Trek 520D for Daily Shopping
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Trek 520D for Daily Shopping
Hi, little intro about me:
I own a Trek DS3 and FX4 and I don't ride it much. In the past 2 years, DS3 have done 1000 km and FX4 only 200 km. I use FX4 to buy newspaper, but I just saw Trek 520 D which comes with racks and I am thinking of buying this as daily shopping cycle instead of touring.
Interestingly, Trek priced this bike bit cheaper in India compared to the USA. So, I find it quite value for money.
Do you think 520D will be good option for local errands?
Thanks,
VK
I own a Trek DS3 and FX4 and I don't ride it much. In the past 2 years, DS3 have done 1000 km and FX4 only 200 km. I use FX4 to buy newspaper, but I just saw Trek 520 D which comes with racks and I am thinking of buying this as daily shopping cycle instead of touring.
Interestingly, Trek priced this bike bit cheaper in India compared to the USA. So, I find it quite value for money.
Do you think 520D will be good option for local errands?
Thanks,
VK
Likes For vignesh_ce:
#2
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,543
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4361 Post(s)
Liked 4,002 Times
in
2,671 Posts
A touring bike makes a fine commuter or hauler. The things that a touring cyclist needs are certainly very similar to the needs of a commuter just tourists tend to ride longer distances but durability, reliability and carrying capacity are quite the same.
#3
Senior Member
I have a Trek 520 (older rim brake version) and a Trek FX disc. I think the 520 makes a great errand and commuter bike. I like both bikes, but the 520 is more comfortable for longer rides, I think because of the geometry with the drop bars (instead of the FX's flat bars) and the steel frame seems a little more comfortable/flexible than the aluminum.
I have racks on both the FX and 520 so both are convenient for lugging around groceries or items for work (laptop, clothes, lunch, etc.).
The 520 comes equipped with a triple chain ring with some nice low gears, so if you are going up any steep hills with a loaded bike it makes things a lot more comfortable. It's nice to have the flexibility to have the wider range of gears, especially for an errand or utility bike. The big chain ring is sufficient for when you want to go fast on the flats and downhill.
The reason why I bought the FX was it was inexpensive and had disc brakes which are good for the snow and rain (I live in New Hampshire in the US). Also, the aluminum frame doesn't rust which is nice. However, I prefer riding the 520.
I have racks on both the FX and 520 so both are convenient for lugging around groceries or items for work (laptop, clothes, lunch, etc.).
The 520 comes equipped with a triple chain ring with some nice low gears, so if you are going up any steep hills with a loaded bike it makes things a lot more comfortable. It's nice to have the flexibility to have the wider range of gears, especially for an errand or utility bike. The big chain ring is sufficient for when you want to go fast on the flats and downhill.
The reason why I bought the FX was it was inexpensive and had disc brakes which are good for the snow and rain (I live in New Hampshire in the US). Also, the aluminum frame doesn't rust which is nice. However, I prefer riding the 520.
Likes For cynergy:
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thank you, I am quite surprised that TREK 520 D is priced at 1300$ in India whereas in the USA it retails at 1700$. I am not sure why though. May be TREK wants to promote cycle touring in India.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Hi Cynergy,
I am in the same boat as yours. I have Trek FX4, I bought it on Sale at 30% off. What I like in Trek 520D is that, it comes with racks and drop down handle bar and I don't have any bicycle with drop down bars. I thought of fixing racks in my FX4, but those Trek racks are bit expensive in India. So, I am thinking to buy 520D just for local errands. I don't intend to do any long distance touring. It will be used only for grocery shopping in style
Do you have any pics of your 520D with loaded luggage?
Vignesh
I am in the same boat as yours. I have Trek FX4, I bought it on Sale at 30% off. What I like in Trek 520D is that, it comes with racks and drop down handle bar and I don't have any bicycle with drop down bars. I thought of fixing racks in my FX4, but those Trek racks are bit expensive in India. So, I am thinking to buy 520D just for local errands. I don't intend to do any long distance touring. It will be used only for grocery shopping in style
Do you have any pics of your 520D with loaded luggage?
Vignesh
#6
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,543
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4361 Post(s)
Liked 4,002 Times
in
2,671 Posts
Are you sure the conversions are all working right? I guess it is possible you might find something for a different price in a different market but can't imagine they are that crazy different.
#7
Senior Member
Hi Cynergy,
I am in the same boat as yours. I have Trek FX4, I bought it on Sale at 30% off. What I like in Trek 520D is that, it comes with racks and drop down handle bar and I don't have any bicycle with drop down bars. I thought of fixing racks in my FX4, but those Trek racks are bit expensive in India. So, I am thinking to buy 520D just for local errands. I don't intend to do any long distance touring. It will be used only for grocery shopping in style
Do you have any pics of your 520D with loaded luggage?
Vignesh
I am in the same boat as yours. I have Trek FX4, I bought it on Sale at 30% off. What I like in Trek 520D is that, it comes with racks and drop down handle bar and I don't have any bicycle with drop down bars. I thought of fixing racks in my FX4, but those Trek racks are bit expensive in India. So, I am thinking to buy 520D just for local errands. I don't intend to do any long distance touring. It will be used only for grocery shopping in style
Do you have any pics of your 520D with loaded luggage?
Vignesh
I find the drop bars more comfortable for longer rides or riding up a long hill. With the flat bars, more of my weight is on my seat rather than distributed on my seat and my hands like they are with the drop bars. For short rides it's not as noticeable, but for longer rides (2 hours or more) i can feel it. Even if I have the same type of seat and same seat height, etc., the drop bar bike feels more comfortable for the longer rides. I still really like my FX bike, though. It's a great commuter and also good for running shorter errands.
I don't have any pictures of the 520 with luggage, but if I get a chance I'll take a photo with the Ortlieb panniers on them. I have the older non-D 520 (I have V rim brakes instead of disk brakes).
Cynergy
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Hi Veganbikes
Yes, indeed. Trek India is promoting the bike tourism. That's why you will find it priced lower. Even their luggage pannier bags are priced significantly lower than the US market. Trek 520D is priced at INR 95,999 inclusive of all taxes, that work out ~ USD 1300. So, I find it as a good deal compared to other bikes. That's why I am inclined to this 520-D, although I don't do any tourism.
https://www.trekbikes.com/in/en_IN/b...?colorCode=red
Yes, indeed. Trek India is promoting the bike tourism. That's why you will find it priced lower. Even their luggage pannier bags are priced significantly lower than the US market. Trek 520D is priced at INR 95,999 inclusive of all taxes, that work out ~ USD 1300. So, I find it as a good deal compared to other bikes. That's why I am inclined to this 520-D, although I don't do any tourism.
https://www.trekbikes.com/in/en_IN/b...?colorCode=red
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Hi Vignesh,
I find the drop bars more comfortable for longer rides or riding up a long hill. With the flat bars, more of my weight is on my seat rather than distributed on my seat and my hands like they are with the drop bars. For short rides it's not as noticeable, but for longer rides (2 hours or more) i can feel it. Even if I have the same type of seat and same seat height, etc., the drop bar bike feels more comfortable for the longer rides. I still really like my FX bike, though. It's a great commuter and also good for running shorter errands.
I don't have any pictures of the 520 with luggage, but if I get a chance I'll take a photo with the Ortlieb panniers on them. I have the older non-D 520 (I have V rim brakes instead of disk brakes).
Cynergy
I find the drop bars more comfortable for longer rides or riding up a long hill. With the flat bars, more of my weight is on my seat rather than distributed on my seat and my hands like they are with the drop bars. For short rides it's not as noticeable, but for longer rides (2 hours or more) i can feel it. Even if I have the same type of seat and same seat height, etc., the drop bar bike feels more comfortable for the longer rides. I still really like my FX bike, though. It's a great commuter and also good for running shorter errands.
I don't have any pictures of the 520 with luggage, but if I get a chance I'll take a photo with the Ortlieb panniers on them. I have the older non-D 520 (I have V rim brakes instead of disk brakes).
Cynergy
#10
astro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pennington, NJ
Posts: 355
Bikes: Raleigh Sports, '72, Bianchi Volpe, '97 (no more, it died), Greenspeed GTVS6, '05, Trek 520, '13
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 51 Times
in
25 Posts
Great all around bike!
Hi, little intro about me:
I own a Trek DS3 and FX4 and I don't ride it much. In the past 2 years, DS3 have done 1000 km and FX4 only 200 km. I use FX4 to buy newspaper, but I just saw Trek 520 D which comes with racks and I am thinking of buying this as daily shopping cycle instead of touring.
Interestingly, Trek priced this bike bit cheaper in India compared to the USA. So, I find it quite value for money.
Do you think 520D will be good option for local errands?
Thanks,
VK
I own a Trek DS3 and FX4 and I don't ride it much. In the past 2 years, DS3 have done 1000 km and FX4 only 200 km. I use FX4 to buy newspaper, but I just saw Trek 520 D which comes with racks and I am thinking of buying this as daily shopping cycle instead of touring.
Interestingly, Trek priced this bike bit cheaper in India compared to the USA. So, I find it quite value for money.
Do you think 520D will be good option for local errands?
Thanks,
VK
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter