How Do I remove these freewheels?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 419
Bikes: 1987 Pinarello Montello, 1996 Litespeed Classic, 1996 Colnago Master Light, 1997 Litespeed Ultimate, 2006 Opera Leonardo FP, 2006 Pinarello Paris FP, 1984 Pinarello Record, 89-ish Cornelo Profilo
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
73 Posts
How Do I remove these freewheels?
These are on a couple of early 80s wheelsets I own. How do I get these things off the hubs (Nuovo Record and 600)?
#2
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
The top one is an early Uniglide freehub. The smallest sprocket is theaded and holds the rest of the cluster in place. To remove the sprockets, hold one of the larger sprockets with a chain whip and use a second chain whip to unthread the smallest sprocket, then lift the other sprockets off the hub.
#3
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
The other one appears to be a Regina style two-notch freewheel. A SunTour two- prong tool will not work reliably. Use a Bicycle Research CT-1 or old style Dura-Ace tool, which have stabilizing rings to reduce the risk of damaging the notches on the freewheel.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,863 Times
in
2,311 Posts
The first is not a freewheel but an early version of a freehub. The smallest cog threads on doing the job of current cassette lock rings. Still holding the other cogs from turning while the second chain whip is working on that small cog is needed
The second is a freewheel that needs a specific two dog/prong removal tool. Could be a SunTour but I can't see the tooth tops which would differentiate it from other two prong tool ones (like Regina or Shimano). Do know that when using the proper two prong tool it's best to secure it really tight against the freewheel, with axle nuts or the QR skewer. Only break the initial threading tightness then back off the QR or nut and continue to spin the FW off. To not clamp the tool against the FW will often result in broken prongs. Andy
The second is a freewheel that needs a specific two dog/prong removal tool. Could be a SunTour but I can't see the tooth tops which would differentiate it from other two prong tool ones (like Regina or Shimano). Do know that when using the proper two prong tool it's best to secure it really tight against the freewheel, with axle nuts or the QR skewer. Only break the initial threading tightness then back off the QR or nut and continue to spin the FW off. To not clamp the tool against the FW will often result in broken prongs. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 419
Bikes: 1987 Pinarello Montello, 1996 Litespeed Classic, 1996 Colnago Master Light, 1997 Litespeed Ultimate, 2006 Opera Leonardo FP, 2006 Pinarello Paris FP, 1984 Pinarello Record, 89-ish Cornelo Profilo
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
73 Posts
So, it turns out, after cleaning it off, that it's a Maillard freewheel.
#6
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 419
Bikes: 1987 Pinarello Montello, 1996 Litespeed Classic, 1996 Colnago Master Light, 1997 Litespeed Ultimate, 2006 Opera Leonardo FP, 2006 Pinarello Paris FP, 1984 Pinarello Record, 89-ish Cornelo Profilo
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
73 Posts
And, sure enough, that 600 wheel is a freehub. Is there a way to turn it into something useful?
#7
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,446 Times
in
1,557 Posts
#8
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
2,056 Posts
FWIW the freewheel appears to be French threaded.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times
in
48 Posts
The limitation of that hub is that the smallest cog is a 13 that screws on to hold the whole cogset together. You can't go smaller and I've never seen anything bigger. Most of them had only 6 cogs, but maybe you could respace them to get 7 or maybe 8. The advantage is that at the time it was the lightest hub/cog combination that was commonly available back then, it is easlily serviceable and you can easily change cogs as you requirements change. The axle is also well supported so it never bends or breaks, which was a problem with the 6 or7 speed freewheels that were common at the time. You can also use a wider chain that's easy to replace and less subject to breakage than 10 and 11 speed chains. The flat cogs shifted well for 1980, but not as well as modern bikes, but you can improve that by using Hyperglide cogs if you can find them.
All those limitation makes it unusable for racing, but for touring or commuting it's arguably better than anything that is availble now, if you can live with it's limitations.
Likes For eddy m:
#10
Senior Member
Shimano Uniglide cassette hub.. I rode on these for years. Good system, and superior to freewheel hubs as explained above.
You'll need to keep the #1 threaded cog to hold everything together; fortunately it doesn't seem too worn. The rest of the cogs can be replaced with far superior shifting Hyperglide (or clone) cassette cogs. Go to your local bike Co-op and find a suitable cassette in which the cogs are loose, or individual cogs are pinned together. $5 at our shop. You may need to do some grinding to remove the pins. Some of the upper-end cassettes are held together with tiny hex-headed pins that look like rivets.
Hyperglide cogs differ from Uniglide in that one (1) of the splines are wider than the rest. A few minutes per cog with a flat file and a bench vice fixes that, until they slide right on. Keep your original spacers.
This way, you have unlimited gearing options, except of course, your necessary #1 cog.
You'll need to keep the #1 threaded cog to hold everything together; fortunately it doesn't seem too worn. The rest of the cogs can be replaced with far superior shifting Hyperglide (or clone) cassette cogs. Go to your local bike Co-op and find a suitable cassette in which the cogs are loose, or individual cogs are pinned together. $5 at our shop. You may need to do some grinding to remove the pins. Some of the upper-end cassettes are held together with tiny hex-headed pins that look like rivets.
Hyperglide cogs differ from Uniglide in that one (1) of the splines are wider than the rest. A few minutes per cog with a flat file and a bench vice fixes that, until they slide right on. Keep your original spacers.
This way, you have unlimited gearing options, except of course, your necessary #1 cog.
Likes For Dave Mayer:
#11
Really Old Senior Member
On the Uni Glide, all but the smallest cog can be flipped over and get 2X the life.
You can also use HG cogs by widening the narrow spline with a file, Dremel or ??
You can also use HG cogs by widening the narrow spline with a file, Dremel or ??
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times
in
48 Posts
The original Shimano 600 cogs were flat, and not even riveted together. That one doesn't even look excessively worn. Clean the cogs, flip them over and use it. The upgrade to Hyperglide is not worth the effort.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
The stamped threading reads "1.375 x 24TPI", which is ISO threading. It was intended to split the difference between, and be compatible with both British (1.370") and Italian (35mm/1.378") 24tpi freewheel hubs. French freewheel threads are 34.7mm x 1.0mm. Hopefully the hub is not French threaded.
(Edited to correct typo)
(Edited to correct typo)
Last edited by Ghrumpy; 07-10-22 at 08:07 PM.
#14
Senior Member
The stamped threading reads "1.375 x 24TPI", which is ISO threading. It was intended to split the difference between, and be compatible with both British (1.370") and Italian (35mm/1.378") 24tpi freewheel hubs. French freewheel threads are 34.7mm x 1.0mm. Hopefully the hub is not French threaded.
(Edited to correct typo)
(Edited to correct typo)
I've read that some Maillard axles used finer threading than the norm. Dunno about their freewheels, and I'm certainly no expert on freewheels. But a 2 TPI difference would possibly be significant.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
I am actually "sure" about a few things.
-- I've never seen a 26tpi hub freewheel thread. Could exist, perhaps before the turn of the 20th century and national thread standardization efforts. If it exists, it likely wouldn't be French though.
-- 1.375" x 24 tpi is ISO thread, definitely not French
-- OP noted that it was mounted to a Campagnolo hub. They made their Record/Super Record hubs with BSC, Italian, and French threading, and no others that I have seen (if indeed there are any others.) So even if a 26tpi freewheel thread existed, Campagnolo didn't accommodate it to my knowledge.
It is true that Maillard used finer 0.75mm axle threads on some of their Professional model hubs. The finer thread is of course less deep, so it leaves more metal in the axle, making it stronger and less prone to breakage.
#16
Senior Member
I'm quite confident. But eyes can be deceived.
I am actually "sure" about a few things.
-- I've never seen a 26tpi hub freewheel thread. Could exist, perhaps before the turn of the 20th century and national thread standardization efforts. If it exists, it likely wouldn't be French though.
-- 1.375" x 24 tpi is ISO thread, definitely not French
-- OP noted that it was mounted to a Campagnolo hub. They made their Record/Super Record hubs with BSC, Italian, and French threading, and no others that I have seen (if indeed there are any others.) So even if a 26tpi freewheel thread existed, Campagnolo didn't accommodate it to my knowledge.
It's definitely a significant difference. I've seen 24tpi head parts screwed onto 26tpi steerers. The threads start to interfere after a turn and a half, and if forced further, it basically obliterates a section of thread four or five turns long on the steerer. So if by chance that is a 26tpi freewheel, it would mean that hub thread is ruined.
It is true that Maillard used finer 0.75mm axle threads on some of their Professional model hubs. The finer thread is of course less deep, so it leaves more metal in the axle, making it stronger and less prone to breakage.
I am actually "sure" about a few things.
-- I've never seen a 26tpi hub freewheel thread. Could exist, perhaps before the turn of the 20th century and national thread standardization efforts. If it exists, it likely wouldn't be French though.
-- 1.375" x 24 tpi is ISO thread, definitely not French
-- OP noted that it was mounted to a Campagnolo hub. They made their Record/Super Record hubs with BSC, Italian, and French threading, and no others that I have seen (if indeed there are any others.) So even if a 26tpi freewheel thread existed, Campagnolo didn't accommodate it to my knowledge.
It's definitely a significant difference. I've seen 24tpi head parts screwed onto 26tpi steerers. The threads start to interfere after a turn and a half, and if forced further, it basically obliterates a section of thread four or five turns long on the steerer. So if by chance that is a 26tpi freewheel, it would mean that hub thread is ruined.
It is true that Maillard used finer 0.75mm axle threads on some of their Professional model hubs. The finer thread is of course less deep, so it leaves more metal in the axle, making it stronger and less prone to breakage.
Again: thanks for the reply. Educational, and I'm always ready to learn.
#17
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
2,056 Posts
The stamped threading reads "1.375 x 24TPI", which is ISO threading. It was intended to split the difference between, and be compatible with both British (1.370") and Italian (35mm/1.378") 24tpi freewheel hubs. French freewheel threads are 34.7mm x 1.0mm. Hopefully the hub is not French threaded.
(Edited to correct typo)
(Edited to correct typo)