Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Carbon handlebars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-24, 03:08 PM
  #51  
adlai
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 819
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Bald Paul
I think AliBaba Express has some super accurate torque wrenches available for $0.99 each.
Hey, you trust their handlebars, may as well put your life in the hands of a good tool as well.
Oh I have a number of those torque wrenches.
I do like their hex wrench sets.
adlai is offline  
Old 04-25-24, 03:14 PM
  #52  
adlai
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 819
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
Well my perception of super-cheap, totally unbranded components is one of complete lottery and it can be assumed that no signficant QC was involved in the process. The best you can hope for is that it was over-engineered to avoid any potential failure.

Genuine branded, high-end components on the other hand are far more likely to have been designed and manufactured to a high standard. Of course you pay for that assurance, but that's the whole point. Some of the more reputable Chinese brands (particularly some of the wheel brands) are reducing this additional cost of assured quality, but that's a different story.
One example is the "3d printed saddle".

I've watched the manufacturer video from selle Italia on the work they put into it

AliExpress sells a number of knockoff "3d printed" saddles for as much as $70. The knockoffs don't have the r&d put into them and reportedly don't have the same variable compression and support in the right spots.

But on this sort of saddle to begin with the margin for comfort is really low because lots of high end bike gear is about shaving as much as is possible to reduce weight to the tenth gram or whatever.

Point is that lots of high end stuff is pseudoscience to begin with and knockoffs just don't have the same marketing speak.
adlai is offline  
Old 04-25-24, 03:26 PM
  #53  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,607
Liked 12,008 Times in 5,131 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
I can't imagine why this would be either an advantage or disadvantage.
Originally Posted by rosefarts
Think about winter riding. Probably insignificant compared to wind. Between gloves and wraps, I don’t think it’s an issue.
.
I've ridden countless times in temps as low as freezing and as high as 100+ Fahrenheit and have never given a single thought to the temperature of my handlebar.
Koyote is online now  
Old 04-25-24, 04:43 PM
  #54  
shelbyfv
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 12,591
Liked 6,520 Times in 3,292 Posts
Originally Posted by adlai
Point is that lots of high end stuff is pseudoscience to begin with and knockoffs just don't have the same marketing speak.
You've certainly convinced me!!
shelbyfv is offline  
Likes For shelbyfv:
Old 04-25-24, 05:00 PM
  #55  
SoSmellyAir
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,158

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3

Liked 1,711 Times in 1,178 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
I can't imagine why this would be either an advantage or disadvantage.
So much for heated handlebar (for those winter morning starts) like the heated steering wheel of my wife's car.
SoSmellyAir is offline  
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
Old 04-25-24, 05:57 PM
  #56  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 10,053
Liked 5,950 Times in 3,665 Posts
Originally Posted by adlai
Point is that lots of high end stuff is pseudoscience to begin with and knockoffs just don't have the same marketing speak.
If we stick to the subject of carbon bars, there is no pseudoscience in the materials, layup design and manufacture of reputable products. The problem is when cheap unknown knockoffs potentially skimp on all aspects of the engineering and quality control process. Then you just end up with a BSO (bar shaped object). This applies to alloy bars too, not just carbon.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 04-25-24, 06:16 PM
  #57  
rosefarts
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,806
Liked 1,061 Times in 601 Posts
In my sample size of a dozen or so, I think Amazon/ebay batteries for tools and cameras are 100% as good any OEM battery I’ve ever had. I’ve never had a failure. Failure means that I need to go back to my charger and grab a different battery a few minutes earlier. It’s low consequence.

Years ago I worked construction with a rope access group. The dudes at one of the training facilities mentioned that they ran across some look-alike rope that had a core made of paper. It was likely some other wadded up fibrous material but had fractional integrity compared to the stuff we were using. That was fairly high consequence.

Bikes are somewhat in between. That’s the point I am trying to make. There is a place for knockoffs. I guess you have to figure out what that place is for you.

I’ll add a thought experiment. Let’s say you have a $4 carbon handlebar that fails on a group ride or even a race. You walk away with a couple scrapes. People in the wreck have thousands of dollars of damage. Some are in the hospital. Maybe someone has injuries that will mean they’ll never ride well again.

Now, how do you feel about the few dollars you saved on a handlebar made of cheese? How do the injured (and their lawyers) feel about you riding with them on such equipment?
rosefarts is offline  
Old 04-25-24, 06:33 PM
  #58  
SoSmellyAir
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,158

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3

Liked 1,711 Times in 1,178 Posts
Originally Posted by veganbikes
... I was not talking China or Jack Ma in terms of that analogy but Alibaba and his 40 thieves as a platform in like buying at that market. ...
Gotcha. Regardless, Alibaba is an interesting choice of name for an e-commerce platform.

Originally Posted by adlai
One example is the "3d printed saddle".

I've watched the manufacturer video from selle Italia on the work they put into it

AliExpress sells a number of knockoff "3d printed" saddles for as much as $70. The knockoffs don't have the r&d put into them and reportedly don't have the same variable compression and support in the right spots.

But on this sort of saddle to begin with the margin for comfort is really low because lots of high end bike gear is about shaving as much as is possible to reduce weight to the tenth gram or whatever.

Point is that lots of high end stuff is pseudoscience to begin with and knockoffs just don't have the same marketing speak.
It is curious that you articulate the sole difference you perceive between Selle Italia 3D printed saddles vs. knockoffs -- i.e., the lack of variable compression and support zones -- but not your perceived difference between branded CF handlebar vs. knockoffs. Care to try to do so? Or:
1. Do you know or assume that there are no structural differences between branded CF handlebar vs. knockoffs?
2. If #1 is not true, do you know or assume that any structural differences would make no difference in the mode or frequency of failures?
SoSmellyAir is offline  
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
Old 04-25-24, 06:44 PM
  #59  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,874

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Liked 1,617 Times in 1,064 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
Well my perception of super-cheap, totally unbranded components is one of complete lottery and it can be assumed that no significant QC was involved in the process....
Genuine branded, high-end components on the other hand are far more likely to have been designed and manufactured to a high standard..
Originally Posted by PeteHski
The problem is when cheap unknown knockoffs potentially skimp on all aspects of the engineering and quality control process. .
Well, we could ask for evidence supporting these assertions. ie. That is that there is more or less QC done in a factory producing a name brand product, than the factory producing a non-name branded product. Or the evidence that higher end components (aka having a higher price tag) have a greater likelihood of being designed and manufactured to a higher standard. Of course we all want to believe this to be be true and therefore why we shell out more money for a brand sold at the local REI than on Alibaba, but where is the support for these conclusions?
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 04-26-24, 04:57 AM
  #60  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Liked 3,935 Times in 2,054 Posts
Sometimes one must apply common sense even if others object.
Maelochs is offline  
Likes For Maelochs:
Old 04-26-24, 05:12 AM
  #61  
Jughed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 1,277

Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1

Liked 1,223 Times in 605 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
Well, we could ask for evidence supporting these assertions. ie. That is that there is more or less QC done in a factory producing a name brand product, than the factory producing a non-name branded product. Or the evidence that higher end components (aka having a higher price tag) have a greater likelihood of being designed and manufactured to a higher standard. Of course we all want to believe this to be be true and therefore why we shell out more money for a brand sold at the local REI than on Alibaba, but where is the support for these conclusions?
I'm in chemical engineering/construction - just about everything purchased from China to save costs, needs to be rebuilt, rewired, re piped in the field and ends up costing 2x than if we simply purchased something made from a reputable vendor.

They all have QC stickers on them, and there is close to zero quality.

The assploded handlebars in my pictures above show clear evidence of dry CF - very little resin, and crappy internal construction. They have a QC sticker on them.

Since they are essentially no name bars not backed by a US company - why would they care if they fail? They don't give a rats ass that I ended up mangled - and I have zero recourse to even get a replacement product - let alone any reimbursement if I chose to go that path (which I wouldn't, but plenty of people would). So a reputable brand, one that is trying to maintain a name for themselves in what is a small high end community - can't simply allow products that assplode to go out the door on a regular basis.
Jughed is offline  
Old 04-26-24, 05:51 AM
  #62  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 10,053
Liked 5,950 Times in 3,665 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
Well, we could ask for evidence supporting these assertions. ie. That is that there is more or less QC done in a factory producing a name brand product, than the factory producing a non-name branded product. Or the evidence that higher end components (aka having a higher price tag) have a greater likelihood of being designed and manufactured to a higher standard. Of course we all want to believe this to be be true and therefore why we shell out more money for a brand sold at the local REI than on Alibaba, but where is the support for these conclusions?
Brand reputation and history is the main evidence. If I buy an S-Works carbon bar I can reasonably expect a high level of quality and safety. If I buy a random unknown, unbranded carbon bar then I can expect nothing. It is a complete lottery.

This principle applies to most products. Sometimes the consequences of poor design and quality are benign and sometimes not. Unknown carbon bars are not something I would personally take a risk on.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 04-26-24, 06:41 AM
  #63  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,295

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

Liked 573 Times in 455 Posts
I can give you a couple of reputable Chinese companies that sell direct to customers online. BTLOS makes excellent carbon rims and wheels. I now have 3 sets of carbon wheels with Bitex hubs that work great. I chose 25mm internal width, hookless with no spoke access holes, so no rim tape required. Yoeleo makes bike frames and integrated handlebars that are priced well and work well. I have two Yoeleo R12 frames that I bought vin 2022. Back then, my custom painted pearl white R12 cost $1215 with seat post and integrated bar/stem, delivered.

btlos.com

​​​​https://www.google.com/search?q=yoel...obile&ie=UTF-8
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 04-26-24, 06:46 AM
  #64  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,607
Liked 12,008 Times in 5,131 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
Brand reputation and history is the main evidence. If I buy an S-Works carbon bar I can reasonably expect a high level of quality and safety. If I buy a random unknown, unbranded carbon bar then I can expect nothing. It is a complete lottery.
That's not really evidence...rather, it's logic.

A name brand has a reputation to protect; one online photo of a broken component might cost them millions in lost sales, and they also have deep pockets in the event of lawsuits. A no-name online seller has no reputation and is largely shielded from litigation. From which company would you rather buy a critical component?
Koyote is online now  
Old 04-26-24, 10:20 AM
  #65  
13ollocks
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 503

Bikes: '00 LS Vortex/Chorus 12/Campag Zondas, '98 LS Classic/Chorus 10/Rolf Vector Pros

Liked 423 Times in 239 Posts
Originally Posted by adlai
So I just installed some carbon handlebars.

Pros: light, there is some flex, slight aero with the tops, does not transmit heat/cool like metal. Internal routing for cables is the most unique feature.

Cons: flex could one day result in breakage, internal routed cables are at odd angles.
GCN did a comparison of a similar pair of handlebars - one Al, the other CF, same manufacturer (can't remember the specifics - TTT or similar), and tested at the manufacturers's facility on a rig that tested fatigue (100,000s low-weight flexes) and strength (increasingly large "hits" with heavier weights). N = 2, so take it for what it's worth, but the end result was that the CF had higher fatigue resistance (Al failed after several 100,000 flexes, they eventually gave up flexing the CF bar) but the Al could take bigger hits without failing. Based on that, I would value fatigue resistance over absolute strength - if my CF bar takes a big enough hit to break it, the chances are that I have more immediate concerns than "oh dear, I broke my handlebar...."

Last edited by 13ollocks; 04-26-24 at 10:27 AM.
13ollocks is offline  
Old 04-26-24, 11:09 AM
  #66  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,874

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Liked 1,617 Times in 1,064 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
I can give you a couple of reputable Chinese companies that sell direct to customers online. BTLOS makes excellent carbon rims and wheels. I now have 3 sets of carbon wheels with Bitex hubs that work great. I chose 25mm internal width, hookless with no spoke access holes, so no rim tape required. Yoeleo makes bike frames and integrated handlebars that are priced well and work well. I have two Yoeleo R12 frames that I bought vin 2022. Back then, my custom painted pearl white R12 cost $1215 with seat post and integrated bar/stem, delivered.
Don't forget Enve (Anta Sports)

Originally Posted by Koyote
That's not really evidence...rather, it's logic.

A name brand has a reputation to protect; one online photo of a broken component might cost them millions in lost sales, and they also have deep pockets in the event of lawsuits. A no-name online seller has no reputation and is largely shielded from litigation. From which company would you rather buy a critical component?
In America, of course you want to buy from whomever a lawsuit would pay off the most.
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 04-26-24, 11:14 AM
  #67  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,607
Liked 12,008 Times in 5,131 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
A name brand has a reputation to protect; one online photo of a broken component might cost them millions in lost sales, and they also have deep pockets in the event of lawsuits. A no-name online seller has no reputation and is largely shielded from litigation. From which company would you rather buy a critical component?
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
In America, of course you want to buy from whomever a lawsuit would pay off the most.
I don't know whether this is just a cynical observation or you missed the point -- which is that such a company actually has something to protect (assets and reputation), and thus is more likely to do its due diligence before bringing a product to market. So, you're not buying the product in the hope of suing the company, but rather you're buying it precisely because of the lower likelihood of having a problem.
Koyote is online now  
Likes For Koyote:
Old 04-26-24, 11:36 AM
  #68  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 10,053
Liked 5,950 Times in 3,665 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
I don't know whether this is just a cynical observation or you missed the point -- which is that such a company actually has something to protect (assets and reputation), and thus is more likely to do its due diligence before bringing a product to market. So, you're not buying the product in the hope of suing the company, but rather you're buying it precisely because of the lower likelihood of having a problem.
Yeah, when I buy products I look for proven quality and usually avoid random unbranded gear unless it is something trivial. I’ve never had to sue using this basic principle.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 04-26-24, 12:53 PM
  #69  
shelbyfv
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 12,591
Liked 6,520 Times in 3,292 Posts
Originally Posted by 13ollocks
I would value fatigue resistance over absolute strength - if my CF bar takes a big enough hit to break it, the chances are that I have more immediate concerns than "oh dear, I broke my handlebar...."
Just to complicate things a bit, remember that specific sharp impacts that would not harm alloy can damage carbon. Think of a kid knocking over a bike in a garage or a parked bike falling over onto a curb. And remember that damage to carbon does not have to be obvious. If you drop your bike, you have to decide how lucky you feel because you won't be able to determine if the bar is damaged. As I understand it, that's the primary reason to avoid used carbon of unknown provenance. Anyway, just another thing to consider.
shelbyfv is offline  
Likes For shelbyfv:
Old 04-26-24, 01:14 PM
  #70  
smd4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 6,451

Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa

Liked 3,379 Times in 2,033 Posts
The only carbon on my bike is in the steel.
smd4 is offline  
Old 04-26-24, 01:39 PM
  #71  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,569

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Liked 13,389 Times in 6,896 Posts
Originally Posted by smd4
The only carbon on my bike is in the steel.
So, you go not only tubeless, but tireless?
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is online now  
Old 04-26-24, 01:41 PM
  #72  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,569

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Liked 13,389 Times in 6,896 Posts
Originally Posted by hidetaka
Yeah, cheap stuff is flexy garbage, expensive parts have engineered compliance for rider comfort and safety.
Pigs sweat, gentlemen perspire
Turns out, pigs don't sweat at all. No functional sweat glands. Hence, wallowing in mud.

/pedant
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is online now  
Old 04-26-24, 01:41 PM
  #73  
smd4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 6,451

Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa

Liked 3,379 Times in 2,033 Posts
Originally Posted by genejockey
So, you go not only tubeless, but tireless?
It's a joke, son.
smd4 is offline  
Old 04-26-24, 01:43 PM
  #74  
adlai
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 819
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
Update: cable snapped. Right at the metal retaining head.

This was definitely because of the cabling setup. I'll have to redo it.

My solution now is to simply use a Dremel rotary tool and drill out part of the arsis shifter so the cable routes more easily.

With this mod of the shifter, the cable hosing slides into the carbon bars easily.
adlai is offline  
Old 04-26-24, 01:46 PM
  #75  
adlai
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 819
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
I think the Chinese manufacturers have every incentive to make safe products. While they may not be able to be sued, bad quality unsafe products will be publicized on the internet. And basic desire to make a good product. Etc.

Unless the major brands are also running these parts through an ultrasound machine, how would their qc be much better?
adlai is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.