Best Complete Touring Bike Value in $1,000 Range
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: College Station Texas
Posts: 32
Bikes: Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Best Complete Touring Bike Value in $1,000 Range
I'm wanting to use the bike for touring and daily commuting. I have been looking at bikes like the Novara Randonne, Jamis Aurora, Surly Long Hual Trucker, fuji tourer, etc. Apparently I like steel.
I'd like your opinoins on the best value for a complete steel frame bike in the $1,000 price range.
Variables that have me hung up include weight, tubing materials, drive train components, chain-stay length, and geometry.
What do you guys have? How hard do you ride them? what would you change about the factory setup?
FYI Im 5'10 with a 33' inseam and wear a 12D shoe since I know those factors have an effect on frame size, wheel size on bikes like the surly, likelyhood of heel strike, and front-wheel to foot overlap on tight turns.
Have fun schooling a newb on a newb thread.
I'd like your opinoins on the best value for a complete steel frame bike in the $1,000 price range.
Variables that have me hung up include weight, tubing materials, drive train components, chain-stay length, and geometry.
What do you guys have? How hard do you ride them? what would you change about the factory setup?
FYI Im 5'10 with a 33' inseam and wear a 12D shoe since I know those factors have an effect on frame size, wheel size on bikes like the surly, likelyhood of heel strike, and front-wheel to foot overlap on tight turns.
Have fun schooling a newb on a newb thread.
#2
Senior Member
This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters.
Steve
Steve
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: College Station Texas
Posts: 32
Bikes: Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You're right, I could search the forums to compare reviews of each individual bike and accumulate enough knowledge to make my own evaluation. But I have other things to do with my time and would rather take advantage of this community's previously acquired cumulative knowledge to help me make that evaluation.
If you have links to specific, up-to-date threads that deal with this precise question, that would be very helpful though.
#4
See You Down The Road
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"I have other things to do with my time"
That's not a great way to get your questions answered
"take advantage of this community's previously acquired cumulative knowledge to help me make that evaluation"
"This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters."
"If you have links to specific, up-to-date threads that deal with this precise question, that would be very helpful though."
We need to supply links for you too.....OK, " This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters."
I hope thats a more "helpful response."
That's not a great way to get your questions answered
"take advantage of this community's previously acquired cumulative knowledge to help me make that evaluation"
"This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters."
"If you have links to specific, up-to-date threads that deal with this precise question, that would be very helpful though."
We need to supply links for you too.....OK, " This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters."
I hope thats a more "helpful response."
Last edited by Burningman; 05-06-08 at 04:06 AM.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: College Station Texas
Posts: 32
Bikes: Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"I have other things to do with my time"
That's not a great way to get your questions answered
"take advantage of this community's previously acquired cumulative knowledge to help me make that evaluation"
"This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters."
"If you have links to specific, up-to-date threads that deal with this precise question, that would be very helpful though."
We need to supply links for you too.....OK, " This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters."
I hope thats a more "helpful response."
That's not a great way to get your questions answered
"take advantage of this community's previously acquired cumulative knowledge to help me make that evaluation"
"This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters."
"If you have links to specific, up-to-date threads that deal with this precise question, that would be very helpful though."
We need to supply links for you too.....OK, " This thread has been done heaps. Search the archives for starters."
I hope thats a more "helpful response."
So, like or not, here it is, being done again, for all posterity to see. Try to be helpfull. Do it for the children.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 252
Bikes: Cannondale Killer-V 900 (Mountain), Jamis Aurora (Touring)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Short answer, none of those are a bad choice. The LHT is probably the best regarded on this site.
#8
Senior Member
The LHT seems to be especially well thought of. I know of one user rider who found toe overlap to be a major issue for him with the LHT, but most folks just get used to toe overlap and don't even notice after some time adjusting to the bike. I prefer STI shifters, but many see the bar ends as a plus.
You might check if the sale this week at REI includes the Randonee. It looks like a very nice setup.
If you want a bit more info about how the WT's worked out for us check out our journal at:
https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/staehling2007
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: College Station Texas
Posts: 32
Bikes: Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Those are all good choices. I would add the Windsor Touring if you either are capable of doing your own wrenching or have a local dealer that will treat you fairly if you have a bike that wasn't bought from them. Three of us rode Windsors on the TransAmerica last year and liked them fine. We swapped cranks to get better gearing for the mountains. The crank we used was a Sugino XD600.
The LHT seems to be especially well thought of. I know of one user rider who found toe overlap to be a major issue for him with the LHT, but most folks just get used to toe overlap and don't even notice after some time adjusting to the bike. I prefer STI shifters, but many see the bar ends as a plus.
You might check if the sale this week at REI includes the Randonee. It looks like a very nice setup.
If you want a bit more info about how the WT's worked out for us check out our journal at:
https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/staehling2007
The LHT seems to be especially well thought of. I know of one user rider who found toe overlap to be a major issue for him with the LHT, but most folks just get used to toe overlap and don't even notice after some time adjusting to the bike. I prefer STI shifters, but many see the bar ends as a plus.
You might check if the sale this week at REI includes the Randonee. It looks like a very nice setup.
If you want a bit more info about how the WT's worked out for us check out our journal at:
https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/staehling2007
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 644
Bikes: Scott scale 29er, Gary fisher Rig SS 29er, Fuji Cross pro, Novara Randonee, Scattante TI custom build, Fuji Team
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just put together my randonee and have 200 miles or so on it. Its pretty darn comfortable. Im happy with it and really like all REI products. On sale, I think it is the best value for the dough. Keep in mind there isgoing to be some money put into it if you plan on doing some serious touring. Nice saddle, front rack, fenders, etc.... it seems all the bikes I looked at all were missing a few of the components I was going to need.
#11
cyclopath
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 5,264
Bikes: Surly Krampus, Surly Straggler, Pivot Mach 6, Bike Friday Tikit, Bike Friday Tandem, Santa Cruz Nomad
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Sounds like you would be ideally suited to ride a Surly...
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From the location, he is probably just an aggie...Hook 'em horns!
Back to the question: considering the specs of each bike, the Randonee is currently very likely the best deal. The only thing that costs less is a Windsor Tourist. The LHT costs significantly more, has similar components, and you don't get a free rack. The Jamis Aurora is similarly priced, but has a road triple crankset that you may need to swap for lower gearing and also doesn't include a rack. You can get a Windsor Tourist cheaper, but you have to factor in the cost of building it (and also the Windsor Tourist comes with generic brand hubs, bottom bracket, and headset. All the other bikes you mentioned have higher quality parts in the specs).
I actually own a Windsor Tourist. The bike has been a learning tool for me, as well as my main form of transportation to work. I've been pretty happy with everything except my bottom bracket failed after 600 km, but this is probably just bad luck on my part. I've tinkered with a lot of other stuff on it and finally have it set up as I like. It (and the Fuji Touring) is one of the few bikes you can get that still has a 1 inch threaded stem. It makes handlebar height adjustment easier, but is a fading technology. The Randonee comes with an adjustable stem anyhow, and you would have the people at REI to help fit you and set it up. So, if it were me, I'd by the Randonee, and I'm not just saying that because I'm a Longhorn
Back to the question: considering the specs of each bike, the Randonee is currently very likely the best deal. The only thing that costs less is a Windsor Tourist. The LHT costs significantly more, has similar components, and you don't get a free rack. The Jamis Aurora is similarly priced, but has a road triple crankset that you may need to swap for lower gearing and also doesn't include a rack. You can get a Windsor Tourist cheaper, but you have to factor in the cost of building it (and also the Windsor Tourist comes with generic brand hubs, bottom bracket, and headset. All the other bikes you mentioned have higher quality parts in the specs).
I actually own a Windsor Tourist. The bike has been a learning tool for me, as well as my main form of transportation to work. I've been pretty happy with everything except my bottom bracket failed after 600 km, but this is probably just bad luck on my part. I've tinkered with a lot of other stuff on it and finally have it set up as I like. It (and the Fuji Touring) is one of the few bikes you can get that still has a 1 inch threaded stem. It makes handlebar height adjustment easier, but is a fading technology. The Randonee comes with an adjustable stem anyhow, and you would have the people at REI to help fit you and set it up. So, if it were me, I'd by the Randonee, and I'm not just saying that because I'm a Longhorn
#13
Getting older and slower
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Silicon Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 102
Bikes: Beat-up commuter, Chumba XCL for the dirt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just got a LHT complete for $900 + shipping from webcyclery.com, but as others have pointed out REI has the Novara Randonee on sale for the next few days. The LHT is working out well for me, toe overlap is a minor issue with fenders but not a big deal.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 174
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FIT..FIT...FIT.
I went with the 53cm Jamis Aurora, even though the 52cm LHT was closer to my size.
The Aurora had STI and cheater brakes, while the LHT had bar ends, which I loathe for use in the city.
The LHT was definitely lighter, though.
The Randonee did not fit my at all...way too big, and the next smaller size was too small.
I went with the 53cm Jamis Aurora, even though the 52cm LHT was closer to my size.
The Aurora had STI and cheater brakes, while the LHT had bar ends, which I loathe for use in the city.
The LHT was definitely lighter, though.
The Randonee did not fit my at all...way too big, and the next smaller size was too small.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montréal, QC (Canada)
Posts: 409
Bikes: 2008 Surly LHT complete & 1988-ish fuglyfixed Specialized RockHopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm wanting to use the bike for touring and daily commuting. I have been looking at bikes like the Novara Randonne, Jamis Aurora, Surly Long Hual Trucker, fuji tourer, etc. Apparently I like steel.
I'd like your opinoins on the best value for a complete steel frame bike in the $1,000 price range.
Variables that have me hung up include weight, tubing materials, drive train components, chain-stay length, and geometry.
What do you guys have? How hard do you ride them? what would you change about the factory setup?
FYI Im 5'10 with a 33' inseam and wear a 12D shoe since I know those factors have an effect on frame size, wheel size on bikes like the surly, likelyhood of heel strike, and front-wheel to foot overlap on tight turns.
Have fun schooling a newb on a newb thread.
I'd like your opinoins on the best value for a complete steel frame bike in the $1,000 price range.
Variables that have me hung up include weight, tubing materials, drive train components, chain-stay length, and geometry.
What do you guys have? How hard do you ride them? what would you change about the factory setup?
FYI Im 5'10 with a 33' inseam and wear a 12D shoe since I know those factors have an effect on frame size, wheel size on bikes like the surly, likelyhood of heel strike, and front-wheel to foot overlap on tight turns.
Have fun schooling a newb on a newb thread.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Ok now tht we have all the obligatory "this has been done lots" comments out of the way lets get on with the actually helpful advice. I've searched the archives and did'nt find what I was looking for otherwise I wouldnt have posted in the first place.
So, like or not, here it is, being done again, for all posterity to see. Try to be helpfull. Do it for the children.
So, like or not, here it is, being done again, for all posterity to see. Try to be helpfull. Do it for the children.
The comment about the children was ironic.
#18
Senior Member
Like this: here's a $2,000 bike for $900.
https://seattle.craigslist.org/sno/bik/670653895.html
Last edited by BengeBoy; 05-06-08 at 05:51 PM.
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: College Station Texas
Posts: 32
Bikes: Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To everyone else: Great info! I had no idea that the Windsor was so similar to the Fuji model. There is a Jamis dealer here in Lubbock and their bikes are usually speced nice for the price. Does anyone else have any experience with the Aurora?
P.S. As far as snide goes. I just have very little tolerance for nit-pickey, bike snobing, couch commandos who have nothing better to say than worthless and unhelpful one-liners that contribute to nothing greater than their post count. A healthy dose of good clean fun and alma mata rivalry are alwayse welcome and enjoyed though
Last edited by wildpony; 05-06-08 at 06:30 PM.
#20
Senior Member
A google search of bikeforums.net yielded the following results with specific information about the Jamis you're interested in.
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-126860.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in...p/t-98677.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in...p/t-53295.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-223871.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-106993.html
I think what people are trying to say that if you used the search function -- either on the site or via Google -- you might get the benefit of some wisdom that's already been displayed here.
Then, I'm sure people would be happy to add any updates.
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-126860.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in...p/t-98677.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in...p/t-53295.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-223871.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-106993.html
I think what people are trying to say that if you used the search function -- either on the site or via Google -- you might get the benefit of some wisdom that's already been displayed here.
Then, I'm sure people would be happy to add any updates.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
This thread had very little information. Much more information was given in previous threads and it will take time to read them all.
#23
tgbikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Omaha Ne.
Posts: 147
Bikes: Volpe,Eros, Voyageur, LHT, Ochsner
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
YOUR body dementions may have more effect on your choice of frames than you may realize. components can't change your shape or the frame dementions.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 170
Bikes: Surly LHT; Surly Ogre; Sekai 1970s classic; Old Trek Hard-tail Mountain Bike; Trek 7200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wildpony,
Don't let anybody be rude to you around here. It's a discussion we should be having all the time, but it's still a good idea to dig into earlier threads, and not just get one point of view.
DE mention of de body is so true, yeah.
I think taller people (like me) need stiffer frames and are not likely to be satisfied with an alumobike. I have my own touring bike now with a very stiff titanium frame. Now that doesn't answer the newb touring question, but definitely, bikes do not scale evenly. Would somebody tell me, and no offense to those whose body type is not thin, but why do people who look like they could (and should) lose 20 lbs spend so much to get a bike that weighs maybe 2 lbs less?
Yesterday, I took a friend with me to visit a bikeshop. I don't need a touring bike right now, but I am just trying to talk one more person into trying touring. When the turbo on my friend's Saab blew its gas-gut, he got out an old Motobecane and started riding it again, for a few days. Soon he was hooked, but he knew he didn't have much of a bike.
Now, what really disappointed me was that the famous LBS we visited hardly had any touring bikes on display. Nothing but the latest fashion in mountain bikes with big knobby tires, impractical bikes that you could never use for a real journey. So let's not jump all over a new guy because it is impossible to get a good comparison of three touring frames in your size EVEN AT A FAMOUS LBS.
How many people here have really tried riding all of these bikes, in their own size, fitted for them? I wish that I could, but it is hard to even find one bike shop that has one. I am impressed that the Surly actually uses a different size wheel from smaller to larger set-ups. That shows a philosophy about how bikes scale.
The famous bike shop didn't even have a Trek 520 to look at. They told me that frankly, they don't sell very many of them. For a serious bike shop, $1000 is an entry level bike that they don't have that much time for, especially when the customer will order it somewhere else to save $30.
Howard
Don't let anybody be rude to you around here. It's a discussion we should be having all the time, but it's still a good idea to dig into earlier threads, and not just get one point of view.
I think taller people (like me) need stiffer frames and are not likely to be satisfied with an alumobike. I have my own touring bike now with a very stiff titanium frame. Now that doesn't answer the newb touring question, but definitely, bikes do not scale evenly. Would somebody tell me, and no offense to those whose body type is not thin, but why do people who look like they could (and should) lose 20 lbs spend so much to get a bike that weighs maybe 2 lbs less?
Yesterday, I took a friend with me to visit a bikeshop. I don't need a touring bike right now, but I am just trying to talk one more person into trying touring. When the turbo on my friend's Saab blew its gas-gut, he got out an old Motobecane and started riding it again, for a few days. Soon he was hooked, but he knew he didn't have much of a bike.
Now, what really disappointed me was that the famous LBS we visited hardly had any touring bikes on display. Nothing but the latest fashion in mountain bikes with big knobby tires, impractical bikes that you could never use for a real journey. So let's not jump all over a new guy because it is impossible to get a good comparison of three touring frames in your size EVEN AT A FAMOUS LBS.
How many people here have really tried riding all of these bikes, in their own size, fitted for them? I wish that I could, but it is hard to even find one bike shop that has one. I am impressed that the Surly actually uses a different size wheel from smaller to larger set-ups. That shows a philosophy about how bikes scale.
The famous bike shop didn't even have a Trek 520 to look at. They told me that frankly, they don't sell very many of them. For a serious bike shop, $1000 is an entry level bike that they don't have that much time for, especially when the customer will order it somewhere else to save $30.
Howard
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 818
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
OK, here's some advice for your question:
-look up all previous threads and read them (use the search function). You say you did and didn't find answers -but there's a ton of similar threads out there so I find it puzzling. Try searching on just each bike name.
-once you've read them all, come back and post the question again, stating that you've read this thread and that thread. You'll also probably have some more focussed questions by then, and I think more people will be receptive to your question (which by the way, I don't think is as specific as you may think, read on).
-and/or be clearer on your original question -there's nothing in your original post that is much different from many of the previous threads (which is more than likely why someone said do a search!). Also, you make no mention of where you wish to tour, whether you will be using the bike exclusively for touring, if you are on a limited budget, what equipment you have, etc, etc, -all things that may be good information to know when people are willing to post their experience in reply.
-finally, I've got to say by stating that you've got better things to do with your time (and yet have the audacity to ask for "links to specific, up-to-date threads that deal with this precise question") but berate someone who posted -admittedly who was a little blunt but certainly not impolite -you should look it up yourself is a little like the pot calling the kettle black (also calling them nit picky or a couch commando isn't improving the situation either). This approach just ain't going to win you friends -remember it takes other people's time and effort to respond to you.
-look up all previous threads and read them (use the search function). You say you did and didn't find answers -but there's a ton of similar threads out there so I find it puzzling. Try searching on just each bike name.
-once you've read them all, come back and post the question again, stating that you've read this thread and that thread. You'll also probably have some more focussed questions by then, and I think more people will be receptive to your question (which by the way, I don't think is as specific as you may think, read on).
-and/or be clearer on your original question -there's nothing in your original post that is much different from many of the previous threads (which is more than likely why someone said do a search!). Also, you make no mention of where you wish to tour, whether you will be using the bike exclusively for touring, if you are on a limited budget, what equipment you have, etc, etc, -all things that may be good information to know when people are willing to post their experience in reply.
-finally, I've got to say by stating that you've got better things to do with your time (and yet have the audacity to ask for "links to specific, up-to-date threads that deal with this precise question") but berate someone who posted -admittedly who was a little blunt but certainly not impolite -you should look it up yourself is a little like the pot calling the kettle black (also calling them nit picky or a couch commando isn't improving the situation either). This approach just ain't going to win you friends -remember it takes other people's time and effort to respond to you.
Last edited by Nigeyy; 05-08-08 at 06:44 AM.