Woman hit by three cars in Palo Alto
#26
Cantilever believer
As someone who has operated bicycles with rather bright lights for 40+ years*, and motor vehicles with full SAE warning light systems for nearly that long, all I can say is that increasing conspicuity can help - but only if the approaching road user is focused on the driving/riding task. Unfortunately, it seems the trend hasn't been positive in this regard in recent years. My observation when Arizona passed their driver handheld cell ban was that drivers just moved the phone below window level when continuing to use it. Now they just hold it in plain sight in the expectation of minimal to nonexistent traffic enforcement. :\
*I still have a Belt Beacon, but 9 volt batteries aren't cheap...
*I still have a Belt Beacon, but 9 volt batteries aren't cheap...
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
#27
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,568
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Liked 356 Times
in
237 Posts
I have no idea what happened to the victim or why, just agreeing with the OP on following traffic rules (laws) to the letter no matter what. That is "decidedly dangerous" and unnecessary in many instances, and just adds to the danger baked into the situation of being the slower, more delicate road user.
Likes For JoeyBike:
#28
Senior Member
This happened like a week after another cyclist got killed in the next town over, Los Altos on a popular biking road. Probably not even 10 miles away.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,971
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200, Soma double cross 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball, Waterford rs11
Liked 3,054 Times
in
1,388 Posts
I do whatever it takes to be safe. That accident looks like a whole lot of inattentiveness going on. After years of commuting it really comes down to being seen. The guy who ran up my butt in his Mercedes said he never saw me, as he looked at my high vis work vest and flashing red beacon on the totalled bike.
#30
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,947
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Liked 6,608 Times
in
3,342 Posts
As someone who has operated bicycles with rather bright lights for 40+ years*, and motor vehicles with full SAE warning light systems for nearly that long, all I can say is that increasing conspicuity can help - but only if the approaching road user is focused on the driving/riding task. Unfortunately, it seems the trend hasn't been positive in this regard in recent years. My observation when Arizona passed their driver handheld cell ban was that drivers just moved the phone below window level when continuing to use it. Now they just hold it in plain sight in the expectation of minimal to nonexistent traffic enforcement. :\
*I still have a Belt Beacon, but 9 volt batteries aren't cheap...
*I still have a Belt Beacon, but 9 volt batteries aren't cheap...
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
#31
Senior Member
For you lot advocating increased visibility as a method for dealing with cars, you should keep in mind that the professional urban riders (delivery boys and girls) tend not to use lights. Some of my shifts ended at 3 am, and none of my coworkers used lights.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,496
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,298 Times
in
3,298 Posts
Why should we care about the cycling habits of a group known for reckless and dangerous behavior?
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,971
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200, Soma double cross 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball, Waterford rs11
Liked 3,054 Times
in
1,388 Posts
Well, if you compared their accident rate to those that ride daily with lights and reflective clothing you might see some percentage differences. I'm going to guess messengers have been in a few more.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,496
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,298 Times
in
3,298 Posts
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,971
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200, Soma double cross 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball, Waterford rs11
Liked 3,054 Times
in
1,388 Posts
I know. I was never in an accident, well, until I was.
#36
Senior Member
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,496
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,298 Times
in
3,298 Posts
I know several people that are into free-soloing, but their climbing experience doesn't make them good examples of safe climbing techniques. You're still safer climbing with a rope, and you're still safer riding at night with a light.
#39
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,118
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,648 Times
in
1,110 Posts
So you say. Any evidence ( besides the hot air emitted from a handful of self-deluded bicycling gas bags) that bicycle delivery boys and girls as a group are more experienced (whatever that means), or more adept at dealing with traffic (whatever that means) than any other group of bicyclists who regularly rides or has regularly ridden in urban traffic?
Likes For I-Like-To-Bike:
#40
Senior Member
So you say. Any evidence ( besides the hot air emitted from a handful of self-deluded bicycling gas bags) that bicycle delivery boys and girls as a group are more experienced (whatever that means), or more adept at dealing with traffic (whatever that means) than any other group of bicyclists who regularly rides or has regularly ridden in urban traffic?
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,496
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,298 Times
in
3,298 Posts
You seem to be implying that lights do not increase visibility, based on the idea that "professional urban riders" often do not use lights. That's faulty logic, much like arguing that seat belts don't improve crash survivability because delivery drivers often don't use them.
#42
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 46,006
Bikes: everywhere
Liked 8,529 Times
in
4,544 Posts
#43
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,118
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,648 Times
in
1,110 Posts
You seem to be implying that lights do not increase visibility, based on the idea that "professional urban riders" often do not use lights. That's faulty logic, much like arguing that seat belts don't improve crash survivability because delivery drivers often don't use them.
Habitual drunken drivers have been known to make the same argument.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,570
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Liked 368 Times
in
274 Posts
It was DARK and RAINING. More lights = more GLARE. Ever passed emergency lights flashing all over??
Yah, I don't see any scenario why car #1 would be going full speed into the girl on a bike, with at least the 2 oncoming cars blocking progress.
The news video with the unhelpful LAB prognosticator, was pointing out a "Green Box" that wasn't green, in front of the turn lane. That's supposed to make somebody safer?? LOL Malarky. It makes some difference IF there's a flashing turn phase, at night? Nope.
She was apparently waiting for opposing cars to stop coming. She risked her life to save MAYBE 8 seconds. FACT. If she's waiting until the light goes yellow, then she has to dodge red light runners from both directions. Is that BETTER?? NO. Otherwise she would already be in position to cross from the right street, and 99.9% SAFE.
>> As for car #2 not stopping, it's hard to blame them leaving. Here's a what IF >> What if car #1 just pushed her sideways, then car #2 did the actual killing??
OR What IF car #2 anticipated the girl getting hit, then slammed on the brakes and gets pushed by car #3 and the girl gets hit anyway??
Who is the lawyers going to go after?? It's a damned lose lose situation.
Every driver's manual says DON'T SWERVE.
So car #1 is still 100% at fault, but the girl still gets some or a lot of the blame. Dead right is still dead. Cyclists are called vulnerable road users by their OWN spokespeople, after all.
RIP dear lady.
Yah, I don't see any scenario why car #1 would be going full speed into the girl on a bike, with at least the 2 oncoming cars blocking progress.
The news video with the unhelpful LAB prognosticator, was pointing out a "Green Box" that wasn't green, in front of the turn lane. That's supposed to make somebody safer?? LOL Malarky. It makes some difference IF there's a flashing turn phase, at night? Nope.
She was apparently waiting for opposing cars to stop coming. She risked her life to save MAYBE 8 seconds. FACT. If she's waiting until the light goes yellow, then she has to dodge red light runners from both directions. Is that BETTER?? NO. Otherwise she would already be in position to cross from the right street, and 99.9% SAFE.
>> As for car #2 not stopping, it's hard to blame them leaving. Here's a what IF >> What if car #1 just pushed her sideways, then car #2 did the actual killing??
OR What IF car #2 anticipated the girl getting hit, then slammed on the brakes and gets pushed by car #3 and the girl gets hit anyway??
Who is the lawyers going to go after?? It's a damned lose lose situation.
Every driver's manual says DON'T SWERVE.
So car #1 is still 100% at fault, but the girl still gets some or a lot of the blame. Dead right is still dead. Cyclists are called vulnerable road users by their OWN spokespeople, after all.
RIP dear lady.
Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 03-03-24 at 09:43 AM.
#45
Senior Member
Likes For LarrySellerz:
#47
>> As for car #2 not stopping, it's hard to blame them leaving. Here's a what IF >> What if car #1 just pushed her sideways, then car #2 did the actual killing??
OR What IF car #2 anticipated the girl getting hit, then slammed on the brakes and gets pushed by car #3 and the girl gets hit anyway??
Who is the lawyers going to go after?? It's a damned lose lose situation.
OR What IF car #2 anticipated the girl getting hit, then slammed on the brakes and gets pushed by car #3 and the girl gets hit anyway??
Who is the lawyers going to go after?? It's a damned lose lose situation.
The penalty for which is up to 4 years in prison, and up to $10,000 in fines.
So, if you aren't busy for the next couple years, run away after running someone over -- but you better hope no one got your plate.