Need help deciding between these Trek bikes
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Need help deciding between these Trek bikes
Hi all, could really use your expert and professional opinions on these 2 bikes I'm considering.
1 - 2019 Trek Checkpoint SL6. Large sporting good store discounting to $3200 down from $3800.
2 - 2020 Trek Checkpoint Sl5 - $2900 from local Trek store.
So $300 difference. I'm a novice (but very active, improving) rider, if I am not getting in 60 minutes on the bike a day I get grumpy. Currently on a Topstone 105 that I love but I'm returning to the shop as it has major issues with rear wheel they can't true.
The Sl6 comes with Schwalbe G-Ones, the SL5 comes with Bontrager GR1.
1 - 2019 Trek Checkpoint SL6. Large sporting good store discounting to $3200 down from $3800.
2 - 2020 Trek Checkpoint Sl5 - $2900 from local Trek store.
So $300 difference. I'm a novice (but very active, improving) rider, if I am not getting in 60 minutes on the bike a day I get grumpy. Currently on a Topstone 105 that I love but I'm returning to the shop as it has major issues with rear wheel they can't true.
The Sl6 comes with Schwalbe G-Ones, the SL5 comes with Bontrager GR1.
#2
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
If you love the topstone, just buy some new wheels.
$500 and you will have quality handbuilt wheels that weigh 300-400g less than the stock wheels.
A lot cheaper than either Trek and you keep the bike you love.
Stock wheels are a crapshoot. Some last forever and some are a constant pain. No reason to think the Checkpoint will be pain free.
As for your 2 options- it's basically a 105 bike for $2900 or an Ultegra bike for $3200.
6 of one, half dozen of the other right there. Neither is really better than the other and they are priced accordingly. 105 is a bit heavier than ultegra, but otherwise they are functionally and reliably both perfectly fine.
The sl6 has different wheels...I assume better...no idea since it's all just house branded bontrager. I would be skeptical that the wheels are noticeably different, but I'm a natural skeptic.
I guess I'd go with 105 because it comes in colors besides murdered out all black.
Yeah...topstone with some handbuilt wheels from prowheelbuilder looks way better.
$500 and you will have quality handbuilt wheels that weigh 300-400g less than the stock wheels.
A lot cheaper than either Trek and you keep the bike you love.
Stock wheels are a crapshoot. Some last forever and some are a constant pain. No reason to think the Checkpoint will be pain free.
As for your 2 options- it's basically a 105 bike for $2900 or an Ultegra bike for $3200.
6 of one, half dozen of the other right there. Neither is really better than the other and they are priced accordingly. 105 is a bit heavier than ultegra, but otherwise they are functionally and reliably both perfectly fine.
The sl6 has different wheels...I assume better...no idea since it's all just house branded bontrager. I would be skeptical that the wheels are noticeably different, but I'm a natural skeptic.
I guess I'd go with 105 because it comes in colors besides murdered out all black.
Yeah...topstone with some handbuilt wheels from prowheelbuilder looks way better.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857
Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times
in
214 Posts
if the 2019 came with an RX RD I'd give it the nod. However it doesn't!
So I'd go with color between the Treks. pick the one you like the best.
I'll however (also) put the First Option towards, getting a wheelset for the Topstone. It is 99% more than likely that eventually you'll do this anyways, on any of the three bicycles here.
So I'd go with color between the Treks. pick the one you like the best.
I'll however (also) put the First Option towards, getting a wheelset for the Topstone. It is 99% more than likely that eventually you'll do this anyways, on any of the three bicycles here.
#5
Full Member
For $2900, I’d ditch the Trek and get a Niner with full Ultegra RX80. I have a carbon trek and a Niner. The Trek sits idle since the Niner does everything much better.
https://www.excelsports.com/main.asp...jor=8&minor=16
https://www.excelsports.com/main.asp...jor=8&minor=16
Likes For csrpenfab:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I’d love to know, the dealer certainly can’t figure it out and since they can’t they’re refunding my money as I’m still in the 30 day window. There also some shifting issues they can’t figure out. Don’t want to work with them anymore to be honest and just want to buy elsewhere.
#7
Junior Member
I have an SL5 and quickly updated wheels to Paradigm elites. I would get the SL6 because the wheels are much better than the SL5 plus the ultega.
P2
P2
__________________
2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD
2009 Trek 2.1 WSD
2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD
2009 Trek 2.1 WSD
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
The SL6 comes with Paradigm Comp wheels that cost $738 and weigh 1675g.
1- different wheels.
2- shockingly high price for the Comps compared to buying aftermarket.
3- surprising to see such light wheels as OEM on a bike thats even Ultegra level.
4- skeptical of the 1675g weight claim for Comps.
#9
Junior Member
Well, to each his own though it did reduce the bike weight by 1.5lbs over the stock on the SL5. That's why if a Checkpoint is the choice, the SL6 for $300 more is a better value based on the wheels and the ultegra. YMMV.
P2
P2
__________________
2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD
2009 Trek 2.1 WSD
2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD
2009 Trek 2.1 WSD
Likes For pinsonp2:
#10
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 50
Bikes: 2014 Trek Crockett 5, Crockett 7, 2016 Specialized Crux E5 Sport, 2016 Salsa Warbird 105, 2017 Trek Boone 5, 2019 Trek Checkpoint ALR5, 2019 Trek Checkpoint SL5, 2021 Trek Checkpoint ALR5, 2023 Trek Checkpoint SL5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
I have a 2018 Checkpoint SL5. The SL6 is the better choice in that you get Ultegra. But if you are a relative novice, and can't do a lot of your own bike work, where you buy the bike is important. For that reason, I would get the SL5 from the Trek shop.
Likes For Roger Ramjet:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
Hmm at 3 grand you have a lot of options out there that aren't a Trek. Off the top of my head:
Niner RLT 9
Ibis Hakka MX (Jenson build)
New Santa Cruz Stigmata
All more versatile bikes with no gimmicky crap.
Niner RLT 9
Ibis Hakka MX (Jenson build)
New Santa Cruz Stigmata
All more versatile bikes with no gimmicky crap.
Likes For gus6464:
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
i haven’t seen anything to lead me to believe those are any better? I’m interested in hearing otherwise before buying. Also, the only local bikes for me to test are Specialized, Salsa, Trek, and Cannondale.
#13
Full Member
Any of those three listed would be on my list, well above Trek for the $$, and I own a Trek in addition to my Niner. For that large purchase, you'd be better off exploring the offerings listed. I bought my Niner RDO online, but have zero regrets that I didn't get to test ride it first. All of the reviews I read were enough to convince me.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: California, PA
Posts: 5
Bikes: Trek Checkpoint SL6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have rode the Trek Checkpoint SL5 and 6 on over 50 mile rides and feel the SL6 is worth the money (it is what I purchased). Sl6 is faster and smoother.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,883
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3240 Post(s)
Liked 2,086 Times
in
1,181 Posts
Hi all, could really use your expert and professional opinions on these 2 bikes I'm considering.
1 - 2019 Trek Checkpoint SL6. Large sporting good store discounting to $3200 down from $3800.
2 - 2020 Trek Checkpoint Sl5 - $2900 from local Trek store.
So $300 difference. I'm a novice (but very active, improving) rider, if I am not getting in 60 minutes on the bike a day I get grumpy. Currently on a Topstone 105 that I love but I'm returning to the shop as it has major issues with rear wheel they can't true.
The Sl6 comes with Schwalbe G-Ones, the SL5 comes with Bontrager GR1.
1 - 2019 Trek Checkpoint SL6. Large sporting good store discounting to $3200 down from $3800.
2 - 2020 Trek Checkpoint Sl5 - $2900 from local Trek store.
So $300 difference. I'm a novice (but very active, improving) rider, if I am not getting in 60 minutes on the bike a day I get grumpy. Currently on a Topstone 105 that I love but I'm returning to the shop as it has major issues with rear wheel they can't true.
The Sl6 comes with Schwalbe G-Ones, the SL5 comes with Bontrager GR1.
Not understanding this.
As others have stated, "factory" wheels are a crapshoot and that includes the Bontrager wheels on the Treks. I have the same Topstone, been riding it since November, am a clyde and have no issues with the wheels, thus I suspect you've got a bad wheel. As well, I think one feature I hate on the Trek is the 50/34 crank. I'd much rather have the FSA 46/30 on the Topstone for gravel riding., thus would look at different bikes with a better component setup. Or buy new wheels for the Topstone, which was the first thing I did in any case, so as to have a ready-to-go set of road wheels with 28mm tires.
Unless there's more going on and you don't like the Topstone and have desired to just up the game with a lighter carbon. I can understand that. If Trek, C-Dale and Specialized are what the shops have, I think a Specialized Diverge Comp is better spec'd. Our LBS has these on sale for $2700. Has a FSA 48/32 crank with Ultegra elsewhere.
Last edited by Steve B.; 04-05-20 at 01:33 PM.
#16
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Hi, just wanted to update.
I was able to get nearly all my Topstone money back and after hundreds of miles on that bike, felt it was a good deal. My reasoning for the upgrade was mostly due to lack of confidence in the LBS and wanting a lighter and more road-friendly setup.
Based on advice from this thread and some test rides I bought the SL6 and have not regretted that decision. I’ve put nearly 3000 miles (Half of those virtual via Tacx Neo and Zwift) on it just since October and frankly if it disintegrated tomorrow I’d feel I’ve got my money’s worth. I ride primarily paved trails and crushed rock paths but have taken it to local gravel and single track and while not as comfortable on rough surfaces as the aluminum Topstone it’s far, far quicker and more alive.
At this point I am on the fence on whether to get some Zipp 303 carbon wheels or go through another bike upgrade to get a Di2 setup. Part of me wants better isolation up front, that hover bar thing on the Canyon Grail CF is mighty interesting...
I was able to get nearly all my Topstone money back and after hundreds of miles on that bike, felt it was a good deal. My reasoning for the upgrade was mostly due to lack of confidence in the LBS and wanting a lighter and more road-friendly setup.
Based on advice from this thread and some test rides I bought the SL6 and have not regretted that decision. I’ve put nearly 3000 miles (Half of those virtual via Tacx Neo and Zwift) on it just since October and frankly if it disintegrated tomorrow I’d feel I’ve got my money’s worth. I ride primarily paved trails and crushed rock paths but have taken it to local gravel and single track and while not as comfortable on rough surfaces as the aluminum Topstone it’s far, far quicker and more alive.
At this point I am on the fence on whether to get some Zipp 303 carbon wheels or go through another bike upgrade to get a Di2 setup. Part of me wants better isolation up front, that hover bar thing on the Canyon Grail CF is mighty interesting...
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468
Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times
in
229 Posts
All better choices than the Trek and I'd put the Salsa Warbird at the top of all of those. The Warbird is on the fourth generation of the frame and they have it really dialed in after many years in gravel. The Checkpoint is still in the early stages of Trek figuring out what a gravel bike is. The Warbird handles beautifully and soaks up vibration like a sponge with no gimicks. You can even see the frame flex vertically while maintaining great comfort for an all-day gravel rout. Warbird is also a great value for what you get for the price.
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: California, PA
Posts: 5
Bikes: Trek Checkpoint SL6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm over 1500 miles on my Checkpoint SL6 and no regret here either. Awesome rail trail bike and if I want to do overnight rides it is designed to add racks and bags. If you want gravel and harsher rides I'm not the guy for advise on that.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,828
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
All better choices than the Trek and I'd put the Salsa Warbird at the top of all of those. The Warbird is on the fourth generation of the frame and they have it really dialed in after many years in gravel. The Checkpoint is still in the early stages of Trek figuring out what a gravel bike is. The Warbird handles beautifully and soaks up vibration like a sponge with no gimicks. You can even see the frame flex vertically while maintaining great comfort for an all-day gravel rout. Warbird is also a great value for what you get for the price.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#21
Full Member
Hi, just wanted to update.
I was able to get nearly all my Topstone money back and after hundreds of miles on that bike, felt it was a good deal. My reasoning for the upgrade was mostly due to lack of confidence in the LBS and wanting a lighter and more road-friendly setup.
Based on advice from this thread and some test rides I bought the SL6 and have not regretted that decision. I’ve put nearly 3000 miles (Half of those virtual via Tacx Neo and Zwift) on it just since October and frankly if it disintegrated tomorrow I’d feel I’ve got my money’s worth. I ride primarily paved trails and crushed rock paths but have taken it to local gravel and single track and while not as comfortable on rough surfaces as the aluminum Topstone it’s far, far quicker and more alive.
At this point I am on the fence on whether to get some Zipp 303 carbon wheels or go through another bike upgrade to get a Di2 setup. Part of me wants better isolation up front, that hover bar thing on the Canyon Grail CF is mighty interesting...
I was able to get nearly all my Topstone money back and after hundreds of miles on that bike, felt it was a good deal. My reasoning for the upgrade was mostly due to lack of confidence in the LBS and wanting a lighter and more road-friendly setup.
Based on advice from this thread and some test rides I bought the SL6 and have not regretted that decision. I’ve put nearly 3000 miles (Half of those virtual via Tacx Neo and Zwift) on it just since October and frankly if it disintegrated tomorrow I’d feel I’ve got my money’s worth. I ride primarily paved trails and crushed rock paths but have taken it to local gravel and single track and while not as comfortable on rough surfaces as the aluminum Topstone it’s far, far quicker and more alive.
At this point I am on the fence on whether to get some Zipp 303 carbon wheels or go through another bike upgrade to get a Di2 setup. Part of me wants better isolation up front, that hover bar thing on the Canyon Grail CF is mighty interesting...
Those Trek (and just about everyone else's) standard handle bars are stiff. Just about any handlebar on the market will be more comfortable. I wouldn't do that silly Canyon bar, but would point you toward some of Easton/Zipp/Ritchey's bars on the reasonable price side, 3T's bars / enve on the not so.
The Trek GR1 tires are SLOW. I'd recommend (depending on how rowdy you're getting) something like the G-One Allaround Evo or Continental Terra Speed.
While you've got your wallet out, you might want to consider multiple wheel tire sets. Maybe a more road orientated wheel/tire combo, then a more rowdy set. Put fast 32-35c tires one the road/zipp wheel. Put fat tires on the rowdy set. Put the fat tires on the stock wheels. You'll need a cassette($80) and pair of brake discs ($80) too.