Madone vs Emonda-madone faster climbing?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Madone vs Emonda-madone faster climbing?
I’m training for 3 upcoming races in the police games: 3-mile climb, 10-mile TT and a 40-mile road race with 4,000 feet of climbing. I have a madone slr 7 (weight around 18 pounds) and a 2019 Emonda SLR (weight 15 pounds). When my Emonda was in the shop, i rode my madone in the mountains and it seemed like there wasn’t much of a difference in overall pace. So, this week i rode the Emonda on a ride that was 36 miles with 3000’ of climbing. There’s a 5-mile strava segment the first 5 miles (flat). I PRd it (no surprise since i usually ride the Emonda). A couple days later i rode the Emonda on the same course. Surprisingly, i PRd the 5-mile segment (3 seconds). I thought I’d be quite a bit faster overall since the climbing started after that. At the end, the ride with the madone was 10 seconds faster. I have an 11/28 cassette on the madone and 11/32 on the emonda. I know there’s could be lots of variables (wind, how I’m feeling that day, etc., but I’m con confused. Thoughts?
Likes For rclouviere:
#2
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
Bike weight plays out over longer periods of time on steeper gradients. I don't think 5min is enough. Wind and other things can affect flat land work. You have to control variables in experiments if you want results worth looking at. So, choose a low wind day or equal days for your try. Hold the power constant. Wear the same clothes or kit. Etc....
I have a local 10mi TT route. Out/back. The angle the wind presents to an out/back course can affect time given equal power. Even then, humidity and temperature matter a LOT.
A fast TT day is usually one not deemed comfortable outdoors........warm and humid. Low air density. A warm but dry day is slower, denser air.
Likes For burnthesheep:
#3
Full Member
I’m training for 3 upcoming races in the police games: 3-mile climb, 10-mile TT and a 40-mile road race with 4,000 feet of climbing. I have a madone slr 7 (weight around 18 pounds) and a 2019 Emonda SLR (weight 15 pounds). When my Emonda was in the shop, i rode my madone in the mountains and it seemed like there wasn’t much of a difference in overall pace. So, this week i rode the Emonda on a ride that was 36 miles with 3000’ of climbing. There’s a 5-mile strava segment the first 5 miles (flat). I PRd it (no surprise since i usually ride the Emonda). A couple days later i rode the Emonda on the same course. Surprisingly, i PRd the 5-mile segment (3 seconds). I thought I’d be quite a bit faster overall since the climbing started after that. At the end, the ride with the madone was 10 seconds faster. I have an 11/28 cassette on the madone and 11/32 on the emonda. I know there’s could be lots of variables (wind, how I’m feeling that day, etc., but I’m con confused. Thoughts?
Saying that, I would use the emonda for the hill climb, the madone with clip on aero bars for the 10 mile TT if it's a flat course, and I would probably take the madone on the road race as well. But I do prefer aero bikes over lightweight climbing bikes. For 40 miles, which bike do you feel more comfortable on?
Likes For rivers:
#4
Newbie
Thread Starter
As above, there are a lot of variables to take into consideration. I did a local 10 mile TT on a closed circuit this week and last week. Identical bike and kit, similar wind conditions, even my off time was pretty much the same (6:33:30 and 6:34) but an 11 degrees celcius temperature difference (17 degrees last week, 6 degrees this week). I had the exact same power output as well (194 watt average, 198 normalised), the difference in time between the 2 weeks was 28 seconds. And everyone who raced both weeks was between 20 and 30 seconds slower this week, with the cooler temperatures.
Saying that, I would use the emonda for the hill climb, the madone with clip on aero bars for the 10 mile TT if it's a flat course, and I would probably take the madone on the road race as well. But I do prefer aero bikes over lightweight climbing bikes. For 40 miles, which bike do you feel more comfortable on?
Saying that, I would use the emonda for the hill climb, the madone with clip on aero bars for the 10 mile TT if it's a flat course, and I would probably take the madone on the road race as well. But I do prefer aero bikes over lightweight climbing bikes. For 40 miles, which bike do you feel more comfortable on?
In fact, the madone is more comfortable- the emonda is the H1 fit ( more aggressive and slammed stem).
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
That's the key right here.
Bike weight plays out over longer periods of time on steeper gradients. I don't think 5min is enough. Wind and other things can affect flat land work. You have to control variables in experiments if you want results worth looking at. So, choose a low wind day or equal days for your try. Hold the power constant. Wear the same clothes or kit. Etc....
I have a local 10mi TT route. Out/back. The angle the wind presents to an out/back course can affect time given equal power. Even then, humidity and temperature matter a LOT.
A fast TT day is usually one not deemed comfortable outdoors........warm and humid. Low air density. A warm but dry day is slower, denser air.
Bike weight plays out over longer periods of time on steeper gradients. I don't think 5min is enough. Wind and other things can affect flat land work. You have to control variables in experiments if you want results worth looking at. So, choose a low wind day or equal days for your try. Hold the power constant. Wear the same clothes or kit. Etc....
I have a local 10mi TT route. Out/back. The angle the wind presents to an out/back course can affect time given equal power. Even then, humidity and temperature matter a LOT.
A fast TT day is usually one not deemed comfortable outdoors........warm and humid. Low air density. A warm but dry day is slower, denser air.
Yeah, you’re right. In fact, yesterday’s ride was the day after a leg weight workout (first in months). This could’ve played a role too.
the watts pushed on the emonda was a little less on the climbs. Wondering if the 11/32 cassette would reflect this (since i had a higher cadence)??
#6
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
Yeah, you’re right. In fact, yesterday’s ride was the day after a leg weight workout (first in months). This could’ve played a role too.
the watts pushed on the emonda was a little less on the climbs. Wondering if the 11/32 cassette would reflect this (since i had a higher cadence)??
the watts pushed on the emonda was a little less on the climbs. Wondering if the 11/32 cassette would reflect this (since i had a higher cadence)??
Otherwise, your freshness from day to day can affect it more.
I'm one of those power meter "people". So, it lets me know whether what I'm seeing makes sense or not.
The pursuit of improving a speed number is a fun and noble pursuit that provides a lot of things to try, work on, investigate. Be it uphill or flat land. Keep at it. Keep good notes. Spot trends or correlations.
I know some folks groan hearing folks do this, but it fascinates me that when doing a 10mi distance on the TT bike that something as simple as how I hold the extensions can make a difference. Normal grip. Stacked. Only hold with pinky and ring finger to get both hands up more. Etc..... I'm a nerd and an engineer, so it's right up my alley.
The climbing just isn't my thing because I don't live near anything. And Zwift may simulate well on my direct drive, but it's still fake. Not real or the same. So, I never really focus on that.
Let us know how your event goes! Good luck.
#7
Newbie
That's the key right here.
Bike weight plays out over longer periods of time on steeper gradients. I don't think 5min is enough. Wind and other things can affect flat land work. You have to control variables in experiments if you want results worth looking at. So, choose a low wind day or equal days for your try. Hold the power constant. Wear the same clothes or kit. Etc....
I have a local 10mi TT route. Out/back. The angle the wind presents to an out/back course can affect time given equal power. Even then, humidity and temperature matter a LOT.
A fast TT day is usually one not deemed comfortable outdoors........warm and humid. Low air density. A warm but dry day is slower, denser air.
Bike weight plays out over longer periods of time on steeper gradients. I don't think 5min is enough. Wind and other things can affect flat land work. You have to control variables in experiments if you want results worth looking at. So, choose a low wind day or equal days for your try. Hold the power constant. Wear the same clothes or kit. Etc....
I have a local 10mi TT route. Out/back. The angle the wind presents to an out/back course can affect time given equal power. Even then, humidity and temperature matter a LOT.
A fast TT day is usually one not deemed comfortable outdoors........warm and humid. Low air density. A warm but dry day is slower, denser air.
Likes For Ti473:
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
The only time gearing would affect anything is if it is sufficiently annoying in terms of the jumps between gear changes or the cadence it forces you to use at the time.
Otherwise, your freshness from day to day can affect it more.
I'm one of those power meter "people". So, it lets me know whether what I'm seeing makes sense or not.
The pursuit of improving a speed number is a fun and noble pursuit that provides a lot of things to try, work on, investigate. Be it uphill or flat land. Keep at it. Keep good notes. Spot trends or correlations.
I know some folks groan hearing folks do this, but it fascinates me that when doing a 10mi distance on the TT bike that something as simple as how I hold the extensions can make a difference. Normal grip. Stacked. Only hold with pinky and ring finger to get both hands up more. Etc..... I'm a nerd and an engineer, so it's right up my alley.
The climbing just isn't my thing because I don't live near anything. And Zwift may simulate well on my direct drive, but it's still fake. Not real or the same. So, I never really focus on that.
Let us know how your event goes! Good luck.
Otherwise, your freshness from day to day can affect it more.
I'm one of those power meter "people". So, it lets me know whether what I'm seeing makes sense or not.
The pursuit of improving a speed number is a fun and noble pursuit that provides a lot of things to try, work on, investigate. Be it uphill or flat land. Keep at it. Keep good notes. Spot trends or correlations.
I know some folks groan hearing folks do this, but it fascinates me that when doing a 10mi distance on the TT bike that something as simple as how I hold the extensions can make a difference. Normal grip. Stacked. Only hold with pinky and ring finger to get both hands up more. Etc..... I'm a nerd and an engineer, so it's right up my alley.
The climbing just isn't my thing because I don't live near anything. And Zwift may simulate well on my direct drive, but it's still fake. Not real or the same. So, I never really focus on that.
Let us know how your event goes! Good luck.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,297 Times
in
2,947 Posts
Recent testing has shown that the overall speed of a bike is largely dependent on the letters used in the naming of the bike. More specifically, speed depends on the letters in the same way points are awarded in Scrabble. (That's why Quintana Roo is so popular among triathletes -- the Q makes them fast.) So, all you need to do is compare the letter scores of your two bikes and you'll have your answer.
Likes For tomato coupe:
Likes For sarhog:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,297 Times
in
2,947 Posts
#13
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,986
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4946 Post(s)
Liked 8,087 Times
in
3,826 Posts
I have an 18lb 2003 bike and a 16lb 2018 bike. There are a couple of climbing PRs done with the old bike in the past 6 months that I still haven't beaten with the newer bike. Motor and conditions matter a LOT more than the differences between similar bikes.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#15
Newbie
Thread Starter
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
Last edited by colnago62; 04-11-21 at 11:45 PM.
Likes For colnago62: