Strava fitness calculation change this week?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Strava fitness calculation change this week?
Did Strava change their fitness/freshness calculation for anyone else this week? I've been using Summit for a bit over a month so naturally I'm still in the phase of geeking out on too many numbers to look at, but my fitness graph just dropped by over half compared to last week. I'm not talking just about todays number, the entire curve has dropped. Even numbers from weeks and months ago. Yeah, I know it's just a number but I'm curious if anyone else saw their fitness calculation change dramatically in the past week?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
Did you change your FTP/LTHR? Strava's fitness calculation is kind of worthless because it doesn't let your set different values for ranges of time in a season even though they fluctuate with training.
#3
Non omnino gravis
Do yourself a huge favor and install the Elevate (formerly Stravistix) plug-in for your browser. So much more information made available, and the Elevate version of the Fitness and Freshness graph (Fitness Trend) is a lot easier to read.
Because Fitness and Freshness can't be refined down past a 6-month display, mine is just a slightly irregular line. The graph in Elevate does a better job of graphically displaying my fatigue.
Because Fitness and Freshness can't be refined down past a 6-month display, mine is just a slightly irregular line. The graph in Elevate does a better job of graphically displaying my fatigue.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I did make a small change in my FTP, but not sure why that would cause the fitness calc to go from 70-80 to mid 30's? I've tried putting it back to see if anything changes.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Atl.
Posts: 172
Bikes: Novara MTN, Merlin Moots Fatbeat, Specialized Allez, Merlin Extralight, BH Ultralight RC
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Mine did Oct 8 this year and my fitness nosed dived for two weeks before I realized it wasn't my training, but their program. I initially had my max HR set up and let the zones fall where they may, but then I decided to set it up to use my zones and that is where the program failed. Got a service ticket on it and the guy at Strava told me to go back to max HR setting. I did, but adjusted it form 183 to 172 to get my zones to line up better. Worked like a charm, but not perfect by any stretch. But, I'm a noob so what do I know...
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
Mine did Oct 8 this year and my fitness nosed dived for two weeks before I realized it wasn't my training, but their program. I initially had my max HR set up and let the zones fall where they may, but then I decided to set it up to use my zones and that is where the program failed. Got a service ticket on it and the guy at Strava told me to go back to max HR setting. I did, but adjusted it form 183 to 172 to get my zones to line up better. Worked like a charm, but not perfect by any stretch. But, I'm a noob so what do I know...
#8
Non omnino gravis
It also seems to have to do with the changes in algorithm when Strava went from "suffer score" to "relative effort." Back in 2016, in the Suffer Score days, my fitness peaked at 142, and I could see Fatigue scores all the way up into the 170s. In the past six months, I've not seen a Fitness score above 80 or below 71. On the 4th of July, I did 108 miles with 5,000ft of climbing, in 106º temps, and netted a Fatigue score of 84. I often wonder about Strava's math. I've had Move Ratios of 1.00 (moving time and elapsed time match) two days in a row, even though I stopped for signs/lights several times on each ride. Strava is just a big fan of rounding off.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I guess the main change is really switching from on bike to a trainer, which means I have a power meter now where I didn't before. Would that trigger Strava to recalculate the entire curve from the last 6 months?
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Mine did Oct 8 this year and my fitness nosed dived for two weeks before I realized it wasn't my training, but their program. I initially had my max HR set up and let the zones fall where they may, but then I decided to set it up to use my zones and that is where the program failed. Got a service ticket on it and the guy at Strava told me to go back to max HR setting. I did, but adjusted it form 183 to 172 to get my zones to line up better. Worked like a charm, but not perfect by any stretch. But, I'm a noob so what do I know...
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
try adding the Elevate plugin for chrome that calculates TSS from your strava HR and power data as mentioned above, its more consistent in general. If you have a PM and want a mobile option, export strava to wattsboard to track TSS
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
When it reached that peak was right near the end of the warm weather here and I'd done two metrics over the course of two weeks, along with a few other shorter rides. The thing is, a few weeks ago, my score in early Nov after completing those rides read 80 or so. Now, when I look at my chart for the same day, it reads 40. It's not that my fitness score has dropped with time (it's actually trending slowly higher with trainer workouts) the weirdness is that my entire chart is now reading differently for the past 6 months. Same general shape, just much lower numbers.
I guess the main change is really switching from on bike to a trainer, which means I have a power meter now where I didn't before. Would that trigger Strava to recalculate the entire curve from the last 6 months?
I guess the main change is really switching from on bike to a trainer, which means I have a power meter now where I didn't before. Would that trigger Strava to recalculate the entire curve from the last 6 months?
A few months with 10 hour weeks with 5-6 harder rides each week ( so nearly every ride) usually puts me around 90 or so.
So anyway, sounds like now it's more accurate than it previously was, though why is a good question.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It also seems to have to do with the changes in algorithm when Strava went from "suffer score" to "relative effort." Back in 2016, in the Suffer Score days, my fitness peaked at 142, and I could see Fatigue scores all the way up into the 170s. In the past six months, I've not seen a Fitness score above 80 or below 71. On the 4th of July, I did 108 miles with 5,000ft of climbing, in 106º temps, and netted a Fatigue score of 84. I often wonder about Strava's math. I've had Move Ratios of 1.00 (moving time and elapsed time match) two days in a row, even though I stopped for signs/lights several times on each ride. Strava is just a big fan of rounding off.
I guess that's the root of it all. Good to know that it's more on track now, even if I liked the older number better. I don't personally know anyone else using Summit, so never had an idea what the numbers should read for a given fitness level. The only change I can think is that before it was using only HR data and recently I've got mostly HR and PM data from my trainer?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
Strava "fitness" or elevate "fitness" is not real fitness, so it doesn't matter what the numbers say. TSS and relative effort are just training metrics. Measure fitness in terms of increases in FTP or times on a repeatable segment of road. There are lots of ways to create the same TSS/RE but not all add to your performance capability in the same way.
#15
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Strava "fitness" or elevate "fitness" is not real fitness, so it doesn't matter what the numbers say. TSS and relative effort are just training metrics. Measure fitness in terms of increases in FTP or times on a repeatable segment of road. There are lots of ways to create the same TSS/RE but not all add to your performance capability in the same way.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
That's the main caveat, not all fitness is the same and not all fitness is created equal. My peak CTL for the season was pretty high, but I wasn't particularly fast, and got faster in the cyclocross season by decreasing my CTL and increasing my amount of intensity for my race specific fitness required.
#17
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
That's the main caveat, not all fitness is the same and not all fitness is created equal. My peak CTL for the season was pretty high, but I wasn't particularly fast, and got faster in the cyclocross season by decreasing my CTL and increasing my amount of intensity for my race specific fitness required.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#19
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
#20
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
It would be interesting to compare metrics from Strava with Training Peaks.
The exact numbers might not agree but the graphs should be roughly the same in terms of trending.
-Tim-
The exact numbers might not agree but the graphs should be roughly the same in terms of trending.
-Tim-
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
If your FTP changes throughout the season(as it should) the shapes won't match since strava only allows 1 value and recalculates all your rides on that, so its pretty much worthless. Depending on where you are in the season, it'll underestimate the early season fitness/fatigue and underestimate the peak season work later in the season if your FTP drops