Effect of weight on hill climbing
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Effect of weight on hill climbing
Hey,
After being bitten by the road cycling bug this year, I have decided my goal for next year is to become a better climber. Luckily in my area all I have are hilly routes. I have already seen a difference so far in my climbing abilities.
I figured the best thing I could do over the winter is focus on weight loss, along with keeping my base fitness level up.
I am currently 5'7" and about 199lb. Years of neglect have crept up. I would like to drop 20 pounds by spring, which I should be on track to achieve.
I guess I am just looking for some additional motivation. So if you have done the weight loss thing and found a noticable difference in your climbing abilities the next season then MOTIVATE ME
-D
After being bitten by the road cycling bug this year, I have decided my goal for next year is to become a better climber. Luckily in my area all I have are hilly routes. I have already seen a difference so far in my climbing abilities.
I figured the best thing I could do over the winter is focus on weight loss, along with keeping my base fitness level up.
I am currently 5'7" and about 199lb. Years of neglect have crept up. I would like to drop 20 pounds by spring, which I should be on track to achieve.
I guess I am just looking for some additional motivation. So if you have done the weight loss thing and found a noticable difference in your climbing abilities the next season then MOTIVATE ME
-D
#2
Emondafied
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi derath,
While I'm not a phenomenal climber, I did lose some weight over the winter last year (went from 198-ish to 185-ish this past spring), and for me it had a dramatic effect on my climbing. Especially on longer rides with repeated climbing. I just wasn't as exhausted by the end of the ride.
IMO if you drop 20 lbs, it will be noticable. Besides, you can't really lose 20 lbs off a bike, can you?
While I'm not a phenomenal climber, I did lose some weight over the winter last year (went from 198-ish to 185-ish this past spring), and for me it had a dramatic effect on my climbing. Especially on longer rides with repeated climbing. I just wasn't as exhausted by the end of the ride.
IMO if you drop 20 lbs, it will be noticable. Besides, you can't really lose 20 lbs off a bike, can you?
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#3
Will Bike for Beer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 242
Bikes: Orbea Onix 2006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well you have invited all the Physics PhD types to chime in......and they will.......but with out the ensuing geek fight that will erupt…… Lance in his book stated that because of his medical condition he lost 30lbs and that was biggest reason for his hill climbing success.
#4
Aut Vincere Aut Mori
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,166
Bikes: Irish Cycles Tir na Nog, Jack Kane Team Racing, Fuji Aloha 1.0, GT Karakoram, Motobecane Fly Team
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not just climbing. On the flats too. Using data from my power tap, and the Kreuzotter Calc (which isn't too innacurate at all really...)
Me now: 6'2.5 178lbs. Bike 18lbs. I need to put out 200 watts to go ~20mph on the flats.
Me in February 6'2.5, 215lbs. Bike 18lbs. I needed to put out 220 watts to go ~20mph on the flats.
Me now: I need to put out 446 watts to go 11mph up a 9% grade.
Me in February: I needed to put out 525 watts to go 11mph up a 9% grade.
The steeper the road gets...the less you weight...the less power you need...the faster you can go.
Take a 15% grade for me now. I can, in theory, put out 100 watts less now, and go the same speed as I could in February.
EDIT: Putting out the same wattage - I could climb at 15% grade hill almost 2mph faster. Albeit not for too very long (as this would require on the order of 650 watts) but thats enough to open a fat gap in a race. If you're racing, you've probably figured out that it's damn hard to open a gap in most RRs unless you attack up a hill...something it's very hard to do if you're heavy.
Me now: 6'2.5 178lbs. Bike 18lbs. I need to put out 200 watts to go ~20mph on the flats.
Me in February 6'2.5, 215lbs. Bike 18lbs. I needed to put out 220 watts to go ~20mph on the flats.
Me now: I need to put out 446 watts to go 11mph up a 9% grade.
Me in February: I needed to put out 525 watts to go 11mph up a 9% grade.
The steeper the road gets...the less you weight...the less power you need...the faster you can go.
Take a 15% grade for me now. I can, in theory, put out 100 watts less now, and go the same speed as I could in February.
EDIT: Putting out the same wattage - I could climb at 15% grade hill almost 2mph faster. Albeit not for too very long (as this would require on the order of 650 watts) but thats enough to open a fat gap in a race. If you're racing, you've probably figured out that it's damn hard to open a gap in most RRs unless you attack up a hill...something it's very hard to do if you're heavy.
Last edited by Snuffleupagus; 11-05-06 at 01:56 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cydewaze
IMO if you drop 20 lbs, it will be noticable. Besides, you can't really lose 20 lbs off a bike, can you?
-D
#6
Will Bike for Beer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 242
Bikes: Orbea Onix 2006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by derath
No, but if I can get back to my "fighting" weight I will feel justified in feeding my weight weenie urges. Seems pointless right now to tweak my bike while I am still carrying around a spare tire on my rides.
-D
-D
Your right.....Tweak yourself then tweak your bike.
#7
My idea of fun
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920
Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times
in
36 Posts
Originally Posted by derath
Hey,
After being bitten by the road cycling bug this year, I have decided my goal for next year is to become a better climber. Luckily in my area all I have are hilly routes. I have already seen a difference so far in my climbing abilities.
I figured the best thing I could do over the winter is focus on weight loss, along with keeping my base fitness level up.
I am currently 5'7" and about 199lb. Years of neglect have crept up. I would like to drop 20 pounds by spring, which I should be on track to achieve.
I guess I am just looking for some additional motivation. So if you have done the weight loss thing and found a noticable difference in your climbing abilities the next season then MOTIVATE ME
-D
After being bitten by the road cycling bug this year, I have decided my goal for next year is to become a better climber. Luckily in my area all I have are hilly routes. I have already seen a difference so far in my climbing abilities.
I figured the best thing I could do over the winter is focus on weight loss, along with keeping my base fitness level up.
I am currently 5'7" and about 199lb. Years of neglect have crept up. I would like to drop 20 pounds by spring, which I should be on track to achieve.
I guess I am just looking for some additional motivation. So if you have done the weight loss thing and found a noticable difference in your climbing abilities the next season then MOTIVATE ME
-D
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 150
Bikes: 1986 Trek road bike (steel, downtube shifters), Rockhopper mountain bike, Seven steel/Campy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just ride the hills and the fat will come off. Your body adjusts to what you ask it to do. Ask it to climb hills on a bike and it will lose weight. At first it will ask you a few questions like, "you can't be serious about this can you?" But soon it will get with the program, gain strength and shed pounds.
#9
Will Bike for Beer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 242
Bikes: Orbea Onix 2006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TNoodles
At first your body will ask you a few questions like, "you can't be serious about this can you?"
My wifes body asks me the same thing all the time.
#10
Senior Member
Originally Posted by BladeGeek
Well you have invited all the Physics PhD types to chime in......and they will.....
#11
Senior Member
Originally Posted by derath
Hey,
After being bitten by the road cycling bug this year, I have decided my goal for next year is to become a better climber. Luckily in my area all I have are hilly routes. I have already seen a difference so far in my climbing abilities.
I figured the best thing I could do over the winter is focus on weight loss, along with keeping my base fitness level up.
I am currently 5'7" and about 199lb. Years of neglect have crept up. I would like to drop 20 pounds by spring, which I should be on track to achieve.
I guess I am just looking for some additional motivation. So if you have done the weight loss thing and found a noticable difference in your climbing abilities the next season then MOTIVATE ME
-D
After being bitten by the road cycling bug this year, I have decided my goal for next year is to become a better climber. Luckily in my area all I have are hilly routes. I have already seen a difference so far in my climbing abilities.
I figured the best thing I could do over the winter is focus on weight loss, along with keeping my base fitness level up.
I am currently 5'7" and about 199lb. Years of neglect have crept up. I would like to drop 20 pounds by spring, which I should be on track to achieve.
I guess I am just looking for some additional motivation. So if you have done the weight loss thing and found a noticable difference in your climbing abilities the next season then MOTIVATE ME
-D
I know I'm getting stronger now that I'm riding more because a year ago, I would try to ride with the Saturday/sunday training ride/race group and I could barely hold on for a couple of miles. Now, I have no problem staying with them on the flats, but I still get dropped most of the time on the hills.
Many years ago when I raced cat 2, my fighting weight was 135. I know I'll never get down that low, but my goal is 150-160.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle
Right because the last thing you would want is accurate, quantifiable information. So in that spirit, I lost 10 lbs and noticed my climbing went from green to refrigerator.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by San Rensho
Many years ago when I raced cat 2, my fighting weight was 135. I know I'll never get down that low, but my goal is 150-160.
Yea I wrestled in high school in the 135 weight class. More years ago than I care to admit. I would also love to get back to the 150-160 range. But I don't see that as an achievable goal over this one winter season.
-D
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mustang, OK
Posts: 727
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have lost 44 pounds since June. The difference is night and day in all my cycling. I find myself not having to shift nearly so often and being able to stay in gears when before I had to shift several. I have a triple and I find I use the granny very rarely. On the flats I can carry a faster speed with less effort and I just feel light on the bike. I can't wait to lose the rest.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 222
Bikes: Cannondale R1000 Compact Drive '05
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BladeGeek
Well you have invited all the Physics PhD types to chime in......and they will.......but with out the ensuing geek fight that will erupt…… Lance in his book stated that because of his medical condition he lost 30lbs and that was biggest reason for his hill climbing success.
#16
SpIn SpIn SuGaR!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,078
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
honestly, just because someone weighs less, doesn't necessarily mean that they're going to be a better climber...
i'm 5'7", and when i started riding this summer i was about 185 pounds, and climbs were my weakest link. currently, i am about 190 pounds, and while climbs are still my weakest link, i can climb better now than when i was 5 pounds lighter...
granted, you may not consider 5 pounds to be that much of a difference, but i think it is. i think if i dropped back down to 185 pounds, i would be an ever better climber than i am now, but i am definitely better now (heavier) than i was back then (lighter)...
i do think you should definitely focus on losing some weight though, not just to make you a better cyclist, but to make you a better you! i was 222 pounds 2 years ago, and dropped about 40 pounds in 4 months, and i definitely noticed a difference in everything about myself, and i know you will too...
best of luck on your goal...
i'm 5'7", and when i started riding this summer i was about 185 pounds, and climbs were my weakest link. currently, i am about 190 pounds, and while climbs are still my weakest link, i can climb better now than when i was 5 pounds lighter...
granted, you may not consider 5 pounds to be that much of a difference, but i think it is. i think if i dropped back down to 185 pounds, i would be an ever better climber than i am now, but i am definitely better now (heavier) than i was back then (lighter)...
i do think you should definitely focus on losing some weight though, not just to make you a better cyclist, but to make you a better you! i was 222 pounds 2 years ago, and dropped about 40 pounds in 4 months, and i definitely noticed a difference in everything about myself, and i know you will too...
best of luck on your goal...
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
[QUOTE=FIVE ONE SIX]honestly, just because someone weighs less, doesn't necessarily mean that they're going to be a better climber...
i'm 5'7", and when i started riding this summer i was about 185 pounds, and climbs were my weakest link. currently, i am about 190 pounds, and while climbs are still my weakest link, i can climb better now than when i was 5 pounds lighter...
granted, you may not consider 5 pounds to be that much of a difference, but i think it is. i think if i dropped back down to 185 pounds, i would be an ever better climber than i am now, but i am definitely better now (heavier) than i was back then (lighter)...
QUOTE]
The first and third paragraphs are contradictory. And I am not a PhD in physics, but can tell you (as have others) that lighter weight with same muscle mass and endurance will make you a better climber. Try to lose weight gradually (1-2 lbs per week) and do some weight training (legs and core) once or twice each week (to maintain muscle tissue as you shed fat) and you will see your climbing abilities grow rapidly.
I am planning to do a couple of big climbing races in the Rockies next year, and losing weight is a major part of my training plan -- I am currently 6'1'' and 175 lbs and would like to be under 170 lbs by May (this will be pretty low body fat as I have considerable upper-body muscle mass -- too much for a cyclist, but there it is).
i'm 5'7", and when i started riding this summer i was about 185 pounds, and climbs were my weakest link. currently, i am about 190 pounds, and while climbs are still my weakest link, i can climb better now than when i was 5 pounds lighter...
granted, you may not consider 5 pounds to be that much of a difference, but i think it is. i think if i dropped back down to 185 pounds, i would be an ever better climber than i am now, but i am definitely better now (heavier) than i was back then (lighter)...
QUOTE]
The first and third paragraphs are contradictory. And I am not a PhD in physics, but can tell you (as have others) that lighter weight with same muscle mass and endurance will make you a better climber. Try to lose weight gradually (1-2 lbs per week) and do some weight training (legs and core) once or twice each week (to maintain muscle tissue as you shed fat) and you will see your climbing abilities grow rapidly.
I am planning to do a couple of big climbing races in the Rockies next year, and losing weight is a major part of my training plan -- I am currently 6'1'' and 175 lbs and would like to be under 170 lbs by May (this will be pretty low body fat as I have considerable upper-body muscle mass -- too much for a cyclist, but there it is).
#18
Cycle for life...
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,338
Bikes: Trek 5200 | Cannondale Six13 TeamOne | Cannondale Road Tandem | Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
We are about the same height (I'm maybe 1/2" shorter). I got up to 209lbs a few years ago. Now, I hover between 165 and 175 which is MUCH better for cycling! So, yes, 20lbs will make a huge difference on the hills. For me, even when I drop from 175 in the winter back down to 165 in the summers ... I notice a difference. It is a very inspiring feeling.
__________________
-\Brian
18' Landshark Tandem - Custom
15' Wabi Special Single-Speed Road
06' Cannondale Six13 TeamOne
06' Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
92' Trek 5200
-\Brian
18' Landshark Tandem - Custom
15' Wabi Special Single-Speed Road
06' Cannondale Six13 TeamOne
06' Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
92' Trek 5200
#20
5
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killadelphia
Posts: 1,229
Bikes: 2007 Fuji Roubaix LTD, 2005 Bianchi Pista
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your weight is directly proportional to the amount of power that you need to move up an incline*. Thus, if you lose 10% of your weight, your climbing will be 10% easier. Seriously. And good for you... I'm on the same mission: 6'0", on the way to 175 from 199.
*F = mg(sin(theta)) where m = the mass of you + your bike, g = acceleration due to gravity, and theta = angle of incline. F is the force from gravity parallel to the incline; that is the force that you have to overcome to climb a hill. The power necessary to do that is F times your desired velocity, v (P = Fv). Therefore, m is directly proportional to P.
*F = mg(sin(theta)) where m = the mass of you + your bike, g = acceleration due to gravity, and theta = angle of incline. F is the force from gravity parallel to the incline; that is the force that you have to overcome to climb a hill. The power necessary to do that is F times your desired velocity, v (P = Fv). Therefore, m is directly proportional to P.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 90
Bikes: Giant TCR2, Santa Cruz V10, Scott Reflex FX15, Speshy BMX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Losing 22lbs is like picking up 50W in power, I'm an inch taller and 60 pounds lighter, you've got a long road ahead but keep at it, eat well and exercise well and the weight will come off
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jeremyb_nz
you've got a long road ahead but keep at it
But thanks everyone for the motivation!!!!
-D
#23
Senior Member
But...
[QUOTE=Coyote2]
Notice you say that with the same muscle mass and endurance, lighter weight will make you a better climber. However, the original poster may be been telling the truth because his extra five pounds of weight could be muscle mass, which would explain why he's a better climber now than when he was five pounds lighter. Indeed, if he has been training a lot since before he gained those five pounds, it is quite possible that he would have significantly added muscle mass and stamina.
So, I think we can agree that all other things being equal the lighter you are the faster you will climb and ride the flats.
Originally Posted by FIVE ONE SIX
honestly, just because someone weighs less, doesn't necessarily mean that they're going to be a better climber...
i'm 5'7", and when i started riding this summer i was about 185 pounds, and climbs were my weakest link. currently, i am about 190 pounds, and while climbs are still my weakest link, i can climb better now than when i was 5 pounds lighter...
granted, you may not consider 5 pounds to be that much of a difference, but i think it is. i think if i dropped back down to 185 pounds, i would be an ever better climber than i am now, but i am definitely better now (heavier) than i was back then (lighter)...
QUOTE]
The first and third paragraphs are contradictory. And I am not a PhD in physics, but can tell you (as have others) that lighter weight with same muscle mass and endurance will make you a better climber. Try to lose weight gradually (1-2 lbs per week) and do some weight training (legs and core) once or twice each week (to maintain muscle tissue as you shed fat) and you will see your climbing abilities grow rapidly.
I am planning to do a couple of big climbing races in the Rockies next year, and losing weight is a major part of my training plan -- I am currently 6'1'' and 175 lbs and would like to be under 170 lbs by May (this will be pretty low body fat as I have considerable upper-body muscle mass -- too much for a cyclist, but there it is).
i'm 5'7", and when i started riding this summer i was about 185 pounds, and climbs were my weakest link. currently, i am about 190 pounds, and while climbs are still my weakest link, i can climb better now than when i was 5 pounds lighter...
granted, you may not consider 5 pounds to be that much of a difference, but i think it is. i think if i dropped back down to 185 pounds, i would be an ever better climber than i am now, but i am definitely better now (heavier) than i was back then (lighter)...
QUOTE]
The first and third paragraphs are contradictory. And I am not a PhD in physics, but can tell you (as have others) that lighter weight with same muscle mass and endurance will make you a better climber. Try to lose weight gradually (1-2 lbs per week) and do some weight training (legs and core) once or twice each week (to maintain muscle tissue as you shed fat) and you will see your climbing abilities grow rapidly.
I am planning to do a couple of big climbing races in the Rockies next year, and losing weight is a major part of my training plan -- I am currently 6'1'' and 175 lbs and would like to be under 170 lbs by May (this will be pretty low body fat as I have considerable upper-body muscle mass -- too much for a cyclist, but there it is).
Notice you say that with the same muscle mass and endurance, lighter weight will make you a better climber. However, the original poster may be been telling the truth because his extra five pounds of weight could be muscle mass, which would explain why he's a better climber now than when he was five pounds lighter. Indeed, if he has been training a lot since before he gained those five pounds, it is quite possible that he would have significantly added muscle mass and stamina.
So, I think we can agree that all other things being equal the lighter you are the faster you will climb and ride the flats.
#24
elite
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 516
Bikes: track, road, cross, fixie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
you know hed makes a set of 200 pound deep v "downhill" wheels that are supposed to make you go 75 miles an hour. and braking distance is tripled. but some guy broke away on a downhill a while ago and people suspect he was using those. maybe being heavy isnt so bad after all.
#25
Just Do It !
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 852
Bikes: Litespeed Ti, Trek Carbon.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I and another rider I know are usually the first to the top of the big hills, and I do mean by a large margin. He and I both have jobs that require us to go up and down stairwells alot during the day carying 50-60 lbs weight and up extension ladders too. Both of us have huge leg muscles without trying and I'm sledom over 138#. You want big muscles and low body weight, period, and it's gotta hurt to work. You might try in winter months finding 10 story or greater buildings where you can access the stairwells and sprint to the top two steps at a time as fast as you can; over and over till you just can't stand the pain anymore. I've done that for fun and it is one heck of a work out that complments ridding. good luck!