Press Fit Bottom Bracket
#6
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3091 Post(s)
Liked 6,601 Times
in
3,785 Posts
Thread moved from Introductions to Road.
__________________
#7
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,057
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,928 Times
in
4,160 Posts
#8
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,547
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,441 Times
in
2,764 Posts
Major manufacturers are moving away from press fit. There are plenty of choices now with threaded. If you are dead set on a particular bike with press fit, investigate whether one of the threaded work arounds exists for that bike. If so, lay one in for the future.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times
in
121 Posts
I will not buy a bike with press fit BB they are a pain at times and need much more regular service. A threaded BB is a thing of beauty and ease of use in some cases lasting many years and miles.
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
I wouldn't let the BB type determine what bike you get. Many other things are more important.
If I had the choice between two bikes that I considered equal in every other way and one was a threaded BB and the other press fit, then I'd choose the one with the threaded BB.
However if the bike with the press fit was a prettier color, then hands down I'd go for the press fit!
If I had the choice between two bikes that I considered equal in every other way and one was a threaded BB and the other press fit, then I'd choose the one with the threaded BB.
However if the bike with the press fit was a prettier color, then hands down I'd go for the press fit!
Likes For Iride01:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
It has never been a big deal for me. I currently have one bike threaded and one press fit. Both are hassle free. Previous bike was press fit too and had no issues.
Likes For PeteHski:
#12
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,448
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3148 Post(s)
Liked 1,714 Times
in
1,034 Posts
There can be alignment issues with monocoque carbon fiber constructions and pressfits, but they’re neither common nor insurmountable, either on the production end or user end. Metal frames are easier to manufacture in this sense.
All things equal, it doesn’t matter what the BB type is.
All things equal, it doesn’t matter what the BB type is.
Likes For chaadster:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,970 Times
in
4,692 Posts
There are plenty of good threaded BB bikes out there, with more mfrs going back to them all the time. If it is a worry for you, you should just go threaded.
Likes For Koyote:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
398 Posts
If you have a frame with a press fit shell you can run an adapter. After all my trials and tribulations with BB30, mainly creaking, I've come to the conclusion that not all bearings are manufactured to the perfect spec. I finally have a set of bearings that are silent with no locktite, the ones that came with my Kuota carbon cranks. As far as installation, ect, after awhile you get it down like anything else. I have no problems working on them now and whoever said they need much more regular maintenance is wrong. After you get them properly installed and silent you can ride thousands upon thousands of miles and not have to touch them.
If I had to choose one or the other I wouldn't choose press fit but it wouldn't be a deal breaker.
If I had to choose one or the other I wouldn't choose press fit but it wouldn't be a deal breaker.
Likes For Lazyass:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,395
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,920 Posts
if the bb pf30 i use could have came with threads instead & contain the same crank arm install assembly, it might be the real chicken dinner for me. not the case, so I just anticipate replacing the pf30 more often than the threaded stuff. I haven't tried anything more expensive other than the OEM pf30 unit, so I probably am making more scheduled work in the end. 15 minutes & $15 isn't too much to clean, swap, & lube it for the scheduled work...
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#17
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,448
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3148 Post(s)
Liked 1,714 Times
in
1,034 Posts
Whether you pressfit cups into the frame or thread them in, the bearings are always pressfit. If it’s good for the goose, it’s good for the gander… Any issues are to do with design and manufacturing, not with the nature of pressfit. Threaded BB inserts can just as easily be misaligned in carbon fiber monocoque if the design (engineering) isn’t good.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
Whether you pressfit cups into the frame or thread them in, the bearings are always pressfit. If it’s good for the goose, it’s good for the gander… Any issues are to do with design and manufacturing, not with the nature of pressfit. Threaded BB inserts can just as easily be misaligned in carbon fiber monocoque if the design (engineering) isn’t good.
so when someone says "press fit bad", they're obviously not saying that the entire concept of press fit is bad. They're saying that much of the time, the manufacturer is going to screw it up and you're going to need help. And that comes from an adapter of some sort.
#19
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,448
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3148 Post(s)
Liked 1,714 Times
in
1,034 Posts
This is meaningless. It's way, way easier to get the tolerances on a machined plastic or meta part right than a molded carbon shell. Yes, press fit is not inherently a problem. But pretty much 0 bike manufacturers are capable of consistently nailing press-fit bottom bracket tolerances. The best PF BB shells are machined alloy. This is what Look does.
so when someone says "press fit bad", they're obviously not saying that the entire concept of press fit is bad. They're saying that much of the time, the manufacturer is going to screw it up and you're going to need help. And that comes from an adapter of some sort.
so when someone says "press fit bad", they're obviously not saying that the entire concept of press fit is bad. They're saying that much of the time, the manufacturer is going to screw it up and you're going to need help. And that comes from an adapter of some sort.
Likes For chaadster:
#20
Senior Member
I had been vehemently anti-press fit for years. I wouldn't buy a bike with a press fit BB... then I bought a bike with press fit. I currently have two bikes with press fit, neither has been an issue over many thousands of miles. I've been persuaded that (properly manufactured) press-fit is just fine. It's worth noting that every other bearing in the entire world is press fit, apparently other industries can figure this out.
I think one major factor in the negative press around press fit is that some of the largest brands (notably Trek, Specialized and Cannondale) are also some of the worst at properly manufacturing press fit BB shells. Also, some standards (example: BB86) seem less reliant on perfect tolerances than others. Having said that I have a cross bike with the supposedly awful BB30 bottom bracket. I haven't had to touch that BB30 (notably high quality NTN bearings in a precisely made titanium shell) since 2017 despite riding it through countless rain storms, mud pits, dust clouds etc. It still turns smooth as silk. In that time, I've replaced two threaded bottom brackets on my (significantly cheaper) gravel/adventure bike. So, I don't know what to believe.
I think one major factor in the negative press around press fit is that some of the largest brands (notably Trek, Specialized and Cannondale) are also some of the worst at properly manufacturing press fit BB shells. Also, some standards (example: BB86) seem less reliant on perfect tolerances than others. Having said that I have a cross bike with the supposedly awful BB30 bottom bracket. I haven't had to touch that BB30 (notably high quality NTN bearings in a precisely made titanium shell) since 2017 despite riding it through countless rain storms, mud pits, dust clouds etc. It still turns smooth as silk. In that time, I've replaced two threaded bottom brackets on my (significantly cheaper) gravel/adventure bike. So, I don't know what to believe.
Likes For Hiro11:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
It seems that you have a pretty nuanced grasp of the situation. Pressfit vs threaded is not what determines the quality of a bottom bracket. Just like how frame material doesn't determine the quality of a bike.
The optimal race bike would use pressfit. Either BB86 for shimano or BB386 for DUB/30mm. It's lighter, stiffer and theoretically allows for better alignment. There is no doubt about that. The only ? is how you would achieve the tolerances required for optimal performance on a carbon frame. With threaded, there is a floor on how bad the frame can be because you have to put in metal inserts and tap them. The tap won't fit if the hole is 1mm undersized. Plus you can safely machine metal to pretty precise tolerances.
I'll go as far as to say that BSA is a suboptimal solution for the modern race bike. There are 3 reasons for this.
1) BSA is not accommodating of 30mm spindles. BSA 30 bottom brackets use less material than BSA (24) to be able to slip a 30mm spindle through. This leads to less stiffness.
2) threaded adds weight. PF has less redundant material in the bottom bracket area. I think I've seen people claim a delta of about 100g.
3) outboard bearings are generally not a great idea. Yes, pulling the bearings outboard on a BSA shell from square taper to a 24 or even 30mm spindle allows for a lighter, stiffer overall setup. But you're not going to match the stiffness to weight ratio of an inboard T47 setup like what Trek uses. And definitely not the stiffness to weight ratio of something like BB386EVO.
That being said... these are all EXTREMELY marginal issues compared to the plague that is poor manufacturing. You'd be hard pressed to notice any of these issues on a perfectly manufactured BSA 30 bike vs a BB386EVO bike.
Overall... we should be pushing manufacturers to adhere to tight tolerances and should hold them accountable when they sell multi-thousand dollar frames that are out of whack. The specific standard they use is far less relevant than most people believe.
The optimal race bike would use pressfit. Either BB86 for shimano or BB386 for DUB/30mm. It's lighter, stiffer and theoretically allows for better alignment. There is no doubt about that. The only ? is how you would achieve the tolerances required for optimal performance on a carbon frame. With threaded, there is a floor on how bad the frame can be because you have to put in metal inserts and tap them. The tap won't fit if the hole is 1mm undersized. Plus you can safely machine metal to pretty precise tolerances.
I'll go as far as to say that BSA is a suboptimal solution for the modern race bike. There are 3 reasons for this.
1) BSA is not accommodating of 30mm spindles. BSA 30 bottom brackets use less material than BSA (24) to be able to slip a 30mm spindle through. This leads to less stiffness.
2) threaded adds weight. PF has less redundant material in the bottom bracket area. I think I've seen people claim a delta of about 100g.
3) outboard bearings are generally not a great idea. Yes, pulling the bearings outboard on a BSA shell from square taper to a 24 or even 30mm spindle allows for a lighter, stiffer overall setup. But you're not going to match the stiffness to weight ratio of an inboard T47 setup like what Trek uses. And definitely not the stiffness to weight ratio of something like BB386EVO.
That being said... these are all EXTREMELY marginal issues compared to the plague that is poor manufacturing. You'd be hard pressed to notice any of these issues on a perfectly manufactured BSA 30 bike vs a BB386EVO bike.
Overall... we should be pushing manufacturers to adhere to tight tolerances and should hold them accountable when they sell multi-thousand dollar frames that are out of whack. The specific standard they use is far less relevant than most people believe.
Likes For smashndash:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,395
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,920 Posts
never had a pf bearing fail. the plastic shell is what gives up on the assembly ime. OEM stock bicycle with a pf30 FSA bb cracked around the pf30's lip & sent it in the bb.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#23
Full Member
It seems that you have a pretty nuanced grasp of the situation. Pressfit vs threaded is not what determines the quality of a bottom bracket. Just like how frame material doesn't determine the quality of a bike.
The optimal race bike would use pressfit. Either BB86 for shimano or BB386 for DUB/30mm. It's lighter, stiffer and theoretically allows for better alignment. There is no doubt about that. The only ? is how you would achieve the tolerances required for optimal performance on a carbon frame. With threaded, there is a floor on how bad the frame can be because you have to put in metal inserts and tap them. The tap won't fit if the hole is 1mm undersized. Plus you can safely machine metal to pretty precise tolerances.
I'll go as far as to say that BSA is a suboptimal solution for the modern race bike. There are 3 reasons for this.
1) BSA is not accommodating of 30mm spindles. BSA 30 bottom brackets use less material than BSA (24) to be able to slip a 30mm spindle through. This leads to less stiffness.
2) threaded adds weight. PF has less redundant material in the bottom bracket area. I think I've seen people claim a delta of about 100g.
3) outboard bearings are generally not a great idea. Yes, pulling the bearings outboard on a BSA shell from square taper to a 24 or even 30mm spindle allows for a lighter, stiffer overall setup. But you're not going to match the stiffness to weight ratio of an inboard T47 setup like what Trek uses. And definitely not the stiffness to weight ratio of something like BB386EVO.
That being said... these are all EXTREMELY marginal issues compared to the plague that is poor manufacturing. You'd be hard pressed to notice any of these issues on a perfectly manufactured BSA 30 bike vs a BB386EVO bike.
Overall... we should be pushing manufacturers to adhere to tight tolerances and should hold them accountable when they sell multi-thousand dollar frames that are out of whack. The specific standard they use is far less relevant than most people believe.
The optimal race bike would use pressfit. Either BB86 for shimano or BB386 for DUB/30mm. It's lighter, stiffer and theoretically allows for better alignment. There is no doubt about that. The only ? is how you would achieve the tolerances required for optimal performance on a carbon frame. With threaded, there is a floor on how bad the frame can be because you have to put in metal inserts and tap them. The tap won't fit if the hole is 1mm undersized. Plus you can safely machine metal to pretty precise tolerances.
I'll go as far as to say that BSA is a suboptimal solution for the modern race bike. There are 3 reasons for this.
1) BSA is not accommodating of 30mm spindles. BSA 30 bottom brackets use less material than BSA (24) to be able to slip a 30mm spindle through. This leads to less stiffness.
2) threaded adds weight. PF has less redundant material in the bottom bracket area. I think I've seen people claim a delta of about 100g.
3) outboard bearings are generally not a great idea. Yes, pulling the bearings outboard on a BSA shell from square taper to a 24 or even 30mm spindle allows for a lighter, stiffer overall setup. But you're not going to match the stiffness to weight ratio of an inboard T47 setup like what Trek uses. And definitely not the stiffness to weight ratio of something like BB386EVO.
That being said... these are all EXTREMELY marginal issues compared to the plague that is poor manufacturing. You'd be hard pressed to notice any of these issues on a perfectly manufactured BSA 30 bike vs a BB386EVO bike.
Overall... we should be pushing manufacturers to adhere to tight tolerances and should hold them accountable when they sell multi-thousand dollar frames that are out of whack. The specific standard they use is far less relevant than most people believe.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
So, why is press fit “optimal”? There has been no correlation shown between any measure of stiffness and efficiency. Numerous threads on this site have been dedicated to that one. Weight maybe, but we’re talking about pretty small amounts when the bike and rider are taken in account as a whole. A 100 gram savings for a 160 lb rider/bike combination is a 0.137% advantage, and then only really on climbs. A BSA bottom bracket is limited to the diameter of the axle as you stated. A 24 mm axle is stiffer torsionally than say an old 17 mm square taper (higher “J” value), but any amount of “wind-up” (very small) in the axle will be returned with essentially no loss of energy during the pedal stroke. As for external bearings, they don’t add anything to stiffness since that is a function of the frame construction, not the location of the bearings in the BB area.
lighter is always better holding all things equal. I shouldn't have to explain more.
A wider bearing stance has some benefits, but yes. Moving the cups themselves outboard doesn't help with stiffness. The only purpose of that was to make room for a 24mm spindle. That's my point. BSA is a hack because it doesn't allow for the frame to fully optimize the construction wrt the bearing stance. An optimal race frame would use something like T47 (Trek) where the frame itself has a wider shell and the bearing stance is also wider.
Also I will disagree that torsional stiffness is the only benefit of a larger spindle. You also have a regular ol bending moment. Sure, with an infinitely stiff frame, this wouldn't matter. But a stiffer spindle will do a better job of transferring the load across the shell and will thus keep the bearings in alignment. At least, that's what I think.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,887
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 1,745 Times
in
1,016 Posts
Is it BB30, then yes. Do not pass go, do not collect $200. I got rid of a Synapse due to the BB30 noise. It drove me nuts.