Official Trek FX Thread
#2201
Junior Member
I have a Cannondale Topstone 6 gravel bike. The Cannondale has a longer wheelbase, but I'm not sure I could tell you how it feels different from the Canyon, from a geometry perspective. I do benefit (in comfort, not speed) from running lower tire pressures -- around 50 psi, vs. 80 psi on the Canyon's 700x28 tires. The Cannondale is about a pound heavier, and not that this matters but I'm about 1 mph slower on the Cannondale. The Canyon was light and and fast and responsive.
What I found after more than a year of tracking every ride was that I rode the Canyon only about 15% of the time, everything else was on the Cannondale. Why? Who knows? Probably multiple factors in play.
What I found after more than a year of tracking every ride was that I rode the Canyon only about 15% of the time, everything else was on the Cannondale. Why? Who knows? Probably multiple factors in play.
#2203
I find the gearing on this bike adequate. The lowest gear lets me climb the hills I need to without much difficulty, and I haven't encountered a downhill yet that required a higher gear than the setup gives me. However, I'm not crazy about the 1x10 setup -- I find that if I'm using any cog too far off the center of the cassette, there is increased drivetrain noise, and presumably increased wear. I'd rather have had a 2x10.
#2204
Newbie
I've joined your ranks with my FX 3 in the garage. Thanks to all who have posted here. I wasn't originally thinking of a Trek for my next bike, but after a test ride and reading this site, I had a lot more confidence in my choice.
I know I'm still in the honeymoon phase, but, holy buckets, is this bike zippy!
I know I'm still in the honeymoon phase, but, holy buckets, is this bike zippy!
Likes For LadyMuMu:
#2205
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Smyrna, GA
Posts: 6
Bikes: Trek Superfly FS 9.8 SL / Scott CR1 Team Carbon
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Newbie on this forum, but have been mtn biking and road biking for ~40 years.
I have been taking a good long look at the Trek FX Sport 5 and 6. Have read a lot of good comments on here.... generally positive, I think. Except for the tires (GR1 team issue) which received rather poor testing results at the bicycle rolling resistance site.
A few observations / concerns:
1. As the FX Sport line-up has evolved over the years, it now seems to be more gravel-oriented. I'm generally OK with this. I was originally thinking more of a flat-bar road bike, but some of the roads around my area are really not good in terms of the road surface. Also, due to traffic, it is sometimes better to pop up onto the sidewalk. And, I may want to ride some dirt / gravel roads. If it was anything more "off-road" than that then I would ride my Trek Superfly mtn bike w/ full suspension anyway.
2. Regarding the tires, these can obviously be replaced with something better, either for a more road-oriented (and faster) set-up, or a better overall gravel set-up. It's a pity that the Bontrager tires are not any better, despite the "team issue" designation. I've had good experience with Bontrager tires on my mtn bike.
3. I was initially looking at the FX Sport 5, as I didn't think the carbon wheels on the FX S 6 would be worth the added cost. However, more recently, I've learned that Trek / Bontrager has a good warranty on the wheels. Anyone have any direct experience on repairing or replacing the carbon wheels ?
4. Both my road bike and mtn bike are set up with a 2x10 drive train. It seems that a lot of mtn bikes are going to 1x set-ups. The 1x11 on the FX S 5 or 6 seems ok, as I don't plan on racing. Would be interested to hear any opinions pro or con....
Thanks,
Dave
I have been taking a good long look at the Trek FX Sport 5 and 6. Have read a lot of good comments on here.... generally positive, I think. Except for the tires (GR1 team issue) which received rather poor testing results at the bicycle rolling resistance site.
A few observations / concerns:
1. As the FX Sport line-up has evolved over the years, it now seems to be more gravel-oriented. I'm generally OK with this. I was originally thinking more of a flat-bar road bike, but some of the roads around my area are really not good in terms of the road surface. Also, due to traffic, it is sometimes better to pop up onto the sidewalk. And, I may want to ride some dirt / gravel roads. If it was anything more "off-road" than that then I would ride my Trek Superfly mtn bike w/ full suspension anyway.
2. Regarding the tires, these can obviously be replaced with something better, either for a more road-oriented (and faster) set-up, or a better overall gravel set-up. It's a pity that the Bontrager tires are not any better, despite the "team issue" designation. I've had good experience with Bontrager tires on my mtn bike.
3. I was initially looking at the FX Sport 5, as I didn't think the carbon wheels on the FX S 6 would be worth the added cost. However, more recently, I've learned that Trek / Bontrager has a good warranty on the wheels. Anyone have any direct experience on repairing or replacing the carbon wheels ?
4. Both my road bike and mtn bike are set up with a 2x10 drive train. It seems that a lot of mtn bikes are going to 1x set-ups. The 1x11 on the FX S 5 or 6 seems ok, as I don't plan on racing. Would be interested to hear any opinions pro or con....
Thanks,
Dave
Last edited by Daveshark; 02-05-24 at 10:25 AM.
#2206
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,302
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 & 2019 Cervelo R3’s & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Liked 1,319 Times
in
757 Posts
Welcome to Bike Forums.
Wife has a carbon FX4 that uses Thru Axels, This allowed me to install any replacement wheel I wanted.
I had a set of Reserve Carbon wheels sitting unused and installed those with GP5000 S TR tires.
Wife was amazed at the difference.
Now the FX series no longer uses industry standard Thru Axels, I believe wheel choice will be more limited.
Barry
Wife has a carbon FX4 that uses Thru Axels, This allowed me to install any replacement wheel I wanted.
I had a set of Reserve Carbon wheels sitting unused and installed those with GP5000 S TR tires.
Wife was amazed at the difference.
Now the FX series no longer uses industry standard Thru Axels, I believe wheel choice will be more limited.
Barry
#2207
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,245
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Liked 1,055 Times
in
514 Posts
Welcome to Bike Forums.
Wife has a carbon FX4 that uses Thru Axels, This allowed me to install any replacement wheel I wanted.
I had a set of Reserve Carbon wheels sitting unused and installed those with GP5000 S TR tires.
Wife was amazed at the difference.
Now the FX series no longer uses industry standard Thru Axels, I believe wheel choice will be more limited.
Barry
Wife has a carbon FX4 that uses Thru Axels, This allowed me to install any replacement wheel I wanted.
I had a set of Reserve Carbon wheels sitting unused and installed those with GP5000 S TR tires.
Wife was amazed at the difference.
Now the FX series no longer uses industry standard Thru Axels, I believe wheel choice will be more limited.
Barry
#2208
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 48
Bikes: 2015 Trek FX 7.0 - modified to be better on the road than it was designed to be. Now, 2021 Domane.
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
If I understand things right, that 'isozone' bar has some filling in it that might dampen some vibration... I'm a bit skeptical, think it's a gimmick, and I'd have no problem, if it were me, replacing or modifying it if it isn't doing what I want it to do. What kind of riding are you doing with your FX? Are you on pavement or on trails? Because what whatever cockpit mods you'd make would depend on just that. I don't ride in the dirt, or gravel. I ride on pavement; and if that is you, and if you want to improve your speed, the best thing you can do is get your arms out of the wind. And, you do that by cutting the handlebars down (my bars are cut down to a total width of about 430mm), moving your shifters in as far as you like. You can also extend the stem and slam it as far down as you are comfortable with; in order to reduce your torso's angle. The race lite bar you refer to is slightly swept but doesn't have a rise to it. Which of course, also would, all other things being equal, also reduce your torso's angle. That said, cutting the bar down will result in your bike being a bit 'twitchier'... meaning that small moves with your hands on the bar makes a larger change than if the bar were longer.. You'd want that longer bar if you were riding on a twistie trail in the dirt and all that Hope this helps.
#2209
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Smyrna, GA
Posts: 6
Bikes: Trek Superfly FS 9.8 SL / Scott CR1 Team Carbon
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's a quick release hub, but then they use a skewer which requires a 5mm hex to remove/install the front wheel....
Why not use a thru-axle with a quick release lever ? That's what is on my Trek mtn bike.
#2211
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Smyrna, GA
Posts: 6
Bikes: Trek Superfly FS 9.8 SL / Scott CR1 Team Carbon
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, I get that.... But this isn't really a super expensive part....... a replacement thru-skewer is $7.99 on the Trek website.
I would be happy to pay a bit more for a thru-axle with a lever. I regularly remove the front wheel of my 29-er mtn bike to carry the bike in my short-bed pickup (front fork attached to a mount with the thru-axle).
A friend told me that most gravel bikes are using the skewer set up.... not sure.
Dave
I would be happy to pay a bit more for a thru-axle with a lever. I regularly remove the front wheel of my 29-er mtn bike to carry the bike in my short-bed pickup (front fork attached to a mount with the thru-axle).
A friend told me that most gravel bikes are using the skewer set up.... not sure.
Dave
#2213
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,245
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Liked 1,055 Times
in
514 Posts
Thru-skew solves a few issues for the manufacturer while keeping the engineering bills low.
Issues like proper wheel installation and disk brake alignment are resolved with a few frame bits without resorting to pricier thru axle systems.
As it uses standard 100/135 QR hubs and a modified skewer, it's cheap to implement.
#2214
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Smyrna, GA
Posts: 6
Bikes: Trek Superfly FS 9.8 SL / Scott CR1 Team Carbon
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks DorkDisk, that is helpful info.
I rode an FX Sport 6 yesterday (size large) at the local shop. Fast and light. Not sure I like the handlebar ends, but they may be OK. If I bought it, I might put on a slightly wider handlebar.
Also, the brakes weren't as "strong" as I expected. Maybe they were not broken-in / seated. I really like the Deore XT on my mtn. bike (w/ metallic pads). According to the specs, the brakes on the FX S 6 are for resin-pads only. Not sure how much of a difference that makes.
I rode an FX Sport 6 yesterday (size large) at the local shop. Fast and light. Not sure I like the handlebar ends, but they may be OK. If I bought it, I might put on a slightly wider handlebar.
Also, the brakes weren't as "strong" as I expected. Maybe they were not broken-in / seated. I really like the Deore XT on my mtn. bike (w/ metallic pads). According to the specs, the brakes on the FX S 6 are for resin-pads only. Not sure how much of a difference that makes.
#2215
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,302
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 & 2019 Cervelo R3’s & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Liked 1,319 Times
in
757 Posts
The Resin Only limitation may be due to the disc itself and not the caliper.
Barry
Barry
#2216
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,915
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Liked 2,750 Times
in
1,468 Posts
the resin only limitation does refer to the rotor - but with a Shimano brake system the pads and caliper are matched to the rotor … a resin pad only type rotor (with very few exceptions) is typically a ‘wide track’ rotor - as opposed to the higher end Shimano brake systems that accept resin and metal pads and use a ‘narrow track’ rotor
Last edited by t2p; 02-10-24 at 03:25 PM.
#2217
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Smyrna, GA
Posts: 6
Bikes: Trek Superfly FS 9.8 SL / Scott CR1 Team Carbon
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, I was curious about that. The Shimano site says the UR300 caliper is “resin-pad only”. The page for the rotor does not mention pads at all.
For some reason, the UR300 rotor shows up on the Shimano Europe site but not the US site…..??
I’ve read through the other thread on here where the OP swapped out the brakes and several other items on the bike. Not sure I would go that far, but maybe that’s a good option. Or buy the frame set and then build it up.
D
For some reason, the UR300 rotor shows up on the Shimano Europe site but not the US site…..??
I’ve read through the other thread on here where the OP swapped out the brakes and several other items on the bike. Not sure I would go that far, but maybe that’s a good option. Or buy the frame set and then build it up.
D
Last edited by Daveshark; 02-10-24 at 04:29 PM.
#2218
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Got a picture of my FX Sport 5, just waiting on some hub caps so I can use some Aeolus Pro 37s on the bike, since this version uses a thru skew axle versus a normal thru axle. Also will be moving to a smaller cassette, 12-25 , no hills here, so no point having 42 tooth cassette.
Last edited by Monsieur_M; 07-20-24 at 05:13 PM.
#2219
Digging Bikes Again!
Hi all, I've started commuting on my new '24 FX3 Disc. I'm 12.5 miles door-to-door, and have found the Isozone handlebar setup comfortable, but want to add a hand position to keep my hands from getting a bit numb at the end of the ride.
I've got regular bar ends on my older 7.3 and 930, but am wondering about the Bontrager Race Lite Ergo Bar Ends. Searching the site, I don't see much about them from a rider's experience point of view.
Anyone using these bar ends? Look like they mostly give a wider perpendicular hand position from the regular grip, not so much a reach further out front.
I've got regular bar ends on my older 7.3 and 930, but am wondering about the Bontrager Race Lite Ergo Bar Ends. Searching the site, I don't see much about them from a rider's experience point of view.
Anyone using these bar ends? Look like they mostly give a wider perpendicular hand position from the regular grip, not so much a reach further out front.
#2220
>> [I] have found the Isozone handlebar setup comfortable, but want to add a hand position to keep my hands from getting a bit numb at the end of the ride. <<
This is a problem I've had with the FX3 for a while now. To grab the bar ends, I have to bow my elbows out. If I don't do that, I can't hold the bars comfortably because I have to rotate my wrists. I really need bars with a 15° sweep, but the ones that come with the bike don't have much sweep at all. I've tried several other bars but haven't found anything yet that works.
As far as bar ends, you have to be careful because the IsoZone bars are nonstandard and a lot of bar ends and caps don't work with them because they are crimped and have the IsoZone inserts. I'd love to know if you find anything that works.
This is a problem I've had with the FX3 for a while now. To grab the bar ends, I have to bow my elbows out. If I don't do that, I can't hold the bars comfortably because I have to rotate my wrists. I really need bars with a 15° sweep, but the ones that come with the bike don't have much sweep at all. I've tried several other bars but haven't found anything yet that works.
As far as bar ends, you have to be careful because the IsoZone bars are nonstandard and a lot of bar ends and caps don't work with them because they are crimped and have the IsoZone inserts. I'd love to know if you find anything that works.
Likes For tenrec:
#2221
Digging Bikes Again!
As far as it seems on the web, you can attach bar end adapters to the ends of the Isozone bars, trimming a small bit of the padding that sits in the indentation at the very ends of the bars. That should allow any standard bar end to be used.
I’m looking to see if anyone is using the Bontrager Race Lite Ergo Bar Ends in particular.
I’m looking to see if anyone is using the Bontrager Race Lite Ergo Bar Ends in particular.