anyone use dura ace 7410 crankset?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
anyone use dura ace 7410 crankset?
cant find any reviews on these. anyone recommend them? i seem to be very light but are they stiff? im using the 7700 crankset now which ive really liked but i want a square taper so i can get a phil wood BB. any other recommendations for light cranksets would be great too....
#2
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Recommend them?? Where are you going to find them? They've been out of production since 1996.
In general, 8-speed DA - doubles especially - are odd animals that don't mix will with other parts. Unless you have a full 7400 DA kit, avoid.
In general, 8-speed DA - doubles especially - are odd animals that don't mix will with other parts. Unless you have a full 7400 DA kit, avoid.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ive seen a few on ebay. i would be running a single chainring front, 5 sprockets spaced in the middle of the freehub, ultegra 9sp derailleur narrowed down to 5 with the limit screws, and a phil wood 103mm BB. wouldnt that work?
#4
Señor Cardgage Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have two in use currently. Actually one a 7400 and the other 7410. I use the 7400 with a DA FD and '97 Record front brifter. It provides me with enough trim ability for very smooth shifting. The rest of those bikes are full DA 7400 series.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
so these feel as sturdy to you as more modern cranks? no flex?
#6
Señor Cardgage Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Compared to my '05 Chorus setup and '06 FSA I would with Chorus being a 10 and FSA being a 4 (definitely flex in this baby), the 7400 is about a 9. Hope that helps (I have noticed that the BB is finally starting to yield).
#7
Mmmmm Donuts!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Crownsville, MD
Posts: 2,069
Bikes: 1998 IF Crown Jewel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I went from a 7400 series crank and BB to a FSA Carbon K-Force ISIS crankset and FSA Platinum Series ISIS Ti BB on my IF. The difference was very noticable to me. FSA setup felt much stiffer. I'm never going back...I should mention i also went from std Looks to Keos at the same time.
On the other hand, since the bling factor is much higher with the FSA stuff, I may just be full of s*@t and it's all a placebo effect. Still, me likey the carbon cranks and Ti BB.
I plan on Ebaying all that old stuff. Real soon. I need a cross frame.
On the other hand, since the bling factor is much higher with the FSA stuff, I may just be full of s*@t and it's all a placebo effect. Still, me likey the carbon cranks and Ti BB.
I plan on Ebaying all that old stuff. Real soon. I need a cross frame.
__________________
John
'09 Cannondale CAAD9 - Team Latitude/ABRT Special.
'04 Lemond Victorie Ti
'98 IF Crown Jewel (dead)
'92 Trek2100 (TT)
'50 something Gino Bartali (fixer)
'02 Ducati ST4s (Moto-Ref mount)
My Blog
John
'09 Cannondale CAAD9 - Team Latitude/ABRT Special.
'04 Lemond Victorie Ti
'98 IF Crown Jewel (dead)
'92 Trek2100 (TT)
'50 something Gino Bartali (fixer)
'02 Ducati ST4s (Moto-Ref mount)
My Blog
#8
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,307
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 733 Times
in
375 Posts
A double chainring is designed for the chain to shift off it, not a desireable charecteristic in a single chainring set up (something David Millar's mechanics forgot in a TDF prologue a couple of years ago.)
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you're going to be running a single front chainring, why not use a crankset designed for one chainring.
A double chainring is designed for the chain to shift off it, not a desireable charecteristic in a single chainring set up (something David Millar's mechanics forgot in a TDF prologue a couple of years ago.)
A double chainring is designed for the chain to shift off it, not a desireable charecteristic in a single chainring set up (something David Millar's mechanics forgot in a TDF prologue a couple of years ago.)
i have a single speed chainring with no ramps or pins 130mm that will fit most road cranksets. just looking at road cranks because theyre generally cheaper and easier to find than track or SS cranks.....
#10
Sensible shoes.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Paul,MN
Posts: 8,798
Bikes: A few.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a rig with 7401 cranks. They still run pretty nice, but I've loosely considered wasting the money on the new ones.
#11
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you're going to be running a single front chainring, why not use a crankset designed for one chainring.
A double chainring is designed for the chain to shift off it, not a desireable charecteristic in a single chainring set up (something David Millar's mechanics forgot in a TDF prologue a couple of years ago.)
A double chainring is designed for the chain to shift off it, not a desireable charecteristic in a single chainring set up (something David Millar's mechanics forgot in a TDF prologue a couple of years ago.)
And it would be even lighter.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts