Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

‘84 Fuji Touring Series V Refurbishment

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

‘84 Fuji Touring Series V Refurbishment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-24, 03:49 PM
  #1  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
‘84 Fuji Touring Series V Refurbishment

I’ve always admired the Japanese-built loaded touring bikes of the early-mid ‘80s, classics like the Miyata 1000, Specialized Expedition, Nishiki Cresta, and the subject of this project, the Fuji Touring Series V. Inspired by the beautiful photos of this model in “Japanese Steel” by William Bevington, I found this frame on eBay:


The frame was in good shape, no rust or dents. Cleaning with mineral spirits and polishing with Renaissance wax brought back the gleam to the beautiful metallic green-blue paint job.


An early challenge: pulling the SunTour Vx sealed bottom bracket. It was stuck tight and the proprietary tool is nearly impossible to find. After breaking a pin spanner I resorted to really big Channel-Lock pliers after a two-day soak in Kroil oil. I restored to better-than-new condition using Phil Wood retaining rings and new Nachi bearings packed with marine grease.

The build proceeded using an assortment of parts on hand and others sourced from eBay. I decided at the start to use only Japanese components when possible, but no Shimano. I have nothing against Shimano - most of my bikes have Shimano drivetrains- but I wanted to use some of the fine SunTour pieces from my parts stash.


Cyclone MkII front…

and rear derailleurs

Superbe downtube levers

I’m pleased with the end result:






Here’s the build list:

Frame: Fuji 9658 quad-butted CroMo (Ishiwata 019?), CroMo stays and fork, 3 water bottle bosses, front/rear rack bosses, double eyelet fork endsHandlebar and stem: Nitto B135 Randonneur 45cm, Nitto Technomic, Newbaum’s dark blue cloth tape

Headset: Hatta Swan

Brakes: Dia-Compe 960 Cantilever, Kool- Stop Pads, Dia-Compe Gran Compe levers, Yokozuna British Racing Green housing

Crankset: Sugino AT 28-38-48, SunTour Vx bottom bracket w/Phil Wood retaining rings, Nachi sealed bearings

Derailleurs: SunTour Cyclone MkII front and rear

Freewheel: SunTour Winner 13-34, 7-speed

Chain: KMC X-8

Pedals: SunTour Superbe w/Nachi sealed bearings, MKS toe clips, Soma black leather straps

Wheels: Sun CR18 700c silver rims, SunTour Sprint sealed cartridge bearing hubs, hand-built by Sugar Wheelworks

Tires: Panaracer Pasela Tourguard 700cx35mm

Saddle: Brooks B-17 black leather

Seatpost: Sugino SP-H alloy, CrMo binder bolt

Color: Metallic Green Blue

Accessories: Tubus Cargo Classic rear rack, Nitto M-1 front rack, King Iris stainless steel bottle cages, Kiley Eyelights USB rechargeable headlight, B&M Top Line taillight, Planet Bike black fenders

Last edited by schensted; 03-16-24 at 09:58 PM.
schensted is offline  
Old 03-14-24, 04:51 PM
  #2  
niliraga 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 512

Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times in 129 Posts
nice work, and gosh darn that paint is wonderful. the TS-IV is so dull by comparison.
niliraga is offline  
Old 03-14-24, 05:07 PM
  #3  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks! It is a beautiful color, really sparkles in the sun.
schensted is offline  
Likes For schensted:
Old 03-14-24, 09:54 PM
  #4  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
Really beautiful!
52telecaster is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 01:04 AM
  #5  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,046
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 1,082 Times in 522 Posts
Really aweosome. Love this model. Will you stick with 27”?
polymorphself is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 06:30 AM
  #6  
TiHabanero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1746 Post(s)
Liked 1,376 Times in 721 Posts
Our shop was a Miyata and Fuji dealer back then and in 86 I struggled with getting a Miyata 1000 or the Fuji Touring Series V. I picked the Fuji based on the looks and the spare spoke holder.
Long point lugs, window cutouts, spare spoke holder, and the graphics were simply stated...how can that be denied?! Years later I was gifted an 85 Miyata 1000 by one of the guys I worked with at the shop. It was NOS frame, fork, crank and once I built it up I realized how much better it was at loaded touring and sold the Fuji. Should have kept it in the collection. Fuji had some real standouts in that time period.
TiHabanero is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 08:25 AM
  #7  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by polymorphself
Really aweosome. Love this model. Will you stick with 27”?

I’m sticking with 27” for now. Not sure if the cantis will work with 700c on this frame. I’ve got some wheels I could try but I’d have to violate the no-Shimano rule (and spread the frame).
schensted is offline  
Likes For schensted:
Old 03-15-24, 08:29 AM
  #8  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
Our shop was a Miyata and Fuji dealer back then and in 86 I struggled with getting a Miyata 1000 or the Fuji Touring Series V. I picked the Fuji based on the looks and the spare spoke holder.
Long point lugs, window cutouts, spare spoke holder, and the graphics were simply stated...how can that be denied?! Years later I was gifted an 85 Miyata 1000 by one of the guys I worked with at the shop. It was NOS frame, fork, crank and once I built it up I realized how much better it was at loaded touring and sold the Fuji. Should have kept it in the collection. Fuji had some real standouts in that time period.
I’m curious, in what way was the Miyata better? Was the handling under load significantly different? The Fuji seems to have pretty low trail; perhaps it would perform better with a heavier front load. I’ll be experimenting.
schensted is offline  
Likes For schensted:
Old 03-15-24, 09:23 AM
  #9  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,046
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 1,082 Times in 522 Posts
Originally Posted by schensted
I’m sticking with 27” for now. Not sure if the cantis will work with 700c on this frame. I’ve got some wheels I could try but I’d have to violate the no-Shimano rule (and spread the frame).
If the cantis that came on it don't reach, there are available options that will, we've seen a good amount of these on this forum with 700c conversions.
polymorphself is offline  
Likes For polymorphself:
Old 03-15-24, 09:48 AM
  #10  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by polymorphself
If the cantis that came on it don't reach, there are available options that will, we've seen a good amount of these on this forum with 700c conversions.
I’ve read a ton of threads about successful conversions. I’m going to try a 700c this afternoon. Am I correct in thinking it’s usually the front brake that causes problems? Just to be clear, the brakes aren’t original spec, I chose them for period correctness.
schensted is offline  
Likes For schensted:
Old 03-15-24, 09:48 AM
  #11  
niliraga 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 512

Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times in 129 Posts
Seconded -- you can easily go to 700c but maybe not with those brakes. I *think* i see 960s on there now... if so, those are the least adjustable DiaCompe, not just for pad placement but also stuck with fixed lengths of straddle cable (which prevents you fine tuning your "mechanical advantage").

I used 981s when moving to 700 rims on my TS-IV, and they (along with the even better 982s) work better in pretty much every respect.

Last edited by niliraga; 03-15-24 at 09:52 AM.
niliraga is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 09:52 AM
  #12  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,046
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 1,082 Times in 522 Posts
Originally Posted by schensted
I’ve read a ton of threads about successful conversions. I’m going to try a 700c this afternoon. Am I correct in thinking it’s usually the front brake that causes problems? Just to be clear, the brakes aren’t original spec, I chose them for period correctness.
Your post says DC 901, are you sure the aren't 981? I'm not familiar with a 901 and a quick google isn't showing anything for cantis, just bmx brakes.

I haven't experienced any issues with front vs rear in my conversion, and from what I've seen on this forum brakes will either fit well in front and back or they won't fit at all, but I'm sure there are exceptions and somebody else will chime in with better experience.

EDIT: Niliraga answered my question.

981s seem to be one of the most recommended for this, and are what came on my bike and worked great.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 10:09 AM
  #13  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by polymorphself
Your post says DC 901, are you sure the aren't 981? I'm not familiar with a 901 and a quick google isn't showing anything for cantis, just bmx brakes.

I haven't experienced any issues with front vs rear in my conversion, and from what I've seen on this forum brakes will either fit well in front and back or they won't fit at all, but I'm sure there are exceptions and somebody else will chime in with better experience.

EDIT: Niliraga answered my question.

981s seem to be one of the most recommended for this, and are what came on my bike and worked great.
You’re right, they’re definitely not 901s, my mistake. I’ll change the build list. The eBay listing said they’re 981s, but they have double-ended straddle cables. Could they be 960s?


schensted is offline  
Likes For schensted:
Old 03-15-24, 10:54 AM
  #14  
Chr0m0ly 
Senior Member
 
Chr0m0ly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609

Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times in 219 Posts
I love this.
I have a Suntour preference myself and the long reach cyclone is a favorite of mine.
As for the Miyata comment…

My wife has a 210 Miyata tourer. It’s a heavy piece of iron, and she had big rack on the back, with collapsible basket, then she hung a U lock from the top tube because with her small size frames, it was the only place that didn’t interfere with the water bottle. Full sized fenders, the works. The result was a heavy bike with the weight high up. It always felt like it was trying to pull her down.

I found her an 80’s Cannondale ST 400, I set it up with short pull levers, and personalized cockpit. I hung a folding Z lock on the underside down tube bottle mount, to keep the weight really low. Lighter rack, race blade fenders, it probably weighs 8 pounds less, unloaded, AND the weight is placed MUCH lower down. She likes it a lot, and she can load it down for commuting and travel.


but riding them back to back, despite the downsides of the Miyata, she says that when it’s loaded down it feels like it “wants to go” in a way the Cannondale doesn’t.

The Dale is lighter, stiffer, better weight distribution…
who knows, it could be tires, right?

but that’s what she says.

it’s funny though, I think she and I have VERY different experiences even on the same models of bikes, because we ride such different sizes frames. She uses 46/48cm frames and I’m on 60cm frames. So the tubing on my frames is longer, plus the taller head tube, compared to the true triangle geometry that her frames have.

When someone says this or that frame feels a certain way, see what size they’re using, and if they’re a spinner or a masher. Lots of factors go into frame feel!
Chr0m0ly is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 12:10 PM
  #15  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,046
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 1,082 Times in 522 Posts
Originally Posted by Chr0m0ly
I love this.
I have a Suntour preference myself and the long reach cyclone is a favorite of mine.
As for the Miyata comment…

My wife has a 210 Miyata tourer. It’s a heavy piece of iron, and she had big rack on the back, with collapsible basket, then she hung a U lock from the top tube because with her small size frames, it was the only place that didn’t interfere with the water bottle. Full sized fenders, the works. The result was a heavy bike with the weight high up. It always felt like it was trying to pull her down.
My girlfriend briefly had a 210 and it didn't seem any heavier (if not lighter) than her current 720 or my Voyageur, as shown here. Goes to show how differently we all interpret these things!

polymorphself is offline  
Likes For polymorphself:
Old 03-15-24, 12:31 PM
  #16  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
I tried a 700c wheel on the front. Everything looks good to me, but I’d love hear from those with more experience doing these conversions. What should I be looking for?


schensted is offline  
Likes For schensted:
Old 03-15-24, 12:40 PM
  #17  
non-fixie 
Shifting is fun!
 
non-fixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,006

Bikes: Yes, please.

Mentioned: 280 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2198 Post(s)
Liked 4,602 Times in 1,764 Posts
Originally Posted by schensted
I’m pleased with the end result:

So am I.

Nice!
__________________
Are we having fun, or what ...



non-fixie is online now  
Likes For non-fixie:
Old 03-15-24, 05:24 PM
  #18  
TiHabanero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1746 Post(s)
Liked 1,376 Times in 721 Posts
The Miyata 1000 is able to handle a 700x38mm tire whereas the Fuji used the limited tire selection of 27x1-1/4. Real big difference. I also found the Miyata handled better when loaded with gear. It was less noodle like up front than the Fuji. Unloaded the Fuji is a real easy going machine while the Miyata shows it's sport bike heritage. Again, I have no complaints with the Fuji, I simply experience a better touring platform with the Miyata. FWIW, frame sizes are 58 for the Fuji and 57 for the Miyata.
TiHabanero is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 10:12 PM
  #19  
RiddleOfSteel
Master Parts Rearranger
 
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,403

Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present

Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times in 989 Posts
If you like the braking performance of the 700C conversion, then that's great, and you'll be able to fit a larger tire underneath the fenders (for the same overall diameter), which is a ride comfort bonus in my book. The angling of the pads and everything looks good to me! I've done a few 27" to 700C conversions and they've worked out well. Nothing out of the ordinary here. Love that you have a TS V! Beautiful build!
RiddleOfSteel is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 10:28 PM
  #20  
IdahoBrett 
Full Member
 
IdahoBrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Idaho, USA
Posts: 216

Bikes: Aluminum and Steel

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times in 138 Posts
Gorgeous! Well done!
__________________
“Ride like the wind boy! Ride like the wind…”
-The Voice inside my head, circa 1982
IdahoBrett is offline  
Old 03-15-24, 10:50 PM
  #21  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by RiddleOfSteel
If you like the braking performance of the 700C conversion, then that's great, and you'll be able to fit a larger tire underneath the fenders (for the same overall diameter), which is a ride comfort bonus in my book. The angling of the pads and everything looks good to me! I've done a few 27" to 700C conversions and they've worked out well. Nothing out of the ordinary here. Love that you have a TS V! Beautiful build!
Thanks for the encouraging words. I’m trying the 700c conversion with a pair of SunTour Sprint hubs laced to Sun CR18 rims. It looks good with 28mm Panaracer GKs, tomorrow I’ll try with 35mm Paselas. I’ll be perfectly content if that combination fits with fenders.
schensted is offline  
Likes For schensted:
Old 03-16-24, 01:38 PM
  #22  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,648

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by schensted
What should I be looking for?



^^^ That.

You more or less want your pads striking the rim kind of level. Notice how your pad posts are *roughly* level?

What happens with brakes that almost work- is they're angled downwards- and the pads are striking the rim along the top edge of the pad.

While this is great- it does pain me because I've always looked at the DC960s as kind of 'low rent.' I've heard the 960s work well, but I've also heard they don't work. As was mentioned- the DC981s are also supposed to be favored to work. My favorites are the Shimano XT M732 or the Deore II MT62 cantis- just because they look so well designed and there's no exposed spring and just look so good. And I've had success with the Suntour XC Pro cantis on my 1985 Trek 720- and those are some pretty brakes- that champagne color would really work on a green frame like the TS-V.

Your TS-V is beautiful.

I thought it was interesting you chose to make your bike Shimano-free... The 1984 and 85 Schwinn Voyageur SP were both Shimano-free builds as well. I used to be a total Suntour homer and go out of my way to not use Shimano stuff. After deciding to use indexing past 6 speeds- Shimano was just better at it. I still think a Suntour XC Pro RD feels nicer than even an M900 XTR RD- Accushift 6 is fine, but I don't have a lot of confidence in Accushift 7 and haven't used 8 at all.

As far as the Suntour BB- I'm running one- and keep an eye on eBay- I think I picked up my BB tool on eBay for like $20. Then again, some clowns have them up for ridiculous amounts of money...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 03-16-24, 02:12 PM
  #23  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,648

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by schensted
I’m curious, in what way was the Miyata better? Was the handling under load significantly different? The Fuji seems to have pretty low trail; perhaps it would perform better with a heavier front load. I’ll be experimenting.
My secret theory is that a lot of the Class A 'flagship model' tourers were built with prestige being a primary factor in their creation- as befitting their 'most expensive bike in the company's range' status. Kind of like having bragging rights of a premium tube set taking precedence over a stiffer or stronger tube set that doesn't have the cachet or the weight savings. However, thicker tubing generally does better under load. I'm not a strong rider, but I flex my 620 frame- and for as many times as I've read about the 720 being "flexy..." those are things you don't want on a touring bike. My 1990 M1000LT is heavier- but it's also much stiffer- But my 1985 Trek 620, 720 and 1984 Voyageur SP are definitely more comfortable unloaded.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 03-16-24, 05:12 PM
  #24  
schensted
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schensted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Touring Series V, 1973 Nishiki Competition, 1980 Raleigh Competition GS, 1983 Trek 600, 1995 Trek 730 Multi-Track, 2010 Nashbar Touring, 2017 Velo-Orange Campeur, 2018 Stanforth Skyelander 650B

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
^^^ That.

You more or less want your pads striking the rim kind of level. Notice how your pad posts are *roughly* level?

What happens with brakes that almost work- is they're angled downwards- and the pads are striking the rim along the top edge of the pad.

While this is great- it does pain me because I've always looked at the DC960s as kind of 'low rent.' I've heard the 960s work well, but I've also heard they don't work. As was mentioned- the DC981s are also supposed to be favored to work. My favorites are the Shimano XT M732 or the Deore II MT62 cantis- just because they look so well designed and there's no exposed spring and just look so good. And I've had success with the Suntour XC Pro cantis on my 1985 Trek 720- and those are some pretty brakes- that champagne color would really work on a green frame like the TS-V.

Your TS-V is beautiful.

I thought it was interesting you chose to make your bike Shimano-free... The 1984 and 85 Schwinn Voyageur SP were both Shimano-free builds as well. I used to be a total Suntour homer and go out of my way to not use Shimano stuff. After deciding to use indexing past 6 speeds- Shimano was just better at it. I still think a Suntour XC Pro RD feels nicer than even an M900 XTR RD- Accushift 6 is fine, but I don't have a lot of confidence in Accushift 7 and haven't used 8 at all.

As far as the Suntour BB- I'm running one- and keep an eye on eBay- I think I picked up my BB tool on eBay for like $20. Then again, some clowns have them up for ridiculous amounts of money...
My front pads are pretty level but the rear pads hit the rim at a distinct downward angle. Thanks for the tip on the SunTour XC Pro cantis. I’ll see if I can find a set.

This bike is pure friction so I’ll be able to keep the drivetrain Shimano-free. It would be cool if I could add SunTour brakes as well.

The Phil Wood retaining rings work perfectly with the SunTour bottom bracket. Actually cheaper than trying to buy the special tool off eBay!
schensted is offline  
Likes For schensted:
Old 03-16-24, 06:50 PM
  #25  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,648

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by schensted
My front pads are pretty level but the rear pads hit the rim at a distinct downward angle. Thanks for the tip on the SunTour XC Pro cantis. I’ll see if I can find a set.

This bike is pure friction so I’ll be able to keep the drivetrain Shimano-free. It would be cool if I could add SunTour brakes as well.

The Phil Wood retaining rings work perfectly with the SunTour bottom bracket. Actually cheaper than trying to buy the special tool off eBay!
Just looking at the pic- I think the 960s will be great for you. Unless you're one of those dorks that just HAS to try to find the best parts ever.. not like I don't know about that... The NGC982 are the Gran Compe cantilevers that everyone goes nutty for- but they're one that I've never used. The DC981 are supposed to be good for conversions- I've only used them for 27" wheels.

(FWIW- I think the difference between the DC960 and the GC960 is that the GC are polished and have Allen bots instead of hex heads)

The XC Pros really are fantastic brakes, they're great stoppers, they're low profile, they're outrageously adjustable and pictures do not capture how beautiful these brakes are and the champagne colored glow they emit. I don't have a really good pic of them on the bike- and of course, I decided to take other pix of the brakes in my basement, partially lit with strands of Christmas lights...



720FrontRack by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr


Superbe Pro Brakes by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr



But there is the DiaCompe 981s as pictured above the XC Pros and below the carbon Spookys.


Grail Brakes by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr



I didn't mention that I really like most of all your equipment choices- The TS-V is a really special bike- IMO only the best stuff goes on there. NOT hunting down a LeTech is a good decision.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.