Endurance Riding Bike Selection
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Endurance Riding Bike Selection
I am truly interested in doing more distance type rides, including some long rail trail rides.
From my online searching, though, I do not see bikes that are designed for this type of riding that are reasonably light.
The bikes that I see that are light usually have high Road gearing. The bikes with the lower gearing on the other hand seem to be heavier.
What are some bike choices you would recommend or is it necessary to customize or build a bike for these purposes?
Thanks
From my online searching, though, I do not see bikes that are designed for this type of riding that are reasonably light.
The bikes that I see that are light usually have high Road gearing. The bikes with the lower gearing on the other hand seem to be heavier.
What are some bike choices you would recommend or is it necessary to customize or build a bike for these purposes?
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Light bikes aren't a big advantage on most brevets, aero is more important since it's "always on" so to speak. Gravel "race" bikes tend to be lighter than the regular versions, something like that salsa warroad vs the warbird. Most endurance road bikes are great rando bikes, and lower gearing is as easy getting a 48/31 or 46/30 crank/chainrings, and/or an 11-34 cassette works with most shimano road groups now.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Light bikes aren't a big advantage on most brevets, aero is more important since it's "always on" so to speak. Gravel "race" bikes tend to be lighter than the regular versions, something like that salsa warroad vs the warbird. Most endurance road bikes are great rando bikes, and lower gearing is as easy getting a 48/31 or 46/30 crank/chainrings, and/or an 11-34 cassette works with most shimano road groups now.
I’m a bit new and age wise a bit late to the cycling world so I have a ton to learn.
#4
Senior Member
I was dreaming about doing an off road endurance race and the Specialized S-works Diverge STR was on my radar. It is about $750/lb but has suspension front and rear
Bikes like these generally will have large tires and rims, which weight at least a pound more compared to a road bike. If your requirements add suspension, then the bike gets heavy
I am of the opinion that much of the energy from sharp vertical movements are absorbed into one's body tissue. A suspended bike with proper tires and pressure should be more efficient and help ward off the trashed out fatigue that always comes.
If you want more road and less trail, the Trek Domane SLR 2023 version might be of interest, I think they ditched the suspension up front but kept the one on the rear. The top of the line version is under 17 lbs.
Bikes like these generally will have large tires and rims, which weight at least a pound more compared to a road bike. If your requirements add suspension, then the bike gets heavy
I am of the opinion that much of the energy from sharp vertical movements are absorbed into one's body tissue. A suspended bike with proper tires and pressure should be more efficient and help ward off the trashed out fatigue that always comes.
If you want more road and less trail, the Trek Domane SLR 2023 version might be of interest, I think they ditched the suspension up front but kept the one on the rear. The top of the line version is under 17 lbs.
#5
How much are you willing to spend to shave a few pounds off the bike? Are you willing to spend $15,000 for a 13 pound Aethos?
Why are you worried about weight anyway? Lighter bikes aren't faster, unless you are Everesting.
What are some bike choices you would recommend or is it necessary to customize or build a bike for these purposes?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,875
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Liked 2,072 Times
in
908 Posts
Check out something like a canyon endurace cf7 or cf8 under 20lbs and can do rough roads or gravel but still cruise at ~20mph. Very comfortable bike to do 100 miles on.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,557
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Liked 1,588 Times
in
1,229 Posts
Before you get too deep into selections based on weight, think about tire clearance.
I regularly ride three different rail trails, one has a fairly hard packed surface and I often use 32mm wide tires which my rando bike has. But one trail often has a bit more mud or soft spots, for that rail trail I usually use my light touring bike with 37mm wide tires, they handle the soft spots better. And one rail trail often has washouts and erosion problems, sometimes it is maintained with loose sand in the eroded areas, any tire gets questionable. That said, I think a lot of bikes with 37 to 40mm wide tires would work quite well for most people that want to ride most rail trails. I would not suggest anything narrower for a maximum clearance for a bike that is intended for that purpose.
Talk to others that ride the same trails that you are interested in, ask them what tire widths they like for the trails.
You want a bike frame and fork that can take the maximum width that you might want to use.
Later you might consider a second set of wheels if you want to use the bike for paved roads too. I can't comment on the cost of a second set of wheels, you likely are looking at a through axle bike, that could rule out older used budget wheel sets.
I regularly ride three different rail trails, one has a fairly hard packed surface and I often use 32mm wide tires which my rando bike has. But one trail often has a bit more mud or soft spots, for that rail trail I usually use my light touring bike with 37mm wide tires, they handle the soft spots better. And one rail trail often has washouts and erosion problems, sometimes it is maintained with loose sand in the eroded areas, any tire gets questionable. That said, I think a lot of bikes with 37 to 40mm wide tires would work quite well for most people that want to ride most rail trails. I would not suggest anything narrower for a maximum clearance for a bike that is intended for that purpose.
Talk to others that ride the same trails that you are interested in, ask them what tire widths they like for the trails.
You want a bike frame and fork that can take the maximum width that you might want to use.
Later you might consider a second set of wheels if you want to use the bike for paved roads too. I can't comment on the cost of a second set of wheels, you likely are looking at a through axle bike, that could rule out older used budget wheel sets.
Likes For Tourist in MSN:
#8
Senior Member
Hope the temps stay down a bit for his run.
Likes For tangerineowl:
Likes For picaf:
#10
Junior Member
I am a long-distance / ultra-distance cyclist, and I like "endurance" bikes for this purpose (generally speaking). However, over the past few years "endurance" geometry has gotten progressively more relaxed (i.e. slacker head tube angles, taller stack, shorter reach), the handlebars have gotten wider, and tire clearance has increased. It's reached a point where "endurance" bikes are now marketed as dual-purpose bikes suitable for road and gravel. This is all very well and nice if you are a road cyclist with very poor flexibility or someone who actively rides road and gravel. For the rest of us, the "endurance" category has left us behind.
I mention this because I recently had to replace my "endurance / gravel" bike, which was a 2020 Basso Palta. Basso originally marketed the Palta as a gravel bike, but it's geometry and overall design was (more or less) a relaxed version of Basso's road geometry with wider tire clearance for gravel applications. It made for an awesome endurance bike on paved surfaces, which was my primary use. As a gravel bike, it was average at best and should have never been marketed for gravel. However, since 2020 the Palta's geometry has gotten much slacker. It is now firmly in the gravel category and no longer suitable for serious road riding.
As I began my search for a replacement bike for long-distance and ultra-distance events I quickly found myself looking at full-on aero bikes and climbing bikes. Since 2020 road bike geometry has gotten more relaxed as manufacturers have realized that mere mortals aren't comfortable (for any distance) stretched out and folded over like a taco with a flat back. As a result, the stack on race bikes in 2023 / 2024 is now slightly taller and the reach slightly shorter, to the point that a reasonably flexible club-level rider can (in many cases) be properly fit on a super-sexy aero or climbing race bike. I'm not so thrilled about the head tube angles dipping below 72 degrees on some race bikes or chainstays growing longer than 410mm (but that is personal preference).
Long-story short, I ended up purchasing a Time Alpe D'Huez (disc) frameset. It's marketed as a "climbing" bike, which is no surprise based on the model name. However, I live in Florida. I primarily train and race in Florida. I am not a climber and will not be using this bike for climbing. The geometry of the Time Alpe D'Huez, which in my opinion is ideal for use as an "endurance" bike, is what got my attention.
The lesson learned and the main takeaway from my recent experience of having to replace my endurance bike is: Don't pay attention to the marketing or the category labels. Pay close attention to the geometry charts and buy that which fits you and your intended riding style. This approach should open your search to more possibilities, and you might be surprised what you find.
I mention this because I recently had to replace my "endurance / gravel" bike, which was a 2020 Basso Palta. Basso originally marketed the Palta as a gravel bike, but it's geometry and overall design was (more or less) a relaxed version of Basso's road geometry with wider tire clearance for gravel applications. It made for an awesome endurance bike on paved surfaces, which was my primary use. As a gravel bike, it was average at best and should have never been marketed for gravel. However, since 2020 the Palta's geometry has gotten much slacker. It is now firmly in the gravel category and no longer suitable for serious road riding.
As I began my search for a replacement bike for long-distance and ultra-distance events I quickly found myself looking at full-on aero bikes and climbing bikes. Since 2020 road bike geometry has gotten more relaxed as manufacturers have realized that mere mortals aren't comfortable (for any distance) stretched out and folded over like a taco with a flat back. As a result, the stack on race bikes in 2023 / 2024 is now slightly taller and the reach slightly shorter, to the point that a reasonably flexible club-level rider can (in many cases) be properly fit on a super-sexy aero or climbing race bike. I'm not so thrilled about the head tube angles dipping below 72 degrees on some race bikes or chainstays growing longer than 410mm (but that is personal preference).
Long-story short, I ended up purchasing a Time Alpe D'Huez (disc) frameset. It's marketed as a "climbing" bike, which is no surprise based on the model name. However, I live in Florida. I primarily train and race in Florida. I am not a climber and will not be using this bike for climbing. The geometry of the Time Alpe D'Huez, which in my opinion is ideal for use as an "endurance" bike, is what got my attention.
The lesson learned and the main takeaway from my recent experience of having to replace my endurance bike is: Don't pay attention to the marketing or the category labels. Pay close attention to the geometry charts and buy that which fits you and your intended riding style. This approach should open your search to more possibilities, and you might be surprised what you find.
Last edited by Turnin_Wrenches; 11-27-23 at 07:19 AM.
Likes For Turnin_Wrenches:
#11
Newbie
This might be said to death elsewhere, but lightweight HT steel is very compliant and comfortable over long distances. I have a Soma Grand Rando, v2, and with lights and fenders and a repair kit and pump it weighs like 23 lbs.
Likes For bderw:
#12
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,767
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,488 Posts
Yeah, the best endurance bike is also the fastest bike. The object of the game is to reduce your saddle time. Carbon is the way to go. Compact bars and a slammed stem, low enough gears that you won't bog down on the hills in Z3. You want a frame that goes where it's pointed, not twitchy, easy to hold a line on.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#13
Temporary Sentient
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Usually on one of my bikes
Posts: 197
Bikes: Yokota Grizzly Peak MTB, Bear Bike Armata (Track)
Liked 211 Times
in
89 Posts
My riding is very simplistic and limited to the frames I have (2 steel 90's MTBs). Given that, the decade of commute riding has taught me that (comfortable) distance is a matter of seat, and seat positioning. If the seat is comfortable for extended miles, then everything else seems ok (at least for me). That's just an everyday man's experience/interpretation. If you are looking for more technical expertise, then former/later thread comments will/have made a mockery of my limited knowledge
Likes For Steel Monkey:
#14
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,757
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Trek Marlin 6, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Liked 819 Times
in
415 Posts
I am truly interested in doing more distance type rides, including some long rail trail rides.
From my online searching, though, I do not see bikes that are designed for this type of riding that are reasonably light.
The bikes that I see that are light usually have high Road gearing. The bikes with the lower gearing on the other hand seem to be heavier.
What are some bike choices you would recommend or is it necessary to customize or build a bike for these purposes?
Thanks
From my online searching, though, I do not see bikes that are designed for this type of riding that are reasonably light.
The bikes that I see that are light usually have high Road gearing. The bikes with the lower gearing on the other hand seem to be heavier.
What are some bike choices you would recommend or is it necessary to customize or build a bike for these purposes?
Thanks
Likes For znomit:
#15
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,877
Liked 4,045 Times
in
2,754 Posts
There are light gravel bikes with lower gearing that will work fine for longer rides. But on rail trails, I don't think I ever shift out of my big chainring. There is one rail trail near here that features 50km of steady climbing. It gets tiring, but your gearing doesn't have to be particularly low. Now that I think of it, the Pine Creek rail trail features a full 100km of steady climbing. It's vaguely tiring for some reason that you can't put a finger on if you haven't looked at an elevation profile. Then when you go back downhill, it doesn't help much because the gravel slows you down.
Likes For unterhausen:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,617
Bikes: Too many 3-speeds, Jones Plus LWB
Liked 295 Times
in
134 Posts
I am truly interested in doing more distance type rides, including some long rail trail rides.
From my online searching, though, I do not see bikes that are designed for this type of riding that are reasonably light.
The bikes that I see that are light usually have high Road gearing. The bikes with the lower gearing on the other hand seem to be heavier.
What are some bike choices you would recommend or is it necessary to customize or build a bike for these purposes?
Thanks
From my online searching, though, I do not see bikes that are designed for this type of riding that are reasonably light.
The bikes that I see that are light usually have high Road gearing. The bikes with the lower gearing on the other hand seem to be heavier.
What are some bike choices you would recommend or is it necessary to customize or build a bike for these purposes?
Thanks
Likes For Salubrious:
Likes For Salubrious:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,557
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Liked 1,588 Times
in
1,229 Posts
You might want to consider what you mean by 'more distance type rides'. What sort of surface will you be on? The Colorado Trail is about 500 miles but you really do need a mountain bike for that. But if you're riding the Mickelson Trail a gravel bike might be overkill.
But we also were carrying camping gear for part of it.