Patrol Bike
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For blacknbluebikes:
#3
Senior Member
I didn't quite read the whole thing, but I would say that the dude needs to think a little bit more about both front and rear racks. Attach to the frame, man. You don't want to rely on a seatpost clamp when the commies come for you.
Likes For brianinc-ville:
#4
Tinker-er
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 676
Bikes: 1956 Rudge Sports; 1983 Univega Alpina Uno; 1981 Miyata 610; 1973 Raleigh Twenty; 1994 Breezer Lightning XTR; V4 Yuba Mundo aka "The Schlepper"; 1987 Raleigh "The Edge" Mountain Trials; 1952 R.O. Harrison "Madison"; 1994 Concorde Aquila
Liked 425 Times
in
271 Posts
Olive Drab and flat black are invisibility cloaks, just like a Klingon bird of prey.
Likes For PhilFo:
#6
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,118
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,111 Posts
#8
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,118
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,111 Posts
Bicycles aren't "featured" in the 1982 movie Blade Runner, but I remember that they made an appearance in some of the street scenes of an LA in the future.
#10
Oysh. S&W has branded and sold all kinds of consumer goods they don't actually make, which is a shame, because their revolvers, at least when I sampled some in the 1980s, were fantastic quality, so this is real brand dilution. How good a bike can that be, with a one-piece steel ashtabula crank, horizontal dropouts (to compensate for poor frame alignment in manufacturing), and most probably a claw-mount rear derailleur on the other side? Walmart quality in a battle zone. Well at least, no big loss if stolen or left behind in a bugout.
#11
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,118
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,111 Posts
How good a bike can that be, with a one-piece steel ashtabula crank, horizontal dropouts (to compensate for poor frame alignment in manufacturing), and most probably a claw-mount rear derailleur on the other side? Walmart quality in a battle zone. Well at least, no big loss if stolen or left behind in a bugout.
A utility bike needs to be available and good enough to get around, priced right (free) and have no need for LBS provenance or bragging rights. These available bikes served me well with no fuss or muss while working on large bases in Iraq and Afghanistan.
#12
Senior Member
This dude gets it. We could debate the specific merits of his bike, but if the zombie apocalypse hit, a bike is the best mode of transportation. Cars and trucks rely to a large extent on roads, bridges, and fuel. They are generally stopped by traffic, roadblocks, or electromagnetic attacks.
A bike, on the other hand, can be lashed on your vehicle and cannot readily be stopped, even if the vehicle is. The bike can even be carried through water, lifted over obstacles, rafted downriver, etc.
A bike, on the other hand, can be lashed on your vehicle and cannot readily be stopped, even if the vehicle is. The bike can even be carried through water, lifted over obstacles, rafted downriver, etc.
Likes For ScottCommutes:
#13
Yeah... sorta. I agree that a bike is great for emergency situations. And I agree that in a war zone, where things could get stolen, need to be left behind, etc, and not needing to bike far, a cheap bike is the way to go. But it's completely contrary to the philosophy of every piece of military equipment, which is durability and function when it counts. If I have to traverse a long area in an emergency, I want a bike that won't let me down. Now, doesn't need to be a handmade boutique tourer, but not walmart quality either; Needs good quality frame, notably with good dropouts and not very thin and just crimped or spot welded in place, and good quality parts.
#14
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,118
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,111 Posts
Yeah... sorta. I agree that a bike is great for emergency situations. And I agree that in a war zone, where things could get stolen, need to be left behind, etc, and not needing to bike far, a cheap bike is the way to go. But it's completely contrary to the philosophy of every piece of military equipment, which is durability and function when it counts. If I have to traverse a long area in an emergency, I want a bike that won't let me down. Now, doesn't need to be a handmade boutique tourer, but not walmart quality either; Needs good quality frame, notably with good dropouts and not very thin and just crimped or spot welded in place, and good quality parts.
Heavy duty cargo carrying capability and availability (including whatever bicycles could be stolen from the civilian populations in occupied countries in the case of European WW2 operations) was probably the primary philosophy in selecting bicycle equipment for military use for the past 80 years. Pictures are extracted from The Military History of The Bicycle by John Norris
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,221
Bikes: Trek 800 x 2, Schwinn Heavy Duti, Schwinn Traveler, Schwinn Le Tour Luxe, Schwinn Continental, Cannondale M400 and Lambert, Schwinn Super Sport
Liked 1,111 Times
in
716 Posts
Look no further that what the Vietnamese were capable of moving with their bikes in war time.