Polling Beliefs about Bicycles on Roads and Sidewalks
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 150
Bikes: Trek Émonda SL 5, Trek Checkpoint SL 5, Giant Trance X 2, Trek Farley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times
in
52 Posts
Polling Beliefs about Bicycles on Roads and Sidewalks
There are plenty of anecdotes about people who believe bicycles belong on, or are required to be on, sidewalks and not roads. From this, it seems like a common belief, but how common? Does anyone know of any polling data on this topic, that shows just how prevalent this misconception is? (I guess I'm particularly interested in the US.)
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,945
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3773 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
790 Posts
There are plenty of laws on the books about how bikes do belong on the roads; however, if people continue to show fear in riding on the roads and cyclists remain a very infrequent user of roadways, then more and more people will incorrectly believe that bikes belong off the roads.
Only we cyclists can convince motorists that we are lawful vehicles on the roads, not by words, there are enough words proving this fact.
.
Only we cyclists can convince motorists that we are lawful vehicles on the roads, not by words, there are enough words proving this fact.
.
Likes For work4bike:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,945
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3773 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
790 Posts
There are plenty of anecdotes about people who believe bicycles belong on, or are required to be on, sidewalks and not roads. From this, it seems like a common belief, but how common? Does anyone know of any polling data on this topic, that shows just how prevalent this misconception is? (I guess I'm particularly interested in the US.)
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 150
Bikes: Trek Émonda SL 5, Trek Checkpoint SL 5, Giant Trance X 2, Trek Farley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times
in
52 Posts
Yeah, I've thought about asking people I know, but I feel like the people I know wouldn't really be a representative cross section of the American populace. Plus, most of the people I know are aware that I bike, which would tip them off to answer differently than they might otherwise.
Likes For UnCruel:
#5
Junior Member
I ride in Falmouth, MA most weekends during the summer. We have the Shining Sea Bikeway that I use a lot, but it really doesn't go to many destinations that I need. I try to use my bike for all errands when I'm in town, and that involves a few miles of roads. Being a "vacation" type town, there are a lot of people that don't pay all that much attention when driving, or are perpetually lost.
I've been squeezed to the curb in a bike lane more than once, so I tend to keep to the sidewalks on the more-travelled roads. Most town roads are relatively narrow and winding, but sidewalks are prevalent throughout the town. I stop or dismount when approaching pedestrians, and ride on the road for short distances when overtaking them. I'm also not zipping around, most of the time it's a leisurely pace, enjoying the time on the bike.
Pretty sure the law in MA is bikes aren't allowed on sidewalks, but no one has said anything to me about it yet.
I've been squeezed to the curb in a bike lane more than once, so I tend to keep to the sidewalks on the more-travelled roads. Most town roads are relatively narrow and winding, but sidewalks are prevalent throughout the town. I stop or dismount when approaching pedestrians, and ride on the road for short distances when overtaking them. I'm also not zipping around, most of the time it's a leisurely pace, enjoying the time on the bike.
Pretty sure the law in MA is bikes aren't allowed on sidewalks, but no one has said anything to me about it yet.
#6
Cantilever believer
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,564
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 536 Post(s)
Liked 1,833 Times
in
829 Posts
My observation: in polls like this how questions are phrased can be just as important as what questions are asked.
In human factors evaluations such as testing a new traffic sign or symbol, open-ended questions such as "what does than sign or symbol mean?" or "what would you do in response to seeing this sign or symbol?" often get more-informative responses than questions with choices or prompts that could be used to shape the received responses.
I haven't looked in TRID to see if a survey similar to what you're asking is on file.
Activism has taken a strong role in cycling research in the US and elsewhere over the past 15+ years, and so it's possible that surveys (depending on desired results) might have questions such as "Knowing that sidewalks are narrow, full of obstructions, and often poorly maintained, do bicyclists belong on them?" or "Knowing that roadways are full of fast-moving cars and trucks with distracted drivers, should bicyclists ride on these roads or instead on sidewalks?" Now there could be good objective surveys out there, but based on my assessment of the current state of activism & research, any study based on surveys should have its assumptions and questions carefully reviewed before using it as a reference.
Disclosure: I'm a former member of the TRB Committee on Bicycle Transportation, and still in the peer review pool for manuscripts assigned to that committee.
In human factors evaluations such as testing a new traffic sign or symbol, open-ended questions such as "what does than sign or symbol mean?" or "what would you do in response to seeing this sign or symbol?" often get more-informative responses than questions with choices or prompts that could be used to shape the received responses.
I haven't looked in TRID to see if a survey similar to what you're asking is on file.
Activism has taken a strong role in cycling research in the US and elsewhere over the past 15+ years, and so it's possible that surveys (depending on desired results) might have questions such as "Knowing that sidewalks are narrow, full of obstructions, and often poorly maintained, do bicyclists belong on them?" or "Knowing that roadways are full of fast-moving cars and trucks with distracted drivers, should bicyclists ride on these roads or instead on sidewalks?" Now there could be good objective surveys out there, but based on my assessment of the current state of activism & research, any study based on surveys should have its assumptions and questions carefully reviewed before using it as a reference.
Disclosure: I'm a former member of the TRB Committee on Bicycle Transportation, and still in the peer review pool for manuscripts assigned to that committee.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Likes For RCMoeur:
#7
Senior Member
Do those polls ask pedestrians, specifically, if they agree to have cyclists riding on sidewalks if they don't think cyclists belong on roads?
#8
Standard Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,271
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times
in
490 Posts
If you think a considerable percentage of the population thinks bikes should not be on the roads, but instead, on side-walks, you are talking and listening to the wrong people. Those individuals are part of an extremist sub-set.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
#9
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
"Those polls" on this subject are imaginary so they ask anything of anybody you wish to imagine and get whatever responses you would like to see.
Likes For I-Like-To-Bike:
#10
Senior Member
If the poll allowed them to give an open ended response to where cyclists should be and a considerable number said bike lanes, I'd be surprised and encouraged.
#11
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
Until we get bicycle safety and law into our drivers education system in this country, there will remain a spectacular breadth of stupidity in our driver's knowledge.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 1,378
Bikes: a couple
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 563 Post(s)
Liked 863 Times
in
456 Posts
To me it depends on the bike and the speed of the bike.
Kids on bikes on the sidewalk are not a problem, adults on slow moving bikes, same thing.
If you're going over 5 MPH, get in the road.
Kids on bikes on the sidewalk are not a problem, adults on slow moving bikes, same thing.
If you're going over 5 MPH, get in the road.
Likes For Schweinhund:
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 150
Bikes: Trek Émonda SL 5, Trek Checkpoint SL 5, Giant Trance X 2, Trek Farley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times
in
52 Posts
I really have no idea what percentage of the population thinks that, which is what leads me to look for data. However, I am skeptical that they are only an "extremist sub-set". I live in the suburban mid-west, and I feel (but do not know) that it is a prevalent attitude here. Heck, members of this forum, who I had assumed were all in agreement on the matter, are already debating it on this thread, which surprises me, and which I did not intend. You may be right that such attitudes are few, but they receive much attention, because our interactions with them tend to be memorable and often newsworthy.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 150
Bikes: Trek Émonda SL 5, Trek Checkpoint SL 5, Giant Trance X 2, Trek Farley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times
in
52 Posts
Missouri's Driver Guide, which is the study guide offered to people seeking to obtain a new driver's license, has a seven page chapter on "Sharing the Road", about 2˝ pages of which is applicable to bicycles. However, I haven't been subjected to driver's education since the 1980s, and most drivers are in more or less the same situation.
Likes For UnCruel:
#16
Standard Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,271
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times
in
490 Posts
Are there that many mal-adjusted people? I suppose everyone is entitled to their opinion. The best we can do is stay to the side, there-by being courteous riders of the road. This should prevent any conflict from hot-heads.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
Likes For 1989Pre:
#17
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
position, one-size-fits-all-roads is not a method I'm going to use. Most states have standards for when riding to the right is not required or recommended.
#18
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
2,056 Posts
#19
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
I ride anywhere I am allowed to keep my self safe, or try to any way. Cities ban bike from sidewalk in many places to try to protect pedestrians. But if you look at it logically, a bike rider and a pedestrian are pretty close to the same weight, OTOH forcing bikes into the street puts them out there with 4 or 5 thousand pound cars seem doing 25 to 30 mph seems to me as kind of stupid. The smart thing to do would be in congested areas to limit bike speed.
#20
Senior Member
If the area is congested, cyclists won't be able to go very fast either. If drivers don't like me filtering through them at 5km/hr, give me my own protected safe space on the side so I can go faster (or slower) without bothering them.
Last edited by Daniel4; 02-12-23 at 11:43 AM.
#21
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,987
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,809 Times
in
3,317 Posts
Missouri's Driver Guide, which is the study guide offered to people seeking to obtain a new driver's license, has a seven page chapter on "Sharing the Road", about 2˝ pages of which is applicable to bicycles. However, I haven't been subjected to driver's education since the 1980s, and most drivers are in more or less the same situation.
I'm encouraged though that you say Missouri goes into some detail in their driving guide. Many don't.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,704
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 1,655 Times
in
782 Posts
I ride in Falmouth, MA most weekends during the summer. We have the Shining Sea Bikeway that I use a lot, but it really doesn't go to many destinations that I need. I try to use my bike for all errands when I'm in town, and that involves a few miles of roads. Being a "vacation" type town, there are a lot of people that don't pay all that much attention when driving, or are perpetually lost.
I've been squeezed to the curb in a bike lane more than once, so I tend to keep to the sidewalks on the more-travelled roads. Most town roads are relatively narrow and winding, but sidewalks are prevalent throughout the town. I stop or dismount when approaching pedestrians, and ride on the road for short distances when overtaking them. I'm also not zipping around, most of the time it's a leisurely pace, enjoying the time on the bike.
Pretty sure the law in MA is bikes aren't allowed on sidewalks, but no one has said anything to me about it yet.
I've been squeezed to the curb in a bike lane more than once, so I tend to keep to the sidewalks on the more-travelled roads. Most town roads are relatively narrow and winding, but sidewalks are prevalent throughout the town. I stop or dismount when approaching pedestrians, and ride on the road for short distances when overtaking them. I'm also not zipping around, most of the time it's a leisurely pace, enjoying the time on the bike.
Pretty sure the law in MA is bikes aren't allowed on sidewalks, but no one has said anything to me about it yet.
Likes For Bald Paul:
#23
Cantilever believer
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,564
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 536 Post(s)
Liked 1,833 Times
in
829 Posts
I ride anywhere I am allowed to keep my self safe, or try to any way. Cities ban bike from sidewalk in many places to try to protect pedestrians. But if you look at it logically, a bike rider and a pedestrian are pretty close to the same weight, OTOH forcing bikes into the street puts them out there with 4 or 5 thousand pound cars seem doing 25 to 30 mph seems to me as kind of stupid. The smart thing to do would be in congested areas to limit bike speed.
Likes For RCMoeur:
#24
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I ride anywhere I am allowed to keep my self safe, or try to any way. Cities ban bike from sidewalk in many places to try to protect pedestrians. But if you look at it logically, a bike rider and a pedestrian are pretty close to the same weight, OTOH forcing bikes into the street puts them out there with 4 or 5 thousand pound cars seem doing 25 to 30 mph seems to me as kind of stupid. The smart thing to do would be in congested areas to limit bike speed.
Even if the weight is identical, the kinetic energy of the bicyclist going 10-15 mph is much higher than the pedestrian going 3-4 mph. Forcing bicyclists to ride at walking speed would be absurd, no one would keep to it. Also, sidewalks are not generally constructed with sightlines when entering in mind. For example, a pedestrian may be emerging from a door that exits directly onto the sidewalk, or stepping out from behind shrubbery. Finally, pedestrians often have strollers, walkers, canes, etc. that make it difficult for them to dodge bicycle traffic. Sidewalks are designed for a walking pace, anything that goes faster is really out of place there.
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 150
Bikes: Trek Émonda SL 5, Trek Checkpoint SL 5, Giant Trance X 2, Trek Farley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times
in
52 Posts
While you guys are debating the laws of physics that apply theoretically, don't forget to check in with reality.
What really happens when a cyclist collides with a pedestrian: someone gets hurt.
What really happens when two pedestrians collide: "Oops. Sorry."
I am honestly surprised that this debate is even taking place here. I thought it was only non-cycling drivers that needed education about the rules of the road.
What really happens when a cyclist collides with a pedestrian: someone gets hurt.
What really happens when two pedestrians collide: "Oops. Sorry."
I am honestly surprised that this debate is even taking place here. I thought it was only non-cycling drivers that needed education about the rules of the road.