About to cut my steerer tube ...
#1
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,043
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,437 Times
in
1,800 Posts
About to cut my steerer tube ...
I just purchased a Park Tool guide and carbon-specific hack saw blade, so I am hoping to do this right.
One thing is obvious even to an idiot like me: if I cut it too short, there ain't no going back.
This is an Enve all-road fork that came with a frame I purchased. It is very long in its uncut state.
Is it better to have a longer steerer tube with lots of spacers, and (say) a 7° upward angle stem, or a shorter tube with fewer spacers, and (say) a 30° stem, to achieve the same bar height? How many is too many spacers (from a physics point of view, rather than aesthetic)?
I suppose now that I own the tools, cutting it twice (choosing the longer option to begin with) isn't out of the question.
One thing is obvious even to an idiot like me: if I cut it too short, there ain't no going back.
This is an Enve all-road fork that came with a frame I purchased. It is very long in its uncut state.
Is it better to have a longer steerer tube with lots of spacers, and (say) a 7° upward angle stem, or a shorter tube with fewer spacers, and (say) a 30° stem, to achieve the same bar height? How many is too many spacers (from a physics point of view, rather than aesthetic)?
I suppose now that I own the tools, cutting it twice (choosing the longer option to begin with) isn't out of the question.
#2
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,663
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 1,471 Times
in
1,020 Posts
- The spacer stack between the top of the upper bearing and the bottom of the stem must not exceed 40 mm (this distance includes the headset dust cap or tapered spacer on top of the bearing).
Last edited by SoSmellyAir; 07-22-22 at 01:57 PM.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#3
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,043
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,437 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Thanks!
That link is extremely helpful.
That link is extremely helpful.
Last edited by Polaris OBark; 07-22-22 at 02:12 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,092
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4208 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
2,314 Posts
I try to talk customers into having a spacer or two ABOVE the stem when installing replacement forks. As one can always go back and cut off another 10mm... I can't remember how many customers I have dealt with over the years that wanted to raise their bars but couldn't because of a short steerer. I can't remember how few I have had that wanted to lower their bars...
Being an old roadie I like a stem with little slope to being horizontal. A stem with a high angle and a shorter steerer will be lighter and possibly measure out as stiffer. Andy
Being an old roadie I like a stem with little slope to being horizontal. A stem with a high angle and a shorter steerer will be lighter and possibly measure out as stiffer. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,674
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 839 Post(s)
Liked 1,061 Times
in
745 Posts
Here is a chart that compares stem angles+lengths+height which can be useful if you want to get the same riding position from 2 different stems. Stem Comparison Tool | yojimg.net
Likes For Crankycrank:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,884
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6969 Post(s)
Liked 10,966 Times
in
4,691 Posts
I try to talk customers into having a spacer or two ABOVE the stem when installing replacement forks. As one can always go back and cut off another 10mm... I can't remember how many customers I have dealt with over the years that wanted to raise their bars but couldn't because of a short steerer. I can't remember how few I have had that wanted to lower their bars...
Likes For Koyote:
#7
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,043
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,437 Times
in
1,800 Posts
What is the major concern with having more than 40mm of spacers (in the Enve example) between the headset and the stem? Is it that the compression bolt won't work right, or that the steering tube will have too much strain applied? If the latter, could one use a longer compression plug (if such a thing exists)? For the same reason, I would assume you wouldn't want too much steering tube protruding above the stem -- the compression plug presumably should reside inside the stem region?
#8
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,663
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 1,471 Times
in
1,020 Posts
What is the major concern with having more than 40mm of spacers (in the Enve example) between the headset and the stem? Is it that the compression bolt won't work right, or that the steering tube will have too much strain applied? If the latter, could one use a longer compression plug (if such a thing exists)? For the same reason, I would assume you wouldn't want too much steering tube protruding above the stem -- the compression plug presumably should reside inside the stem region?
But like I said in my prior post, there are certain assumptions made to arrive at the maximum spacer stack height. Maybe you are very light weight. Maybe you will use the shortest possible stem. Maybe you will only ride on the smoothest surface even though you have an all road fork. Maybe you will install the widest possible tires at the optimal air pressure to absorb any bumps you encounter. So maybe you can have a few more millimeters of spacers between the stem and the top of the headset.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#9
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,663
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 1,471 Times
in
1,020 Posts
Likes For tFUnK:
#11
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,043
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,437 Times
in
1,800 Posts
The function of the expander plug is to reinforce the carbon fiber steerer against the compression forces exerted by tightening the stem around the steerer. The steerer is designed to flex along its entire length. By using a longer expander plug to reinforce the length of the steerer, you prevent that and focus the strain onto the section of the steerer below the expander plug, which may be worse for the integrity and longevity of the steerer.
But like I said in my prior post, there are certain assumptions made to arrive at the maximum spacer stack height. Maybe you are very light weight. Maybe you will use the shortest possible stem. Maybe you will only ride on the smoothest surface even though you have an all road fork. Maybe you will install the widest possible tires at the optimal air pressure to absorb any bumps you encounter. So maybe you can have a few more millimeters of spacers between the stem and the top of the headset.
The Enve fork was provided with the frame, and no instructions, so I am eternally grateful for the link to their very detailed information on their website (and a bit ashamed I didn't look hard enough for it).
#12
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,663
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 1,471 Times
in
1,020 Posts
Well, if she rides sitting fairly upright she would not be putting that much weight onto the handlebar, stem, and steerer, regardless of her actual total weight. But to be safe (and for warranty purposes), best to use only 40 mm worth of spacers and use a stem with a larger angle.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,092
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4208 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
2,314 Posts
Well, if she rides sitting fairly upright she would not be putting that much weight onto the handlebar, stem, and steerer, regardless of her actual total weight. But to be safe (and for warranty purposes), best to use only 40 mm worth of spacers and use a stem with a larger angle.
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#14
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,043
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,437 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Ok, I have been playing around with measurements (measure twice, saw once), and wouldn't mind a bit of a reality-check, if anyone is interested. The bike frame is fairly similar to my bike, so posted below are the measurements for mine, printed, and hers, in red handwriting. The reach is slightly longer for hers, and the stack significantly lower (-32 mm).
I have 20 mm of spacers on mine, which adds about 19mm to the intrinsic frame stack, resulting in an "effective" stack of 596mm.
Max. 40mm spacers and her intrinsic stack of 545 mm = 583 mm "effective" stack. So I used these as starting points to play around with the stem geometry website input. (I used 72.0° for the fork/head tube angle, as it splits the difference evenly).
Here is what I am getting, using a Ritchey adjustable stem I have set to 45° and it is 90mm center-center:
(I've subtracted 500mm from both heights so that I can see what is going on in the plot grid). Red is my bike, blue is her prediction.
Here are the bike geometry vitals:
Even though I currently have too many spacers in place, the reality is that the measured difference in effective reach is 8mm less than predicted, and, more significantly, the drop (from saddle to bars) appears to be greater in her case, (i.e., the bars sit lower than mine, not higher as predicted). Both saddles are at the same height for simplicity.
I must be doing something wrong, but I can't figure it out.
Briefly, my assumptions are that the most relevant differences are the intrinsic (frame) stack, the angle of the stem, and the length of the stem. (The difference in intrinsic reach is +7mm for her bike, but the total handle bar height is what has me more worried. Currently she has a zero set-back saddle, and mine is set back 10mm).
I have 20 mm of spacers on mine, which adds about 19mm to the intrinsic frame stack, resulting in an "effective" stack of 596mm.
Max. 40mm spacers and her intrinsic stack of 545 mm = 583 mm "effective" stack. So I used these as starting points to play around with the stem geometry website input. (I used 72.0° for the fork/head tube angle, as it splits the difference evenly).
Here is what I am getting, using a Ritchey adjustable stem I have set to 45° and it is 90mm center-center:
(I've subtracted 500mm from both heights so that I can see what is going on in the plot grid). Red is my bike, blue is her prediction.
Here are the bike geometry vitals:
Even though I currently have too many spacers in place, the reality is that the measured difference in effective reach is 8mm less than predicted, and, more significantly, the drop (from saddle to bars) appears to be greater in her case, (i.e., the bars sit lower than mine, not higher as predicted). Both saddles are at the same height for simplicity.
I must be doing something wrong, but I can't figure it out.
Briefly, my assumptions are that the most relevant differences are the intrinsic (frame) stack, the angle of the stem, and the length of the stem. (The difference in intrinsic reach is +7mm for her bike, but the total handle bar height is what has me more worried. Currently she has a zero set-back saddle, and mine is set back 10mm).
#15
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,663
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 1,471 Times
in
1,020 Posts
Polaris OBark Your effective stack calculations check out:
Adjacent (i.e., change in reach) = cosine of 72° x hypotenuse (i.e., 40 mm of headset spacer height) = 12.36 mm
Opposite (i.e., change in stack) = sine of 72° x hypotenuse (i.e., 40 mm of headset spacer height) = 38.04 mm
Trigonometric Functions - Justin Skycak (justinmath.com)
So adding 40 mm of headset spacers effectively reduce reach by 12.36 mm and increase stack by 38.04 mm.
But the height input for the stem comparison tool should not be the effective stack minus an arbitrary 500 mm. Rather, it should be spacer height plus half the stack height of the stem. But I am not sure why you are comparing between two bikes.
Adjacent (i.e., change in reach) = cosine of 72° x hypotenuse (i.e., 40 mm of headset spacer height) = 12.36 mm
Opposite (i.e., change in stack) = sine of 72° x hypotenuse (i.e., 40 mm of headset spacer height) = 38.04 mm
Trigonometric Functions - Justin Skycak (justinmath.com)
So adding 40 mm of headset spacers effectively reduce reach by 12.36 mm and increase stack by 38.04 mm.
But the height input for the stem comparison tool should not be the effective stack minus an arbitrary 500 mm. Rather, it should be spacer height plus half the stack height of the stem. But I am not sure why you are comparing between two bikes.
#16
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,043
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,437 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Just for the record, I did put in 38mm, not 40mm (and similarly 19mm for the 20mm spacers on my bike), as the projection on the vertical axis (calculated as you described).
I'm comparing these two bikes because they are fairly similar in geometry, so I am trying to see where they differ. Since I have one already, I can physically measure, check and verify everything, and I know that it almost fits my wife, so it seemed like a decent reference point.
Subtracting 500mm from the height input doesn't change anything in the calculation (as long as the height difference is accurate), but repositions the figure on the graphic representation so you can see what is going on (try it if you don't believe me).
I'm comparing these two bikes because they are fairly similar in geometry, so I am trying to see where they differ. Since I have one already, I can physically measure, check and verify everything, and I know that it almost fits my wife, so it seemed like a decent reference point.
Subtracting 500mm from the height input doesn't change anything in the calculation (as long as the height difference is accurate), but repositions the figure on the graphic representation so you can see what is going on (try it if you don't believe me).
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SFBay
Posts: 2,334
Bikes: n, I would like n+1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 133 Times
in
108 Posts
I try to talk customers into having a spacer or two ABOVE the stem when installing replacement forks. As one can always go back and cut off another 10mm... I can't remember how many customers I have dealt with over the years that wanted to raise their bars but couldn't because of a short steerer. I can't remember how few I have had that wanted to lower their bars...
Being an old roadie I like a stem with little slope to being horizontal. A stem with a high angle and a shorter steerer will be lighter and possibly measure out as stiffer. Andy
Being an old roadie I like a stem with little slope to being horizontal. A stem with a high angle and a shorter steerer will be lighter and possibly measure out as stiffer. Andy
#18
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,043
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,437 Times
in
1,800 Posts
In this case, 40 mm of spacers sets an upper-bound.
#19
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,663
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 1,471 Times
in
1,020 Posts
My point is that the "height" input in the stem comparison tool is for a length at an angle (i.e., the hypotenuse), whereas you had input a length that is vertical by using the effective stack (i.e., the opposite), which may account for the difference you are seeing between calculated and actual.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#20
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,043
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,437 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Got it. Sorry.
You are absolutely correct. Fortunately, sin(72) = 0.95
You are absolutely correct. Fortunately, sin(72) = 0.95