Performance Wheelset Decision on New Tandem?
#26
Full Member
This brings to mind a conversation I had with a park ranger in the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area about a very steep section of road where there are more pot holes than there is smooth pavement (some of you may know the stretch I am talking about). I asked him if the park service had any intention of patching these canyons and he said no, but then said off the record, in his previous assignment somewhere in New Mexico to get pot holes patched, cyclists would come out and spray paint brightly colored penises all over the pot holes then later call and complain about all the penis graffiti on the road which would result in the pot holes being quickly patched. Seems like an effective approach
Likes For Alcanbrad:
#27
Newbie
We were about a half hour behind the couple that crashed, who are our good friends. Was a pretty frightening scene as they were just loading the stoker into the ambulance when we got there.
If you notice the two holes just above the one they hit, I think what happened was the captain saw the first two holes near the center of the road and moved to the right to avoid them and that led them into the hole that caused the crash which was in the shade and hard to see. Another cyclist had crashed there a couple weeks earlier and I know of one other who hit the hole and ruined a wheel but stayed upright.
The holes were filled in and fixed prior to the Climb to Kaiser ride held last Saturday (but still other hazards on that descent if you are planning on trying it so take it easy). By the way the efforts of Ritterview from this forum were the main reason the holes got fixed after his insistent and numerous contacts to the Forest Service and Congressman's office.
Captain and stoker are doing OK, but it's going to be quite a while before they will be able to ride again.
#28
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,774
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Liked 2,113 Times
in
1,493 Posts
Mildly OT wheel alternative, alu, less expensive: Kinlin XC279 rims (23 X 28), 36 CX-Ray spokes, WI CLD hubs, = ~1700g. We've been using these rims and spokes on CK hubs for many years and have nothing but good to say about them. Fast enough, inexpensive for what they are especially if you build them yourself, like I did. Max top speed so far a little over 60 mph. Never a problem with them. Hit many a pothole. 285 lb. team. We run 28mm Conti 4K IIs tires on them @ 95-100 lbs. "We drop like rocks."
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#29
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
Was marked (a few days after the accident) by a nice man who lives up near Huntington Lake and was very helpful at the accident scene, including diving the captain down to the valley to the hospital.
We were about a half hour behind the couple that crashed, who are our good friends. Was a pretty frightening scene as they were just loading the stoker into the ambulance when we got there.
If you notice the two holes just above the one they hit, I think what happened was the captain saw the first two holes near the center of the road and moved to the right to avoid them and that led them into the hole that caused the crash which was in the shade and hard to see. Another cyclist had crashed there a couple weeks earlier and I know of one other who hit the hole and ruined a wheel but stayed upright.
The holes were filled in and fixed prior to the Climb to Kaiser ride held last Saturday (but still other hazards on that descent if you are planning on trying it so take it easy). By the way the efforts of Ritterview from this forum were the main reason the holes got fixed after his insistent and numerous contacts to the Forest Service and Congressman's office.
Captain and stoker are doing OK, but it's going to be quite a while before they will be able to ride again.
We were about a half hour behind the couple that crashed, who are our good friends. Was a pretty frightening scene as they were just loading the stoker into the ambulance when we got there.
If you notice the two holes just above the one they hit, I think what happened was the captain saw the first two holes near the center of the road and moved to the right to avoid them and that led them into the hole that caused the crash which was in the shade and hard to see. Another cyclist had crashed there a couple weeks earlier and I know of one other who hit the hole and ruined a wheel but stayed upright.
The holes were filled in and fixed prior to the Climb to Kaiser ride held last Saturday (but still other hazards on that descent if you are planning on trying it so take it easy). By the way the efforts of Ritterview from this forum were the main reason the holes got fixed after his insistent and numerous contacts to the Forest Service and Congressman's office.
Captain and stoker are doing OK, but it's going to be quite a while before they will be able to ride again.
I know it can be rubbing some salt in the wound, but yikes, those Zipp wheels (low spoke count, low profile carbon) were a catastrophe waiting to happen... and did. Even on a single bike, those wheels need to be treated carefully.
#30
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,774
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Liked 2,113 Times
in
1,493 Posts
Thanks for the update. Yes it is understandable that they maybe dodged the earlier holes and then in the tree shade hit that last one. Wouldn't wish that on anyone cycling.
I know it can be rubbing some salt in the wound, but yikes, those Zipp wheels (low spoke count, low profile carbon) were a catastrophe waiting to happen... and did. Even on a single bike, those wheels need to be treated carefully.
I know it can be rubbing some salt in the wound, but yikes, those Zipp wheels (low spoke count, low profile carbon) were a catastrophe waiting to happen... and did. Even on a single bike, those wheels need to be treated carefully.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#31
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
I've jumped an entire 4x8 sheet of plywood lengthwise on my single during a race event. We practiced hopping our road tandem to clear sidewalk/curbs and now it is no big deal. At 49mph, distance covered for a good hop would easily clear the full length of these potholes, but it does require a readiness and enough lead time (ie: holes not hidden in shade) to setup.
#32
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
Mildly OT wheel alternative, alu, less expensive: Kinlin XC279 rims (23 X 28), 36 CX-Ray spokes, WI CLD hubs, = ~1700g. We've been using these rims and spokes on CK hubs for many years and have nothing but good to say about them. Fast enough, inexpensive for what they are especially if you build them yourself, like I did. Max top speed so far a little over 60 mph. Never a problem with them. Hit many a pothole. 285 lb. team. We run 28mm Conti 4K IIs tires on them @ 95-100 lbs. "We drop like rocks."
FWIW, when we moved to a thru-axle setup, I had another front wheel built up with a disk hub and was left with one extra, new rim and the rim-brake front wheel. Available:
- 1 near new front wheel (32 hole BHS/Kinlin XC279, DT Swiss Aerolight spokes, White Industries MI5/non-disk QR 100mm hub)
- 1 new, unused 32 hole BHS/Kinlin XC279 rim. This could be used to build up a new rear wheel.
PM me if interested.
#33
Full Member
I've jumped an entire 4x8 sheet of plywood lengthwise on my single during a race event. We practiced hopping our road tandem to clear sidewalk/curbs and now it is no big deal. At 49mph, distance covered for a good hop would easily clear the full length of these potholes, but it does require a readiness and enough lead time (ie: holes not hidden in shade) to setup.
#34
Junior Member
#35
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
Just for fun, you can see some others attempt on YouTube https://www.google.com/search?q=how+...nt=firefox-b-1
My wife is so light that I should try doing a nose wheelie on our mtb tandem when going done something really steep. LOL.
#36
Junior Member
Folks,
At 47 mph you are traveling 69 ft/sec; fastest reaction time (not time to complete an avoidance maneuver) for a driver is 0.7 seconds (avg. is 1.5 sec); the distance between the potholes appear to be no more than 40-50 feet. You are coming out of a turn at 47 mph and steer to miss the first potholes; by the time you see (assuming no shade) the large pothole and before you can steer around, tell your stoker we need to bunny hop, say a prayer, whatever, you’ve already hit it (0.7 sec at 47 mph = 48 feet traveled). So let’s rule out bunny hopping or any other evasive maneuver.
As for equipment choice, if you had stout wheels and running anything less than 50mm tires you’re most likely getting a pinch flat and quick deflation. With 32 mm & narrower tires I would suspect a blowout. I doubt many, if any of us could keep our tandems upright, assuming we were (the bike may not of even been back vertical yet from steering to avoid the first potholes), if we had a blowout or rapid deflation at 47 mph, thus we are going down. Many a blow-off, blowout, & rapid flat have taken down singles and tandems, especially with clincher tires.
So let’s not sit back and criticize their equipment choices either, but wish them well and be thankful they were not hurt worse. I know I will be alert and check my speed more on downhills, especially hills we haven’t ridden very recently (which is most for us).
Here’s to a speedy recovery for Terry & Lynn Rueter!
Tailwinds,
Charlie
South Louisiana
At 47 mph you are traveling 69 ft/sec; fastest reaction time (not time to complete an avoidance maneuver) for a driver is 0.7 seconds (avg. is 1.5 sec); the distance between the potholes appear to be no more than 40-50 feet. You are coming out of a turn at 47 mph and steer to miss the first potholes; by the time you see (assuming no shade) the large pothole and before you can steer around, tell your stoker we need to bunny hop, say a prayer, whatever, you’ve already hit it (0.7 sec at 47 mph = 48 feet traveled). So let’s rule out bunny hopping or any other evasive maneuver.
As for equipment choice, if you had stout wheels and running anything less than 50mm tires you’re most likely getting a pinch flat and quick deflation. With 32 mm & narrower tires I would suspect a blowout. I doubt many, if any of us could keep our tandems upright, assuming we were (the bike may not of even been back vertical yet from steering to avoid the first potholes), if we had a blowout or rapid deflation at 47 mph, thus we are going down. Many a blow-off, blowout, & rapid flat have taken down singles and tandems, especially with clincher tires.
So let’s not sit back and criticize their equipment choices either, but wish them well and be thankful they were not hurt worse. I know I will be alert and check my speed more on downhills, especially hills we haven’t ridden very recently (which is most for us).
Here’s to a speedy recovery for Terry & Lynn Rueter!
Tailwinds,
Charlie
South Louisiana
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I've jumped an entire 4x8 sheet of plywood lengthwise on my single during a race event. We practiced hopping our road tandem to clear sidewalk/curbs and now it is no big deal. At 49mph, distance covered for a good hop would easily clear the full length of these potholes, but it does require a readiness and enough lead time (ie: holes not hidden in shade) to setup.
I appreciate your skills and experience but I find it hard to believe at 49 mph one would have a hard time communicating to the stoker the need to hop and pulling off in time especially if the pot hole was not seen until the last minute. You and us both have a fair amount of carbon wheel experience and ride them with confidence but that obstacle could taco any wheel.
#38
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
Brian
I appreciate your skills and experience but I find it hard to believe at 49 mph one would have a hard time communicating to the stoker the need to hop and pulling off in time especially if the pot hole was not seen until the last minute. You and us both have a fair amount of carbon wheel experience and ride them with confidence but that obstacle could taco any wheel.
I appreciate your skills and experience but I find it hard to believe at 49 mph one would have a hard time communicating to the stoker the need to hop and pulling off in time especially if the pot hole was not seen until the last minute. You and us both have a fair amount of carbon wheel experience and ride them with confidence but that obstacle could taco any wheel.
Deep section carbon wheels with plenty of spokes will not taco like the ones in question here. More likely a tire blow out or fork failure than anything, neither of which would result in a pleasant day.
Either way, ride with what you can live with.
Last edited by twocicle; 07-17-18 at 08:42 AM.
#39
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 420
Bikes: 2022 Calfee Tetra, 2023 Giant TCR
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Hope that this couple makes a full recovery and resume riding.
#40
Newbie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Andover, Mass
Posts: 53
Bikes: 2010 Co-Motion Supremo, 2018 Calfee DragonFly Tandem
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
So, i just saw that Rolf Wheels came out with a new version of their carbon rims. These are 60mm deep and another $100 over the current version. The dilemma for us now is, do we get a pair. We have almost 2700 miles on our new custom Calfee Dragonfly with the current Rolf carbon wheels on it. When we spec'd the bike, Rolf was the only maker we could find that would warranty the tandem wheels for use actually on a tandem. I am aware of other wheel builders and such that would put a wheel together for us, but that didn't work out. We love the Rolf carbon wheels so an upgrade would be just for kicks. We are a light team - about 265, plus 27 pound bike. any thoughts?
#41
Full Member
If you normally ride flat rides at 20+ MPH average they may make sense.
If you ride hilly terrain normally they likely will be no better and perhaps worse than what you already have.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 1,098
Bikes: 1980's Spectrum 10 sp Campagnolo Centaur, 1990 Eddy Merckx 10 sp Campagnolo Centaur, Bushnell Tandem, Co-Motion Speedster Tandem
Liked 103 Times
in
66 Posts
So, i just saw that Rolf Wheels came out with a new version of their carbon rims. These are 60mm deep and another $100 over the current version. The dilemma for us now is, do we get a pair. We have almost 2700 miles on our new custom Calfee Dragonfly with the current Rolf carbon wheels on it. When we spec'd the bike, Rolf was the only maker we could find that would warranty the tandem wheels for use actually on a tandem. I am aware of other wheel builders and such that would put a wheel together for us, but that didn't work out. We love the Rolf carbon wheels so an upgrade would be just for kicks. We are a light team - about 265, plus 27 pound bike. any thoughts?
#43
Cycle for life...
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,338
Bikes: Trek 5200 | Cannondale Six13 TeamOne | Cannondale Road Tandem | Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Agree with Diabloridr ... 1/2 heavier is a big deal for me given we ride what I consider a medium/moderate hilly area with an average accent on a 25 mile ride of 1300 ft.
#44
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hilo Hawaii
Posts: 76
Bikes: Landshark, Kestrel Ironman, Giant Defy, Redline 925er, Orbea team Euskatel, AMP B2, Landshark e-Tandem, and, well you get the idea.
Liked 46 Times
in
17 Posts
Just curious, did you ever post the photo of the new tandem and the new wheels?
#45
Cycle for life...
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,338
Bikes: Trek 5200 | Cannondale Six13 TeamOne | Cannondale Road Tandem | Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Magnum PI ... we are very happy with our choice of wheelsets! We did end up getting away from the Lightning cranks after a catastrophic MFR/failure.
__________________
-\Brian
18' Landshark Tandem - Custom
15' Wabi Special Single-Speed Road
06' Cannondale Six13 TeamOne
06' Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
92' Trek 5200
-\Brian
18' Landshark Tandem - Custom
15' Wabi Special Single-Speed Road
06' Cannondale Six13 TeamOne
06' Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
92' Trek 5200
Likes For woodcycl:
#46
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hilo Hawaii
Posts: 76
Bikes: Landshark, Kestrel Ironman, Giant Defy, Redline 925er, Orbea team Euskatel, AMP B2, Landshark e-Tandem, and, well you get the idea.
Liked 46 Times
in
17 Posts
Wow, that is stunning! That might win a tandem weight contest if we had one.
Yikes, Lightning crank failure**********
Yikes, Lightning crank failure**********
#47
Cycle for life...
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,338
Bikes: Trek 5200 | Cannondale Six13 TeamOne | Cannondale Road Tandem | Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Thank you Magnum PI! We are really pleased with it. On a real sunny day, the paint really pops! With everything attached (including pedals) but no saddlebag, we are right at 30lbs. I've heard of lighter, but I don't believe they have pedals, computer, cages, etc. Plus, we could save another few grams on a carbon stoker handlebar. Plus we hope to get custom carbon stems from Calfee next year. All in all, those two things might save another 1lbs or so. But, honestly, given my weight fluctuates 20 to 25lbs over the season (my wife is only 118 ... jealous!) and together we are around 290 to 300lbs, it is more ME that needs to shed weight and keep it off than the tandem! Ha!
__________________
-\Brian
18' Landshark Tandem - Custom
15' Wabi Special Single-Speed Road
06' Cannondale Six13 TeamOne
06' Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
92' Trek 5200
-\Brian
18' Landshark Tandem - Custom
15' Wabi Special Single-Speed Road
06' Cannondale Six13 TeamOne
06' Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
92' Trek 5200
#48
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hilo Hawaii
Posts: 76
Bikes: Landshark, Kestrel Ironman, Giant Defy, Redline 925er, Orbea team Euskatel, AMP B2, Landshark e-Tandem, and, well you get the idea.
Liked 46 Times
in
17 Posts
Aloha Brian! To me, weight on a tandem is not as important as on a single bike. On my single bikes I always worked on lowering the rotating weight of wheels and tires first to get any advantage from getting a jump to catch a wheel or make a move in a group ride or race. On the tandem the added heft of 2 people plus water bottles always resulted in us going off the back when the roads started going up. However, as you know, the joy or riding with your partner far outweighs making the break! Hey my wife is 114 pounds soaking wet!
I see you guys also had a Cannondale road tandem and a Landshark Twinshark. We recently upgraded to an e-assist Twinshark (S&S couplers and gravel geared) and while heavier than our 'Dale, it makes us feel 30 years younger as we now can hang with the first group again. John Slawta put Vision wheels on it and they feel very responsive. I had him spec the whole bike as I haven't been keeping up with the tech side of bikes. I have 165 Lightning cranks on the front so your comments make me a little nervous. Hope I don't have any problems.....
I see you guys also had a Cannondale road tandem and a Landshark Twinshark. We recently upgraded to an e-assist Twinshark (S&S couplers and gravel geared) and while heavier than our 'Dale, it makes us feel 30 years younger as we now can hang with the first group again. John Slawta put Vision wheels on it and they feel very responsive. I had him spec the whole bike as I haven't been keeping up with the tech side of bikes. I have 165 Lightning cranks on the front so your comments make me a little nervous. Hope I don't have any problems.....
#49
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It has been 6 years since this thread about tandem rims started. The world has changed a bit since then, including recently finding our 1998 Co-Motion stolen from our locked Explorer in our driveway. We found a nice used Carrera, but want to upgrade the wheels since they were optimized for a heavier couple.
Just like Woodcycl, we are right around 290lb to 300lb. Six years after he posted the question, we have the same question regarding today's high-end tandem wheelsets. We run 32m tires and are looking at Spinergy and Rolf. We are a bit shy about the Rolf limiting inflation for 32 tires to 80lbs. We have found that around 88 to 89 is great on the old rims. We would love to get your input on Rolf vs Spinergy for modest speed paved roads and trails.
Just like Woodcycl, we are right around 290lb to 300lb. Six years after he posted the question, we have the same question regarding today's high-end tandem wheelsets. We run 32m tires and are looking at Spinergy and Rolf. We are a bit shy about the Rolf limiting inflation for 32 tires to 80lbs. We have found that around 88 to 89 is great on the old rims. We would love to get your input on Rolf vs Spinergy for modest speed paved roads and trails.
#50
Full Member
I put aluminum rim brake Spinergy tandem wheels on our Speedster about 7 years ago. Max pressure recommended for those wheels at that time was 86 psi for 32mm. I used to run higher pressure than that and replaced the rear rim due to cracks developing around spoke holes before knowing about the pressure limit. I’ve stayed closer to the limit since then and the wheels have been trouble free. With the trend toward wider tires, the recommended limits may have changed. I’d recommend a check with Spinergy.