Difference between 1982 Trek 412 vs 1989 Trek 400???
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Difference between 1982 Trek 412 vs 1989 Trek 400???
So this year I wanted to try doing a brevet.
I was thinking about buying a another TREK and adding different parts to it, spreading the frame for different hubs, adding fenders, basically just customizing it. I might have an opportunity to buy either a 1982 412 or a 1989 400, is there a major difference in geometry? I know as the years went on the geo changed? I also know the 400 used true temper and the 412 used ishiwata 022. I don't mind the ishiwats as my other trek is a 1980 412 and is basically the 82 version but with added top tube braze ons, and a pair of water bottle mounts. Also the 400 is in better shape than the 412.
What do you all think?
I was thinking about buying a another TREK and adding different parts to it, spreading the frame for different hubs, adding fenders, basically just customizing it. I might have an opportunity to buy either a 1982 412 or a 1989 400, is there a major difference in geometry? I know as the years went on the geo changed? I also know the 400 used true temper and the 412 used ishiwata 022. I don't mind the ishiwats as my other trek is a 1980 412 and is basically the 82 version but with added top tube braze ons, and a pair of water bottle mounts. Also the 400 is in better shape than the 412.
What do you all think?
#2
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
491 Posts
I just went through this process trying to find a bike to stash at the in-laws and came up with an 81 or 82 410 because they are mid trail. An ‘89 400 will be high trail. If you are Rando-riding and want a bar bag, the mid trail bike may be a better choice as they aren’t as affected by the front load as a high trail bike would be. It’s not a primo frame as the fork and stays are simple HiTen, but with an Ishiwata main triangle it’s going to be a good workingman's ride.
In fact I spent the afternoon tearing down the bike and started building it back up in the desired build: a rando-style bike.
Plus, I just love the earlier Treks more.
In fact I spent the afternoon tearing down the bike and started building it back up in the desired build: a rando-style bike.
Plus, I just love the earlier Treks more.
Last edited by mountaindave; 12-28-19 at 12:56 AM.
#3
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,626
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 6,485 Times
in
3,209 Posts
I've had one of each, and it's a no brainer to go with the early '80s Treks. I've failed to see what's special with the later '80s 400s.
#4
Full Member
The head and seat tube angles of the late 89 400 were steeper, and the chain stays shorter, than those of the 82 412 so you could call the 89 a more aggressive geometry. You might not want that for long brevets, though plenty of people rando on race bikes. Another factor is that the 82 was sold with 27” wheels, while the 89 would’ve worn a more modern 700c set. Converting to 700c might be something to budget for, the 82’s stock brakes will reach a 700c wheel.
I used an 82 412 for one rando season. It was fine, but the top tube was simply too long for me. Here’s mine 700c converted.
But if you’re buying wheels, 650b is an option. A big plus to the 1982 412 was that it 650b converted very well with 75mm reach center pulls. It fits 650x42b tires with lots of room left for fenders. Here it is 650b’d, minus fenders.
I used an 82 412 for one rando season. It was fine, but the top tube was simply too long for me. Here’s mine 700c converted.
But if you’re buying wheels, 650b is an option. A big plus to the 1982 412 was that it 650b converted very well with 75mm reach center pulls. It fits 650x42b tires with lots of room left for fenders. Here it is 650b’d, minus fenders.
#5
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
491 Posts
But if you’re buying wheels, 650b is an option. A big plus to the 1982 412 was that it 650b converted very well with 75mm reach center pulls. It fits 650x42b tires with lots of room left for fenders.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
mountaindave Thanx for the response! This is exactly the info I was looking for, I was going to try to compare the geo charts but wanted to ask the opinion of the group.
SurferRosa I do love my 1980's TREK! My TREK 412 is awesome even without the water bottle and cable brazeons.
fliplap I was hoping you would chime in, I was looking at your bike when doing research. Are you here in the valley? I am leaning more toward the 82 at this point. I feel like I can do more with it in the long run.
SurferRosa I do love my 1980's TREK! My TREK 412 is awesome even without the water bottle and cable brazeons.
fliplap I was hoping you would chime in, I was looking at your bike when doing research. Are you here in the valley? I am leaning more toward the 82 at this point. I feel like I can do more with it in the long run.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
Just for an alternate take on the '89, it's an all Chromo frame where the '82 has hi ten fork and stays. The '89 has 73.5 ST angle and 73 HT angle, not crazy steep, and a midish trail of 5.6cm.
And it sounds like you already own a 1980 400 series trek, maybe the newer one would offer more variety?
And it sounds like you already own a 1980 400 series trek, maybe the newer one would offer more variety?
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
When I was comparing the charts I noticed the same thing about the geo. I believe that the 1982 is the same as my 1980 in regards to steel used. I was wondering if the 89 would offer something different than what I have.
#10
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
491 Posts
Clearly the answer is n+2, then later it can be n-1 which results in the net of n+1 - still an acceptable outcome.
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
*edited to show the correct geometry charts for the 400*
Sorry about creating confusion! Here is the correct chart. The ‘89 significantly racier than the ‘80 or ‘82 models.
Sorry about creating confusion! Here is the correct chart. The ‘89 significantly racier than the ‘80 or ‘82 models.
Last edited by Chr0m0ly; 12-30-19 at 10:35 AM.
#12
Full Member
Last edited by fliplap; 12-30-19 at 10:07 AM.
#13
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
491 Posts
The difference between the ‘89 400 and 420 is negligible. The difference between the ‘82 and ‘89 is more significant - mostly in the fork offset difference of 10mm. That changes the trail number from mid-high on the ‘89 to solid mid trail on the ‘82. Those two bikes will handle differently.
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,158
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,701 Times
in
2,612 Posts
This thread gives me an excuse to post the receipt from my purchase of a Trek 412 in Dec 1982. That was my first ever brand new complete bike and also the last as long as you don’t count framesets.
#15
Full Member
The difference between the ‘89 400 and 420 is negligible. The difference between the ‘82 and ‘89 is more significant - mostly in the fork offset difference of 10mm. That changes the trail number from mid-high on the ‘89 to solid mid trail on the ‘82. Those two bikes will handle differently.
The 420 came with 28mm tires and what appears to be lots of room to go bigger. At least 32mm. Could probably get fenders in there too.
Here's the 400 on the stock 25mm tires. Hard to say it would clear anything bigger than that. The tire is snugged right up against the front derailleur and seat tube. The OP wanted fenders, the 400 doesn't look like it would fit them, and doesn't have eyelets anyway.
Also, depending on what the OP was planning to change, components will make a difference. The 400 came with a double with traditional (aka huge) chain rings, while the 420 came with a half step plus granny triple. The 400 runs a short cage derailleur, while the 420 and 412 both feature long cages, though the 412 came with a double.
@jamesj: The 400 will offer something very different than your 1980 412. If you're looking for an entry level skinny tired road racer, the 400 is that. If you're looking for another wire tired and fender capable sport tourer, the 82 412 is your better bet.
Last edited by fliplap; 12-30-19 at 10:01 AM.
#16
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
491 Posts
@flipflap; - I think I probably just assumed the ‘89 would have tighter clearances as that was de rigueur for the day. But good to articulate that and include the important consideration of tire/fender clearance with regard for the chain stay lengths.
I believe we are arguing the same point. 1982 412 for the win!
I believe we are arguing the same point. 1982 412 for the win!
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
In the sellers images I had noticed that it had fenders mounts in front and rear also rack mounts, I thought it was a Elance at first.
#18
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,626
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 6,485 Times
in
3,209 Posts
Even though the early ones were made with hi-ten forks and stays, they didn't feel heavy/dead to me like some other manufacturers that did the same. I'm thinking of the lower mid-level Japanese (Fuji, etc.) and Motobécanes.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Looking back at the catalogs just now I think its a 1988 Trek 400T.
It has the same color scheme and mounts.
It has the same color scheme and mounts.
#20
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
491 Posts
Which would make the chain stays 43cm instead of 41. However, still a high trail bike.
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
Well that decides it, He just needs both.
N+2 = For the Win.
N+2 = For the Win.