Chain lube
#26
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 6,357
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Liked 3,313 Times
in
1,992 Posts
#28
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: So. California
Posts: 311
Bikes: Gary Fisher Advance (1993, heavily modded); Fuji Absolute 2.0 (2010; modded); 1989 Miyata 512 (58cm; $50, thrift buy); KHS Classic (63cm, 12-spd); Schwinn World Sport (58cm); Schwinn Voyageur (58cm); 1987 Centurion Ironman (60cm); etc.
Liked 48 Times
in
32 Posts
WD40 dry lube
WD40 dry lube (ptfe).
This is my go-to lube.
This is my go-to lube.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,830
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Liked 676 Times
in
463 Posts
Do a search "bar and chain lube" and lots come up over the years like this one "https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-mechanics/929173-homebrew-diy-chain-lube-users-storage-application.html".
Likes For easyupbug:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,895
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Liked 2,709 Times
in
1,458 Posts
expensive - but reduced maintenance to just about nothing and last almost forever … just replace the counter shaft sprocket now and then
Likes For t2p:
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,830
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Liked 676 Times
in
463 Posts
Other than being messy on the bike and needing a little OMS to thin it is a great chain lube and very economical, many of us had our own homebrew formulas. I don't wax but with all do respect to Zero Friction over the years I also used Chain-L, Rock and Roll, etc. and found that there is not much difference other than cost to apply and frequency of needed application. As I retired with a 5 gal bucket mostly full of industrial open chain lube which is used on very expensive drag chains moving millions of tons of crushed/powdered ore I have been using it. It's viscosity is very low so rather than drop by drop slow application I run the bottle spout down the chain rollers quickly. It is working out well and is amazingly clean after wiping the chain down with a rag over several revolutions and literally takes a couple mins at the very most. I have too many bikes to keep accurate logs but am happy with chain life as best I can tell.
#33
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,078
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 508 Times
in
262 Posts
One problem that kept coming up was riders not lubing their chain and it breaking under load. We all learned early how to replace the upper and lower sections of the crankcase. On Goldwing it seemed the chain would hit exactly where the 2 case sections met so both would need replacing.
#34
Senior Member
Don't let the chain lube choices dazzle you with wondering which is best. Just use the lube that makes sense to you. If you find you don't like something about it, then change to some other type.
Some don't need to be used as frequently. Some do a tad better in the wet. Some will help keep your chain cleaner than others. I don't know that any give significantly greater chain life.
Some don't need to be used as frequently. Some do a tad better in the wet. Some will help keep your chain cleaner than others. I don't know that any give significantly greater chain life.
Lube is good; no lube is bad
Likes For Camilo:
#35
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Liked 1,611 Times
in
1,059 Posts
I have been using White Lightning chain lube, either Clean Ride or Easy Ride. Honestly I didn’t notice they have several types.
One they have is Epic Ride. This one isn’t a wax lube. It’s a synthetic.
I was reading their descriptions and White Lightning makes all of their products sound great.
Is the Epic better or worse than the others or just different?
I don’t ride in dirt, mud or gravel-just on the street or a paved trail. I try hard to avoid riding in rain. Given all this does it even matter what I use?
One they have is Epic Ride. This one isn’t a wax lube. It’s a synthetic.
I was reading their descriptions and White Lightning makes all of their products sound great.
Is the Epic better or worse than the others or just different?
I don’t ride in dirt, mud or gravel-just on the street or a paved trail. I try hard to avoid riding in rain. Given all this does it even matter what I use?
Likes For Sy Reene:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,496
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,298 Times
in
3,298 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#37
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Montréal
Posts: 321
Bikes: Hardrock touring bike
Liked 129 Times
in
85 Posts
This discussion led me to reading this very long critique / comparison / test analysis, which I imagine a lot of you have already seen :
from Zero Friction Cycling
from Zero Friction Cycling
Likes For Paul_P:
#38
We were riding and working on them from the mid to late ‘60s through the ‘80s. The chains then were pretty basic.
One problem that kept coming up was riders not lubing their chain and it breaking under load. We all learned early how to replace the upper and lower sections of the crankcase. On Goldwing it seemed the chain would hit exactly where the 2 case sections met so both would need replacing.
One problem that kept coming up was riders not lubing their chain and it breaking under load. We all learned early how to replace the upper and lower sections of the crankcase. On Goldwing it seemed the chain would hit exactly where the 2 case sections met so both would need replacing.
Likes For phughes:
#39
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,078
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 508 Times
in
262 Posts
What are you even talking about? The Goldwing is a shaft driven bike. No chain, unless you are referring to the primary drive chain? Camshaft chain? Neither of which are something you are lubing like you would an external drive chain. Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
Likes For pepperbelly:
#40
Likes For phughes:
Likes For pepperbelly:
Likes For pepperbelly:
#43
#44
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 41,027
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Liked 3,015 Times
in
1,710 Posts
I've used many kinds of chain lube. I have been somewhat satisfied with all of them, ATF, even chainsaw/bar or whatever it's called, and even classic WD-40. None of them is perfect. Lately, I use Chain-L.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#46
Senior Member
Chain lubes is like comparing beers. My beer is the best, no MY beer is the best. The best beer is the one you like.
There was a fairly scientific study done comparing the various lubes. Some of the results were expected and some unexpected results. I use both a wax-based lube on some bikes and an oil-based lube on others. I like both.
There was a fairly scientific study done comparing the various lubes. Some of the results were expected and some unexpected results. I use both a wax-based lube on some bikes and an oil-based lube on others. I like both.
Likes For drlogik:
#47
It should be noted the test protocol used in these tests, vastly favors melt on wax or lubes that doesnt attract too much grit and sand. - Because it involves relubing on average every 200km (simulated) without any cleaning what so ever. He just adds more lube on top of old lube and added sand etc. Melt on wax will sort of clean the chain where liquid oil will not. Imo its a bit underhanded that with the drip on lubes no effort what so ever is done to clean the chain as opposed so removing, melt lube and replace the chain with melt on wax. If the chain survives to the end it amounts to removing and replacing the chain 30 times for melt wax vs zero cleaning or other maintenance for drip lubes.
That said Epict ride may be terrible, I dunno. Just commenting the test protocol highly favors some lubes and the results are likely only replicated IRL, if you copy that. If on the other hand you spend a similar amount of time taking cafe of a drip lubed chain, the results wouldn't be as dramatic.
That said Epict ride may be terrible, I dunno. Just commenting the test protocol highly favors some lubes and the results are likely only replicated IRL, if you copy that. If on the other hand you spend a similar amount of time taking cafe of a drip lubed chain, the results wouldn't be as dramatic.
Last edited by Racing Dan; 05-26-24 at 08:29 AM.
Likes For Racing Dan:
#48
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,700
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Liked 4,537 Times
in
2,522 Posts
Chain lubes is like comparing beers. My beer is the best, no MY beer is the best. The best beer is the one you like.
There was a fairly scientific study done comparing the various lubes. Some of the results were expected and some unexpected results. I use both a wax-based lube on some bikes and an oil-based lube on others. I like both.
There was a fairly scientific study done comparing the various lubes. Some of the results were expected and some unexpected results. I use both a wax-based lube on some bikes and an oil-based lube on others. I like both.
To put the differences into perspective, 75W of power is needed to propel a bike at 12mph. A 5W loss is 7% of the power and a 9W loss is 1.2% of the power. At 18mph, the power need is about doubled and the percentage power loss due to the chain lube is about halved. It doesn’t make as much difference as people seem to think.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#49
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,078
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 508 Times
in
262 Posts
I was asking more for chain life than power loss. If wax based lubes attract and hold less dirt and grit that is what I will use. It doesn’t matter to me if I need to lube more often.
I will stay with White Lightning Clean or Easy Ride.
Now to really stir things up here-how often should I clean my chain and how?
I will stay with White Lightning Clean or Easy Ride.
Now to really stir things up here-how often should I clean my chain and how?
#50
Addition to #47
you also have to question the validity of some of the posted wear percentages. Frequently zfc posts figures in the 0-1% range. Meaning 0--1% of the wear allowance that is in itself 0.5% elongation vs a new chain.
Now tell me what lab grade equipment he uses to measure say 0.3% of 0.5% chain elongation. on a 110 link chain that would amount to 0.003 x 0.005 x 110 x 0.5 = 0.000825" or just shy of of thou measured over almost 4 feet.
Sure buddy! :-)
you also have to question the validity of some of the posted wear percentages. Frequently zfc posts figures in the 0-1% range. Meaning 0--1% of the wear allowance that is in itself 0.5% elongation vs a new chain.
Now tell me what lab grade equipment he uses to measure say 0.3% of 0.5% chain elongation. on a 110 link chain that would amount to 0.003 x 0.005 x 110 x 0.5 = 0.000825" or just shy of of thou measured over almost 4 feet.
Sure buddy! :-)
Likes For Racing Dan: