How much did you pay for your road bike?
#26
Senior Member
I allocate 4% of my time cycling and thus prepare to dedicate an equivalent percentage of income. Typically, I replace my bikes every four years, but since I buy quality and sell the old ones after purchasing replacements, I only need to fund the depreciation; I maintain a rotation schedule for two bikes. Although I have a few extra bikes, they are not factored into my budget calculations as they've already been paid for. I amortize the depreciation over the four years, forming the basis of my bicycle budget framework.
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
#27
For me it’s around £5k for a new bike. That seems to be about the sweet spot for a desirable build without going nuts on marginal gains or bling.
Likes For PeteHski:
#28
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,626
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2022 Trek Supercaliber, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Liked 8,957 Times
in
4,199 Posts
I allocate 4% of my time cycling and thus prepare to dedicate an equivalent percentage of income. Typically, I replace my bikes every four years, but since I buy quality and sell the old ones after purchasing replacements, I only need to fund the depreciation; I maintain a rotation schedule for two bikes. Although I have a few extra bikes, they are not factored into my budget calculations as they've already been paid for. I amortize the depreciation over the four years, forming the basis of my bicycle budget framework.
Can I count my time on BF and other time I spend thinking about bikes as part of my "cycling time" calculation? If so, my wife may not be so fond of the hit to our family funds.
__________________
Platypus gravelus.
Platypus gravelus.
Likes For Eric F:
#29
Followed by the assertion that you'd pay $10,000 for a bike if you could.
That's why I asked, but it's fine.
For me, my bike purchases are all about my personal enjoyment. They serve my needs for the way I want to ride, and the way I want my bike to perform. I buy bikes that are exciting to me (even just to look at), and inspire me to want to ride. My bikes excite me in the same way sports cars do. I have bought used high-end bikes because I can get a better bike (lighter, higher-quality components, better wheels) for a lot less money than buying new. This is primarily budget-driven. I have nothing against new bikes. I also could not care less about making any kind of profit, because I don't ever buy a bike with the intent to sell it.
My 3 most-ridden bikes were all purchased used, at less than half of their original cost. However, I didn't know what I didn't know about gravel bikes, so I jumped in on a used bike that was a very good deal, started to figure out what I liked and didn't like, and began replacing things. I eventually ended up replacing everything, including the frame, and spent new-bike money doing it, but I ended up with a bike that is perfect in all the little details that make a difference in my enjoyment of the ride. I don't care that I probably could have done it a cheaper way. The learning process that went on during the process is also valuable to me.
My 3 most-ridden bikes were all purchased used, at less than half of their original cost. However, I didn't know what I didn't know about gravel bikes, so I jumped in on a used bike that was a very good deal, started to figure out what I liked and didn't like, and began replacing things. I eventually ended up replacing everything, including the frame, and spent new-bike money doing it, but I ended up with a bike that is perfect in all the little details that make a difference in my enjoyment of the ride. I don't care that I probably could have done it a cheaper way. The learning process that went on during the process is also valuable to me.
It was your assumption about an expensive bike's performance benefits and ability to challenge oneself physically that I thought might've been a little questionable.
Do you agree with [MENTION=89773]TMonk[/MENTION] and I that the point of diminishing returns is probably below even 5K?
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,496
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,298 Times
in
3,298 Posts
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,496
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,298 Times
in
3,298 Posts
#32
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,699 Times
in
1,166 Posts
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#33
Senior Member
As I've written before, it's a very childish sort of egocentrism -- to judge other people's values, preferences, priorities...To fail to even understand the rather obvious fact that some people have more money than you do, and that it buys them more expensive stuff.
Likes For Koyote:
#34
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,626
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2022 Trek Supercaliber, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Liked 8,957 Times
in
4,199 Posts
Sure, but you explicitly stated that you ride expensive bikes because they get the most out of you in terms of physical fitness.
Followed by the assertion that you'd pay $10,000 for a bike if you could.
That's why I asked, but it's fine.
Yeah I get the personal enjoyment part, I can certainly agree with that, hypothetically.
It was your assumption about an expensive bike's performance benefits and ability to challenge oneself physically that I thought might've been a little questionable.
Do you agree with [MENTION=89773]TMonk[/MENTION] and I that the point of diminishing returns is probably below even 5K?
Followed by the assertion that you'd pay $10,000 for a bike if you could.
That's why I asked, but it's fine.
Yeah I get the personal enjoyment part, I can certainly agree with that, hypothetically.
It was your assumption about an expensive bike's performance benefits and ability to challenge oneself physically that I thought might've been a little questionable.
Do you agree with [MENTION=89773]TMonk[/MENTION] and I that the point of diminishing returns is probably below even 5K?
I tend to agree with TMonk about most bike-related things, including his assessment about the tipping point on diminishing returns.
EDIT: I would buy a $10k bike. Not because I think it will make me X amount faster, but because that bike excites me, is a joy to ride, and serves my needs for how I want to ride. Right now, that bike would be a Time Alpe d'Huez with Dura Ace Di2 and Enve 4.5 wheels. It is unlikely that I will ever own that bike.
__________________
Platypus gravelus.
Platypus gravelus.
Last edited by Eric F; 05-01-24 at 03:13 PM.
#35
Senior Member
A high-quality bike is going to be light, efficient, and designed with the intent of being ridden hard and fast. It will inspire confidence, and perform reliably and predictably under high-demand conditions. Although I'm not as strong and fast as I used to be, the former racer-boy in me isn't dead, and I still enjoy riding at/near the limits of what I'm capable of. Yes, a bike that costs less than the ones I have might also serve me adequately, with measurable performance differences being minimal, if any. However, I don't buy bikes to serve only a performance level desire. I buy them because they excite me, as well as the fact that I've been doing this long enough to recognize, appreciate, and enjoy the differences between decent and excellent.
I tend to agree with TMonk about most bike-related things, including his assessment about the tipping point on diminishing returns.
EDIT: I would buy a $10k bike. Not because I think it will make me X amount faster, but because that bike excites me, is a joy to ride, and serves my needs for how I want to ride. Right now, that bike would be a Time Alpe d'Huez with Dura Ace Di2 and Enve 4.5 wheels. It is unlikely that I will ever own that bike.
I tend to agree with TMonk about most bike-related things, including his assessment about the tipping point on diminishing returns.
EDIT: I would buy a $10k bike. Not because I think it will make me X amount faster, but because that bike excites me, is a joy to ride, and serves my needs for how I want to ride. Right now, that bike would be a Time Alpe d'Huez with Dura Ace Di2 and Enve 4.5 wheels. It is unlikely that I will ever own that bike.
It's like another semi-regular argument that popped up again earlier today, in which people who've never tried anything nicer than a $70 Pearl Izumi club fit jersey absolutely insist that the $20 Amazon jerseys are just as good as the $200 offerings from Assos and Rapha and the like, and that anyone who buys the expensive ones has been duped.
I mean, really. If someone said to me, "I've never had sex, but I think it's probably not all that great," I'd laugh until I fell on the floor. And yet, regularly here on bf, people tell us "I haven't tried _____, but I know it's not worth the price, and the rest of you are foolish for buying it."
Likes For Koyote:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,768
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,844 Times
in
1,182 Posts
Well I dont know how long you have been riding or what you have been ridding. If you are completely new to the sport then I would say get a 300 USD Road Bike. Ride it a year and then decide what you want to invest in.
If you are experienced and have been riding for a while then you already know what ya want, so get off the pot...
If you are experienced and have been riding for a while then you already know what ya want, so get off the pot...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#37
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,340
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Liked 1,874 Times
in
1,063 Posts
I love the assumption that I paid for my road bike as if it were a bought commodity item. A better question would be how much I spent on my road bike. I have only ever purchased 2 bikes at a store. One was a last season hold over bought at a 50% discount totaling $600 after tax with helmet & pedals. The other cost $6000 dollars. I still own both & neither remained in store bought configuration for long.
The $600 one is hanging in my garage rafters with a crack at the chain stay bridge. I've probably cycled $10,000 dollars of income (hyperbole?) through that frame set in one form or another over the years. The $6000 one lives on the Zwift trainer with an untold amount of ridiculous weight weenie upgrades. It weighs in the 13 pound range.
Blowing $50,000 in a decade on bikes is still cheaper than financing one moderately priced car. TBH, I'd rather have a bike instead of some equivalent cost "Sat/Nav entertainment package" option any day.
The $600 one is hanging in my garage rafters with a crack at the chain stay bridge. I've probably cycled $10,000 dollars of income (hyperbole?) through that frame set in one form or another over the years. The $6000 one lives on the Zwift trainer with an untold amount of ridiculous weight weenie upgrades. It weighs in the 13 pound range.
Blowing $50,000 in a decade on bikes is still cheaper than financing one moderately priced car. TBH, I'd rather have a bike instead of some equivalent cost "Sat/Nav entertainment package" option any day.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#38
Senior Member
I'm just wondering, you self-admittedly ride bikes to push the limit of what your body is capable of, but do you believe that a bike in your budget range, let's say $5,000, would help you achieve quantifiably better fitness results than a $2,000 bike could?
Did I say that?
For me it's not about enjoyment, but profitability and value.
I am talking about used bikes, but $2000 is a threshold where I believe that the performance levels of certain bike parts and their cost/benefit ratio starts to reach a point of diminishing returns.
Of course you can spend $10,000 on a road bike, but the question for me personally would be whether there is an actual, justifiable performance advantage compared to a more cost effective solution. And the answer is no, in my opinion.
Did I say that?
For me it's not about enjoyment, but profitability and value.
I am talking about used bikes, but $2000 is a threshold where I believe that the performance levels of certain bike parts and their cost/benefit ratio starts to reach a point of diminishing returns.
Of course you can spend $10,000 on a road bike, but the question for me personally would be whether there is an actual, justifiable performance advantage compared to a more cost effective solution. And the answer is no, in my opinion.
Depends on the car. My Miata is 24 years old and it's extremely low maintenance. Watch it blow a gasket, now that I said that.
It also depends on one's standards. For example:
I guess you mean 'vintage [something besides Japanese] cars'.
It also depends on one's standards. For example:
- the power windows are pretty draggy and slow on my Miata, but they keep working, so I left it alone.
- I think the shift boot is shot, as I can feel some heat getting through
- It weeps a bit from the front main seal; maybe a cup every 10,000 miles
- The oil temp gauge is frozen in one place.
I guess you mean 'vintage [something besides Japanese] cars'.
I love the assumption that I paid for my road bike as if it were a bought commodity item. A better question would be how much I spent on my road bike. I have only ever purchased 2 bikes at a store. One was a last season hold over bought at a 50% discount totaling $600 after tax with helmet & pedals. The other cost $6000 dollars. I still own both & neither remained in store bought configuration for long.
The $600 one is hanging in my garage rafters with a crack at the chain stay bridge. I've probably cycled $10,000 dollars of income (hyperbole?) through that frame set in one form or another over the years. The $6000 one lives on the Zwift trainer with an untold amount of ridiculous weight weenie upgrades. It weighs in the 13 pound range.
Blowing $50,000 in a decade on bikes is still cheaper than financing one moderately priced car. TBH, I'd rather have a bike instead of some equivalent cost "Sat/Nav entertainment package" option any day.
The $600 one is hanging in my garage rafters with a crack at the chain stay bridge. I've probably cycled $10,000 dollars of income (hyperbole?) through that frame set in one form or another over the years. The $6000 one lives on the Zwift trainer with an untold amount of ridiculous weight weenie upgrades. It weighs in the 13 pound range.
Blowing $50,000 in a decade on bikes is still cheaper than financing one moderately priced car. TBH, I'd rather have a bike instead of some equivalent cost "Sat/Nav entertainment package" option any day.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#39
Banned
From what's been posted, it doesn't seem OP actually rides a bike of any price. IIRC he said he flips mostly mtbs and had no experience with road bikes until he bought the one he's currently trying to flip.
#40
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,699 Times
in
1,166 Posts
OP has most likely not, because he would rather spend the money to play video games or mine BitCoin; see below:
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#41
Full Member
My bike collection ranges from $3,700USD to $12,000USD. I'm not a racer, just a weekend warrior. Some were bikes that I simply wanted in my "stable" and some that made me want to ride more. My wife spends money on golf and I spend on bikes and nice cars.
Likes For DUHI4GOT:
#42
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,475
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Liked 893 Times
in
458 Posts
So we can actually graph this out following the concept of marginal utility. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that the return for increased spending gets steep above $5000. That is only part of the equation.
The next part is what those funds not spent on a bike could be spent upon,and the utility from such expenditure.
On a micro level, if you are struggling to pay buy groceries, the utility of buying another pound of hamburger greatly exceeds shaving 50 grams off your bike.
However, if you have everything you need, and most of what you want, that 50 grams could be worth a few bucks.
On a micro level, you can’t judge for a person in who’s shoes you do not walk
On a macro level, the market sorts it out.
The next part is what those funds not spent on a bike could be spent upon,and the utility from such expenditure.
On a micro level, if you are struggling to pay buy groceries, the utility of buying another pound of hamburger greatly exceeds shaving 50 grams off your bike.
However, if you have everything you need, and most of what you want, that 50 grams could be worth a few bucks.
On a micro level, you can’t judge for a person in who’s shoes you do not walk
On a macro level, the market sorts it out.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
Likes For merlinextraligh:
#43
Senior Member
So we can actually graph this out following the concept of marginal utility. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that the return for increased spending gets steep above $5000. That is only part of the equation.
The next part is what those funds not spent on a bike could be spent upon,and the utility from such expenditure.
On a micro level, if you are struggling to pay buy groceries, the utility of buying another pound of hamburger greatly exceeds shaving 50 grams off your bike.
However, if you have everything you need, and most of what you want, that 50 grams could be worth a few bucks.
On a micro level, you can’t judge for a person in who’s shoes you do not walk
On a macro level, the market sorts it out.
The next part is what those funds not spent on a bike could be spent upon,and the utility from such expenditure.
On a micro level, if you are struggling to pay buy groceries, the utility of buying another pound of hamburger greatly exceeds shaving 50 grams off your bike.
However, if you have everything you need, and most of what you want, that 50 grams could be worth a few bucks.
On a micro level, you can’t judge for a person in who’s shoes you do not walk
On a macro level, the market sorts it out.
Though I must offer one correction: individual markets are still considered the micro level, not macro. You can see that by perusing the table of contents of any intro level text. Trivial detail in this context, obviously.
Likes For Koyote:
#44
Senior Member
I mean, really. If someone said to me, "I've never had sex, but I think it's probably not all that great," I'd laugh until I fell on the floor. And yet, regularly here on bf, people tell us "I haven't tried _____, but I know it's not worth the price, and the rest of you are foolish for buying it."
#45
Senior Member
God bless the rich people. They supply the used market. Darn near every cool thing I own once belonged to someone wealthier than I.
Likes For ScottCommutes:
#46
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 429
Bikes: '00 LS Vortex/Chorus 12/Campag Zondas, '98 LS Classic/Chorus 10/Rolf Vector Pros
Liked 366 Times
in
209 Posts
I allocate 4% of my time cycling and thus prepare to dedicate an equivalent percentage of income. Typically, I replace my bikes every four years, but since I buy quality and sell the old ones after purchasing replacements, I only need to fund the depreciation; I maintain a rotation schedule for two bikes. Although I have a few extra bikes, they are not factored into my budget calculations as they've already been paid for. I amortize the depreciation over the four years, forming the basis of my bicycle budget framework.
Likes For 13ollocks:
#47
Senior Member
My main bike, a Trek Domane SLR 7, with my power meter pedals, radar, lights and cycling computer is right around $10,000 and worth every penny of it, to me.
Pretty much any additional amount of money you spend on a bike is going to be diminishing returns. At least if the baseline bike functions to some degree. And that's true of just about any product. Value is also subjective. Some put more value on least expensive now, others on least expensive over time. Some value features more or less than others. No one calculation is the right answer for all people.
It's obvious that someone in a 3rd world country making say $1,000 year or whatever would think spending $10,000 on a bike to be absolute insanity. And from their perspective, I would completely agree.
I could have spent something like $4,000 more and got my Domane with the Dura-Ace groupset and higher-end wheels. But, I chose not to. So, I drew my line there.
But I also drive a 22 year-old Toyota Tundra pickup, that has less paint on it every year. I could afford to buy a new truck, but the one I have works just fine (only 65,000 miles), though it is starting to look pretty crappy. I put more miles on my bike than my truck. Plenty of people would have bought a new vehicle before spending thousands on a bike.
I could probably have spent about half or less than what I did on my bike, and had 95-99% of the same speed (performance). But I like the Ultegra Di2 electronic groupset, I like the lighter SLR frame, I like the custom paint color.
I'm not some multi-gazillionaire, but I'm retired, my house is paid for, and the only difference the money I spend on bikes is going to make is how much money my kids get when I'm dead.
Pretty much any additional amount of money you spend on a bike is going to be diminishing returns. At least if the baseline bike functions to some degree. And that's true of just about any product. Value is also subjective. Some put more value on least expensive now, others on least expensive over time. Some value features more or less than others. No one calculation is the right answer for all people.
It's obvious that someone in a 3rd world country making say $1,000 year or whatever would think spending $10,000 on a bike to be absolute insanity. And from their perspective, I would completely agree.
I could have spent something like $4,000 more and got my Domane with the Dura-Ace groupset and higher-end wheels. But, I chose not to. So, I drew my line there.
But I also drive a 22 year-old Toyota Tundra pickup, that has less paint on it every year. I could afford to buy a new truck, but the one I have works just fine (only 65,000 miles), though it is starting to look pretty crappy. I put more miles on my bike than my truck. Plenty of people would have bought a new vehicle before spending thousands on a bike.
I could probably have spent about half or less than what I did on my bike, and had 95-99% of the same speed (performance). But I like the Ultegra Di2 electronic groupset, I like the lighter SLR frame, I like the custom paint color.
I'm not some multi-gazillionaire, but I'm retired, my house is paid for, and the only difference the money I spend on bikes is going to make is how much money my kids get when I'm dead.
Likes For Mtracer:
#48
You obviously remember your microeconomics course. Along with utility and marginal utility, you're applying the concept of opportunity cost -- which essentially suggests that a $10,000 bike costs different amounts for different consumers. That's one of the key factors that many of these scolding posters don't recognize: to someone who has substantial net worth, buying a $10k bike is no big deal because it doesn't require giving up anything else that is deemed essential or even important.
Though I must offer one correction: individual markets are still considered the micro level, not macro. You can see that by perusing the table of contents of any intro level text. Trivial detail in this context, obviously.
Though I must offer one correction: individual markets are still considered the micro level, not macro. You can see that by perusing the table of contents of any intro level text. Trivial detail in this context, obviously.
What actually stops me from spending £15k on a top tier bike is my self-consciousness. As an average, middle-aged British sportive rider, do I really want to rock up on a £15k S-Works or Pinarello? I just feel more at ease on a £4.5k Canyon Endurace. We are all different in that way and there is no right or wrong.
Likes For PeteHski:
Likes For seypat:
#50
Pre-pandemic, 2000 was probably not a bad spot to claim a decent performance bike after which returns would drop off faster than it might be worth. Currently I think its about 4k but you probably have to shop around to get the best deals. For 4k I got a trek cross frameset, 12sp force wireless, and king wheelset custom built with lightbicycle rims along with the rest of the parts needed to make a functioning bike.
My moderately priced car is now 10 years old, has 178k miles, was new off the floor and only 28k with interest by the end of the loan period. Only wish I'd paid that little for bikes over the same time period. If it was for just me I'd have been able to keep it under that but with bikes for the whole family I've blown past my car "investment" but the car is still going so there is that.
I remember my dad taking us to Walmart for our very first bikes and we loved it. Nowadays, your kids are telling you about which freehubs to get for their light gravel bike.
So we can actually graph this out following the concept of marginal utility. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that the return for increased spending gets steep above $5000. That is only part of the equation.
The next part is what those funds not spent on a bike could be spent upon,and the utility from such expenditure.
On a micro level, if you are struggling to pay buy groceries, the utility of buying another pound of hamburger greatly exceeds shaving 50 grams off your bike.
However, if you have everything you need, and most of what you want, that 50 grams could be worth a few bucks.
On a micro level, you can’t judge for a person in who’s shoes you do not walk
On a macro level, the market sorts it out.
The next part is what those funds not spent on a bike could be spent upon,and the utility from such expenditure.
On a micro level, if you are struggling to pay buy groceries, the utility of buying another pound of hamburger greatly exceeds shaving 50 grams off your bike.
However, if you have everything you need, and most of what you want, that 50 grams could be worth a few bucks.
On a micro level, you can’t judge for a person in who’s shoes you do not walk
On a macro level, the market sorts it out.
I understand what you mean, but I still wonder if you can articulate what it is in particular that makes a 10K bike worth every penny for you, which couldn't be achieved with a more cost efficient solution.