A question about bicycle weights and physical weight
#1
Walmart bike rider
Thread Starter
A question about bicycle weights and physical weight
Example. I buy a 40 pound bike and I buy a 20 pound bike at 190 pounds. Okay, all things equal, the 20 pound bike should be faster.
But let's say I lost 20 pounds and went down to 170 pounds but kept the same muscle mass. Would the 40 pound bike be as fast as the 20 pound bike was when I was 20 pounds heavier?
Not that I am either of those things but just was wondering...
But let's say I lost 20 pounds and went down to 170 pounds but kept the same muscle mass. Would the 40 pound bike be as fast as the 20 pound bike was when I was 20 pounds heavier?
Not that I am either of those things but just was wondering...
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
I don't think any of us thought you were either a 20-pound nor a forty-pound bicycle.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
This is a classic "all other things being equal" situation.
If you bought a 20-lb. bike and filled the frame with lead or something so that the balance and aero and mechanical functions were the same ... and if you lost pure fat so that your power didn't change .... at this point I would simply stop caring. Why would anyone do all that?
And, it would be tricky to calculate tire pressure to get the same rolling resistance at each weight ....
What this really is, is a semi-troll sneaking into a thread ahead of the engineers and poisoning the ground ......
As for the actual question .... hypothetically .... I think so.
Why do you ask?
(This is a parody response.None of the potentially factual information it presents should be considered true.)
If you bought a 20-lb. bike and filled the frame with lead or something so that the balance and aero and mechanical functions were the same ... and if you lost pure fat so that your power didn't change .... at this point I would simply stop caring. Why would anyone do all that?
And, it would be tricky to calculate tire pressure to get the same rolling resistance at each weight ....
What this really is, is a semi-troll sneaking into a thread ahead of the engineers and poisoning the ground ......
As for the actual question .... hypothetically .... I think so.
Why do you ask?
(This is a parody response.None of the potentially factual information it presents should be considered true.)
Likes For CrimsonEclipse:
#5
PBP Ancien (2007)
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 358
Bikes: Cannondale CAADX (for commuting), Cannondale CAAD12, Cannondale CAAD12 Team CNCPT, Giant Contend 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 156 Times
in
106 Posts
The 20lb bike would be faster because you'll keep catching sight of your now svelte reflection in shop windows and push that much harder to maintain the athletic image.
Likes For Welshboy:
#6
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Another weight and speed thread, when will this madness stop ??
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times
in
3,012 Posts
If the 20 lb bike has lighter wheels it will be approx twice as fast as the equivalent amount of body fat.
Likes For PeteHski:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
I'll take 20 pounds off the human frame any day. Fat has a very high moment of inertia and it also overheats the motor and wears out the chain wax faster
So, dropping from 190 to 170 is way faster
So, dropping from 190 to 170 is way faster
Likes For GhostRider62:
#9
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Ok...Lets take an elite level pro cyclist on a 40 pound bike vs an "overweight MAMIL weekend warrior" on an 18 pound bike. Who would go faster and win ?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 884
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 772 Times
in
404 Posts
It's been proven - your gut is more aero than a 6 pack. The fat guy on a lighter bike will be at least 22% faster at 21 mph.
#11
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
That might be offset if all of the 20 pounds of fat is in your rotating feet.
I think we all know who I'm hoping will take this post seriously.
Last edited by livedarklions; 03-10-23 at 06:10 AM.
#12
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#13
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Example. I buy a 40 pound bike and I buy a 20 pound bike at 190 pounds. Okay, all things equal, the 20 pound bike should be faster.
But let's say I lost 20 pounds and went down to 170 pounds but kept the same muscle mass. Would the 40 pound bike be as fast as the 20 pound bike was when I was 20 pounds heavier?
Not that I am either of those things but just was wondering...
But let's say I lost 20 pounds and went down to 170 pounds but kept the same muscle mass. Would the 40 pound bike be as fast as the 20 pound bike was when I was 20 pounds heavier?
Not that I am either of those things but just was wondering...
You're not a newbie, I don't believe you haven't seen this movie before.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,299
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8285 Post(s)
Liked 9,053 Times
in
4,479 Posts
#17
Pennylane Splitter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,879
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1804 Post(s)
Liked 1,444 Times
in
993 Posts
Need more information.
What size are the wheels on each bicycle? 700, 26", or 650?
Schrader or Presta valves on the wheels? or tubeless?
Will the riders of the two bicycles be stopping for pie and coffee somewhere along the route?
Will the riders be dressed in aero 'roadie' gear or standard loose-fit MTB gear?
Wrap-around shades or standard Ray-Ban sunglasses?
Clipless, platform, or strapped-in pedals?
What size are the wheels on each bicycle? 700, 26", or 650?
Schrader or Presta valves on the wheels? or tubeless?
Will the riders of the two bicycles be stopping for pie and coffee somewhere along the route?
Will the riders be dressed in aero 'roadie' gear or standard loose-fit MTB gear?
Wrap-around shades or standard Ray-Ban sunglasses?
Clipless, platform, or strapped-in pedals?
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 982
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 506 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 639 Times
in
357 Posts
If this is serious, then first of all it is not true, or at least poorly stated. It takes more energy to spin up a heavier wheel but that energy is returned when coasting. At steady speed, it makes zero difference where the weight is.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times
in
3,012 Posts
It was as serious as the opening troll post.
Likes For PeteHski:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,847
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,543 Posts
Example. I buy a 40 pound bike and I buy a 20 pound bike at 190 pounds. Okay, all things equal, the 20 pound bike should be faster.
But let's say I lost 20 pounds and went down to 170 pounds but kept the same muscle mass. Would the 40 pound bike be as fast as the 20 pound bike was when I was 20 pounds heavier?
Not that I am either of those things but just was wondering...
But let's say I lost 20 pounds and went down to 170 pounds but kept the same muscle mass. Would the 40 pound bike be as fast as the 20 pound bike was when I was 20 pounds heavier?
Not that I am either of those things but just was wondering...
bike weight is too simple of of a measure as a bike is a system
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Likes For squirtdad:
#21
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
This is what is known in law schools as "fighting the hypothetical." OP stipulated "all else being equal", so the bikes are identical except for the weight. As Maelochs notes, that and the "all 20 pounds is fat" are such weird assumptions that the exercise is entirely pointless. It might be a fun mental exercise, but I prefer to go completely absurd with those:
https://www.bikeforums.net/general-c...ikes-moon.html
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,952
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,302 Times
in
2,948 Posts
Very few people realize that Einstein’s motivation for developing general relativity came from his observation that excess body weight is not subject to the laws of Newtonian mechanics.
#23
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Actually , it's subject to Fig Newtonian Mechanics. I could definitely get fat eating those wonderful cookies.
#24
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
Example. I buy a 40 pound bike and I buy a 20 pound bike at 190 pounds. Okay, all things equal, the 20 pound bike should be faster.
But let's say I lost 20 pounds and went down to 170 pounds but kept the same muscle mass. Would the 40 pound bike be as fast as the 20 pound bike was when I was 20 pounds heavier?
Not that I am either of those things but just was wondering...
But let's say I lost 20 pounds and went down to 170 pounds but kept the same muscle mass. Would the 40 pound bike be as fast as the 20 pound bike was when I was 20 pounds heavier?
Not that I am either of those things but just was wondering...
For my average rides of 20 to 30 miles, I was all of 1 mph faster if even that much, IIRC.
The big difference was in acceleration and amount of energy used to climb a hill. Notable on the hill climbing was that I could not only climb them quicker, I also had more energy left at the top as I didn't have to use up as much of my energy reserves. So on the downside of the hill and for any little bit of flat I might have I recovered more of my energy reserves and was able to ride further distances with a bigger energy reserve to have for those hills or sprints I might have to do later.
If you are somewhere where it's only flat, then weight isn't a big concern. If you aren't going to ride more than a hour or maybe two hours, weight isn't a big concern even in moderate rolling terrain. If you have to climb a grade either long or steep to get home after over 20 miles of riding, then weight is a concern. If you want to keep up with a group of riders on lighter bikes, then weight is a concern as they will generally out accelerate you or out climb you.
Weight you yourself lose will give you similar results. However the weight you lose from getting a lighter bike will be immediate and permanent.
Last edited by Iride01; 03-10-23 at 03:11 PM.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 939
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
259 Posts
Bike weight depends on how you ride it. Every young ultra fit person needs a light race bike just for fun on smooth surfaces. Any other type riding bike weight won't matter as much as other factors. A light bike is great but sometimes a heavy one is more practical.