Shimano Front Chain Ring Option (Larger?)
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Shimano Front Chain Ring Option (Larger?)
I purchased a new Salsa Warbird with the Tiagra group last month. It has a 2x10 gearset with 34/46 front chain rings. I ride 80% on the road, some on the nearby C&O canal. I find myself on the smallest rear ring 80% of the time and rarely past 8-9-10 range. On even modest downhills, I seem to run out of pedal and feel I could ride faster. I've never swapped a chain ring before, so this is uncharted territory.
I have the FC-R460 chain set.
It looks like Shimano offers a 48 gear front ring in that group. Is that something that would work for me? Would my current chain work? Any advice or tips are appreciated, this is completely new to me.
I have the FC-R460 chain set.
It looks like Shimano offers a 48 gear front ring in that group. Is that something that would work for me? Would my current chain work? Any advice or tips are appreciated, this is completely new to me.
Last edited by Warbird21; 05-09-21 at 07:23 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
If you're in 8-9-10 80% of the time, maybe you need something bigger than a 48T top end. Or maybe you just need to shift to the big ring more often? Or are you saying that you're in your big ring and little cogs 80% of the time?
Step 1 is to figure out your spinout cadence. How fast can you spin downhill before you can't put out useful power? At what speed do you hit that cadence?
Step 2: Figure out what you want your top speed to be. For example, do you have a good reason to be able to pedal past 40mph?
Step 3: Use bikecalc.com to figure out what gear ratio allows you to hit your target speed.
Step 4: Get the chainrings (or even new cranks?) you need. Any 10 speed 110mm 5 bolt ring should work. You can try to just get a bigger big ring. Your front mech probably won't be able to handle it. Thus, you'll need a bigger little ring. If you need easy gears, you'll need a bigger cassette. If your rear mech is a short cage, you'll need a new rear mech. And you'll also need a new chain to accommodate the larger gears. And you'll need to readjust the front mech.
Alternatively: get better at spinning. I can put down useful power well beyond 45mph if I want to using a 50:11, which is pretty standard gearing. It's usually far more beneficial to tuck than to continue to pedal at those speeds anyway.
With a 46:11, at 130rpm, you're doing 43mph rather than 46.5mph. Not a huge difference IMO.
Those are your options.
Step 1 is to figure out your spinout cadence. How fast can you spin downhill before you can't put out useful power? At what speed do you hit that cadence?
Step 2: Figure out what you want your top speed to be. For example, do you have a good reason to be able to pedal past 40mph?
Step 3: Use bikecalc.com to figure out what gear ratio allows you to hit your target speed.
Step 4: Get the chainrings (or even new cranks?) you need. Any 10 speed 110mm 5 bolt ring should work. You can try to just get a bigger big ring. Your front mech probably won't be able to handle it. Thus, you'll need a bigger little ring. If you need easy gears, you'll need a bigger cassette. If your rear mech is a short cage, you'll need a new rear mech. And you'll also need a new chain to accommodate the larger gears. And you'll need to readjust the front mech.
Alternatively: get better at spinning. I can put down useful power well beyond 45mph if I want to using a 50:11, which is pretty standard gearing. It's usually far more beneficial to tuck than to continue to pedal at those speeds anyway.
With a 46:11, at 130rpm, you're doing 43mph rather than 46.5mph. Not a huge difference IMO.
Those are your options.
Last edited by smashndash; 05-09-21 at 11:54 PM.
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
Thanks@smashndash!
"you're in your big ring and little cogs 80% of the time?"
Yes - I've only need to use the small front ring 1x.
Going down a mild grade, I can't get past 30 mph, no matter how fast I pedal. Speed measured by an older Garmin Edge 500 (a cast-off my brother gave me), but no cadence monitor.
My brother was over last night, he had not seen the new Salsa. He said I wouldn't notice any difference with the 48 tooth and should only try the 50. He said I would also need a new chain, and the whole process could be going down a bit of a rabbit-hole.
"you're in your big ring and little cogs 80% of the time?"
Yes - I've only need to use the small front ring 1x.
Going down a mild grade, I can't get past 30 mph, no matter how fast I pedal. Speed measured by an older Garmin Edge 500 (a cast-off my brother gave me), but no cadence monitor.
My brother was over last night, he had not seen the new Salsa. He said I wouldn't notice any difference with the 48 tooth and should only try the 50. He said I would also need a new chain, and the whole process could be going down a bit of a rabbit-hole.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,837
Bikes: 2012 Specialized Elite Disc, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
430 Posts
My 36/50 works fine for me. I live at the border of plains and mountains. I use them both. When I ride east, it's a big ring day. When I ride west, it's a small ring day. I spent a winter in Florida last year and never used the small ring. But it's low enough for me for the big climbs out here. (11-34 rear cassette)
The deciding factor will be your rear derailleur (RD). Try to find its chain wrap specs. Or do this test: Shift to small-small combination and the RD should be fully retracted, with the pulleys almost touching the chain. Then shift to large-large, and the RD cage (line between pulley axes) should be extended at a max 45 degree angle to the ground.
Every two teeth added on a gear will need one more inch of chain.
The deciding factor will be your rear derailleur (RD). Try to find its chain wrap specs. Or do this test: Shift to small-small combination and the RD should be fully retracted, with the pulleys almost touching the chain. Then shift to large-large, and the RD cage (line between pulley axes) should be extended at a max 45 degree angle to the ground.
Every two teeth added on a gear will need one more inch of chain.
#5
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,790
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3590 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
Yes, a larger ring will likely need a longer chain. And a new chain will likely need a new rear cassette, as chains and cassettes wear together, such that a new chain will not mesh securely under load with a worn cassette. There's also a possibility that the larger ring/longer chain may exceed the wrap capacity of your rear derailleur, requiring a longer cage derailleur.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,093
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4208 Post(s)
Liked 3,875 Times
in
2,315 Posts
The time tested way to go faster is to pedal faster That and understand that gravel bikes, and their gearing, are not about max paved road down hill speed. I might suggest you are using the wrong tool for 80% or your riding. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#7
Senior Member
My 36/50 works fine for me. I live at the border of plains and mountains. I use them both. When I ride east, it's a big ring day. When I ride west, it's a small ring day. I spent a winter in Florida last year and never used the small ring. But it's low enough for me for the big climbs out here. (11-34 rear cassette)
The deciding factor will be your rear derailleur (RD). Try to find its chain wrap specs. Or do this test: Shift to small-small combination and the RD should be fully retracted, with the pulleys almost touching the chain. Then shift to large-large, and the RD cage (line between pulley axes) should be extended at a max 45 degree angle to the ground.
Every two teeth added on a gear will need one more inch of chain.
The deciding factor will be your rear derailleur (RD). Try to find its chain wrap specs. Or do this test: Shift to small-small combination and the RD should be fully retracted, with the pulleys almost touching the chain. Then shift to large-large, and the RD cage (line between pulley axes) should be extended at a max 45 degree angle to the ground.
Every two teeth added on a gear will need one more inch of chain.
https://www.parktool.com/blog/repair...-length-sizing
#8
Full Member
Thread Starter
Wow,I appreciate all the replies and input. I suspected this might be pretty involved (replacing the chain, derailleur and/or rear cassette = pretty involved, by my experience) I'll complete this season of riding and see if I still feel the need to change. I guess that I was used to my Cannondale road bike from 30 years ago.
I've learned quite about already from this forum, thanks again for helping to educate me!
I've learned quite about already from this forum, thanks again for helping to educate me!
#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
Perhaps I need to learn and adapt! Today, I beat my max speed, down a modest grade hill by nearly two mph - by getting on the drops.
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
Sorry if that sounds rude, I think you have to agree that has to be a duh!
Aerodynamics if you need a hint.