Choosing front derailleur + braze-on clamp?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,706
Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
251 Posts
For touring, I can live with a bigger fold than the Brompton. After hooking the front wheel to the bracket, the bike can be made smallest by removing the seatpost and attaching it horizontally between the frame and the front wheel.
~100km maiden ride scheduled on Sunday.
~100km maiden ride scheduled on Sunday.
#52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
99 Posts
On the rear, I removed the (nice looking but 300g) wooden board on the rack and attached a plastic fender.
As for the front, the collapsible fender seems to hold better. At worst, I could replace it with an ass saver cut to fit — while less aesthetic, a small fender could have been installed below the top tube permanently.
As for the front, the collapsible fender seems to hold better. At worst, I could replace it with an ass saver cut to fit — while less aesthetic, a small fender could have been installed below the top tube permanently.
Last edited by Winfried; 03-14-24 at 08:50 AM.
Likes For Winfried:
#53
Senior Member
For touring, I can live with a bigger fold than the Brompton. After hooking the front wheel to the bracket, the bike can be made smallest by removing the seatpost and attaching it horizontally between the frame and the front wheel.
~100km maiden ride scheduled on Sunday.
~100km maiden ride scheduled on Sunday.
For travel, I should be able to get just as small with my 20" bi-fold, by taking off both wheels. But the Ahooga is a lot less effort to get that compact. Taking off the rear wheel on my bike is a mess, not to be done frequently.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 03-14-24 at 07:08 PM.
#54
Senior Member
Hello,
I'd like to replace the original single chainring on a folder with a compact double eg. 50/34. FWIW, it currently has a 7s derailleur in the back, and I measured 52mm between the center of the seat tube and the center of the chain.
What do you suggest to maximimze the chances of finding the right braze-on clamp (Litepro etc.) + derailleur (and two-speed shifter) so I don't order a bunch of parts that won't work?
Since we're not talking performance bike, entry-level parts are fine.
Thank you.
I'd like to replace the original single chainring on a folder with a compact double eg. 50/34. FWIW, it currently has a 7s derailleur in the back, and I measured 52mm between the center of the seat tube and the center of the chain.
What do you suggest to maximimze the chances of finding the right braze-on clamp (Litepro etc.) + derailleur (and two-speed shifter) so I don't order a bunch of parts that won't work?
Since we're not talking performance bike, entry-level parts are fine.
Thank you.
I'd say, first off, try installing a square taper 2X crank on the same bottom bracket spindle, see how it looks, how close chain is to down tube.
I hope you can get it to work, because the frame folding design is excellent.
EDIT: I'm a huge fan of 2X cranks on 20" folders. But in this special case, if one won't fit due to the downtube configuration, this may be a candidate for 1X crank and megarange cassette. It looks like you already have a medium or long cage rear derailleur, it's a question of the maximum big cog size it can handle (my guess is 34, that's pretty standard), but there are other new derailleurs that can go much bigger, though it still needs to be finessed to not have the derailleur hang too low to the ground, such as chain length such that the derailleur cage is swung forward when on the big cog. Ron Damon, a frequent presence on the folder threads, seems to have specific knowledge in that department, he runs 20"/406 and 16"/349/305 bikes with big cassettes.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 03-15-24 at 12:06 AM.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: The Ring of Fire
Posts: 932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 567 Times
in
356 Posts
For 11-speed, there's the pricier Shimano SLX RD-M7000-GS and XT RD-M8000-GS parts.
Last edited by Ron Damon; 03-15-24 at 04:45 PM.
#56
Senior Member
Wow, it's like calling out for Superman, and he's there!
Ron, he's running a 7 speed freehub (hopefully), are there megarange 1X cassettes in 7? On a standard 7, he can't even fit 8, 8 needs a longer freehub.
Ron, he's running a 7 speed freehub (hopefully), are there megarange 1X cassettes in 7? On a standard 7, he can't even fit 8, 8 needs a longer freehub.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: The Ring of Fire
Posts: 932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 567 Times
in
356 Posts
Last edited by Ron Damon; 03-15-24 at 12:56 AM.
#58
Senior Member
The issue is the RD and ground clearance. Say there is a mega-range 7-, 8- or 9-speed cogset, what medium-cage RD are you gonna use to span it? There simply ain't any in the Shimano lineup. 10-speed is where Shimano starts offering medium-cage RD that you can use with wide range cogsets. Again...and again...and again, the entry point is the Deore RD-M6000-GS, 10-speed part.
So on a new bike, that would be
- new rear wheel
- new cassette
- new rear derailleur
- new shifter
- (probably) new 10-speed compatible crank
A bit of an expense on a brand new bike. Unless 7 will work.
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 03-15-24 at 01:26 AM.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: The Ring of Fire
Posts: 932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 567 Times
in
356 Posts
Yes, I get that. I suppose this will clarify my question: For that Deore RD, are the linkage ratios workable with a 7 speed indexed shifter? Because there's no indexing on the RD itself. If yes, and someone makes a megarange 7 cassette, it should work. If not, then he has to, at minimum, swap out the freehub body (if that will fit), and if that doesn't fit on his hub, swap out the whole wheel for one with a 10 speed compatible freehub.
So on a new bike, that would be
- new rear wheel
- new cassette
- new rear derailleur
- new shifter
- (probably) new 10-speed compatible crank
A bit of an expense on a brand new bike. Unless 7 will work.
Thanks in advance.
So on a new bike, that would be
- new rear wheel
- new cassette
- new rear derailleur
- new shifter
- (probably) new 10-speed compatible crank
A bit of an expense on a brand new bike. Unless 7 will work.
Thanks in advance.
9-speed, 11-46T. Which GS RD, though?
Last edited by Ron Damon; 03-15-24 at 01:45 AM.
#60
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
99 Posts
No issue with the chalnline with a compact 50/34 and a 52/34, for riding or folding. Considering how rare I need to shift to the smaller ring, I'd much rather use a double crankset and a smaller cassette such as the 7s that came with the bike.
To reduce the chance of the rear deraileur hitting something, I might replace the long cage Acera RD-M360 for either a medium cage or even a short cage eg. Claris RD-R20x . I wonder why the mfg chose a long cage for a 7s cassette, especially for a 20" wheel.
Once the Litepro clamp comes in, I'll report back at how the Sora front derailleur works with that setup.
To reduce the chance of the rear deraileur hitting something, I might replace the long cage Acera RD-M360 for either a medium cage or even a short cage eg. Claris RD-R20x . I wonder why the mfg chose a long cage for a 7s cassette, especially for a 20" wheel.
Once the Litepro clamp comes in, I'll report back at how the Sora front derailleur works with that setup.
Last edited by Winfried; 03-15-24 at 02:29 AM.
#61
Senior Member
9 speed would require a new freehub body, so in for a pence, in for a pound, I'd then recommend 10 road (I think road is on 130mm OLD?).
So yeah, a lot of new parts for a new bike. But at least it does offer an option if he really likes the bike in terms of fold.
Again, thanks.
#62
Senior Member
No issue with the chalnline with a compact 50/34 and a 52/34, for riding or folding. Considering how rare I need to shift to the smaller ring, I'd much rather use a double crankset and a smaller cassette such as the 7s that came with the bike.
To reduce the chance of the rear deraileur hitting something, I might replace the long cage Acera RD-M360 for either a medium cage or even a short cage eg. Claris RD-R20x . I wonder why the mfg chose a long cage for a 7s cassette, especially for a 20" wheel.
Once the Litepro clamp comes in, I'll report back at thow the Sora front derailleur works with that setup.
To reduce the chance of the rear deraileur hitting something, I might replace the long cage Acera RD-M360 for either a medium cage or even a short cage eg. Claris RD-R20x . I wonder why the mfg chose a long cage for a 7s cassette, especially for a 20" wheel.
Once the Litepro clamp comes in, I'll report back at thow the Sora front derailleur works with that setup.
Looking forward to more pics and comments, very interesting, different bike from other 20" folders.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 03-15-24 at 02:19 AM.
#63
iti biking
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: The Ring of Fire
Posts: 932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 567 Times
in
356 Posts
Well, there you have it.
Though in my parish, Microshift is virtually non-existent. Barring availability problems, the issue would then turn to whether the Microshift part is substantially less expensive, lighter or studier than the Shimano part. Otherwise, why bother.
Though in my parish, Microshift is virtually non-existent. Barring availability problems, the issue would then turn to whether the Microshift part is substantially less expensive, lighter or studier than the Shimano part. Otherwise, why bother.
Last edited by Ron Damon; 03-16-24 at 07:02 AM.
#65
Senior Member
I generally agree. However, a Microshift front derailleur (braze-on) fits on my FD adaptor, whereas Shimano doesn't, the linkage interferes with the mounting point. The Shimano linkage is double-shear, generally more durable, but the Microshift linkage is cantilever, so is more compact and thus fits. (This would not be an issue if the frame had an FD braze-on.) I want to swap out the Microshift (9-triple) because the spring is ridiculously strong, so much so, I could not use a gripshift, and even with a Shimano lever, it's still a hard push.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: The Ring of Fire
Posts: 932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 567 Times
in
356 Posts
I generally agree. However, a Microshift front derailleur (braze-on) fits on my FD adaptor, whereas Shimano doesn't, the linkage interferes with the mounting point. The Shimano linkage is double-shear, generally more durable, but the Microshift linkage is cantilever, so is more compact and thus fits. (This would not be an issue if the frame had an FD braze-on.) I want to swap out the Microshift (9-triple) because the spring is ridiculously strong, so much so, I could not use a gripshift, and even with a Shimano lever, it's still a hard push.
#67
Senior Member
#68
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
99 Posts
To install the Litepro B clamp, filing down the upper bracket for the bottle cage was super easy because of the aluminum frame. For that reason, the other clamps with the flange at the bottom (Litepro K/P/SP8, etc.) might work too. The Sora derailleur works very well with a compact 52/34 crankset.
#69
Senior Member
To install the Litepro B clamp, filing down the upper bracket for the bottle cage was super easy because of the aluminum frame. For that reason, the other clamps with the flange at the bottom (Litepro K/P/SP8, etc.) might work too. The Sora derailleur works very well with a compact 52/34 crankset.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 747
Bikes: Dahon Jetstream p8 (sold), customized Dahon Helios x10, customzed Dahon Smooth Hound x11,customized Dahon Hammerhead 8.0 d7, Planet X Free Ranger (mullet setup 1x11), Planet X Giovanissimi 20 (1x9), Frog 52 (1x9) and Frog 48 1s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Liked 240 Times
in
176 Posts
Looking how the thread is evolving, I thought I'd add food for thoughts.
I get the 2x appeal to add range to the current 7s 11-28 cassette. During the 1st lockdown, I run my helios with 2x 7s tourney (53-39 x 14-30 from memory) on big apple 50-406 tyres and while it was OK for touring, I found the gaps between gear quite big (annoying) and redundant (3 gear over laps). Because on this, I moved to 2x9 with a cheap close ratio cassette and that was much better... but it was more complicated.
Since then, I built several bikes and for simplicity, the 5 bikes are now 1X. For touring on 20", I found that a 50T chainring with a 11-34 or 36 cassette works well however, with 20% climbs, 11-40 is required. For flatter stuff a 56T chainring is better.
Talking to Ron and racing gravel, CX and XC, I swapped the helios transmission (again) . Now it is simpler and more importantly, the risk of chain drop and chain slap is reduced. As such, I fitted a narrow wide chainring with a 10s clutched derailleurs and a wider range cassette. The result is excellent and simple.
Going towards 2x with a 7s system is going to give ~310 to 350% range with redundancies and complexity. Moving to a simpler 1x 10 would give ~310 to 360% with a 11-34 or 11-40 cassette and a Zee/Saint clutch derailleur and ~418% with a 11-46 and deore derailleur. These solutions involve simple part swap and are easy to service. To me, they seem very suited to touring.
Note also that many ultra distance racers run 1x aero system with wide range cassette for simplicity and weight and some "adventure" racers have gone back to 1X9 because simple, cheap and durable.
I get the 2x appeal to add range to the current 7s 11-28 cassette. During the 1st lockdown, I run my helios with 2x 7s tourney (53-39 x 14-30 from memory) on big apple 50-406 tyres and while it was OK for touring, I found the gaps between gear quite big (annoying) and redundant (3 gear over laps). Because on this, I moved to 2x9 with a cheap close ratio cassette and that was much better... but it was more complicated.
Since then, I built several bikes and for simplicity, the 5 bikes are now 1X. For touring on 20", I found that a 50T chainring with a 11-34 or 36 cassette works well however, with 20% climbs, 11-40 is required. For flatter stuff a 56T chainring is better.
Talking to Ron and racing gravel, CX and XC, I swapped the helios transmission (again) . Now it is simpler and more importantly, the risk of chain drop and chain slap is reduced. As such, I fitted a narrow wide chainring with a 10s clutched derailleurs and a wider range cassette. The result is excellent and simple.
Going towards 2x with a 7s system is going to give ~310 to 350% range with redundancies and complexity. Moving to a simpler 1x 10 would give ~310 to 360% with a 11-34 or 11-40 cassette and a Zee/Saint clutch derailleur and ~418% with a 11-46 and deore derailleur. These solutions involve simple part swap and are easy to service. To me, they seem very suited to touring.
Note also that many ultra distance racers run 1x aero system with wide range cassette for simplicity and weight and some "adventure" racers have gone back to 1X9 because simple, cheap and durable.
Last edited by Fentuz; 03-20-24 at 02:58 AM.
#73
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
99 Posts
But it requires a long cage, which isn't a good idea with 20" wheels. While riding in the woods, I got a twig stuck in the derailleur cage, which is why I'll be swapping it for a short cage — and is fine for a 7s cassette anyway, and makes me wonder why the mfg chose a long cage.
52/34 + 11-28 = 1,83m - 7,14m = 390%
I've been using a double crankset + derailleur for years on a Brompton successfully. I don't mind the close/overlapping gears as long as I have the right gears for hills and flat. Besides, I rarely switch to the small ring — but am glad it's there when needed. I do touring, not performance cycling :-)
52/34 + 11-28 = 1,83m - 7,14m = 390%
I've been using a double crankset + derailleur for years on a Brompton successfully. I don't mind the close/overlapping gears as long as I have the right gears for hills and flat. Besides, I rarely switch to the small ring — but am glad it's there when needed. I do touring, not performance cycling :-)
#74
Senior Member
(above #71) Only 3 gear overlaps? My 50/34 11-30 (7-speed) has 5 redundant gears. So with regard to that, there's no question that 1X is superior. But to get 400% range with 21 gear inch low on 20"/406, I need 2X, or, a cassette with such a large low cog (44), that rear derailleur clearance to the ground, and to the tire on wide tires, is worse, marginal with cheaper derailleurs. And I can't shrink a 1X chainring smaller than 50T and still get the 85 gear inch high that I need, on 20"/406. 1X works fantastic on 24"/26"/700c/29er, you name it. But more iffy on 20"/406, unless you go to one of the freehubs that offers a 9T high cog, so the low is only 36T, which is more expensive in parts and a bit less durable. I wish it were not so, because 1X would give me finer gear steps and no redundant gears. I know folks here have done it, but I still want more RD clearance than that, if I can.
There are sailboats with only one sail, they're called "cat-rigged", simpler to sail. I don't find sailboats interesting unless they have a jib as well, two sails. I also prefer manual transmissions, and can synchronize my shifts to save wear on the synchro rings.
There are sailboats with only one sail, they're called "cat-rigged", simpler to sail. I don't find sailboats interesting unless they have a jib as well, two sails. I also prefer manual transmissions, and can synchronize my shifts to save wear on the synchro rings.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 03-20-24 at 04:24 AM.