Shimano FD-CX70 + 10S STI Triple = ???
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Shimano FD-CX70 + 10S STI Triple = ???
Hello,
As the title says I am looking to shift a custom road triple crankset possibly with a CX70 FD. As they say the devil is in the details...
FD - CX70 10S cyclecross
Crankset - Ultegra FC-6603 with 24-38-46 rings. The rings are TA and are pinned.
Shifter - Ultegra 6603 STI
After spending waaay too much time online I have been able to pull the following tidbits out of the ether...
What is lacking is any real data points that anyone has ever tried or had success with this configuration. Now it is your turn! Any thoughts on why this setup either would or would not work? Please be gentle!
BTW, I have considered a triple MTB FD but apparently the cable pull is different than road... Don't know by how much.
Thanks,
Steve
As the title says I am looking to shift a custom road triple crankset possibly with a CX70 FD. As they say the devil is in the details...
FD - CX70 10S cyclecross
Crankset - Ultegra FC-6603 with 24-38-46 rings. The rings are TA and are pinned.
Shifter - Ultegra 6603 STI
After spending waaay too much time online I have been able to pull the following tidbits out of the ether...
- Jan Heine and others on this forum have confirmed that the CX70 FD has enough throw to shift a triple. Jan indicated an issue with STI caused by lack of pins on the chain rings. My pinned rings may or may not fix this.
- Rivendell supposedly used the CX70 FD with a half-step triple which would have fairly close middle/big rings. It is unknown what they used for shifting. Knowing Rivendell it was probably friction.
- I have seen various places where the CX70 should be able to handle the 22T capacity even though it is only rated for a 16T (double configuration). This is likely rated for maximum jump between rings instead of total capacity (cage size).
- Cable pulls should be compatible as the CX70 is a road (cyclecross) FD and the 6603 is also a road shifter?
What is lacking is any real data points that anyone has ever tried or had success with this configuration. Now it is your turn! Any thoughts on why this setup either would or would not work? Please be gentle!
BTW, I have considered a triple MTB FD but apparently the cable pull is different than road... Don't know by how much.
Thanks,
Steve
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,702
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1175 Post(s)
Liked 456 Times
in
325 Posts
With the 46/38/24 chainrings, I would say your choice of the FD-CX70 is probably a better option than the Ultegra 6603 FD, But with the 6603 indexing shifter you are going to want to get into set up for proper indexing. I say go ahead and give it a whorl then report back here your results. I suspect it will work, but getting it to index perfectly may not be intuitive. The FD-CX70 might be for a compact double but not a compact triple. If you have the orange gauge block that these ship with you will need it here. It you don't possess the orange gauge block you can use a 5mm Allen key for the set up. The idea is, that when you first pull a new inner front cable you want the FD to initially be between the "granny" ring and he middle ring. This allows you to use the barrel adjuster to set your trim stops and it prevents the cable from getting too tight when you shift to your "big" chainring. Good luck and please keep us posted on how this works for you. I feel like there are still many, many applications where triple cranks are relevant be they road, trekking, gravel, commuting or whatever you want to call it.
Last edited by masi61; 04-03-24 at 04:59 PM.
#3
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,009
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4522 Post(s)
Liked 4,222 Times
in
2,825 Posts
CX-70 was a fantastic derailleur. I am using it on my touring bike with a similar ratio (24/36/48) but mine is friction shifting so I cannot make any promises to indexing but I wish they still made that derailleur. I would happily scoop up a couple more but at the time I didn't think about it and wasn't as spare conscious as I am now not that I have had problems but incase I want to use it for a future build.
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
With the 46/38/24 chainrings,I suspect it will work, but getting it to index perfectly may not be intuitive. The FD-CX70 might be for a compact double but not a compact triple. If you have the orange gauge block that these ship with you will need it here. It you don't possess the orange gauge block you can use a 5mm Allen key for the set up. The idea is, that when you first pull a new inner front cable you want the FD to initially be between the "granny" ring and he middle ring. This allows you to use the barrel adjuster to set your trim stops and it prevents the cable from getting too tight when you shift to your "big" chainring
#5
Senior Member
The 6603 FD rear cage is too tall and runs into the middle ring if the outer cage is set correctly for the big ring.
I saw a link to the 5mm allen trick but the link was broken. Where is the allen positioned? I am assuming that this has something to do with the swing position and not the vertical height on the seat tube. Would the orange gauge block be relevant with this oddball ring setup?
I saw a link to the 5mm allen trick but the link was broken. Where is the allen positioned? I am assuming that this has something to do with the swing position and not the vertical height on the seat tube. Would the orange gauge block be relevant with this oddball ring setup?
See the difference in the inner cage shape.
![](https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikeforums.net-vbulletin/820x339/shimano_fd_6500_6600_e3785eff387c39445b448aa15ebb242147ffd778.jpg)
#6
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,775
Mentioned: 236 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2175 Post(s)
Liked 3,532 Times
in
1,237 Posts
That CX 70 will definitely shift the triple flawlessly…when friction shifted.
Many here will be interested to find out how it works with STI shifters.
Not me personally, but…others.
Many here will be interested to find out how it works with STI shifters.
Not me personally, but…others.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Likes For rccardr:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,702
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1175 Post(s)
Liked 456 Times
in
325 Posts
The 6603 FD rear cage is too tall and runs into the middle ring if the outer cage is set correctly for the big ring.
I saw a link to the 5mm allen trick but the link was broken. Where is the allen positioned? I am assuming that this has something to do with the swing position and not the vertical height on the seat tube. Would the orange gauge block be relevant with this oddball ring setup?
I saw a link to the 5mm allen trick but the link was broken. Where is the allen positioned? I am assuming that this has something to do with the swing position and not the vertical height on the seat tube. Would the orange gauge block be relevant with this oddball ring setup?
#8
Full Member
Thread Starter
I just did some quick calculations and there is only a .156" radius difference between a 38T and a 36T middle ring. So if there was cage interference with this setup raising the FD a bit might fix it.
I was out riding my now ancient 1992 Trek 950 MTB today and thinking... This bike has a 46-36-?? triple on it with indexed shifters and it shifts the front flawlessly with no help from any ramps or pins. So what has changed over the years to require all of these fancy chain ring shapes and pins?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,846
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1956 Post(s)
Liked 2,201 Times
in
1,339 Posts
I was out riding my now ancient 1992 Trek 950 MTB today and thinking... This bike has a 46-36-?? triple on it with indexed shifters and it shifts the front flawlessly with no help from any ramps or pins. So what has changed over the years to require all of these fancy chain ring shapes and pins?
What I can’t do is just force it over and have it climb onto the next ring seamlessly.
People want to just shift immediately without that slight pause that was used decades ago. And in some ways I can’t blame them.
John
#10
Full Member
Thread Starter
The 5mm Allen key is positioned between the parallelogram arms when they are pressed outward against the spring to make a sufficient opening for it. Then you can tighten all the slack out of the cable while the triple shifter is in the lowest position. Then you can test the indexing and trim stops as you pedal and shift into the middle, big chainrings and back down. Hopefully whatever ramps are on your chainring set will speed the upshifts and downshifts without too much drama.
Generally all this works but indexed triples I think are naturally a bit tricky. I wax my chains and for some reason my downshift from the middle 39 chainring to the 30 tooth granny pops so strongly that my waxed chain doesn’t flex sufficiently (sometimes) so I will drop the chain at the base of a hill. More embarrassing than anything if on a group ride.
Now the most important thing is to NOT add any more lube until you can thoroughly clean the chain again. Adding lube in between just washes road grit into the pins and wears out the chain in short order. This gets really critical on trails with granite screenings (dust). I made it coast to coast on less than one chain using this method.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,702
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1175 Post(s)
Liked 456 Times
in
325 Posts
Thanks for the tip! So does this do the same thing as the gauge block that comes with the FD?
Yes, I think so.
I gave up on waxed chains a long time ago. I now use my own proprietary blend of equal parts 90W gear oil, chainsaw bar oil, and mineral spirits. The secret to chain life is to get the chain pristine clean either with solvent or ultrasonic cleaning. Then apply the chain lube and let the mineral spirits flash off overnight. Next day wipe any excess off the chain and go ride. Wipe the chain as necessary between rides.
Now the most important thing is to NOT add any more lube until you can thoroughly clean the chain again. Adding lube in between just washes road grit into the pins and wears out the chain in short order. This gets really critical on trails with granite screenings (dust). I made it coast to coast on less than one chain using this method.
Yes, I think so.
I gave up on waxed chains a long time ago. I now use my own proprietary blend of equal parts 90W gear oil, chainsaw bar oil, and mineral spirits. The secret to chain life is to get the chain pristine clean either with solvent or ultrasonic cleaning. Then apply the chain lube and let the mineral spirits flash off overnight. Next day wipe any excess off the chain and go ride. Wipe the chain as necessary between rides.
Now the most important thing is to NOT add any more lube until you can thoroughly clean the chain again. Adding lube in between just washes road grit into the pins and wears out the chain in short order. This gets really critical on trails with granite screenings (dust). I made it coast to coast on less than one chain using this method.
![Thumbs Up](images/smilies/thumb.gif)
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
Well, to prove that no good deed goes unpunished here is an update... I had already found the chain rings and also a FD-CX70 FD. Since this is my primary bike I have been waiting for my calendar to clear from events and a 2 week tour in Mallorca.
So I assembled the crank with the new rings (again) and found a new issue. When the chain is on the small ring the chain catches on the middle ring when the chain is in the smallest cog. I know that this isn't a really usable combination but the chain shouldn't catch.
I am pretty sure that I have the rings installed in the correct directions with all of the labels facing out. Here is a photo. I am beginning to think that this is all money down the toilet. Has anyone gotten any other ideas / suggestions on why this isn't working and if it is possible to fix it? I also sent an email to T.A. to see if they have any comments or suggestions.
So I assembled the crank with the new rings (again) and found a new issue. When the chain is on the small ring the chain catches on the middle ring when the chain is in the smallest cog. I know that this isn't a really usable combination but the chain shouldn't catch.
I am pretty sure that I have the rings installed in the correct directions with all of the labels facing out. Here is a photo. I am beginning to think that this is all money down the toilet. Has anyone gotten any other ideas / suggestions on why this isn't working and if it is possible to fix it? I also sent an email to T.A. to see if they have any comments or suggestions.
![](https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikeforums.net-vbulletin/2000x948/20240612_155836_53f6378a310cfb6a01a800186bc1c56290a156f1.jpg)
#13
Senior Member
Well, to prove that no good deed goes unpunished here is an update... I had already found the chain rings and also a FD-CX70 FD. Since this is my primary bike I have been waiting for my calendar to clear from events and a 2 week tour in Mallorca.
So I assembled the crank with the new rings (again) and found a new issue. When the chain is on the small ring the chain catches on the middle ring when the chain is in the smallest cog. I know that this isn't a really usable combination but the chain shouldn't catch.
I am pretty sure that I have the rings installed in the correct directions with all of the labels facing out. Here is a photo. I am beginning to think that this is all money down the toilet. Has anyone gotten any other ideas / suggestions on why this isn't working and if it is possible to fix it? I also sent an email to T.A. to see if they have any comments or suggestions.
So I assembled the crank with the new rings (again) and found a new issue. When the chain is on the small ring the chain catches on the middle ring when the chain is in the smallest cog. I know that this isn't a really usable combination but the chain shouldn't catch.
I am pretty sure that I have the rings installed in the correct directions with all of the labels facing out. Here is a photo. I am beginning to think that this is all money down the toilet. Has anyone gotten any other ideas / suggestions on why this isn't working and if it is possible to fix it? I also sent an email to T.A. to see if they have any comments or suggestions.
You could put thin spacers between the smallest ring and the crank. M8 (or SAE equivalent) X 0.5mm possibly. Cranks with 53/39 rings sometimes needs a spacer.
#14
Full Member
Thread Starter
With a 14 teeth difference, depending on chainstay length & front/rear chainline, the angle is large enough that this can happen.
You could put thin spacers between the smallest ring and the crank. M8 (or SAE equivalent) X 0.5mm possibly. Cranks with 53/39 rings sometimes needs a spacer.
You could put thin spacers between the smallest ring and the crank. M8 (or SAE equivalent) X 0.5mm possibly. Cranks with 53/39 rings sometimes needs a spacer.
Spacers might work but the crank bolts are relatively large diameter. However, this may also screw up indexing by changing the chain ring spacing.
I am still waiting to hear from T.A. Specialties to see if they have any suggestions.
#15
Recreational Road Cyclist
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MetroWest, Mass.
Posts: 560
Bikes: 1990 Peter Mooney road bike
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 259 Post(s)
Liked 257 Times
in
138 Posts
Doctor, doctor!
![Twitchy](images/smilies/twitchy.gif)
Reminds me of the old joke:
Patient: Doctor, doctor! it hurts when I do this!
Doctor: Don't do that!
Doctor: Don't do that!
![lol](images/smilies/lol.gif)
Where did you find the CX70? It's a great derailler. I learned about it from the Rivendell site years ago, but it is no longer in production.
Good luck!
Likes For BCDrums:
#16
Senior Member
Closer inspection shows that it is mainly hitting the edges of the back side of the chain ring bolts but also hits the ring ramps lightly in a spot or two. One cog up and it clears, barely.
Spacers might work but the crank bolts are relatively large diameter. However, this may also screw up indexing by changing the chain ring spacing.
I am still waiting to hear from T.A. Specialties to see if they have any suggestions.
Spacers might work but the crank bolts are relatively large diameter. However, this may also screw up indexing by changing the chain ring spacing.
I am still waiting to hear from T.A. Specialties to see if they have any suggestions.
Indexing (cable tension setting) for triples is normally done while on the middle chainring so a small change to the L screw should have no effect on the mid & big ring. In the small/small combo it could cause rub outer cage but you'll have to check.
As for the chainring bolt (nut) can you thin-down or radius the edges to allow a little more clearance. Don't think that removing a little material would cause a problem. Don't recall if the bolts are steel on these cranks.
#17
Full Member
Thread Starter
Steve, I am using the CX70 with 24-37-46 rings. Shifts fine in both friction and STI triple lever. Prompted by your rubbing issue on the middle ring, I just checked the bike and discovered that the chain rubs the outer cage plate in the four smallest cogs of a 13-28 9sp cassette. Never knew it because I never use those cogs with the 24T ring. If your problem is that it rubs a bit in the smallest cog, I wouldn't sweat that, because you're not going to use that combo, are you? ![Twitchy](images/smilies/twitchy.gif)
![Twitchy](images/smilies/twitchy.gif)
Thanks! I'll need it
#18
Full Member
Thread Starter
A half a mm should not have much effect on indexing. With the chain on the smallest ring and innermost sprocket, is there enough of a gap for an additional 0.5mm? Is the cable tension in that combo relatively tight and loosening the low limit screw slightly wouldn't allow the cage to move at all?
Indexing (cable tension setting) for triples is normally done while on the middle chainring so a small change to the L screw should have no effect on the mid & big ring. In the small/small combo it could cause rub outer cage but you'll have to check.
As for the chainring bolt (nut) can you thin-down or radius the edges to allow a little more clearance. Don't think that removing a little material would cause a problem. Don't recall if the bolts are steel on these cranks.
Indexing (cable tension setting) for triples is normally done while on the middle chainring so a small change to the L screw should have no effect on the mid & big ring. In the small/small combo it could cause rub outer cage but you'll have to check.
As for the chainring bolt (nut) can you thin-down or radius the edges to allow a little more clearance. Don't think that removing a little material would cause a problem. Don't recall if the bolts are steel on these cranks.