from ANY material that fits the rider is better than a not-so-well made and/or poorly fitting one made of wonderful material.
#8
Senior Member
This old timer has ridden nothing but carbon since the late nineties. Thirteen carbon frames from Colnago, LOOK, Cervelo, Cinelli and Yoeleo. I've crashed hard and been hit by cars twice, ruined both wheels once, never hurt the frame.
Likes For DaveSSS:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,147
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1587 Post(s)
Liked 1,224 Times
in
619 Posts
Kind of sad, really. Eben Weiss (a.k.a. BSNYC) has been selling variations on this tired theme since at least 2010. In the early days these could at least be kind of funny. Now they are just a bore.
Likes For badger1:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,564
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,577 Times
in
1,533 Posts
If I really think about it, The accessories like saddles, tires, riding apparel, handlebar tape etc are probably more important to the ride that what material the frame is made out of. If you're out there in a pair of bibs/shorts that aren't working for you, it's not going to matter if steel is real, ti is fly, or plastic is fantastic.
Likes For seypat:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 950
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 604 Post(s)
Liked 873 Times
in
440 Posts
The way its written - meh, stupid article.
It's all about wants vs needs.
My Emonda aluminum ALR5 out of the box is $1000 cheaper than the CF SL5 version of the bike. $1000 buys you a few ounces of weight savings. Or I can put that $1000 into a decent set of wheels and be well over a pound lighter, and have better wheels...With the wheel upgrade - the ALR close in weight to the SL6 - which comes in at $5k.
3k gets you similar performance to 5k.
The CF version of the bike get's me absolutely nothing extra. The only reason to purchase the CF version is to say I have CF.
It's all about wants vs needs.
My Emonda aluminum ALR5 out of the box is $1000 cheaper than the CF SL5 version of the bike. $1000 buys you a few ounces of weight savings. Or I can put that $1000 into a decent set of wheels and be well over a pound lighter, and have better wheels...With the wheel upgrade - the ALR close in weight to the SL6 - which comes in at $5k.
3k gets you similar performance to 5k.
The CF version of the bike get's me absolutely nothing extra. The only reason to purchase the CF version is to say I have CF.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,286
Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Liked 849 Times
in
411 Posts
Bike snob was fun when "it" was young. As a former Brooklyn resident, I found lots of funny things in his writing to connect with. Then he got big and Outside gave him a column, and, well, the material has gotten somewhat tired.
Like therapy, after a while, you just run out of things to talk about.
Like therapy, after a while, you just run out of things to talk about.
Likes For blacknbluebikes:
#13
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,193
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 561 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22715 Post(s)
Liked 9,077 Times
in
4,217 Posts
If I really think about it, The accessories like saddles, tires, riding apparel, handlebar tape etc are probably more important to the ride that what material the frame is made out of. If you're out there in a pair of bibs/shorts that aren't working for you, it's not going to matter if steel is real, ti is fly, or plastic is fantastic.
What KILLS me is seeing fellow "serious" cyclists spend big bucks on a CF frame and have them proclaim how smooth the ride is, while they are riding their 23 or 25mm tires at 110+ PSI. They would do much better on ANY frame material with 28's at 75PSI but it's consumer choice.
Likes For datlas:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,062
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7099 Post(s)
Liked 11,221 Times
in
4,792 Posts
#15
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,244
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6338 Post(s)
Liked 4,933 Times
in
3,396 Posts
I love it <sarcasm> when OP's post a link to something and then don't offer any opinion of their own or give any indication of what the thread purpose is.
Seems to fit one of the definitions of Trolling to me.
Seems to fit one of the definitions of Trolling to me.
Likes For Iride01:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,062
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7099 Post(s)
Liked 11,221 Times
in
4,792 Posts
Likes For Koyote:
#17
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,308
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10217 Post(s)
Liked 5,927 Times
in
3,194 Posts
Actually most important item is tires (quality, size, and proper inflation) after bike fit.
What KILLS me is seeing fellow "serious" cyclists spend big bucks on a CF frame and have them proclaim how smooth the ride is, while they are riding their 23 or 25mm tires at 110+ PSI. They would do much better on ANY frame material with 28's at 75PSI but it's consumer choice.
What KILLS me is seeing fellow "serious" cyclists spend big bucks on a CF frame and have them proclaim how smooth the ride is, while they are riding their 23 or 25mm tires at 110+ PSI. They would do much better on ANY frame material with 28's at 75PSI but it's consumer choice.
Weiss is an entertaining writer, but a bit of a jerk and a one-trick pony.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#18
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,239
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10563 Post(s)
Liked 12,159 Times
in
6,223 Posts
Apparently, only World Tour pros race. This may come as some surprise to all of you folks who line up for local crits.
Also, only CF bikes are broken in crashes. This may come as a surprise to those who have broken metal frames in crashes.
Also, apparently the laws of physics only apply to World Tour pros, so that none of the rest of us derive any aerodynamic benefits from a more aerodynamic bike, nor any advantage in climbing from a lighter bike.
Basically, the whole thing is...
Also, only CF bikes are broken in crashes. This may come as a surprise to those who have broken metal frames in crashes.
Also, apparently the laws of physics only apply to World Tour pros, so that none of the rest of us derive any aerodynamic benefits from a more aerodynamic bike, nor any advantage in climbing from a lighter bike.
Basically, the whole thing is...
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#19
Fat n slow
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 4,306
Bikes: Cervelo R3, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,087 Times
in
981 Posts
What a stupid column. I bet this guy is a blast at parties.
Except to my wife, I don’t think I have ever justified any bike related purchase beyond a new chain or cassette as a need.
Except to my wife, I don’t think I have ever justified any bike related purchase beyond a new chain or cassette as a need.
Likes For phrantic09:
#20
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,239
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10563 Post(s)
Liked 12,159 Times
in
6,223 Posts
Probably says, "Well, actually...." a lot. That is, of course, the sort of thing that everyone JUST LOVES at a party.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,595
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7687 Post(s)
Liked 3,589 Times
in
1,891 Posts
The way its written - meh, stupid article.
It's all about wants vs needs.
My Emonda aluminum ALR5 out of the box is $1000 cheaper than the CF SL5 version of the bike. $1000 buys you a few ounces of weight savings. Or I can put that $1000 into a decent set of wheels and be well over a pound lighter, and have better wheels...With the wheel upgrade - the ALR close in weight to the SL6 - which comes in at $5k.
3k gets you similar performance to 5k.
The CF version of the bike get's me absolutely nothing extra. The only reason to purchase the CF version is to say I have CF.
It's all about wants vs needs.
My Emonda aluminum ALR5 out of the box is $1000 cheaper than the CF SL5 version of the bike. $1000 buys you a few ounces of weight savings. Or I can put that $1000 into a decent set of wheels and be well over a pound lighter, and have better wheels...With the wheel upgrade - the ALR close in weight to the SL6 - which comes in at $5k.
3k gets you similar performance to 5k.
The CF version of the bike get's me absolutely nothing extra. The only reason to purchase the CF version is to say I have CF.
Yo0u are mixing standards here ... are we rating bikes by performance (and what does "performance:" mean in this context) oro by price, or by "perceived value" (which we all can immediately see is purely subjective) .... You say the Al version gets you "similar" performance .... but if i am buying for Max performance, not to save money ... I would get the CF. In fact, i would get the CF and put better wheels on it and for &6K get a better bike than the stock CF version or the upgraded Al version.
If I were Actually buying the bike, being me with my mindset, abilities, desires and finances, i would follow your route: Get the Al frame (all the performance I need, not being a great performer anyway) and get good wheels .... but that is "perceived vale," where ultimate performance is compromised by financial concerns, and we are both looking for "bang per buck" and willing to get a little less "bang" to save some bucks.
Saying there is no benefit to CF except bragging rights is just ignorant. Saying that To You the benefits of CF seems minuscule and not worth the cost is valid.
Bieksnob has terned into "Grant Peterson of new York," preaching his "ultimate bicycle philosophy" to whoever will listen. I didn't even bother reading the article .... we have all heard it all before. "I like what I like and this is why what I like is better, why I am smarter, and why people who agree with me are smart and people who think differently are dumb."
I listen to specialists about their specialties. If @RChung talks about aero and energy expenditure, if @PeteHski or some of the other actual engineers start breaking down the physics, I listen, because I know I don't know. When it comes to general knowledge, basic logic, and assessing one's personal needs and desires ... I have many decades of practice and I can do that pretty well. Therefore, when someone tells me what I think or need to think, what I want or should want, all that nonsense ....
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,062
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7099 Post(s)
Liked 11,221 Times
in
4,792 Posts
He was a lot funnier when he was mocking brakeless fixie riders.
Likes For Koyote:
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,564
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,577 Times
in
1,533 Posts
I love it <sarcasm> when OP's post a link to something and then don't offer any opinion of their own or give any indication of what the thread purpose is.
Seems to fit one of the definitions of Trolling to me.
Seems to fit one of the definitions of Trolling to me.
Especially when the article is behind a paywall.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 950
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 604 Post(s)
Liked 873 Times
in
440 Posts
Unless for whatever reason the CF version is simply more comfortable to you, and then when you add the better wheels it is Much lighter and Much more comfortable.
Yo0u are mixing standards here ... are we rating bikes by performance (and what does "performance:" mean in this context) oro by price, or by "perceived value" (which we all can immediately see is purely subjective) .... You say the Al version gets you "similar" performance .... but if i am buying for Max performance, not to save money ... I would get the CF. In fact, i would get the CF and put better wheels on it and for &6K get a better bike than the stock CF version or the upgraded Al version.
If I were Actually buying the bike, being me with my mindset, abilities, desires and finances, i would follow your route: Get the Al frame (all the performance I need, not being a great performer anyway) and get good wheels .... but that is "perceived vale," where ultimate performance is compromised by financial concerns, and we are both looking for "bang per buck" and willing to get a little less "bang" to save some bucks.
Saying there is no benefit to CF except bragging rights is just ignorant. Saying that To You the benefits of CF seems minuscule and not worth the cost is valid.
Bieksnob has terned into "Grant Peterson of new York," preaching his "ultimate bicycle philosophy" to whoever will listen. I didn't even bother reading the article .... we have all heard it all before. "I like what I like and this is why what I like is better, why I am smarter, and why people who agree with me are smart and people who think differently are dumb."
I listen to specialists about their specialties. If @RChung talks about aero and energy expenditure, if @PeteHski or some of the other actual engineers start breaking down the physics, I listen, because I know I don't know. When it comes to general knowledge, basic logic, and assessing one's personal needs and desires ... I have many decades of practice and I can do that pretty well. Therefore, when someone tells me what I think or need to think, what I want or should want, all that nonsense ....
Yo0u are mixing standards here ... are we rating bikes by performance (and what does "performance:" mean in this context) oro by price, or by "perceived value" (which we all can immediately see is purely subjective) .... You say the Al version gets you "similar" performance .... but if i am buying for Max performance, not to save money ... I would get the CF. In fact, i would get the CF and put better wheels on it and for &6K get a better bike than the stock CF version or the upgraded Al version.
If I were Actually buying the bike, being me with my mindset, abilities, desires and finances, i would follow your route: Get the Al frame (all the performance I need, not being a great performer anyway) and get good wheels .... but that is "perceived vale," where ultimate performance is compromised by financial concerns, and we are both looking for "bang per buck" and willing to get a little less "bang" to save some bucks.
Saying there is no benefit to CF except bragging rights is just ignorant. Saying that To You the benefits of CF seems minuscule and not worth the cost is valid.
Bieksnob has terned into "Grant Peterson of new York," preaching his "ultimate bicycle philosophy" to whoever will listen. I didn't even bother reading the article .... we have all heard it all before. "I like what I like and this is why what I like is better, why I am smarter, and why people who agree with me are smart and people who think differently are dumb."
I listen to specialists about their specialties. If @RChung talks about aero and energy expenditure, if @PeteHski or some of the other actual engineers start breaking down the physics, I listen, because I know I don't know. When it comes to general knowledge, basic logic, and assessing one's personal needs and desires ... I have many decades of practice and I can do that pretty well. Therefore, when someone tells me what I think or need to think, what I want or should want, all that nonsense ....
Performance based on value as it relates to me and what I do, which is very similar to what other recreational riders do...
The 3k ALR (price including wheel upgrade) is pretty much going to get me to the same place in the same amount of time as the 5k carbon model.
Aero on a long ride or century? I guess if I'm doing a 100 mile TT it would matter - but just like most everyone else, I'm not doing 100 mile TT's on a standard road bike. I'm drafting other riders with very limited time up front. And I'm riding the speed of the paceline - the CF bike isn't getting me into a faster paceline, so my time will be based off the paceline time.
Climbing? The bikes are within a few ounces of each other, in some cases the ALR + wheels weighs less than the CF of the same total cost.
Sure, if I double the cost I can get a more aero or lighter bike - but I'm talking dollar for dollar, and in some cases more dollars for the CF bike - the extra performance just isn't there.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,595
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7687 Post(s)
Liked 3,589 Times
in
1,891 Posts
(I'm not telling anyone what to think, say or brag about)
Performance based on value as it relates to me and what I do, which is very similar to what other recreational riders do...
The 3k ALR (price including wheel upgrade) is pretty much going to get me to the same place in the same amount of time as the 5k carbon model.
Aero on a long ride or century? I guess if I'm doing a 100 mile TT it would matter - but just like most everyone else, I'm not doing 100 mile TT's on a standard road bike. I'm drafting other riders with very limited time up front. And I'm riding the speed of the paceline - the CF bike isn't getting me into a faster paceline, so my time will be based off the paceline time.
Climbing? The bikes are within a few ounces of each other, in some cases the ALR + wheels weighs less than the CF of the same total cost.
Sure, if I double the cost I can get a more aero or lighter bike - but I'm talking dollar for dollar, and in some cases more dollars for the CF bike - the extra performance just isn't there.
Performance based on value as it relates to me and what I do, which is very similar to what other recreational riders do...
The 3k ALR (price including wheel upgrade) is pretty much going to get me to the same place in the same amount of time as the 5k carbon model.
Aero on a long ride or century? I guess if I'm doing a 100 mile TT it would matter - but just like most everyone else, I'm not doing 100 mile TT's on a standard road bike. I'm drafting other riders with very limited time up front. And I'm riding the speed of the paceline - the CF bike isn't getting me into a faster paceline, so my time will be based off the paceline time.
Climbing? The bikes are within a few ounces of each other, in some cases the ALR + wheels weighs less than the CF of the same total cost.
Sure, if I double the cost I can get a more aero or lighter bike - but I'm talking dollar for dollar, and in some cases more dollars for the CF bike - the extra performance just isn't there.
Please note the following:
If I were Actually buying the bike, being me with my mindset, abilities, desires and finances, i would follow your route: Get the Al frame (all the performance I need, not being a great performer anyway) and get good wheels .... but that is "perceived vale," where ultimate performance is compromised by financial concerns, and we are both looking for "bang per buck" and willing to get a little less "bang" to save some bucks.
Saying there is no benefit to CF except bragging rights is just ignorant. Saying that To You the benefits of CF seems minuscule and not worth the cost is valid.
Saying there is no benefit to CF except bragging rights is just ignorant. Saying that To You the benefits of CF seems minuscule and not worth the cost is valid.