Is it V-Brake or U-Brake
#2
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Given your previous posts about a BMX bike, I'm gong to guess U-brake. What do I win?
Likes For Rolla:
#3
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,119
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1791 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
934 Posts
"V" brakes were the replacement for canti's on canti studs that pulled 2x as much cable 1/2 as hard to avoid compression of coiled brake housing.
"U" brakes were the BMX equivalent but the studs were mounted further away from the wheel axle and were operated via a long "U" shaped center-pull style straddle cable.
Both are considered "long pull" so you will need matching brake levers or if have an option set the levers set to "long." Meaning the cable head attaches at the location further from the brake lever pivot.
"U" brakes were the BMX equivalent but the studs were mounted further away from the wheel axle and were operated via a long "U" shaped center-pull style straddle cable.
Both are considered "long pull" so you will need matching brake levers or if have an option set the levers set to "long." Meaning the cable head attaches at the location further from the brake lever pivot.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#4
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
U-brakes are often run underneath the seatstays, or sometimes under the chainstays behind the bottom bracket. V-brakes are always on the top of the seatstays.
Likes For Rolla:
#5
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,468
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3165 Post(s)
Liked 1,723 Times
in
1,041 Posts
"V" brakes were the replacement for canti's on canti studs that pulled 2x as much cable 1/2 as hard to avoid compression of coiled brake housing.
"U" brakes were the BMX equivalent but the studs were mounted further away from the wheel axle and were operated via a long "U" shaped center-pull style straddle cable.
"U" brakes were the BMX equivalent but the studs were mounted further away from the wheel axle and were operated via a long "U" shaped center-pull style straddle cable.
Also, the U-brake takes its name from the shape of the brake arms, not the straddle cable, and in fact, U-brakes needn’t even use a straddle cable, as some models can run the cable housing right to one of the arms directly..
The U-brake was, as I recall, Shimano’s high volume interpretation of Charlie Cunningham’s roller cam brake.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
Likes For cxwrench:
#7
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,119
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1791 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
934 Posts
For clarity, U-brakes debuted on MTB bikes— well before they appeared on BMX— as the high performance brake option of the ‘80s to replace weak and clearance-challenged cantilever brakes. The V-brake came after the U-brake as the high performance option, and effectively replaced U-brakes.
Also, the U-brake takes its name from the shape of the brake arms, not the straddle cable, and in fact, U-brakes needn’t even use a straddle cable, as some models can run the cable housing right to one of the arms directly..
The U-brake was, as I recall, Shimano’s high volume interpretation of Charlie Cunningham’s roller cam brake.
Also, the U-brake takes its name from the shape of the brake arms, not the straddle cable, and in fact, U-brakes needn’t even use a straddle cable, as some models can run the cable housing right to one of the arms directly..
The U-brake was, as I recall, Shimano’s high volume interpretation of Charlie Cunningham’s roller cam brake.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#8
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,524
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2750 Post(s)
Liked 3,406 Times
in
2,061 Posts
mountain bike u brakes were short lived - a couple, two, three years in the late 80's. They filled with mud/debris due to location.
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...1bb58&Enum=117
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...1bb58&Enum=117
Likes For alcjphil:
#11
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,606
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4391 Post(s)
Liked 4,029 Times
in
2,690 Posts
Also lets keep in mind that V-Brakes are a trademark from Shimano. Linear pull brakes would be the proper name for non-shimano brakes of that style.
However yes nonsense post for no reason.
However yes nonsense post for no reason.
#12
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Likes For Rolla:
#13
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,468
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3165 Post(s)
Liked 1,723 Times
in
1,041 Posts
mountain bike u brakes were short lived - a couple, two, three years in the late 80's. They filled with mud/debris due to location.
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...1bb58&Enum=117
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...1bb58&Enum=117
The response was to develop low-profile cantis, designs which evolved into the V-brake.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 549
Bikes: Focus Arriba, Specialized Roubaix Expert, Bianchi Impulso Allroad
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 82 Times
in
53 Posts
It wasn’t really the location that was the problem— you could find MTBs both with under-chainstay and typical seatstay mounted U-brakes— but rather due to the nature of the design, which restricted wheel clearance and caused mud to build up. They were also heavy because of the design.
The response was to develop low-profile cantis, designs which evolved into the V-brake.
The response was to develop low-profile cantis, designs which evolved into the V-brake.
#15
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,468
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3165 Post(s)
Liked 1,723 Times
in
1,041 Posts
Not accurate as far as the timing. Cantilever brakes were around well before (and during and after) MTB U-brakes were designed. The primary reason for U-brake development was the relatively poor performance of cantis. Leverage was much higher with the U-brake but as noted, they quickly mucked up in muddy conditions, and they were heavy-- so everyone went back to Cantis rather quickly. Circa 86 I had an MTB with the under-chainstay Shimano Deore U-brake (Cantis on front) and in non-muddy conditions the power and better modulation of the U-brake was definitely an advantage IMO. In muddy conditions I just left that bike at home and took my other bike with the standard-of-the-time Cantilevers.
Similarly, discs followed V’s, which is not to say that discs didn’t exist before nor that V’s disappeared after, I’m talking about trends and common usage. Suntour didn’t eliminate the rollercam from it’s lineup until after they launched the lo-pro XC 9000 series cantis, nor did Shimano drop the U until after the ‘92 intro of XTR and the lo-pro canti.
Likes For chaadster:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 549
Bikes: Focus Arriba, Specialized Roubaix Expert, Bianchi Impulso Allroad
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 82 Times
in
53 Posts
Note that I said “low profile” cantis followed the U-brake.
Similarly, discs followed V’s, which is not to say that discs didn’t exist before nor that V’s disappeared after, I’m talking about trends and common usage. Suntour didn’t eliminate the rollercam from it’s lineup until after they launched the lo-pro XC 9000 series cantis, nor did Shimano drop the U until after the ‘92 intro of XTR and the lo-pro canti.
Similarly, discs followed V’s, which is not to say that discs didn’t exist before nor that V’s disappeared after, I’m talking about trends and common usage. Suntour didn’t eliminate the rollercam from it’s lineup until after they launched the lo-pro XC 9000 series cantis, nor did Shimano drop the U until after the ‘92 intro of XTR and the lo-pro canti.
Edit - I see the first Shimano V-brakes weren't available until 1996 - that was a lot of years of canti-s and u-brakes. I guess the developments in forks and suspension were dominating all my memories of those interim years.
Shimano History (mombatbicycles.com)
Last edited by redcon1; 08-17-22 at 07:33 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
U brakes were popular for like 2 years, the odds of finding a bike with them is low. V brakes were popular for a long time and work great.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
This does not agree with my experience. U brakes were put on bikes before 'long pull' levers were available. Long pull levers weren't a thing, AFAIK, until Mid 90s when V brakes came out. All bikes with U brakes came with the standard 'short pull' levers of the time. There were also brakes very similar to 'u brakes' that were common on old road bikes - 'centre pull caliper brakes' and I think these had very similar geometry to the U brakes, which were typically mounted on posts above the rim... these were used with standard road levers which are definitely 'short pull'
#19
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
#20
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,979
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,045 Times
in
668 Posts
This does not agree with my experience. U brakes were put on bikes before 'long pull' levers were available. Long pull levers weren't a thing, AFAIK, until Mid 90s when V brakes came out. All bikes with U brakes came with the standard 'short pull' levers of the time. There were also brakes very similar to 'u brakes' that were common on old road bikes - 'centre pull caliper brakes' and I think these had very similar geometry to the U brakes, which were typically mounted on posts above the rim... these were used with standard road levers which are definitely 'short pull'
Otto
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
#22
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,468
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3165 Post(s)
Liked 1,723 Times
in
1,041 Posts
I did note that.. I just don't put the low-profile arms in their own category, I suppose. The braking performance of the low-pro versions were at best the same-- and with poor setup, even worse than the medium or longer arm canti's. I suppose most everyone, including me, moved quickly to V-brakes, and were elated when disc brakes came along
Edit - I see the first Shimano V-brakes weren't available until 1996 - that was a lot of years of canti-s and u-brakes. I guess the developments in forks and suspension were dominating all my memories of those interim years.
Shimano History (mombatbicycles.com)
Edit - I see the first Shimano V-brakes weren't available until 1996 - that was a lot of years of canti-s and u-brakes. I guess the developments in forks and suspension were dominating all my memories of those interim years.
Shimano History (mombatbicycles.com)
Charlie Cunningham invented the roller cam and sold it through WTB, later licensing it Suntour in ‘85. Shimano couldn’t directly copy Suntour’s brake, so they came up with the U-brake as the workaround to bring a competitor into that space. So really, Us and roller cams should be considered together, and enjoyed a good 10 years of usage on some of the most interesting, creative, and important framesets dating back the early days of MTB.
Likes For chaadster:
#23
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,119
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1791 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
934 Posts
Well, everyone has a time to eat a big ol' bowl of crow.
I think today is my day. All this time I thought U's (& BMX calipers) were long pull & just accepted things it as-is.
Time to onboard some knowledge in this here noggin' o' mine.
Thanks all.
I think today is my day. All this time I thought U's (& BMX calipers) were long pull & just accepted things it as-is.
Time to onboard some knowledge in this here noggin' o' mine.
Thanks all.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
Likes For base2:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,922
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4813 Post(s)
Liked 3,941 Times
in
2,563 Posts
Let's get down to the root of all this. "V"s and "U"s. If you double up a "V" you get two double "U"s as in "W", not double "V". Spelled out clearly in out alphabet. I rest my case.
Likes For 79pmooney: