Looking for tire suggestions, 29er as a Gravel bike
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
Looking for tire suggestions, 29er as a Gravel bike
2010 or so Performance Access XCL9r, was a gift from family a few years ago. It is still as equipped, with Salsa Woodchipper bars, Sora 3500 brifters, and cyclocross brake levers on the flats. Yes, it is heavy as configured. The bike was built as a "Monster Cross" bike. No real idea what that means. But it is faster on pavement than I ever expected it to be, and fun on trails.
I've purchased a second set of wheels to run a narrower tire. It currently rolls on 700x54 Kenda Small Block 8 and Slant Six. Neither of my roadbikes can accept bigger rubber. I'm a 244 pound guy, and looking for something different. No intention to compete in any format, but looking for something other than MTB wide tires...
If I enjoy gravel, I may look for a proper gravel bike...
Last edited by zjrog; 09-26-19 at 08:58 PM. Reason: spelling errors
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848
Bikes: Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times
in
422 Posts
I'm riding these Vittoria Mezcal 2.25 inch on XC 29r...... and they are fast on pavement and good on gravel, fireroads and mild singletrack.
They also come in 2.1 inch.
https://www.jensonusa.com/Vittoria-M...II-G20-29-Tire
Or perhaps these:
https://www.jensonusa.com/Vittoria-Terreno-G20-29-Tire
I ran the SmallBlock 8 and liked them, but are not made anymore I think.
The Vittorias have better flat protection.
They also come in 2.1 inch.
https://www.jensonusa.com/Vittoria-M...II-G20-29-Tire
Or perhaps these:
https://www.jensonusa.com/Vittoria-Terreno-G20-29-Tire
I ran the SmallBlock 8 and liked them, but are not made anymore I think.
The Vittorias have better flat protection.
#3
Senior Member
I know they aren't anything special, but I have been using these tires for some time on a drop bar 29er. They roll remarkably well, behave predictably, have good traction in loose stuff and are even working tubeless despite not being designed for it.
https://www.serfas.com/shop/products...1-sheriff-mtb/
https://www.serfas.com/shop/products...1-sheriff-mtb/
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
Yeah those Kendas are slow tires (I have them). Lots of rolling resistance (well, that may be less of an issue on dirt).
Monster Cross means mountain bike tires on a drop bar (Cyclocross type) bicycle.
What are you looking for? Same size? Knobby for mostly dirt? More slick for mix of dirt and pavement? Mostly Pavement ?
Generally, something in the 40-45mm size is typical for gravel - and often a lot lighter too. - is that the size you are thinking?
Monster Cross means mountain bike tires on a drop bar (Cyclocross type) bicycle.
What are you looking for? Same size? Knobby for mostly dirt? More slick for mix of dirt and pavement? Mostly Pavement ?
Generally, something in the 40-45mm size is typical for gravel - and often a lot lighter too. - is that the size you are thinking?
#5
Senior Member
I'm riding these Vittoria Mezcal 2.25 inch on XC 29r...... and they are fast on pavement and good on gravel, fireroads and mild singletrack.
They also come in 2.1 inch.
https://www.jensonusa.com/Vittoria-M...II-G20-29-Tire
They also come in 2.1 inch.
https://www.jensonusa.com/Vittoria-M...II-G20-29-Tire
Not the be all end all but this site may help you narrow down the recommendations.
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.com/
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
Schwalbe G-One Speed Evo Liteskin is a great tire if you want something different. It rolls very well for it's size - 29x2.35 and is light weight as well. Thunder Burts from the same company are another good option. For a true slick I like the Compass Antelope Hill, spendy but very fast.
Thunder burts really make the bike feel like a mountain bike. Very different feel (G-One tires handle more like road bike tires). Lots of 50mm G-one variations - so there should be something there for everyone.
Again, not sure the terrain or tire size for the OP...
#7
Senior Member
Riding up hills a lightweight tire is noticeably easier. The downside is they're more prone to punctures and really should be run tubeless with latex sealant inside. The super lightweight Schwalbe tubeless tires like Thunder Burt, Rocket Ron, and Racing Ralph are nice on hard pack and gravel. I'm referring to the folding Aramid bead version of these tires. The folding Performance series of Schwalbes are sometimes lighter and more durable than the more expensive EVO Pacestar racing series but these are expensive tires in general and I only buy them if I can find a good deal like on Ebay, Ribble UK, or Merlincycles.
These are 2.1" tires but they only weigh about 450 grams compared to the Small Block 8 you have which is a good tire but as I recall they weigh at least 600 grams, sometimes more. The Thunder Burts would do well on pavement but these three tires are all very fast rolling even with knobbies. You don't really need knobbies on the rolling center of a tire but knobbies on the tire shoulder are desirable to keep the bike upright on loose-over-hardpack. Always look for a weight on the tire package, or even weight them if you can bring a scale into the store.
Sure you could go with a narrower tire like 40mm Panaracer Gravel Kings (about 330 grams) but they aren't much lighter and you lose the suspension and grip of a fatter tire. It seems to me the cost benefit of 2.1" puts them ahead of everything else especially if you're a heavy person and intend to run them tubeless.
If I ever buy a gravel bike it'll be 27.5 with two wheelsets, one with 700c Gravel King slicks and the other with 27.5 x 2.1 Rocket Rons. That would be my do-everything bike.
These are 2.1" tires but they only weigh about 450 grams compared to the Small Block 8 you have which is a good tire but as I recall they weigh at least 600 grams, sometimes more. The Thunder Burts would do well on pavement but these three tires are all very fast rolling even with knobbies. You don't really need knobbies on the rolling center of a tire but knobbies on the tire shoulder are desirable to keep the bike upright on loose-over-hardpack. Always look for a weight on the tire package, or even weight them if you can bring a scale into the store.
Sure you could go with a narrower tire like 40mm Panaracer Gravel Kings (about 330 grams) but they aren't much lighter and you lose the suspension and grip of a fatter tire. It seems to me the cost benefit of 2.1" puts them ahead of everything else especially if you're a heavy person and intend to run them tubeless.
If I ever buy a gravel bike it'll be 27.5 with two wheelsets, one with 700c Gravel King slicks and the other with 27.5 x 2.1 Rocket Rons. That would be my do-everything bike.
Last edited by Clem von Jones; 09-24-19 at 01:52 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
WTB Riddlers come in a big variety of sizes
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
Thanks for the replies and ideas!!! I'm thinking a narrower tire to start. I do ride trails, so the 700x54s (2.25) are fine. Though the Slant Six is showing signs of wear, and needs a replacement by next summer.
Frankly, I grew up in rural Kansas, rode a Sears Free Spirit 10 speed all over, gravel roads, cow trails. Wherever. But that doesn't mean I know squat today! I knew 700x32 was TOO narrow, and would really look funny under this bike.
As for the drop bar aspect. I took to it right away. The spread of the Woodchippers works very well for me. Having the wide tires for trail rides is good, but I feel they are too wide for more groomed trails and some gravel I've ridden on.
And I'm not sure what works best around here. A knobby tire, mixed tread or simple treaded tire.
Frankly, I grew up in rural Kansas, rode a Sears Free Spirit 10 speed all over, gravel roads, cow trails. Wherever. But that doesn't mean I know squat today! I knew 700x32 was TOO narrow, and would really look funny under this bike.
As for the drop bar aspect. I took to it right away. The spread of the Woodchippers works very well for me. Having the wide tires for trail rides is good, but I feel they are too wide for more groomed trails and some gravel I've ridden on.
And I'm not sure what works best around here. A knobby tire, mixed tread or simple treaded tire.
#10
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
I would put a fairly large tire on that bike. But around here, our gravel roads either go up or down, nothing in the middle. There are long relatively steep downhills that sometimes have soft surfaces. So a mountain bike tire is the right size. I would probably look for at least a 50mm tire that has a chance of rolling well on the road.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
I would put a fairly large tire on that bike. But around here, our gravel roads either go up or down, nothing in the middle. There are long relatively steep downhills that sometimes have soft surfaces. So a mountain bike tire is the right size. I would probably look for at least a 50mm tire that has a chance of rolling well on the road.
I guess I'm looking to make a versatile bike, more versatile.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
maybe these tires would be useful to you. WTB Nano
the guy I bought my MTB from had them on the bike (40mm). I swapped for big fat MTB tires (2.25 Riddlers) & put the Nanos on a Trek FX. been riding it this summer with Wifey & the family mostly on paved trails & a little hard packed dirt.
gotta say I like them a lot
on the MTB
on the Trek FX
cpl pics from this summer. was surprised to see how prominent the center line is while rolling
real good coming on & off the pavement
the guy I bought my MTB from had them on the bike (40mm). I swapped for big fat MTB tires (2.25 Riddlers) & put the Nanos on a Trek FX. been riding it this summer with Wifey & the family mostly on paved trails & a little hard packed dirt.
gotta say I like them a lot
on the MTB
on the Trek FX
cpl pics from this summer. was surprised to see how prominent the center line is while rolling
real good coming on & off the pavement
Last edited by rumrunn6; 09-25-19 at 07:30 AM.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
maybe these tires would be useful to you. WTB Nano
the guy I bought my MTB from had them on the bike (40mm). I swapped for big fat MTB tires (2.25 Riddlers) & put the Nanos on a Trek FX. been riding it this summer with Wifey & the family mostly on paved trails & a little hard packed dirt.
gotta say I like them a lot
on the MTB
on the Trek FX
cpl pics from this summer. was surprised to see how prominent the center line is while rolling
real good coming on & off the pavement
the guy I bought my MTB from had them on the bike (40mm). I swapped for big fat MTB tires (2.25 Riddlers) & put the Nanos on a Trek FX. been riding it this summer with Wifey & the family mostly on paved trails & a little hard packed dirt.
gotta say I like them a lot
on the MTB
on the Trek FX
cpl pics from this summer. was surprised to see how prominent the center line is while rolling
real good coming on & off the pavement
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
These are 2.1" tires but they only weigh about 450 grams compared to the Small Block 8 you have which is a good tire but as I recall they weigh at least 600 grams, sometimes more. The Thunder Burts would do well on pavement but these three tires are all very fast rolling even with knobbies.
zjrog, given your weight, I would go with some 50mm tires - more and more gravel tires are now available in 40 or 50mm sizes. 40mm will save you some weight - but that isn't a weight weenie bike. I tend to like "gravel" tires over "MTB" tires, as the gravel tires handle a lot better on pavement and hardpack. If you are doing a mix of both - stick with the gravel tires. MTB tires tend to be less rounded and have higher knobs on the side, making them pretty sloppy cornering if its dry and hard. But of course if your spending most of your time in loose stuff, the opposite is true.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
I think a big factor is that Kendas litterally have more than 50% more rolling resisitance than the Burts. I'll use my Kendas on single track, but I would rather be on my burts if its hard pack to paved. Much less draggy.
zjrog, given your weight, I would go with some 50mm tires - more and more gravel tires are now available in 40 or 50mm sizes. 40mm will save you some weight - but that isn't a weight weenie bike. I tend to like "gravel" tires over "MTB" tires, as the gravel tires handle a lot better on pavement and hardpack. If you are doing a mix of both - stick with the gravel tires. MTB tires tend to be less rounded and have higher knobs on the side, making them pretty sloppy cornering if its dry and hard. But of course if your spending most of your time in loose stuff, the opposite is true.
zjrog, given your weight, I would go with some 50mm tires - more and more gravel tires are now available in 40 or 50mm sizes. 40mm will save you some weight - but that isn't a weight weenie bike. I tend to like "gravel" tires over "MTB" tires, as the gravel tires handle a lot better on pavement and hardpack. If you are doing a mix of both - stick with the gravel tires. MTB tires tend to be less rounded and have higher knobs on the side, making them pretty sloppy cornering if its dry and hard. But of course if your spending most of your time in loose stuff, the opposite is true.
Haha, even my weight weenie bike is heavy. At 18 pounds... 2006 Cannondale CAAD8. This 29er is 31. I had no illusions of it being a lightweight, despite being aluminum...
Thank you!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857
Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times
in
214 Posts
I have Nano 2.1 and I don't like them on anything!!!!!!!
The impossible to get WTB Exiwolf are way better than the WTB Nano. Especially if you have room for a 2.3.
As for skinnier, Depending on the gravel/roads you ride, I'd drop a 40 MSO on it. Or a 700x42 resolute.
Edit. maybe the 40c nano is better?
Or not, because the Exiwolf tend to show the same trait as the 2.1 Nano. Both tires likes to meander all over the place, the Exiwolf just not as bad as the Nano. I didn't realize how bad they were until I dropped them on a Scalpel. I'll be finding a different 2.3 tire
The impossible to get WTB Exiwolf are way better than the WTB Nano. Especially if you have room for a 2.3.
As for skinnier, Depending on the gravel/roads you ride, I'd drop a 40 MSO on it. Or a 700x42 resolute.
Edit. maybe the 40c nano is better?
Or not, because the Exiwolf tend to show the same trait as the 2.1 Nano. Both tires likes to meander all over the place, the Exiwolf just not as bad as the Nano. I didn't realize how bad they were until I dropped them on a Scalpel. I'll be finding a different 2.3 tire
Last edited by Metieval; 09-25-19 at 04:59 PM.
Likes For Metieval:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times
in
31 Posts
Tires
2010 or so Performance Access XCL9r, was a gift from family a few years ago. It is still as equipped, with Salsa Woodchipper bars, Sora 3500 grifters, and cyclocross brake levers on the flats. Yes, it is heavy as configured. The bike was built as a "Monster Cross" bike. No real idea what that means. But it is faster on pavement than I ever expected it to be, and fun on trails.
I've purchased a second set of wheels to run a narrower tire. It currently rolls on 700x54 Kenda Small Block 8 and Slant Six. Neither of my roadbikes can accept bigger rubber. I'm a 244 pound guy, and looking for something different. No intention to compete in any format, but looking for something other than MTB wide tires...
If I enjoy gravel, I may look for a proper gravel bike...
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
maybe these tires would be useful to you. WTB Nano
the guy I bought my MTB from had them on the bike (40mm). I swapped for big fat MTB tires (2.25 Riddlers) & put the Nanos on a Trek FX. been riding it this summer with Wifey & the family mostly on paved trails & a little hard packed dirt.
gotta say I like them a lot
on the MTB
on the Trek FX
cpl pics from this summer. was surprised to see how prominent the center line is while rolling
real good coming on & off the pavement
the guy I bought my MTB from had them on the bike (40mm). I swapped for big fat MTB tires (2.25 Riddlers) & put the Nanos on a Trek FX. been riding it this summer with Wifey & the family mostly on paved trails & a little hard packed dirt.
gotta say I like them a lot
on the MTB
on the Trek FX
cpl pics from this summer. was surprised to see how prominent the center line is while rolling
real good coming on & off the pavement
#19
Full Member
Lots of opinions in previous posts about favorite tires and best performing tires (not necessarily one-in-the-same). Personally, my go-to tire gravel that I have found to be fast-rolling and well-suited to anything from smooth gravel to single track has been the Maxxis Rambler in 700 x 40 size set up tubeless.
Likes For jp911:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
Lots of opinions in previous posts about favorite tires and best performing tires (not necessarily one-in-the-same). Personally, my go-to tire gravel that I have found to be fast-rolling and well-suited to anything from smooth gravel to single track has been the Maxxis Rambler in 700 x 40 size set up tubeless.
Likes For tyrion:
#22
Not lost wanderer.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,331
Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 994 Times
in
524 Posts
Schwalb Big Apples are great tires. Not the fastest, not the lightest, but flat proof and have decent traction in all but mud.
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Likes For bwilli88: