Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Planning routes on Google Maps

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Planning routes on Google Maps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-21, 08:06 AM
  #26  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Since RWGPS has been mentioned multiple times, Ill add that I am pretty annoyed with how the system categorizes what is paved and unpaved riding.
I use RWGPS to create routes and whenever this feature was added, it was added too soon since it is so very wrong(at least in the 3 metros I have used it).

It labels maybe 20% of gravel roads as 'unpaved'. I personally dont care because I happen to know what is and isnt gravel, but it would really screw someone over if they didnt know ahead of time.
Is it better than Google Maps at indicating whether it's making you a shooting target? See my post #16.
livedarklions is offline  
Likes For livedarklions:
Old 09-08-21, 08:15 AM
  #27  
prj71
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times in 771 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Since RWGPS has been mentioned multiple times, Ill add that I am pretty annoyed with how the system categorizes what is paved and unpaved riding.
I use RWGPS to create routes and whenever this feature was added, it was added too soon since it is so very wrong(at least in the 3 metros I have used it).

It labels maybe 20% of gravel roads as 'unpaved'. I personally dont care because I happen to know what is and isnt gravel, but it would really screw someone over if they didnt know ahead of time.
It's unreasonable to expect the developers to keep up with timely changes on road conditions in every community around the U.S. It's just not going to happen.

And wouldn't unpaved mean a gravel road or dirt two track?
prj71 is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 08:17 AM
  #28  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
Is it better than Google Maps at indicating whether it's making you a shooting target? See my post #16.
RwGPS and Strava both route using popularity, based upon cyclist ride data; unless you've got a bunch of thrill-seeking cyclists regularly riding through the range, neither would route you through it.

edit: for those that haven't used one of the above services, this may give you a better idea of what we mean. The darker the lines, the more cyclists there are riding on a given segment. RwGPS and Strava will both weigh this data in connecting the dots between desired stops/waypoints -


Last edited by WhyFi; 09-08-21 at 08:22 AM.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 09-08-21, 08:27 AM
  #29  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
RwGPS and Strava both route using popularity, based upon cyclist ride data; unless you've got a bunch of thrill-seeking cyclists regularly riding through the range, neither would route you through it.

Good point. I've never really used either of those for routing, I might have to start because I'm getting a bit tired of the same old same old. I've tried using Komoot for it, but it's not good at distinguishing good running routes from cycling routes.

Might be fun to trade bad routing suggestion anecdotes. My second worst one from GM was when it tried to put me on a path that is a rapidly flowing creek without rideable banks for a good part of the year. Guess which part of the year it was.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 08:33 AM
  #30  
OldRailfan
Old enough, hmmm?
 
OldRailfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Coldstream, BC Canada
Posts: 287

Bikes: DeVinci, Bianchi, Nishiki, RBSM Mud Adder

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Liked 113 Times in 82 Posts
I use Google Map Pedometer https://www.mappedometer.com/
It does precisely what I want., nothing else required.
As far as results go Garmin Connect works for me.
OldRailfan is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 08:37 AM
  #31  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
Good point. I've never really used either of those for routing, I might have to start because I'm getting a bit tired of the same old same old. I've tried using Komoot for it, but it's not good at distinguishing good running routes from cycling routes.
FYI, you can create routes with a free account on RwGPS. Strava's routing tools are subscriber only, though you can look at their heatmap (you can't zoom in too far and no road names, but you could piece it together), which may be enough for some folks - https://www.strava.com/heatmap#7.00/....22856/hot/all
WhyFi is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 08:57 AM
  #32  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
RwGPS and Strava both route using popularity, based upon cyclist ride data; unless you've got a bunch of thrill-seeking cyclists regularly riding through the range, neither would route you through it.

edit: for those that haven't used one of the above services, this may give you a better idea of what we mean. The darker the lines, the more cyclists there are riding on a given segment. RwGPS and Strava will both weigh this data in connecting the dots between desired stops/waypoints -

I didn't scroll down to see the map. That's the route I used to ride in the 1970s! I didn't go around Nokomis much, but I did the east side of the 3 lakes starting with Isles down to Minnehaha, then around at the river and back to Kenwood.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 09:05 AM
  #33  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times in 4,189 Posts
Originally Posted by prj71
It's unreasonable to expect the developers to keep up with timely changes on road conditions in every community around the U.S. It's just not going to happen.

And wouldn't unpaved mean a gravel road or dirt two track?
I agree, that is unreasonable.

- the issue I mention is that gravel roads, which have been gravel roads since well before GPS was a thing, are listed as paved. This then does not apply to your comment since there is no change.
- if they cant keep up with changes, then they shouldnt offer the option. If this were a mile here and a mile there that is incorrect, it would be easy to chalk that up to changing road conditions that havent been changed in the system. This is especially true if they show gravel and the road sections are now paved since that is the most common road condition change. Having 80% of the gravel roads show as paved is a very different situation- being that incorrect makes the feature pretty useless.
mstateglfr is offline  
Likes For mstateglfr:
Old 09-08-21, 10:47 AM
  #34  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,276
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4259 Post(s)
Liked 1,360 Times in 943 Posts
Originally Posted by prj71
It's unreasonable to expect the developers to keep up with timely changes on road conditions in every community around the U.S. It's just not going to happen.
RWGPS isn't a mapping company. It appears they are getting the road surface data from Openstreetmap.
njkayaker is online now  
Old 09-08-21, 10:55 AM
  #35  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,276
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4259 Post(s)
Liked 1,360 Times in 943 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
I agree, that is unreasonable.

- the issue I mention is that gravel roads, which have been gravel roads since well before GPS was a thing, are listed as paved. This then does not apply to your comment since there is no change.
- if they cant keep up with changes, then they shouldnt offer the option. If this were a mile here and a mile there that is incorrect, it would be easy to chalk that up to changing road conditions that havent been changed in the system. This is especially true if they show gravel and the road sections are now paved since that is the most common road condition change. Having 80% of the gravel roads show as paved is a very different situation- being that incorrect makes the feature pretty useless.
Not offering the option means assuming all roads are paved. That doesn't seem better at all.

If you don't like the option, turn it off.

RWGPS isn't a mapping company. It's a "use map data" company.

The road surface option might encourage people to update the map data (RWGPS appears to use Openstreetmap data for the road surfaces).
njkayaker is online now  
Old 09-08-21, 11:32 AM
  #36  
ClydeClydeson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times in 518 Posts
For off road riding, Google maps can be useful because you can see where what they call a 'road' ends, but there is often some sort of cut in the trees beyond that might be passable. One of my favourite mixed terrain loops isn't a loop on Google Maps, but you can clearly see a road coming from the North and a road coming from the south with a gap of a few hundred meters of some type of cut in the trees.

I don't carry any type of odometer or distance measuring tool when I ride, so I often use Google maps to estimate my ride distance after I get home, if I can remember which way I went.
ClydeClydeson is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 11:36 AM
  #37  
Troul 
Senior Member
 
Troul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,389

Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,972 Times in 1,918 Posts
If a driveway was properly identified as such or a private drive was labeled right, it'd likely save someone's life.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
Troul is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 02:53 PM
  #38  
freetors
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
I will generally use RWGPS but will also consult the google when necessary. In the ~100 mile radius around where I live there is a lot of really bad map data; often times with roads being a hundred feet from where they actually are, intersections in the wrong place, or most frustrating miles of spiderwebbing farm tracks and driveways (which are usually gated and locked anyway) all over the place that software thinks are navigable roads. Therefore, I've started heavily editing roads in open street map to reflect reality and I would urge everyone else to do the same. It helps everyone else out too when that map data trickles down into all the other mapping softwares that use OSM.
freetors is offline  
Likes For freetors:
Old 09-08-21, 03:38 PM
  #39  
billridesbikes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 701
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by freetors
I will generally use RWGPS but will also consult the google when necessary. In the ~100 mile radius around where I live there is a lot of really bad map data; often times with roads being a hundred feet from where they actually are, intersections in the wrong place, or most frustrating miles of spiderwebbing farm tracks and driveways (which are usually gated and locked anyway) all over the place that software thinks are navigable roads. Therefore, I've started heavily editing roads in open street map to reflect reality and I would urge everyone else to do the same. It helps everyone else out too when that map data trickles down into all the other mapping softwares that use OSM.
+1 OpenStreetMap.org is crowdsourced map data for the world. Anyone can create an OSM account and edit the surface or other information like you’re doing and at some point we’ll all benefit! I think just about all non-Google apps use OSM, RWGPS says it can take up to 3 months for changes to OSM to show up. Here is a link on how to start: https://ridewithgps.com/help/edit-routing-data
billridesbikes is offline  
Old 09-08-21, 04:07 PM
  #40  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,883

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3240 Post(s)
Liked 2,086 Times in 1,181 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
I agree, that is unreasonable.

- the issue I mention is that gravel roads, which have been gravel roads since well before GPS was a thing, are listed as paved. This then does not apply to your comment since there is no change.
- if they cant keep up with changes, then they shouldnt offer the option.
The subject of gravel vs. dirt, when do they change, was the subject a month or so ago. It's completely unreasonable to think that any online map database is going to have an accurate database of what's gravel and what's paved. RWGPS just instituted a change that everybody seemed to agree was completely inaccurate as to where the gravel was and was an essentially useless effort.. The OSM maps just don't get updated quick enough to track changes. In the upstate area of NY where I do a lot of off pavement riding, it's the counties usually that decide to extend the asphalt out another few miles and it's not like they then go and inform the assorted mapping companies. Neither Google nor OSM has people in the field checking and the only online database I've seen that is even close is GravelMaps, which relies on users to upload rides and or create routes online that are gravel. As the Op was asking about Google, I don't think Google shows when roads are not paved. Hell, they show roads that are under 12ft of snow half the year, forget gravel.
Steve B. is online now  
Old 09-09-21, 08:10 AM
  #41  
prj71
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times in 771 Posts
Originally Posted by freetors
I will generally use RWGPS but will also consult the google when necessary.
As I mentioned earlier Google Maps is layer available withing RWGPS. You never need to leave the Ride with GPS website to consult google maps.
prj71 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.