People who commute by car are less happy and less healthy than the rest of us
#1
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
People who commute by car are less happy and less healthy than the rest of us
There is scientific backup for a couple things most of us know through personal expreience and common sense:
There are a few interesting surprises in the article that I was not aware of:
Biking or walking to work will make you happier and healthier - Vox
Originally Posted by vox.com
Commuting sucks. But it doesn't suck equally for everyone.
You might assume that the length of your commute is the main thing that affects how pleasant or nightmarish it is. But a number of studies show that the mode of transportation you take is also really important — both in terms of how happy (or unhappy) you are with your commute, and your overall chance of obesity.
This sort of analysis of commute mode is still fairly new. But a recent Canadian study sorted people by mode of travel — walking, biking, driving, bus, intercity train, and intracity metro — and found that people who walk, bike, or take the intercity train are more satisfied with their commutes than others.
Meanwhile, a British study found that people who walk, bike, or take any form of public transit have lower rates of obesity than people who drive, after controlling for other forms of exercise and socioeconomic factors.
You might assume that the length of your commute is the main thing that affects how pleasant or nightmarish it is. But a number of studies show that the mode of transportation you take is also really important — both in terms of how happy (or unhappy) you are with your commute, and your overall chance of obesity.
This sort of analysis of commute mode is still fairly new. But a recent Canadian study sorted people by mode of travel — walking, biking, driving, bus, intercity train, and intracity metro — and found that people who walk, bike, or take the intercity train are more satisfied with their commutes than others.
Meanwhile, a British study found that people who walk, bike, or take any form of public transit have lower rates of obesity than people who drive, after controlling for other forms of exercise and socioeconomic factors.
Biking or walking to work will make you happier and healthier - Vox
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
I think cycling would make you happier as a form of commuting. Unless it rains or it gets real hot. But it is also where you commute and where you live.
Overall, Americans in the Suburbs Are Still the Happiest - CityLab
I know but everything is subjective in this kind of discussion. LOL
Overall, Americans in the Suburbs Are Still the Happiest - CityLab
I know but everything is subjective in this kind of discussion. LOL
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Based on the gearheads that post here, I'd agree, as they seem like a grumpy, haughty lot when compared to cyclists and public transit users.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
I think public transit and cars are equal in terms of how it makes a person feel during their commute. Sometimes public transit can be just as frustrating as being stuck inside your car during rush hour gridlock.
Commuting by bicycle is the most enjoyable way of getting to work.
Commuting by bicycle is the most enjoyable way of getting to work.
#5
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Friday was one of those days. Happily, for a change, everything was moving quite quickly and I didn't have to be on the bus for an extended period of time. But while I was, I was surrounded by sick people coughing, sneezing, snuffling
...
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#6
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
I think public transit and cars are equal in terms of how it makes a person feel during their commute. Sometimes public transit can be just as frustrating as being stuck inside your car during rush hour gridlock.
Commuting by bicycle is the most enjoyable way of getting to work.
Commuting by bicycle is the most enjoyable way of getting to work.
Bike users, on the other hand, can often find a way to get through or around the gridlock when escape is impossible for larger vehicles. Or at least cultivate an active fantasy life to see them through the rare times when escape is not possible.
The main inescapable frustration while bike commuting is probably waiting at train crossings. At my former home, I had to cross a couple freight train tracks near a car plant and a coal power plant. So sometimes my wait would be for >150 freight cars full of shiny new Cadillacs (fantasies of train-jacking $50 million worth of luxury automobiles--no more carfree for me!). It was worse waiting for the coal trains. They went super-slow, I guess because they were unloading the coal, and they frequently reversed a few yards and went forward again. (Fantasies then about becoming an eco-terrorist and taking out that power plant so I wouldn't be late for work).
But other than the occasional train delays, my bike commute was pretty much hassle-free and stress-free, as well as carfree.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#7
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Car drivers can choose different routes and go at different times. But drivers are locked into the one route (unless there's a really bad accident ahead and the road is closed ... that's happened once on my current commute) and they are more or less locked into set times.
I'd much prefer a train system.
Trains (light rail) are not part of the car traffic so they have an increased chance of running fast and running on time.
I'd much prefer a train system.
Trains (light rail) are not part of the car traffic so they have an increased chance of running fast and running on time.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#8
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
Car drivers can choose different routes and go at different times. But drivers are locked into the one route (unless there's a really bad accident ahead and the road is closed ... that's happened once on my current commute) and they are more or less locked into set times.
I'd much prefer a train system.
Trains (light rail) are not part of the car traffic so they have an increased chance of running fast and running on time.
I'd much prefer a train system.
Trains (light rail) are not part of the car traffic so they have an increased chance of running fast and running on time.
My personal experience is that in taking the bus to work for several years in total over my career, buses were on time the vast majority of the time I was late maybe 5 or 6 times over hundreds of commutes.. On the flip side, I was early a lot of times, because one bus I took was scheduled poorly, and it took the bus routers a long time to figure that out.
I took an intercity bus >100 times to visit my parents 200 miles from my city. I was a few minutes early or late much of the time. I was notably late around 10 times, to the point that it would be inconvenient if I had somebody picking me up at the bus station. One time I was almost 6hours late. One time the trip was totally cancelled and I had to wait for the next bus.
By car, I was late a few times, usually because of traffic or train delays, a couple times because of engine problems.
Walking, I don't think I was ever late. Bicycling, a few times because of trains. Once because my bottom bracket blew out on my way to work--my fault really, because I ignored warning signs.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
171 Posts
People who commute by car are less happy and less healthy than the rest of us
Many years ago, early in my cycling lifestyle, I heard a lecture by a psychiatrist who said that in experimental (animal) studies of stress, immobilization was the most powerful stressor. I immediately extrapolated that concept to realize that confinement in an automobile was society’s most common form of immobilization. Even when cruising along on a freeway, the driver is still immobilized, and it becomes more acute when in a traffic jam. The bus, followed by the train, offer more freedom of movement, but walking and cycling allow essentially total freedom of movement.
Since automobile commuting is such a prolonged daily, and life-long activity, I would attribute a lot of the morbidity of civilization to that incessant stressor. Perhaps scientific, maybe not, but certainly makes sense to me.
Since automobile commuting is such a prolonged daily, and life-long activity, I would attribute a lot of the morbidity of civilization to that incessant stressor. Perhaps scientific, maybe not, but certainly makes sense to me.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1015 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm happier riding under my own steam. It is empowering. I pick my route and schedule and don't feel that I'm subject to regular impediments that are beyond my control. And to top it all off, I travel at a reasonable pace.
https://www.minnpost.com/second-opin...uman-happiness
Their finding was seemingly straightforward: the longer the drive, the less happy people were. Before you dismiss this as numbingly obvious, keep in mind that they were testing not for drive satisfaction, but for life satisfaction. People were choosing commutes that made their entire lives worse. Stutzer and Frey found that a person with a one-hour commute has to earn 40% more money to be as satisfied with life as someone who walks to the office. On the other hand, for a single person, exchanging a long commute for a short walk to work has the same effect on happiness as finding a new love.Daniel Gilbert, Harvard psychologist and author of Stumbling On Happiness, explained the commuting paradox this way: "Most good and bad things become less good and bad over time as we adapt to them. However, it is much easier to adapt to things that stay constant than to things that change. So we adapt quickly to the joy of a larger house, because the house is exactly the same size every time. But we find it difficult to adapt to commuting by car, because every day is a slightly new form of misery
https://www.minnpost.com/second-opin...uman-happiness
#11
In the right lane
People who commute by car are less happy and less healthy than the rest of us
Many years ago, early in my cycling lifestyle, I heard a lecture by a psychiatrist who said that in experimental (animal) studies of stress, immobilization was the most powerful stressor. I immediately extrapolated that concept to realize that confinement in an automobile was society’s most common form of immobilization. Even when cruising along on a freeway, the driver is still immobilized, and it becomes more acute when in a traffic jam. The bus, followed by the train, offer more freedom of movement, but walking and cycling allow essentially total freedom of movement.
Since automobile commuting is such a prolonged daily, and life-long activity, I would attribute a lot of the morbidity of civilization to that incessant stressor. Perhaps scientific, maybe not, but certainly makes sense to me.
Many years ago, early in my cycling lifestyle, I heard a lecture by a psychiatrist who said that in experimental (animal) studies of stress, immobilization was the most powerful stressor. I immediately extrapolated that concept to realize that confinement in an automobile was society’s most common form of immobilization. Even when cruising along on a freeway, the driver is still immobilized, and it becomes more acute when in a traffic jam. The bus, followed by the train, offer more freedom of movement, but walking and cycling allow essentially total freedom of movement.
Since automobile commuting is such a prolonged daily, and life-long activity, I would attribute a lot of the morbidity of civilization to that incessant stressor. Perhaps scientific, maybe not, but certainly makes sense to me.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Trains might be more on-time than other modes; I don't know, having never seen statistics.
My personal experience is that in taking the bus to work for several years in total over my career, buses were on time the vast majority of the time I was late maybe 5 or 6 times over hundreds of commutes.. On the flip side, I was early a lot of times, because one bus I took was scheduled poorly, and it took the bus routers a long time to figure that out.
I took an intercity bus >100 times to visit my parents 200 miles from my city. I was a few minutes early or late much of the time. I was notably late around 10 times, to the point that it would be inconvenient if I had somebody picking me up at the bus station. One time I was almost 6hours late. One time the trip was totally cancelled and I had to wait for the next bus.
By car, I was late a few times, usually because of traffic or train delays, a couple times because of engine problems.
Walking, I don't think I was ever late. Bicycling, a few times because of trains. Once because my bottom bracket blew out on my way to work--my fault really, because I ignored warning signs.
My personal experience is that in taking the bus to work for several years in total over my career, buses were on time the vast majority of the time I was late maybe 5 or 6 times over hundreds of commutes.. On the flip side, I was early a lot of times, because one bus I took was scheduled poorly, and it took the bus routers a long time to figure that out.
I took an intercity bus >100 times to visit my parents 200 miles from my city. I was a few minutes early or late much of the time. I was notably late around 10 times, to the point that it would be inconvenient if I had somebody picking me up at the bus station. One time I was almost 6hours late. One time the trip was totally cancelled and I had to wait for the next bus.
By car, I was late a few times, usually because of traffic or train delays, a couple times because of engine problems.
Walking, I don't think I was ever late. Bicycling, a few times because of trains. Once because my bottom bracket blew out on my way to work--my fault really, because I ignored warning signs.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
171 Posts
Many years ago, early in my cycling lifestyle, I heard a lecture by a psychiatrist who said that in experimental (animal) studies of stress, immobilization was the most powerful stressor. I immediately extrapolated that concept to realize that confinement in an automobile was society’s most common form of immobilization…
Since automobile commuting is such a prolonged daily, and life-long activity, I would attribute a lot of the morbidity of civilization to that incessant stressor. Perhaps scientific, maybe not, but certainly makes sense to me.
Since automobile commuting is such a prolonged daily, and life-long activity, I would attribute a lot of the morbidity of civilization to that incessant stressor. Perhaps scientific, maybe not, but certainly makes sense to me.
Of course, the true Couch Potato only leaves to answer the “call of nature,” or seek out sustenance from the four food groups (sugar, salt, grease, and alcohol).
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Well of course public transit (buses at least) are stuck in traffic about equally with cars. They are using the same roads after all. The feeling of control that people have when they are driving is pure illusion when it comes to gridlock. Car drivers can no more whoosh away than bus drivers can.
If the traffic was slowed by congestion, you could turn into it but then you'd be stuck in the congestion. If it was slightly less busy, you could turn onto the road without waiting and immediately soar to top speed. It's goldy locks gridlock, really: not too fast, not too slow, just right for keeping you at stop sign for five minutes.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
immobilization was the most powerful stressor. I immediately extrapolated that concept to realize that confinement in an automobile was society’s most common form of immobilization. Even when cruising along on a freeway, the driver is still immobilized, and it becomes more acute when in a traffic jam. The bus, followed by the train, offer more freedom of movement, but walking and cycling allow essentially total freedom of movement.
#16
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
They pick me up at least 5 minutes late about 90% of the time ... although on the odd occasion they might actually be 5 minutes early, so I have to be out there early, just in case. If I miss the bus, it will be a good 45 minutes before the next one comes. And so I'm usually left standing out there, in all sorts of weather, for 15+ minutes.
They are supposed to arrive at my stop in Hobart at 8:50. I don't think they've ever arrived there at 8:50. I consider it a good run if we arrived at 9:00. 9:10 is a more likely time. And we've pulled up to the stop somewhere between 9:15 and 9:20 about half the time.
I cannot make 9:00 am appointments/meetings because although my bus should arrive in ample time, it simply does not. The only way I can make an early appointment/meeting is if I plan to take an earlier bus, which runs somewhere between 30 and 40 minutes earlier, depending on when it feels like turning up.
I have started voicing my concerns because my thinking is that if you're never going to arrive at 8:50, don't put that time on the schedule!
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#17
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
The bus I have been taking to work every day for the past 9 months has been pretty consistently late.
They pick me up at least 5 minutes late about 90% of the time ... although on the odd occasion they might actually be 5 minutes early, so I have to be out there early, just in case. If I miss the bus, it will be a good 45 minutes before the next one comes. And so I'm usually left standing out there, in all sorts of weather, for 15+ minutes.
They are supposed to arrive at my stop in Hobart at 8:50. I don't think they've ever arrived there at 8:50. I consider it a good run if we arrived at 9:00. 9:10 is a more likely time. And we've pulled up to the stop somewhere between 9:15 and 9:20 about half the time.
I cannot make 9:00 am appointments/meetings because although my bus should arrive in ample time, it simply does not. The only way I can make an early appointment/meeting is if I plan to take an earlier bus, which runs somewhere between 30 and 40 minutes earlier, depending on when it feels like turning up.
I have started voicing my concerns because my thinking is that if you're never going to arrive at 8:50, don't put that time on the schedule!
They pick me up at least 5 minutes late about 90% of the time ... although on the odd occasion they might actually be 5 minutes early, so I have to be out there early, just in case. If I miss the bus, it will be a good 45 minutes before the next one comes. And so I'm usually left standing out there, in all sorts of weather, for 15+ minutes.
They are supposed to arrive at my stop in Hobart at 8:50. I don't think they've ever arrived there at 8:50. I consider it a good run if we arrived at 9:00. 9:10 is a more likely time. And we've pulled up to the stop somewhere between 9:15 and 9:20 about half the time.
I cannot make 9:00 am appointments/meetings because although my bus should arrive in ample time, it simply does not. The only way I can make an early appointment/meeting is if I plan to take an earlier bus, which runs somewhere between 30 and 40 minutes earlier, depending on when it feels like turning up.
I have started voicing my concerns because my thinking is that if you're never going to arrive at 8:50, don't put that time on the schedule!
#18
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Because commuting by bicycle would take me 2 hours each way. I don't have 4 hours a day to spend commuting.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#19
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
I just noticed on re-reading my post that the train has been the main cause of me being late for work--and I wasn't even riding on the train! Rather, I was sitting in the street, on bike or in car, waiting for a crossing train to clear the road. I guess that's less of a problem in Europe, where most RR crossings are either above- or below-grade.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#20
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
The bus I have been taking to work every day for the past 9 months has been pretty consistently late.
They pick me up at least 5 minutes late about 90% of the time ... although on the odd occasion they might actually be 5 minutes early, so I have to be out there early, just in case. If I miss the bus, it will be a good 45 minutes before the next one comes. And so I'm usually left standing out there, in all sorts of weather, for 15+ minutes.
They are supposed to arrive at my stop in Hobart at 8:50. I don't think they've ever arrived there at 8:50. I consider it a good run if we arrived at 9:00. 9:10 is a more likely time. And we've pulled up to the stop somewhere between 9:15 and 9:20 about half the time.
I cannot make 9:00 am appointments/meetings because although my bus should arrive in ample time, it simply does not. The only way I can make an early appointment/meeting is if I plan to take an earlier bus, which runs somewhere between 30 and 40 minutes earlier, depending on when it feels like turning up.
I have started voicing my concerns because my thinking is that if you're never going to arrive at 8:50, don't put that time on the schedule!
They pick me up at least 5 minutes late about 90% of the time ... although on the odd occasion they might actually be 5 minutes early, so I have to be out there early, just in case. If I miss the bus, it will be a good 45 minutes before the next one comes. And so I'm usually left standing out there, in all sorts of weather, for 15+ minutes.
They are supposed to arrive at my stop in Hobart at 8:50. I don't think they've ever arrived there at 8:50. I consider it a good run if we arrived at 9:00. 9:10 is a more likely time. And we've pulled up to the stop somewhere between 9:15 and 9:20 about half the time.
I cannot make 9:00 am appointments/meetings because although my bus should arrive in ample time, it simply does not. The only way I can make an early appointment/meeting is if I plan to take an earlier bus, which runs somewhere between 30 and 40 minutes earlier, depending on when it feels like turning up.
I have started voicing my concerns because my thinking is that if you're never going to arrive at 8:50, don't put that time on the schedule!
Rather than complaining about early or late service, you might have better luck in getting your bus company to participate in one of the new apps that permits real-time posting of real-world arrival times at your particular stop. Eventually, these apps could make public schedules unnecessary.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#21
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Rather than complaining about early or late service, you might have better luck in getting your bus company to participate in one of the new apps that permits real-time posting of real-world arrival times at your particular stop. Eventually, these apps could make public schedules unnecessary.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#22
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
True, but at least you can wait in your house or other sheltered area rather than standing by the curb for 27 minutes.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#23
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,978
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
#24
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
It's the drop off that's the issue. If we have a bad run in, we can lose a lot of time.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#25
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
The pick up isn't the issue. I'm right at the start of the route and the bus arrives anywhere from a few minutes before the time on the schedule to about 10 minutes after. Not too bad. I'd like the bus to pull up on the dot every time, but I also know that's never going to happen.
It's the drop off that's the issue. If we have a bad run in, we can lose a lot of time.
It's the drop off that's the issue. If we have a bad run in, we can lose a lot of time.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"