I'm a track bike nerd wanting to get into road cycling. But still kind of a luddite
#1
I'm a track bike nerd wanting to get into road cycling. But still kind of a luddite
I'm into classic mountain bikes (90's Klein) and steel track bikes (own a 3Rensho, Samson, Look, Viner, etc..)
Realized I just need to get road bike but it's hard for me to jump on the carbon sloping top tube train.
At the same time I don't want to deal with 80's downtube friction shifters.
I'm guessing 90s to 2000s as my sweet spot?
Would like to find something similar to late 90s road bike. Like Pantani's Bianchi, Cipo Saeco Cannondale, Trek 5900 OCLV etc...
Feel like this era of bikes is a good mix of classic and modern.
Horizontal top tube, shifting on the brake hood/levers, threadless headset, etc..
Old but not too old.
What are some good road bikes in this era that aren't super collectable/pricey?
This will be ridden, not displayed.
Like something that's quality but can be easily found on the used market?
Again, I'm not talking about this specific bike, I'm taking about the frame geometry and era of technology.
Realized I just need to get road bike but it's hard for me to jump on the carbon sloping top tube train.
At the same time I don't want to deal with 80's downtube friction shifters.
I'm guessing 90s to 2000s as my sweet spot?
Would like to find something similar to late 90s road bike. Like Pantani's Bianchi, Cipo Saeco Cannondale, Trek 5900 OCLV etc...
Feel like this era of bikes is a good mix of classic and modern.
Horizontal top tube, shifting on the brake hood/levers, threadless headset, etc..
Old but not too old.
What are some good road bikes in this era that aren't super collectable/pricey?
This will be ridden, not displayed.
Like something that's quality but can be easily found on the used market?
Again, I'm not talking about this specific bike, I'm taking about the frame geometry and era of technology.
Last edited by Regulatori; 04-18-24 at 09:16 PM.
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 424
Bikes: 2016 Cervelo R3 & 1999 Litespeed Tuscany
Liked 139 Times
in
80 Posts
Look for a circa 2000s Litespeed. It may not have the panache of a world tour bike, but they have a legacy of their own. No sloping top tube, STI shifters, and if you get lucky you might find one with the Shimano Flight Deck. The titanium frame will last you a lifetime and there's no proprietary pieces so you can replace the groupset if you want.
Mine's 25 years old and I still ride it.
Mine's 25 years old and I still ride it.
#3
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,202
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Liked 1,728 Times
in
985 Posts
There is no right answer and like anything in bikes the quality level can run the whole Gambit from garbage to life changing just by the particular component selection and how a particular frame fits your individual proportions.
That being said: I built up a 19lb Raleigh R300 in size 58 that was simply an amazing ride with down tube shifters and an Ultegra 3x9. My son had a size 56 that I later outfitted with SRAM Red 2x10 that came to about 17lbs. All aluminum, everything. I regret selling both. To this day I still long for them.
I think I only spent ~$15 for each frame set. Hugely under rated, unknown, and unappreciated.
One thing to consider is there is a difference between feeling fast and being fast. A lot of bikes from that era will not accept nice tires. You may very well be stuck with 23 or 25mm of tire width and no more.
If you'd like the find the middle ground between a lot of 2000 metal road bikes and today's carbon wünderbikes, a 2010'-20-teens CX bike will be a solid choice for road raciness, nice supple tire widths, and modern fit/component selection at a reasonable price...May even be tubeless capable and have disc brakes if you are lucky.
That being said: I built up a 19lb Raleigh R300 in size 58 that was simply an amazing ride with down tube shifters and an Ultegra 3x9. My son had a size 56 that I later outfitted with SRAM Red 2x10 that came to about 17lbs. All aluminum, everything. I regret selling both. To this day I still long for them.
I think I only spent ~$15 for each frame set. Hugely under rated, unknown, and unappreciated.
One thing to consider is there is a difference between feeling fast and being fast. A lot of bikes from that era will not accept nice tires. You may very well be stuck with 23 or 25mm of tire width and no more.
If you'd like the find the middle ground between a lot of 2000 metal road bikes and today's carbon wünderbikes, a 2010'-20-teens CX bike will be a solid choice for road raciness, nice supple tire widths, and modern fit/component selection at a reasonable price...May even be tubeless capable and have disc brakes if you are lucky.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#4
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,418
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Liked 1,259 Times
in
714 Posts
Funny, I don't think I ever met a tracky who wasn't a roadie first. Anyway, I think you're on the right track as there are plenty of steel rigs with 8 or 9 speed brifters from the 90's. The only catch is you can only find them on the used market, so you either pick from what's available or you wait.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#5
So why care about how it looks?
But anyway, I would try to find something that can take at least modern 28c road tyres. Otherwise you will be compromising your future premium tyre choices. Limited tyre clearance is one of the major drawbacks of most older bikes.
But anyway, I would try to find something that can take at least modern 28c road tyres. Otherwise you will be compromising your future premium tyre choices. Limited tyre clearance is one of the major drawbacks of most older bikes.
#6
Full Member
I think a Lemond from the late 90's/early 2000's would suit you well. Steel frame, horizontal top tube so classic styling and construction but with more modern stuff like integrated shifters, threadless fork, vertical rear dropouts, etc. They're also not particularly collectible so that keeps the values down. Just checked my local craigslist (San Francisco Bay Area) and I didn't see any for over a grand, most in the $400-$700 range.
I'm personally a long time Cannondale nerd so of course I'll recommend them. They're all aluminum back in the day and kept the horizontal top tube for a long time. Quality bikes, fairly abundant so fairly inexpensive. I will say though to be aware of frames made during the mid-90's as all but the touring models had a goofy rear dropout that was looooong and sometimes problematic. Last year I of that I think was '97. Anyways, they're easy to spot, the rear dropout sticks like an an inch a half out past where the chainstay and seatstays meet. What was problematic about them was the dropouts pointed forward and made it possible to pull the wheel out of the dropout when hard on the pedals. I've seen it happen on more than one. That damages the droupout and makes it more likely to happen again. They fixed the issue by simply going back to a conventional vertical dropout in the late 90's, so start your hunt there, if you choose.
I'm personally a long time Cannondale nerd so of course I'll recommend them. They're all aluminum back in the day and kept the horizontal top tube for a long time. Quality bikes, fairly abundant so fairly inexpensive. I will say though to be aware of frames made during the mid-90's as all but the touring models had a goofy rear dropout that was looooong and sometimes problematic. Last year I of that I think was '97. Anyways, they're easy to spot, the rear dropout sticks like an an inch a half out past where the chainstay and seatstays meet. What was problematic about them was the dropouts pointed forward and made it possible to pull the wheel out of the dropout when hard on the pedals. I've seen it happen on more than one. That damages the droupout and makes it more likely to happen again. They fixed the issue by simply going back to a conventional vertical dropout in the late 90's, so start your hunt there, if you choose.
#7
I think a Lemond from the late 90's/early 2000's would suit you well. Steel frame, horizontal top tube so classic styling and construction but with more modern stuff like integrated shifters, threadless fork, vertical rear dropouts, etc. They're also not particularly collectible so that keeps the values down. Just checked my local craigslist (San Francisco Bay Area) and I didn't see any for over a grand, most in the $400-$700 range.
I'm personally a long time Cannondale nerd so of course I'll recommend them. They're all aluminum back in the day and kept the horizontal top tube for a long time. Quality bikes, fairly abundant so fairly inexpensive. I will say though to be aware of frames made during the mid-90's as all but the touring models had a goofy rear dropout that was looooong and sometimes problematic. Last year I of that I think was '97. Anyways, they're easy to spot, the rear dropout sticks like an an inch a half out past where the chainstay and seatstays meet. What was problematic about them was the dropouts pointed forward and made it possible to pull the wheel out of the dropout when hard on the pedals. I've seen it happen on more than one. That damages the droupout and makes it more likely to happen again. They fixed the issue by simply going back to a conventional vertical dropout in the late 90's, so start your hunt there, if you choose.
I'm personally a long time Cannondale nerd so of course I'll recommend them. They're all aluminum back in the day and kept the horizontal top tube for a long time. Quality bikes, fairly abundant so fairly inexpensive. I will say though to be aware of frames made during the mid-90's as all but the touring models had a goofy rear dropout that was looooong and sometimes problematic. Last year I of that I think was '97. Anyways, they're easy to spot, the rear dropout sticks like an an inch a half out past where the chainstay and seatstays meet. What was problematic about them was the dropouts pointed forward and made it possible to pull the wheel out of the dropout when hard on the pedals. I've seen it happen on more than one. That damages the droupout and makes it more likely to happen again. They fixed the issue by simply going back to a conventional vertical dropout in the late 90's, so start your hunt there, if you choose.
Don't even look up prices for a 90's Cannondale Track frame go for now....like $2500+ It's crazy but the CDale track frame geo is just iconic.
How is the aluminum on the late 90's Cannondale? I know that was kind of the first decade of fat tube thin wall aluminum with Cannondale and Klein.
Curious if you've heard any issues with stress, cracks, etc.. for the fact they're 25 years old now.
I was thinking of maybe a Klein too. I've had a few of their mountain bikes.
#8
I just personally prefer a horizontal top tube. Trying to find that era where the bikes still had horizontal top tubes but modern features (no downtube friction shifting, threadless headset, etc..)
#9
Look for a circa 2000s Litespeed. It may not have the panache of a world tour bike, but they have a legacy of their own. No sloping top tube, STI shifters, and if you get lucky you might find one with the Shimano Flight Deck. The titanium frame will last you a lifetime and there's no proprietary pieces so you can replace the groupset if you want.
Mine's 25 years old and I still ride it.
Mine's 25 years old and I still ride it.
Remember when REI started carrying them in the 90s and I was just drooling over them.
#10
Senior Member
Thanks, appreciate it.
Don't even look up prices for a 90's Cannondale Track frame go for now....like $2500+ It's crazy but the CDale track frame geo is just iconic.
How is the aluminum on the late 90's Cannondale? I know that was kind of the first decade of fat tube thin wall aluminum with Cannondale and Klein.
Curious if you've heard any issues with stress, cracks, etc.. for the fact they're 25 years old now.
I was thinking of maybe a Klein too. I've had a few of their mountain bikes.
Don't even look up prices for a 90's Cannondale Track frame go for now....like $2500+ It's crazy but the CDale track frame geo is just iconic.
How is the aluminum on the late 90's Cannondale? I know that was kind of the first decade of fat tube thin wall aluminum with Cannondale and Klein.
Curious if you've heard any issues with stress, cracks, etc.. for the fact they're 25 years old now.
I was thinking of maybe a Klein too. I've had a few of their mountain bikes.
The report noted that at least some of the failures among the frames (including a Klein) likely could have been prevented with better design work and QC control. Anyway, the percentages of frame failures are very low regardless of the material used.
#11
OM boy
Very Late 90s and 2000s is a sweet spot for, all the building materials. Really, 'Brand' is not important, many great bikes out there, a lot depends on your personal taste and, of course, what geometry you might wish/need.
Patience and Craigslist will have you finding something - depending on where you live.
You'll need some knowledge about bikes, and the good stuff. What you don;t know, you can search and ask here.
Things I would avoid:
1. Square Taper - is still available, but in better bikes, it's for the 'Vintage' crowd.
2. I would also avoid anything using ISIS, OCTALINK or the Campy equivalent (name escapes me...). They were ok, but became problematic with extended use... Stay with any of the Modern crankset/BB combos which have the Crank spindle attached to the Drive side Crank - mostly bulletproof and great shifting.
3. 9 Speed was good, But 10 spd is awesome good, 1st gearing which could handle shifting under load an 'expected' good result. 10 spd also has the greatest variety of stuff available, especially gearing combinations (chainrings options and a vast range of cassettes).
4. Late 90's and newer should all be 'Threadless' stem, although the old school Quill Stem might sneak in... I would avoid Quill Stem bikes and any with 1" headtubes.
5. If you're a real 'trackie', you would know 'sewups/tubular' - avoid... stay with clincher wheels. Tubular are still common to very recent times, for racing, but they are finally having the nails put in their coffin (maybe...)
6. Wheels, complicated, some good, some not so good. Best to ask specifics here when you have some for consideration.
Good Luck, happy tire kicking ! Bike shopping is super great fun!
Ride On
Yuri
Patience and Craigslist will have you finding something - depending on where you live.
You'll need some knowledge about bikes, and the good stuff. What you don;t know, you can search and ask here.
Things I would avoid:
1. Square Taper - is still available, but in better bikes, it's for the 'Vintage' crowd.
2. I would also avoid anything using ISIS, OCTALINK or the Campy equivalent (name escapes me...). They were ok, but became problematic with extended use... Stay with any of the Modern crankset/BB combos which have the Crank spindle attached to the Drive side Crank - mostly bulletproof and great shifting.
3. 9 Speed was good, But 10 spd is awesome good, 1st gearing which could handle shifting under load an 'expected' good result. 10 spd also has the greatest variety of stuff available, especially gearing combinations (chainrings options and a vast range of cassettes).
4. Late 90's and newer should all be 'Threadless' stem, although the old school Quill Stem might sneak in... I would avoid Quill Stem bikes and any with 1" headtubes.
5. If you're a real 'trackie', you would know 'sewups/tubular' - avoid... stay with clincher wheels. Tubular are still common to very recent times, for racing, but they are finally having the nails put in their coffin (maybe...)
6. Wheels, complicated, some good, some not so good. Best to ask specifics here when you have some for consideration.
Good Luck, happy tire kicking ! Bike shopping is super great fun!
Ride On
Yuri
#12
In a 1997 fatigue test of 12 high-end racing bike frames, sponsored by the German magazine Tour, the only frames that didn't fail were Trek's OCLV carbon frame and two aluminum frames, a Principia and a Cannondale. (All the steel and titanium frames failed.)
The report noted that at least some of the failures among the frames (including a Klein) likely could have been prevented with better design work and QC control. Anyway, the percentages of frame failures are very low regardless of the material used.
The report noted that at least some of the failures among the frames (including a Klein) likely could have been prevented with better design work and QC control. Anyway, the percentages of frame failures are very low regardless of the material used.
I was thinking more about an older aluminum road bike being used today. I've heard of a few stories of 90's era aluminum or carbon bikes have catastrophic failures due to 20 years of fatigue. Or with a carbon bike, some of the early tech resulting in failures due to bonding/layers/glue issues over time.
I have an old HED rear disc and the carbon weave and finishing on it looks like it was made in someone's garage.
#13
Very Late 90s and 2000s is a sweet spot for, all the building materials. Really, 'Brand' is not important, many great bikes out there, a lot depends on your personal taste and, of course, what geometry you might wish/need.
Patience and Craigslist will have you finding something - depending on where you live.
You'll need some knowledge about bikes, and the good stuff. What you don;t know, you can search and ask here.
Things I would avoid:
1. Square Taper - is still available, but in better bikes, it's for the 'Vintage' crowd.
2. I would also avoid anything using ISIS, OCTALINK or the Campy equivalent (name escapes me...). They were ok, but became problematic with extended use... Stay with any of the Modern crankset/BB combos which have the Crank spindle attached to the Drive side Crank - mostly bulletproof and great shifting.
3. 9 Speed was good, But 10 spd is awesome good, 1st gearing which could handle shifting under load an 'expected' good result. 10 spd also has the greatest variety of stuff available, especially gearing combinations (chainrings options and a vast range of cassettes).
4. Late 90's and newer should all be 'Threadless' stem, although the old school Quill Stem might sneak in... I would avoid Quill Stem bikes and any with 1" headtubes.
5. If you're a real 'trackie', you would know 'sewups/tubular' - avoid... stay with clincher wheels. Tubular are still common to very recent times, for racing, but they are finally having the nails put in their coffin (maybe...)
6. Wheels, complicated, some good, some not so good. Best to ask specifics here when you have some for consideration.
Good Luck, happy tire kicking ! Bike shopping is super great fun!
Ride On
Yuri
Patience and Craigslist will have you finding something - depending on where you live.
You'll need some knowledge about bikes, and the good stuff. What you don;t know, you can search and ask here.
Things I would avoid:
1. Square Taper - is still available, but in better bikes, it's for the 'Vintage' crowd.
2. I would also avoid anything using ISIS, OCTALINK or the Campy equivalent (name escapes me...). They were ok, but became problematic with extended use... Stay with any of the Modern crankset/BB combos which have the Crank spindle attached to the Drive side Crank - mostly bulletproof and great shifting.
3. 9 Speed was good, But 10 spd is awesome good, 1st gearing which could handle shifting under load an 'expected' good result. 10 spd also has the greatest variety of stuff available, especially gearing combinations (chainrings options and a vast range of cassettes).
4. Late 90's and newer should all be 'Threadless' stem, although the old school Quill Stem might sneak in... I would avoid Quill Stem bikes and any with 1" headtubes.
5. If you're a real 'trackie', you would know 'sewups/tubular' - avoid... stay with clincher wheels. Tubular are still common to very recent times, for racing, but they are finally having the nails put in their coffin (maybe...)
6. Wheels, complicated, some good, some not so good. Best to ask specifics here when you have some for consideration.
Good Luck, happy tire kicking ! Bike shopping is super great fun!
Ride On
Yuri
This is exactly what I was looking for.
Feel like there is always some new innovation in the bike world for a few years and then you never hear about it again. Like the Shimano Bio-Space oval chainrings (which I'm now noticing people are making oval rings again). Your info is super helpful.
I do actually have a set of tubular wheels running sew-ups. Been riding them off and on for 10 years but mainly short rides. Kind of a pain to set up but a very comfortable ride. I definitely pay attention when shopping for used stuff though, lots of vintage tubular out there.
All of my track bikes run square taper Sugino 75s and Sugino loose ball BB. Not too worried about changing to newer tech. Just not excited about buying more tools.
Thanks again, so much helpful info!
#14
Bad example
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,293
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Liked 430 Times
in
203 Posts
I do actually have a set of tubular wheels running sew-ups. Been riding them off and on for 10 years but mainly short rides. Kind of a pain to set up but a very comfortable ride. I definitely pay attention when shopping for used stuff though, lots of vintage tubular out there.
All of my track bikes run square taper Sugino 75s and Sugino loose ball BB. Not too worried about changing to newer tech. Just not excited about buying more tools.
All of my track bikes run square taper Sugino 75s and Sugino loose ball BB. Not too worried about changing to newer tech. Just not excited about buying more tools.
just another data point for your consideration!
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
#15
Full Member
Thanks, appreciate it.
Don't even look up prices for a 90's Cannondale Track frame go for now....like $2500+ It's crazy but the CDale track frame geo is just iconic.
How is the aluminum on the late 90's Cannondale? I know that was kind of the first decade of fat tube thin wall aluminum with Cannondale and Klein.
Curious if you've heard any issues with stress, cracks, etc.. for the fact they're 25 years old now.
I was thinking of maybe a Klein too. I've had a few of their mountain bikes.
Don't even look up prices for a 90's Cannondale Track frame go for now....like $2500+ It's crazy but the CDale track frame geo is just iconic.
How is the aluminum on the late 90's Cannondale? I know that was kind of the first decade of fat tube thin wall aluminum with Cannondale and Klein.
Curious if you've heard any issues with stress, cracks, etc.. for the fact they're 25 years old now.
I was thinking of maybe a Klein too. I've had a few of their mountain bikes.
I'm a Klein fan too so I've had a few. Two of my road bikes are a 1991 Quantum and a 1995 Quantum II. The latter is a very recent purchase that I've put no miles on yet as it's completely apart for an overhaul (sitting for 15 years) so no review yet. Build quality is high based on initial inspection. The 1991 Quantum has been my primary ride for a couple of years now. Always worked fine and I enjoy the ride despite it being a tad stiffer than a steel frame. The fork steerer recently broke but that has entirely to do with a different stem than original and not being inserted far enough, nothing about the craftsmanship is to blame. Build quality is top notch. I know that's a bit older than you're aiming, just using it as a reference point for build quality.
I did have a 2001 Adept Comp full suspension. Bought it in rough shape, ridden hard and put away wet, but no structural damage to the frame.
Bottom line, I find Klein to be high quality and many who own them feel the same. My two Quantums are definitely forever bikes.
Kleins can fetch a premium but really only the ones with their famous linear fade paint jobs. If you can find one with a more traditional single color paint job, you can get them for about the same as a Cannondale of the same era.
#16
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,892
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,573 Times
in
1,089 Posts
You are on the right track. A CAAD4 or CAAD5 should work. He is my 2000 CAAD4:
Cannondale made the switch from a 1" to a 1-1/8" head tube and fork steerer for MY 2001. Mine being a 2000, I got the former, which requires a shim to use a modern stem, so I agree with cyclezen that it would be preferable to get a 1-1/8" one, but many sellers do not have that information.
Cannondale made the switch from a 1" to a 1-1/8" head tube and fork steerer for MY 2001. Mine being a 2000, I got the former, which requires a shim to use a modern stem, so I agree with cyclezen that it would be preferable to get a 1-1/8" one, but many sellers do not have that information.
Last edited by SoSmellyAir; 04-24-24 at 07:26 PM.
#17
Full Member
Cannondale supposedly made the switch from a 1" to a 1-1/8" head tube and fork steerer in 2001. Mine must have been an earlier example because I got the former, which requires a shim to use a modern stem, so I agree with cyclezen that it would be preferable to get a 1-1/8" one, but many sellers do not have that information.
Additionally, don't be afraid of 1 inch steerers. 1" threadless forks can still be readily found online if you want to convert from threaded and same with stems and headsets. FSA still produces a brand new 1" threadless headset for about 40 bucks. As for stems, I haven't exactly looked for brand new so I don't know if new is still an option but used certainly is, primarily on ebay.
#18
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,892
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,573 Times
in
1,089 Posts
I did not find any stem that would fit a 1" threadless steerer and a more contemporary 31.8 mm handlebar, which was why I had to use a shim.
#19
Full Member
Good to know about the 1" carbon forks.
That is something I hadn't thought about and none probably exist. However, if you run bars from the late 90's or early 2000's, those will be 26.0 or 25.4 and 1" threadless stems for that clamp size do exist.
#21
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,892
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,573 Times
in
1,089 Posts
#22
Likes For Regulatori:
#23
#25
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,602
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Liked 1,335 Times
in
730 Posts
That's their charm! Definitely separates the men from the boys when you start mixing it up with traffic on a genuine fixie.
I will admit: You probably don't wanna bring the track bike on a group ride. Not that the experienced fixie rider can't deal with it; it's that most other (geared) roadies can't deal with a fixie in their midst. Throws off their "rhythm" (...and I'm being charitible with that word)
Oh, yeah, I totally get that! ::::
I will admit: You probably don't wanna bring the track bike on a group ride. Not that the experienced fixie rider can't deal with it; it's that most other (geared) roadies can't deal with a fixie in their midst. Throws off their "rhythm" (...and I'm being charitible with that word)
Oh, yeah, I totally get that! ::::