Vintage Raleighs, which is the better bike?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
Vintage Raleighs, which is the better bike?
Firstly, new to this forum, so apologies if this has been discusses somewhere deep in the threads. Secondly, I've had my sights on a '69 Raleigh Sports, 3-speed, (step-through) at our local bike co-op. It looks to be all original, the metallic brown paint and decals are in great shape. The rear internal hub needs some work.
While I've been working on this bike at the co-op, I found another vintage Raleigh on our local FB marketplace. I checked it out and ultimately ended up purchasing it, with the intent to flip it. It's a '79 Raleigh Record Ace, all original parts and I actually purchased from the original owner. It was stored indoors, so it is really in great condition for its age. I'm in the process of stripping it down to re-grease most of the parts that articulate (e.g., headset, hubs, seatpost, etc), and re-do all the cabling for the brakes and shifters. After working on this bike, I am really liking it and I'm not sure I want to flip it now.
What I am interested in, is your opinions on which bike is more valuable. In my research, it would seem the Record Ace would be the better model based on components and some old Raleigh price sheets I've come across. I'm curious what your thoughts are between the two models.
While I've been working on this bike at the co-op, I found another vintage Raleigh on our local FB marketplace. I checked it out and ultimately ended up purchasing it, with the intent to flip it. It's a '79 Raleigh Record Ace, all original parts and I actually purchased from the original owner. It was stored indoors, so it is really in great condition for its age. I'm in the process of stripping it down to re-grease most of the parts that articulate (e.g., headset, hubs, seatpost, etc), and re-do all the cabling for the brakes and shifters. After working on this bike, I am really liking it and I'm not sure I want to flip it now.
What I am interested in, is your opinions on which bike is more valuable. In my research, it would seem the Record Ace would be the better model based on components and some old Raleigh price sheets I've come across. I'm curious what your thoughts are between the two models.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,265
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,207 Times
in
703 Posts
Ride the Record Ace before you decide to sell it. You may not decide to sell it.
Both bikes are good quality, but are targeted to different types of riding. If you really want to fit in here, you'll probably end up keeping both.
Both bikes are good quality, but are targeted to different types of riding. If you really want to fit in here, you'll probably end up keeping both.
Likes For noobinsf:
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
I agree, I plan to ride it once I have it all restored and functioning properly again. I like the double top tube on the Record Ace as it is a little more unique, IMO. I understand they are bother targeted for different riding too. It's hard to compare a 3-speed with a 10-speed. We'll see what happens, I do have problem hoarding bicycles, just like most in this forum
Likes For Tiny_Valkyrie:
#4
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 6,001
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1957 Post(s)
Liked 3,669 Times
in
1,683 Posts
It's rare for an aw hub to have any significant problems that a flush and relube plus cable adjustment won't fix. Both bikes are cool.
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
Yea, for sure. The gal that runs the co-op was working on the hub. I honestly don't know why it has taken her so long. It's typically a simple job like you mentioned. I've dealt with internal hubs before. Anyway, this Record Ace is pretty cool. I've purchased a new stem and wider drop bars for it, plus the new cables/housing. I was hoping to post pictures of it, but looks like I need to hit a minimum number of posts before i can.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 70
Bikes: '62 Schwinn Continental, '69 Schwinn Paramount, '74 Raleigh International, '75 Peugeot PX-10LE, '76 MKM Dominator, '80 Holdsworth Mistral, '81 Woodrup Giro Touring, '87 Bianchi Brava, '89 Schwinn (Waterford) Paramount, '94 Trek 1400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
5 Posts
Market value really isn't the issue.
I've had my sights on a '69 Raleigh Sports, 3-speed, (step-through) at our local bike co-op. It looks to be all original, the metallic brown paint and decals are in great shape. The rear internal hub needs some work. [break] [But] After working on [the Raleigh Record] bike, I am really liking it and I'm not sure I want to flip it now.
What I am interested in, is your opinions on which bike is more valuable. In my research, it would seem the Record Ace would be the better model based on components and some old Raleigh price sheets I've come across. I'm curious what your thoughts are between the two models.
What I am interested in, is your opinions on which bike is more valuable. In my research, it would seem the Record Ace would be the better model based on components and some old Raleigh price sheets I've come across. I'm curious what your thoughts are between the two models.
They are two entirely different riding experiences. The Sports seats an upright rider, takes things slower, is much more comfortable over road and track. The Record puts the rider leaning forward, has a dreadful seat IIRC, and can be positively punishing on a really rough road. But you will certainly both feel and in reality be moving faster, hair in the wind, on the Record.
For my money I'd take the Sports and find another bike for the sporting ride. You will need more than one bike anyway, as others have pointed out. There are plenty of 10 - 12 - multi multi speed options out there, the majority of which will be lighter than the Record, with better components, and will cost not much more and perhaps less. You get a better version of that particular riding experience. OTOH the Sports was and is the apotheosis of the English touring/commuting bike experience. There's nothing else that gives that experience.
Last edited by Zumkopf; 06-23-22 at 05:26 PM.
Likes For Zumkopf:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,993
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26472 Post(s)
Liked 10,427 Times
in
7,241 Posts
.
...FWIW, Raleigh recycled the name "Record Ace" a few times, and I have no idea (prior to your pictures you intend to post) what the 1979 version was. At least one of them was pretty nice, with a Reynolds 531 frame, but I think that was much earlier than 1979. The Raleigh Sports it the Raleigh Sports.
I rode a series of them around town in D.C., Minneapolis, and Sacramento back when they were ubiquitous in thrift stores, because everyone wanted a ten speed. There's a spot out at the landfill here off Kiefer Blvd, where they used to toss all the ones they got into a big pile, and then grade dirt over them every couple of years. That was where I got all of my hub repair parts, until they closed the place down. *sigh* But it's probably a mistake to try to do a direct comparison with anything else.
You can make up the money you lose on individual bike flips by increasing your sales volume.
...FWIW, Raleigh recycled the name "Record Ace" a few times, and I have no idea (prior to your pictures you intend to post) what the 1979 version was. At least one of them was pretty nice, with a Reynolds 531 frame, but I think that was much earlier than 1979. The Raleigh Sports it the Raleigh Sports.
I rode a series of them around town in D.C., Minneapolis, and Sacramento back when they were ubiquitous in thrift stores, because everyone wanted a ten speed. There's a spot out at the landfill here off Kiefer Blvd, where they used to toss all the ones they got into a big pile, and then grade dirt over them every couple of years. That was where I got all of my hub repair parts, until they closed the place down. *sigh* But it's probably a mistake to try to do a direct comparison with anything else.
You can make up the money you lose on individual bike flips by increasing your sales volume.
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
OK, first of all, market value really isn't the issue. Neither bike will ever command much money; the Record was the entry-level derailleur/drop bar bike in the Raleigh lineup; the Sports was their meat and potatoes in England, and to a lesser state here in the States, for decades. Multiple decades.
They are two entirely different riding experiences. The Sports seats an upright rider, takes things slower, is much more comfortable over road and track. The Record puts the rider leaning forward, has a dreadful seat IIRC, and can be positively punishing on a really rough road. But you will certainly both feel and in reality be moving faster, hair in the wind, on the Record.
For my money I'd take the Sports and find another bike for the sporting ride. You will need more than one bike anyway, as others have pointed out. There are plenty of 10 - 12 - multi multi speed options out there, the majority of which will be lighter than the Record, with better components, and will cost not much more and perhaps less. You get a better version of that particular riding experience. OTOH the Sports was and is the apotheosis of the English touring/commuting bike experience. There's nothing else that gives that experience.
They are two entirely different riding experiences. The Sports seats an upright rider, takes things slower, is much more comfortable over road and track. The Record puts the rider leaning forward, has a dreadful seat IIRC, and can be positively punishing on a really rough road. But you will certainly both feel and in reality be moving faster, hair in the wind, on the Record.
For my money I'd take the Sports and find another bike for the sporting ride. You will need more than one bike anyway, as others have pointed out. There are plenty of 10 - 12 - multi multi speed options out there, the majority of which will be lighter than the Record, with better components, and will cost not much more and perhaps less. You get a better version of that particular riding experience. OTOH the Sports was and is the apotheosis of the English touring/commuting bike experience. There's nothing else that gives that experience.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,519
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2562 Post(s)
Liked 3,059 Times
in
1,744 Posts
Just to clarify for the OP:
Zumkopf is, I think, under the impression that you're talking about a Raleigh Record, which was usually Raleigh's lowest-level 10-speed. Occasionally it was the second-to-lowest model.
3alarmer is talking about the Record Ace, which came and went in Raleigh's lineup over the years but was always a few tiers above the Record. It's closer to the Supercourse, Grand Sport, and maybe the International in quality than to the Record.
Zumkopf is, I think, under the impression that you're talking about a Raleigh Record, which was usually Raleigh's lowest-level 10-speed. Occasionally it was the second-to-lowest model.
3alarmer is talking about the Record Ace, which came and went in Raleigh's lineup over the years but was always a few tiers above the Record. It's closer to the Supercourse, Grand Sport, and maybe the International in quality than to the Record.
#10
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
.
...FWIW, Raleigh recycled the name "Record Ace" a few times, and I have no idea (prior to your pictures you intend to post) what the 1979 version was. At least one of them was pretty nice, with a Reynolds 531 frame, but I think that was much earlier than 1979. The Raleigh Sports it the Raleigh Sports.
I rode a series of them around town in D.C., Minneapolis, and Sacramento back when they were ubiquitous in thrift stores, because everyone wanted a ten speed. There's a spot out at the landfill here off Kiefer Blvd, where they used to toss all the ones they got into a big pile, and then grade dirt over them every couple of years. That was where I got all of my hub repair parts, until they closed the place down. *sigh* But it's probably a mistake to try to do a direct comparison with anything else.
You can make up the money you lose on individual bike flips by increasing your sales volume.
...FWIW, Raleigh recycled the name "Record Ace" a few times, and I have no idea (prior to your pictures you intend to post) what the 1979 version was. At least one of them was pretty nice, with a Reynolds 531 frame, but I think that was much earlier than 1979. The Raleigh Sports it the Raleigh Sports.
I rode a series of them around town in D.C., Minneapolis, and Sacramento back when they were ubiquitous in thrift stores, because everyone wanted a ten speed. There's a spot out at the landfill here off Kiefer Blvd, where they used to toss all the ones they got into a big pile, and then grade dirt over them every couple of years. That was where I got all of my hub repair parts, until they closed the place down. *sigh* But it's probably a mistake to try to do a direct comparison with anything else.
You can make up the money you lose on individual bike flips by increasing your sales volume.
Just to clarify for the OP:
Zumkopf is, I think, under the impression that you're talking about a Raleigh Record, which was usually Raleigh's lowest-level 10-speed. Occasionally it was the second-to-lowest model.
3alarmer is talking about the Record Ace, which came and went in Raleigh's lineup over the years but was always a few tiers above the Record. It's closer to the Supercourse, Grand Sport, and maybe the International in quality than to the Record.
Zumkopf is, I think, under the impression that you're talking about a Raleigh Record, which was usually Raleigh's lowest-level 10-speed. Occasionally it was the second-to-lowest model.
3alarmer is talking about the Record Ace, which came and went in Raleigh's lineup over the years but was always a few tiers above the Record. It's closer to the Supercourse, Grand Sport, and maybe the International in quality than to the Record.
#11
Count Orlok Member
I agree, I plan to ride it once I have it all restored and functioning properly again. I like the double top tube on the Record Ace as it is a little more unique, IMO. I understand they are bother targeted for different riding too. It's hard to compare a 3-speed with a 10-speed. We'll see what happens, I do have problem hoarding bicycles, just like most in this forum
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,993
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26472 Post(s)
Liked 10,427 Times
in
7,241 Posts
.
...link to the 1978 catalog, where the Record Ace Mixte specs are listed on the final page. I can't seem to access the Bulgier.net catalogs any more without a user name. But it's probably not much different from 1978. Yes, they used a lot of Suntour componentry in those years, because they were cheaper and worked better than the other guys' stuff at the time.
I've only seen (in person) one Raleigh production step through, made from 531 frame tubing. It was a bike that came through the co-op once. It was sold to some smaller woman down in the San Francisco Bay area, who drove all the way up to Sacramento to get it. As a smaller (shorter) person, it was that valuable to her.
...link to the 1978 catalog, where the Record Ace Mixte specs are listed on the final page. I can't seem to access the Bulgier.net catalogs any more without a user name. But it's probably not much different from 1978. Yes, they used a lot of Suntour componentry in those years, because they were cheaper and worked better than the other guys' stuff at the time.
I've only seen (in person) one Raleigh production step through, made from 531 frame tubing. It was a bike that came through the co-op once. It was sold to some smaller woman down in the San Francisco Bay area, who drove all the way up to Sacramento to get it. As a smaller (shorter) person, it was that valuable to her.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 70
Bikes: '62 Schwinn Continental, '69 Schwinn Paramount, '74 Raleigh International, '75 Peugeot PX-10LE, '76 MKM Dominator, '80 Holdsworth Mistral, '81 Woodrup Giro Touring, '87 Bianchi Brava, '89 Schwinn (Waterford) Paramount, '94 Trek 1400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
5 Posts
I could be wrong but I don't think so.
Just to clarify for the OP:
Zumkopf is, I think, under the impression that you're talking about a Raleigh Record, which was usually Raleigh's lowest-level 10-speed. Occasionally it was the second-to-lowest model.
3alarmer is talking about the Record Ace, which came and went in Raleigh's lineup over the years but was always a few tiers above the Record. It's closer to the Supercourse, Grand Sport, and maybe the International in quality than to the Record.
Zumkopf is, I think, under the impression that you're talking about a Raleigh Record, which was usually Raleigh's lowest-level 10-speed. Occasionally it was the second-to-lowest model.
3alarmer is talking about the Record Ace, which came and went in Raleigh's lineup over the years but was always a few tiers above the Record. It's closer to the Supercourse, Grand Sport, and maybe the International in quality than to the Record.
My opinion is based on experience, not snobbery. I've literally been there. My very first serious bicycle was a 1974 Raleigh Grand Prix, with cottered cranks, steel seatpost and rims, horrible saddle, plastic derailleur -- actually optioned a little worse than the '79 Record Ace. I loved that GP and rode it everywhere. It felt like... freedom.
But it's a big world and it moves fast and there's a ton more bicycles available on the used market. Take my MKM Dominator. Built by top British builders, 531DB throughout, great components (Dura-Ace except for Campy Record hubs, tubulars)... and listed for $100 on eBay, and even at that couldn't find a buyer. Ended up getting it for $50. And that wasn't a fluke -- I picked up two more over time, equally low-priced and market-scorned, fixed them up a bit, and gave them to son and his fiance. 21 - 22 lb bikes even with sizeable frames.
Were I starting from scratch I'd simply look for the cheapest decent condition Reynolds 531 double-butted lugged frame bike I could find in my size. I wouldn't worry too much about bike brand. 531 was expensive steel, so tended to be used exclusively on expensive bikes -- of good to excellent quality. And Reynolds 531 gives an excellent ride, confident and lively. There are lighter materials developed since, but at best save only a few pounds, and at the cost of ride quality. [Columbus made good tubing also. I would go Reynolds 531 mainly because it's an easy demarcator and was very popular in the top market through the 1980s.] Chances are a 531 frame will also have decent components, and even if it doesn't those can be changed out as funds permit. They can be found, with a little patience, for bargain prices.
That does assume that you can tolerate a men's frame, of which there are far, far more and better examples out there. If you insist on Ladies' or Mixte frames, choices are considerably fewer, and the Record might be one of the better ones for little money. There are better Mixte bikes out there, but they tend to command a price premium.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,993
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26472 Post(s)
Liked 10,427 Times
in
7,241 Posts
.
...I'm presuming that the username "Tiny Valkyrie" means that we are talking about someone smaller in stature (but large in spirit.)
I've spoken to such people over the years, many of them women, and they tell me there are fewer options for them in the classic bike marketplace.
Thus mixte frames and better quality step through frames are kinda what they end up riding. Like I said, that woman drove all the way from San Francisco to Sacramento and back, just to buy our mixte at the co-op. And she was very happy to get it. It's not so much insisting on these frames if you are a shorter woman, it's just what you can fit on.
...I'm presuming that the username "Tiny Valkyrie" means that we are talking about someone smaller in stature (but large in spirit.)
I've spoken to such people over the years, many of them women, and they tell me there are fewer options for them in the classic bike marketplace.
Thus mixte frames and better quality step through frames are kinda what they end up riding. Like I said, that woman drove all the way from San Francisco to Sacramento and back, just to buy our mixte at the co-op. And she was very happy to get it. It's not so much insisting on these frames if you are a shorter woman, it's just what you can fit on.
#15
Not lost wanderer.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,358
Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 890 Post(s)
Liked 1,020 Times
in
536 Posts
If it is a 79 Record Ace, the RRA is actually about even with a Gran Sports. Both are 531 and decent components. I recently sold my 80 RRA and while it was a nice bike, it did not appeal to me.
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Likes For bwilli88:
#16
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
gna I apparently hit the max number of posts yesterday. The one in my garage is the top left
#17
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
.
...I'm presuming that the username "Tiny Valkyrie" means that we are talking about someone smaller in stature (but large in spirit.)
I've spoken to such people over the years, many of them women, and they tell me there are fewer options for them in the classic bike marketplace.
Thus mixte frames and better quality step through frames are kinda what they end up riding. Like I said, that woman drove all the way from San Francisco to Sacramento and back, just to buy our mixte at the co-op. And she was very happy to get it. It's not so much insisting on these frames if you are a shorter woman, it's just what you can fit on.
...I'm presuming that the username "Tiny Valkyrie" means that we are talking about someone smaller in stature (but large in spirit.)
I've spoken to such people over the years, many of them women, and they tell me there are fewer options for them in the classic bike marketplace.
Thus mixte frames and better quality step through frames are kinda what they end up riding. Like I said, that woman drove all the way from San Francisco to Sacramento and back, just to buy our mixte at the co-op. And she was very happy to get it. It's not so much insisting on these frames if you are a shorter woman, it's just what you can fit on.
Last edited by Tiny_Valkyrie; 06-24-22 at 04:25 PM.
Likes For Tiny_Valkyrie:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,993
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26472 Post(s)
Liked 10,427 Times
in
7,241 Posts
...IIRC, there are a couple of dedicated mixte threads, that go on at some length. I'm a larger person, and I used to choose 3 speed, step through frames to use as commuter bikes, because they get no respect from thieves, so you can lock them up and have some hope of riding them home at the end of the day.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...ppy-place.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...our-mixte.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...ggestions.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...ppy-place.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...our-mixte.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...ggestions.html
Likes For 3alarmer:
#19
Count Orlok Member
gna I apparently hit the max number of posts yesterday. The one in my garage is the top left
So 20-30 Hi ten steel, steel rims. Could still be a nice bike. If it were me I would get a new wheelset with aluminum rims. If the brakes have enough reach 700c may work.
Are you still considering the 3-speed sports? The feel is different , but they can be fun.
#20
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
3alarmer thanks for the thread links, I'll have to check those out. My thinking is spot on with yours. My intention was to use this vintage rig as a commuter, so I can leave my much pricier builds at home when I run errands. I wanted something I could more safely lock up, that doesn't scream "take me" like the other bikes in my quiver.
gna That's a great spec sheet. I agree on the wheelset. I was thinking if I keep it, I'd re build the wheels to aluminum rims. I've planned to modernize the cockpit with a Velo Orange quill stem adapter to a regular stem and 44cm drop bars. Still considering the 3-speed Sports. Having 10-speed is kinda nice in our hilly area, but doesn't mean I'm sold on it, as I've also ridden single speed.
gna That's a great spec sheet. I agree on the wheelset. I was thinking if I keep it, I'd re build the wheels to aluminum rims. I've planned to modernize the cockpit with a Velo Orange quill stem adapter to a regular stem and 44cm drop bars. Still considering the 3-speed Sports. Having 10-speed is kinda nice in our hilly area, but doesn't mean I'm sold on it, as I've also ridden single speed.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Saratoga calif.
Posts: 1,049
Bikes: Miyata 610(66cm), GT Vantara Hybrid (64cm), Nishiki International (64cm), Peugeot rat rod (62 cm), Trek 800 Burning Man helicopter bike, Bob Jackson frame (to be restored?) plus a never ending stream of neglected waifs from the Bike exchange.
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 340 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 632 Times
in
229 Posts
I might be coming in a little late to this thread. I can understand you r interest in the Raleigh's. I owned a 1980 Record ace and have restored a few Raleigh sports as well. The record ace I owned (64 cm) weighed in at 30 lbs with aluminum rims. At 280 lbs and 6'5" I found it to be a very satisfactory ride. The 20/40 hi ten tubing is lighter than gas pipe and sturdier than Cromo so you don't have to worry about denting it. I put a 14-34 tooth freewheel on it for the steep hills here in silicon valley and it worked great. after a while I swapped the bars for north roads and never regretted it.
My Raleigh sport projects were mostly cosmetic. stripping the bike down, deep cleaning, rubbing out with white polishing compound, then clear coating the often really nice paint work . the results were spectacular.
If possible I replaced the front wheel with an aluminum version to save a little weight and also help braking which was further enhanced with Koolstop Salmon pads. . The rear was cleaned , treated with naval jelly, rubbed with aluminum foil and then clear coated to prevent rusting.
One thing I would recommend on the sport is to replace the rear cog wit a 24 tooth version, available on amazon for under $10. It lowers the gearing which I think is way too high from the factory and gives you some climbing ability
My Raleigh sport projects were mostly cosmetic. stripping the bike down, deep cleaning, rubbing out with white polishing compound, then clear coating the often really nice paint work . the results were spectacular.
If possible I replaced the front wheel with an aluminum version to save a little weight and also help braking which was further enhanced with Koolstop Salmon pads. . The rear was cleaned , treated with naval jelly, rubbed with aluminum foil and then clear coated to prevent rusting.
One thing I would recommend on the sport is to replace the rear cog wit a 24 tooth version, available on amazon for under $10. It lowers the gearing which I think is way too high from the factory and gives you some climbing ability
#22
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,955
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1500 Post(s)
Liked 1,103 Times
in
646 Posts
IF I were a bike thief (I certainly am not), I would consider a mixte as a "mark" long before I'd even think about a ladies' 3-speed. Granted, I have a bit of bias (would love to acquire a mixte to put on my trainer), but thought I'd put it out there as a fwiw.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#23
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
capnjonny Both of those bikes are in fantastic shape! They look great. The Sports I've been eyeing is exactly that one. I actually know the owner who brought it into the co-op, so I know it's in great condition. Just waiting for the gal who runs the ship to bring in the rear wheel, she gets so busy she forgets to bring it.
I'd definitely switch that rear cog as well to help with the hills here and like you said, switching to aluminum rims. Velocity wheels actually makes 26" and 27" aluminum rims, so I can keep either bike periodic specific with the wheel size.
I'd definitely switch that rear cog as well to help with the hills here and like you said, switching to aluminum rims. Velocity wheels actually makes 26" and 27" aluminum rims, so I can keep either bike periodic specific with the wheel size.
#24
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: High-desert of WA state
Posts: 29
Bikes: Custom 2020 MaHall bikeworks gravel machine, 2021 Tumbleweed Prospector, 2019 Niner Air9 RDO, 2017 Norco Tactic, 1969 Raleigh Sports, 2020 Surly Troll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
10 Posts
That's a good point too. I was just excited to find a complete Raleigh mixte here locally and in such good condition. I know I won't be able to keep both. They are both great finds, IMO which makes it hard to decide what to ultimately hold on too. One could argue that I already have bikes great for commuting, but how could you overlook to opportunity to add a nice vintage ride to the stable?
#25
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 6,001
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1957 Post(s)
Liked 3,669 Times
in
1,683 Posts
Cool you're a bit of a wrench. It makes all things bicycle possible. 3 speeds, aluminium rims and lower gears make for a terrific city bike. This is my thusly prepared 1973 supercourse.