Thomas DeGent no fan of hookless…
#226
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,022
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Obed Boundary, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Liked 769 Times
in
463 Posts
I found this SlowTwitch article from 2023 between Dan Empfield and Josh Poertner on hookless safety to be quite illuminating, and it avoids the drama/emotions drummed up from the high profile blowouts in the news that spurred the current focus on hookless.
It's balanced in the sense that neither are arguing for a ban on hookless and agreed that it was the direction wheels were going to go, but they disagreed on how dangerous current hookless wheels were to use for road cycling. Two things Josh said jumped out to me: 1) no measurable performance benefit to hookless, and 2) an alarming rate of blowoffs in testing hookless rims vs. none with hooked.
Also Adam Hansen, CPA head, wrote in the comments of an Escape Collective article
It's balanced in the sense that neither are arguing for a ban on hookless and agreed that it was the direction wheels were going to go, but they disagreed on how dangerous current hookless wheels were to use for road cycling. Two things Josh said jumped out to me: 1) no measurable performance benefit to hookless, and 2) an alarming rate of blowoffs in testing hookless rims vs. none with hooked.
[Josh Poertner] While I know that hookless really is generally robust in the larger tire sizes as your experience has shown, I will say that in the 100+ tires we've tested over the last few years on 40+ wheels, we've had 6 blowoffs in tire seating, 3 blowoffs below the 110% ISO test, and 1 blowoff of a wheel just leaning against a wall. Every single one of them was on a hookless rim and following ETRTO guidelines. Or stated from the other side, we've never had a hooked tubeless blow off, and that's from a larger sample size and includes combinations that violate ETRTO in the pursuit of performance gains.
What we want is, a system in place where a rider can have a flat or a cracked rim and the tire stays in place. A tubular is extreme, but you could have decented at 100km/h with a flat and have zero issues. A clincher or tubeless there is a chance the tire can come off, but you still have the hooks to "try" to keep the tire on. Hookless... it's automatically comes off and carbon on road is never a safe option...
Likes For surak:
#227
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,325
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,333 Times
in
2,789 Posts
[QUOTE=surak;23177690]I found this SlowTwitch article from 2023 between Dan Empfield and Josh Poertner on hookless safety to be quite illuminating, and it avoids the drama/emotions drummed up from the high profile blowouts in the news that spurred the current focus on hookless.
It's balanced in the sense that neither are arguing for a ban on hookless and agreed that it was the direction wheels were going to go, but they disagreed on how dangerous current hookless wheels were to use for road cycling. Two things Josh said jumped out to me: 1) no measurable performance benefit to hookless, and 2) an alarming rate of blowoffs in testing hookless rims vs. none with hooked.
Suggesting Thomas de Gendt isn't totally out of his head.
It's balanced in the sense that neither are arguing for a ban on hookless and agreed that it was the direction wheels were going to go, but they disagreed on how dangerous current hookless wheels were to use for road cycling. Two things Josh said jumped out to me: 1) no measurable performance benefit to hookless, and 2) an alarming rate of blowoffs in testing hookless rims vs. none with hooked.
[Josh Poertner] While I know that hookless really is generally robust in the larger tire sizes as your experience has shown, I will say that in the 100+ tires we've tested over the last few years on 40+ wheels, we've had 6 blowoffs in tire seating, 3 blowoffs below the 110% ISO test, and 1 blowoff of a wheel just leaning against a wall. Every single one of them was on a hookless rim and following ETRTO guidelines. Or stated from the other side, we've never had a hooked tubeless blow off, and that's from a larger sample size and includes combinations that violate ETRTO in the pursuit of performance gains.{/QUOTE]
Also Adam Hansen, CPA head, wrote in the comments of an Escape Collective article
Also Adam Hansen, CPA head, wrote in the comments of an Escape Collective article
#228
Senior Member
On the other hand, I have read suggestions that the walls of hookless rims have to be stronger to keep from flexing outward from tire pressure - otherwise, the chance of a tire blowing off would escalate - and are therefore, as a fortunate coincidence, also less prone to being damaged by potholes and such.
#229
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,496
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,298 Times
in
3,298 Posts
#230
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,854
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Liked 1,613 Times
in
1,061 Posts
I'm skeptical that it will make any difference if you're traveling 50 mph and have a major puncture. I've been riding high speed descents in Colorado since 2003. I'm not worried about it.
t
t
#231
Senior Member
I live in a mountainous area with a strong cycling community. On an average weekend on our local climb which is approx 3000’ there are hundreds of riders most on premium gear of which I am sure some are hookless. Also one of my best friends owns a local premium bike shop who moves hundreds of quality bikes a month some of which run hookless. I have never heard of an issue the death cult seems so obsessed about.
#232
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,854
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Liked 1,613 Times
in
1,061 Posts
I live in a mountainous area with a strong cycling community. On an average weekend on our local climb which is approx 3000’ there are hundreds of riders most on premium gear of which I am sure some are hookless. Also one of my best friends owns a local premium bike shop who moves hundreds of quality bikes a month some of which run hookless. I have never heard of an issue the death cult seems so obsessed about.
#233
Senior Member
#234
.
- its already been shown that very few options even exist where there is an option to buy a wheel in hooked and hookless, the hooked costs more, and the lower cost is why people buy the hookless option.
- its already been shown that a popular up and coming wheel brand offers rims and wheel builds in hooked and hookless for the same price, so lower cost isnt why people buy the hookless option..
- its already been shown that very few options even exist where there is an option to buy a wheel in hooked and hookless, the hooked costs more, and the lower cost is why people buy the hookless option.
- its already been shown that a popular up and coming wheel brand offers rims and wheel builds in hooked and hookless for the same price, so lower cost isnt why people buy the hookless option..
Exactly!
#235
Senior Member
The advantages of hookless are purely in the manufacturing side. There are no advantages for the rider in terms of riding. I won't address the price thing because there has been a good amount of discussion on that already.
There are however disadvantages for hookless in terms of riding and use.
they aren't as safe as hooked.
This one's pretty self explanatory when you think about it. The tire and rim width combinations are extremely limited when compared to hooked. With hookless you have one rim doing one job, because there's so few tire widths you can use on a given rim width. With hooked you can use a narrow road tire and a wide gravel tire on the same rim.
The pressure limits are low. The tires can't hold on for more pressure, which isn't confidence inspiring.
Tire choices are limited, because manufacturers need to test whether a tire is safe on their rim. Which is absurd. Standardization should be enough.
ETRTO is enough for hooked. Hookless is based on ETRTO but that's a wrong standard, because ETRTO was made for hooked with the assumption there would be a hook. Taking the hook away makes the rims pretty darn different.
In order to make hookless safe there needs to be tighter tire manufacturing tolerances, which just isn't going to happen. Bicycle tolerances are what they are and have always been. To assume they're magically going to get better is silly.
To address the tolerance issue AND the blowout issue, sidewalls of hookless rims need to be taller. But this in turn can make mounting tires nearly impossible on the road. Having floppy 200g tires on rims which have had THE major tire retention device removed is just asking for trouble.
I remembered correctly btw. There was a manufacturer that proposed glueing on a hook after the rim has initially been manufactured with the hookless process. That manufacturer was no other than SRAM.
That might actually be a pretty good idea, because you'll get the advantages of hookless manufacturing and a bead hook. So to have your cake and eat it too.
There are however disadvantages for hookless in terms of riding and use.
they aren't as safe as hooked.
This one's pretty self explanatory when you think about it. The tire and rim width combinations are extremely limited when compared to hooked. With hookless you have one rim doing one job, because there's so few tire widths you can use on a given rim width. With hooked you can use a narrow road tire and a wide gravel tire on the same rim.
The pressure limits are low. The tires can't hold on for more pressure, which isn't confidence inspiring.
Tire choices are limited, because manufacturers need to test whether a tire is safe on their rim. Which is absurd. Standardization should be enough.
ETRTO is enough for hooked. Hookless is based on ETRTO but that's a wrong standard, because ETRTO was made for hooked with the assumption there would be a hook. Taking the hook away makes the rims pretty darn different.
In order to make hookless safe there needs to be tighter tire manufacturing tolerances, which just isn't going to happen. Bicycle tolerances are what they are and have always been. To assume they're magically going to get better is silly.
To address the tolerance issue AND the blowout issue, sidewalls of hookless rims need to be taller. But this in turn can make mounting tires nearly impossible on the road. Having floppy 200g tires on rims which have had THE major tire retention device removed is just asking for trouble.
I remembered correctly btw. There was a manufacturer that proposed glueing on a hook after the rim has initially been manufactured with the hookless process. That manufacturer was no other than SRAM.
That might actually be a pretty good idea, because you'll get the advantages of hookless manufacturing and a bead hook. So to have your cake and eat it too.
Likes For elcruxio:
#236
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,854
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Liked 1,613 Times
in
1,061 Posts
The advantages of hookless are purely in the manufacturing side. There are no advantages for the rider in terms of riding. I won't address the price thing because there has been a good amount of discussion on that already.
There are however disadvantages for hookless in terms of riding and use.
they aren't as safe as hooked.
This one's pretty self explanatory when you think about it. The tire and rim width combinations are extremely limited when compared to hooked. With hookless you have one rim doing one job, because there's so few tire widths you can use on a given rim width. With hooked you can use a narrow road tire and a wide gravel tire on the same rim.
The pressure limits are low. The tires can't hold on for more pressure, which isn't confidence inspiring.
.
There are however disadvantages for hookless in terms of riding and use.
they aren't as safe as hooked.
This one's pretty self explanatory when you think about it. The tire and rim width combinations are extremely limited when compared to hooked. With hookless you have one rim doing one job, because there's so few tire widths you can use on a given rim width. With hooked you can use a narrow road tire and a wide gravel tire on the same rim.
The pressure limits are low. The tires can't hold on for more pressure, which isn't confidence inspiring.
.
From the below, a hookless rim with a 19mm ID width is supposedly compatible with every road tire width you'd probably ever want to be able to run, and supposedly, a 19mm rim width allows higher pressures than the 73psi bandied about all of the time.
#237
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Liked 601 Times
in
453 Posts
To your points above, it seems that many of the issues relate to the very wide rim widths being made hookless but for road riding (ie. 25mm ID widths). All of this for the supposed aero benefit.
From the below, a hookless rim with a 19mm ID width is supposedly compatible with every road tire width you'd probably ever want to be able to run, and supposedly, a 19mm rim width allows higher pressures than the 73psi bandied about all of the time.
From the below, a hookless rim with a 19mm ID width is supposedly compatible with every road tire width you'd probably ever want to be able to run, and supposedly, a 19mm rim width allows higher pressures than the 73psi bandied about all of the time.
#238
Senior Member
The hooks only work when the tire is inflated. A deflated clincher on a hooked rim is still going to come off if you keep riding it.
You either believe that DeGent's tire spontaneously blew off the rim, causing the crash (and rim damage occurred during the crash) - or you believe what Vittoria and Zipp have concluded, that he hit a rock, which damaged the rim causing the tire to deflate, which then came off the rim.
On either system, you're probably in a world of trouble if you have a spontaneous blowout at 50mph on an alpine descent. Pretending that hooked rims are going to save you in this situation is silly.
You either believe that DeGent's tire spontaneously blew off the rim, causing the crash (and rim damage occurred during the crash) - or you believe what Vittoria and Zipp have concluded, that he hit a rock, which damaged the rim causing the tire to deflate, which then came off the rim.
On either system, you're probably in a world of trouble if you have a spontaneous blowout at 50mph on an alpine descent. Pretending that hooked rims are going to save you in this situation is silly.
Likes For msu2001la:
#239
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Liked 601 Times
in
453 Posts
The hooks only work when the tire is inflated. A deflated clincher on a hooked rim is still going to come off if you keep riding it.
You either believe that DeGent's tire spontaneously blew off the rim, causing the crash (and rim damage occurred during the crash) - or you believe what Vittoria and Zipp have concluded, that he hit a rock, which damaged the rim causing the tire to deflate, which then came off the rim.
On either system, you're probably in a world of trouble if you have a spontaneous blowout at 50mph on an alpine descent. Pretending that hooked rims are going to save you in this situation is silly.
You either believe that DeGent's tire spontaneously blew off the rim, causing the crash (and rim damage occurred during the crash) - or you believe what Vittoria and Zipp have concluded, that he hit a rock, which damaged the rim causing the tire to deflate, which then came off the rim.
On either system, you're probably in a world of trouble if you have a spontaneous blowout at 50mph on an alpine descent. Pretending that hooked rims are going to save you in this situation is silly.
People skip to conclusion too fast nowadays.
#240
Senior Member
Can we get some decent, zoomed in footage of the wreck? I'm not seeing the sudden, violent deceleration from hitting an immovable object hard enough to break a supposedly strong sidewall rim. I don't need to see an endo, but he just looks like he lost traction in some loose surface covering. It doesn't look like he hit a trip wire, curb or expansion joint sticking up slightly. We need to see the rock big enough to cause that damage.
Last edited by seypat; 03-08-24 at 09:52 AM.
Likes For seypat:
#241
Senior Member
To your points above, it seems that many of the issues relate to the very wide rim widths being made hookless but for road riding (ie. 25mm ID widths). All of this for the supposed aero benefit.
From the below, a hookless rim with a 19mm ID width is supposedly compatible with every road tire width you'd probably ever want to be able to run, and supposedly, a 19mm rim width allows higher pressures than the 73psi bandied about all of the time.
From the below, a hookless rim with a 19mm ID width is supposedly compatible with every road tire width you'd probably ever want to be able to run, and supposedly, a 19mm rim width allows higher pressures than the 73psi bandied about all of the time.
As to the 5 bar / 73psi, that comes directly from ETRTO. So essentially the absolute do not exceed limit of hookless on any size tire is 5 bar / 73psi or lower if dictated by the manufacturer.
I'd love to get the current ERTRO standards handbook but it's 150 €, so a bit too steep just for wanting to know a few things.
#242
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Liked 601 Times
in
453 Posts
If you look at rim manufacturer websites the allowable tire widths are far more restricted.
As to the 5 bar / 73psi, that comes directly from ETRTO. So essentially the absolute do not exceed limit of hookless on any size tire is 5 bar / 73psi or lower if dictated by the manufacturer.
I'd love to get the current ERTRO standards handbook but it's 150 €, so a bit too steep just for wanting to know a few things.
As to the 5 bar / 73psi, that comes directly from ETRTO. So essentially the absolute do not exceed limit of hookless on any size tire is 5 bar / 73psi or lower if dictated by the manufacturer.
I'd love to get the current ERTRO standards handbook but it's 150 €, so a bit too steep just for wanting to know a few things.
Giant Hookless Technology | Giant Bicycles Canada (giant-bicycles.com)
#243
Senior Member
False. I had a pair of hookless Giant SLR-1 wheels on my previous race bike and they had a maximum pressure limit way above 73psi. It was 125psi if I recall properly. Most manufacturer, however, have a maximum pressure of 5 bars.
Giant Hookless Technology | Giant Bicycles Canada (giant-bicycles.com)
Giant Hookless Technology | Giant Bicycles Canada (giant-bicycles.com)
#244
Fat n slow
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 4,323
Bikes: Cervelo R3, Giant Revolt
Liked 2,105 Times
in
985 Posts
You guys convinced me!! I’m selling my Zipps tomorrow and buying a set of hooked alloy DT Alexrims wheels that weigh 2200g. I mean between no hooks and possible crabon asplosions i definitely should ditch these wheels.
#245
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,039
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,066 Times
in
4,473 Posts
Over the top responses that go to the extreme and dip into the absurd are always fun to read.**
Likes For mstateglfr:
Likes For phrantic09:
#247
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,854
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Liked 1,613 Times
in
1,061 Posts
#248
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,039
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,066 Times
in
4,473 Posts
#249
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,355
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,205 Times
in
6,778 Posts
As entertaining as all this is, it's all moot for me because I can't justify (to myself) spending that much on wheels, so I'm stuck with hooked alloy rims.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#250
Senior Member
I agree with the poster who said that a major puncture at 50 mph is going to be a big problem with hooked or hookless rims. I go that fast dozens of times each year. I'm not going to worry about it, but I do watch well ahead for possible road problems.
Whoever said that hookless rims make for limited tire choices is correct. The most popular tire widths have been increasing as disc brake frames have gradually replaced rim brake frames. Along with disc brakes has come wider tires. 25mm is now considered to be on the skinny side and very few are listed as compatible with hookless rims. 28mm tires have become the new minimum, like it or not. Hookless rims also work with much wider gravel tires, so they don't restrict gravel tire size. If you move up to the 25mm IW hookless rims that I use, most tire brands approve of 28mm and larger tires to be used on them, but ETRTO has recently decided that 29mm is the new minimum. In 2022, 28mm was OK. I've had no problems with 28mm and I'll at least use them until all of mine are worn out. I've got six 30mm Pirelli P-Zero Road TLR tires that are significantly less expensive than race version, waiting to be used.
Those complaining that they can't use hookless without exceeding 73 psi are probably restricted by a frame that can't handle a tire larger than a 28mm and/or you're not using the Zipp pressure calculator. The Silca pressure calculator does not consider internal rim width or hookless rims and limits the combined rider and bike weight to 200 pounds with 73 psi. The Zipp pressure calculator allows a total weight of up to 270 pounds with 28mm tires and 23mm IW hookless or 21mm or wider hooked tubeless rims, at higher pressures. I use the Zipp pressure calculator exclusively.
Whoever said that hookless rims make for limited tire choices is correct. The most popular tire widths have been increasing as disc brake frames have gradually replaced rim brake frames. Along with disc brakes has come wider tires. 25mm is now considered to be on the skinny side and very few are listed as compatible with hookless rims. 28mm tires have become the new minimum, like it or not. Hookless rims also work with much wider gravel tires, so they don't restrict gravel tire size. If you move up to the 25mm IW hookless rims that I use, most tire brands approve of 28mm and larger tires to be used on them, but ETRTO has recently decided that 29mm is the new minimum. In 2022, 28mm was OK. I've had no problems with 28mm and I'll at least use them until all of mine are worn out. I've got six 30mm Pirelli P-Zero Road TLR tires that are significantly less expensive than race version, waiting to be used.
Those complaining that they can't use hookless without exceeding 73 psi are probably restricted by a frame that can't handle a tire larger than a 28mm and/or you're not using the Zipp pressure calculator. The Silca pressure calculator does not consider internal rim width or hookless rims and limits the combined rider and bike weight to 200 pounds with 73 psi. The Zipp pressure calculator allows a total weight of up to 270 pounds with 28mm tires and 23mm IW hookless or 21mm or wider hooked tubeless rims, at higher pressures. I use the Zipp pressure calculator exclusively.