Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Why does this Cannondale have 650c wheels?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Why does this Cannondale have 650c wheels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-23, 12:21 PM
  #1  
Jicafold
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,087
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 89 Posts
Why does this Cannondale have 650c wheels?

So I picked up this R700 Cannondale recently.1989ish model. Put on new tires and cables as well as a general tune up. I added clip on aero bars as I assumed this is supposed to be a tri bike. So my question is...Why does it have 650c wheels? Is this supposed to be a tri bike? It is a 54cm frame and has 650c wheels. Thank you.


Last edited by Jicafold; 09-27-23 at 12:31 PM.
Jicafold is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 12:38 PM
  #2  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,478
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,377 Times in 1,581 Posts
The bike industry is always interested in change as a way to drive sales.
I've got an article from Bicycle Guide (circa 1991) that discusses two new models of Schwinn Paramount. One is a "26 inch" version, with 650 wheels. There is a reference to 650 x 25C, and a mention of 650B, but it seems pretty obvious that they are dealing with 650C wheels.

As a disclaimer(?), I've got a recumbent with 650C wheels. They make sense there, and probably for small frames on upright bikes.

Here's the article:







I haven't bought new 650C tires in quite a while, but have the impression that they might be harder to find than they used to be.

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Likes For steelbikeguy:
Old 09-27-23, 01:17 PM
  #3  
smd4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795

Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times in 1,776 Posts
Originally Posted by Jicafold
Why does it have 650c wheels?
Saving a pound between the two wheels seems like a pretty good reason.
smd4 is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 01:19 PM
  #4  
Jicafold
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,087
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by smd4
Saving a pound between the two wheels seems like a pretty good reason.
But the frame has to be bigger.
Jicafold is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 01:20 PM
  #5  
rando_couche
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,272
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 228 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times in 111 Posts
Originally Posted by smd4
Saving a pound between the two wheels seems like a pretty good reason.
Evidently, not good enough for "the market", as even triathletes have gone back to 700c for the most part.
rando_couche is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 01:25 PM
  #6  
bargainguy
Senior Member
 
bargainguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Trekland
Posts: 2,237
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 517 Post(s)
Liked 310 Times in 191 Posts
Ah, the 80s and 90s. This was the heyday of triathlons. Back then, it was thought that 650c wheels spin up faster than 700c, as they're smaller and lighter. so advantage triathletes.

They do spin up faster, but that's where any advantage evaporates. Because it's a smaller wheel, unless you compensate with gearing, you'll have a lower top gear than with 700c, and that's a problem if you need that tall top gear. No free lunch.
bargainguy is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 01:40 PM
  #7  
madpogue 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,157
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2364 Post(s)
Liked 1,751 Times in 1,193 Posts
Usually it's to accomodate a smaller rider, at the same time avoiding toe strike.

(Exquisitely ironic model numbering, however.)
madpogue is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 01:58 PM
  #8  
Jicafold
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,087
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by madpogue
Usually it's to accomodate a smaller rider, at the same time avoiding toe strike.

(Exquisitely ironic model numbering, however.)
Yes but this is a 54cm....which is why I was asking.
Jicafold is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 02:00 PM
  #9  
madpogue 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,157
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2364 Post(s)
Liked 1,751 Times in 1,193 Posts
Maybe I should have specified smaller-torso riders. Many years ago I had a WSD frame that took a 700C rear, 650C front, and was 55cm. Perfect for my 32-inch inseam and VERY short back and short arms.
madpogue is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 02:24 PM
  #10  
Chuckk
Groupetto Dragon-Ass
 
Chuckk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lostin Austin, TX
Posts: 617
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 415 Post(s)
Liked 787 Times in 372 Posts
"Multisport" Tri - TT model
vintagecannondale.com will help you convert the serial number to year, and then they have all the catalogs scanned.


Last edited by Chuckk; 09-27-23 at 02:40 PM.
Chuckk is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 02:50 PM
  #11  
Chuckk
Groupetto Dragon-Ass
 
Chuckk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lostin Austin, TX
Posts: 617
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 415 Post(s)
Liked 787 Times in 372 Posts
I guessed '96 and there it is:

Chuckk is offline  
Likes For Chuckk:
Old 09-27-23, 03:43 PM
  #12  
Jicafold
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,087
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Chuckk
I guessed '96 and there it is:
Great. Thank you.
Jicafold is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 06:41 PM
  #13  
SpeedofLite 
Senior Member
 
SpeedofLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,992

Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 436 Post(s)
Liked 3,475 Times in 1,000 Posts
The R700 was clearly targeted at the triathlete market. Pro triathletes (Scott Tinley and Jeff Devlin), "multisport frame", "aerodynamic forward position geometry" and 650C wheels were all sexy things for triathletes in the early 90s. It was a successful mix of marketing, triathlon-centric innovation, and triathlete testimonials that created strong desire for that type of bike in those days.

The downfall of the 650C had much to do with triathletes starting to buy road bikes for longer easier group rides with friends and for acceptability by the local road club. Now they had at least two bikes requiring different size and/or types of tires. Not to mention that the rear disc and deep-rim carbon wheels that everyone wanted were not as robust as they are now and were only used for races -- maybe 6-12 times per year. So racing and training got expensive with multiple bikes, multiple wheels (700C, 650C, mtb, deep rim, disc, 32 cross 3), and multiple tires (size, clincher, tubular). Many of the newbies, especially young ones, didn't have the wherewithal or desire to deal with all of this. Road bike geometry with tri-bike features starting picking up steam as triathletes started to race at longer distances through the 1990s. Comfort and endurance over 56-112 miles became more important than top-end speed over shorter distances. Tri-specific geometry also suffered in mountain races or on courses with many twists and turns where bike handling skills were advantageous. Finally, influential voices started challenging the 650C dogma and felt that 700C might even be superior, especially for triathletes with relatively long femurs. This all hastened the demise of 650C among triathletes, the principal market for this size of wheel.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.














SpeedofLite is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 06:48 PM
  #14  
Het Volk
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
The bike industry is always interested in change as a way to drive sales.
I've got an article from Bicycle Guide (circa 1991) that discusses two new models of Schwinn Paramount. One is a "26 inch" version, with 650 wheels. There is a reference to 650 x 25C, and a mention of 650B, but it seems pretty obvious that they are dealing with 650C wheels.

As a disclaimer(?), I've got a recumbent with 650C wheels. They make sense there, and probably for small frames on upright bikes.

Here's the article:







I haven't bought new 650C tires in quite a while, but have the impression that they might be harder to find than they used to be.

Steve in Peoria
As someone who actually built up a pair of 650C wheels during the pandemic in order to allow for more clearance on a Fuji touring bike, it is INDEED incredibly difficult.
Het Volk is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 06:55 PM
  #15  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,478
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,377 Times in 1,581 Posts
regarding the possible difficulty of finding 650C tires:
Originally Posted by Het Volk
As someone who actually built up a pair of 650C wheels during the pandemic in order to allow for more clearance on a Fuji touring bike, it is INDEED incredibly difficult.
rats.
I've also got a set of 26" wheels for the bike, which I use with 1.25" tires. They make a nice option for rougher roads. I suppose they are subject to the same trends in tire sizes, though.
Probably ought to see if I can find some spares.

I normally go to the Hostel Shop, a 'bent oriented mail-order shop (and an actual physical shop too) located in Wisconsin. The 'bent market seems to be geared towards tadpole trikes, and my impression is that they use 700C rear wheels and much smaller front wheels.

edit: they do carry the Continental Gatorskin in 650C x 23mm, but it's not cheap. A proper skinny 559mm tire is hard to find too... they have a Schwalbe Marathon, which sounds slower than a Gatorskin.

Steve in Peoria

Last edited by steelbikeguy; 09-27-23 at 07:03 PM.
steelbikeguy is offline  
Old 09-27-23, 08:34 PM
  #16  
SpeedofLite 
Senior Member
 
SpeedofLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,992

Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 436 Post(s)
Liked 3,475 Times in 1,000 Posts
Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
I haven't bought new 650C tires in quite a while, but have the impression that they might be harder to find than they used to be.

Steve in Peoria
Harder to find now than in the 1990s, but not difficult. Just a quick search of some of my favorite sites showed Tree Fort Bikes, Universal Cycles, and Bike Tires Direct all have Conti, Vittoria, and/or Kenda 650C road tires 23-28mm. I haven't thought about this era much until tonight or ridden my 650C bikes (Felt B2 Tri, Kestrel KM40, Slingshot Tri) in the last 15 years. So now you guys have me looking for 650C wheels with rims wider than 13mm. Dang you.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.














SpeedofLite is offline  
Old 09-28-23, 01:26 PM
  #17  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,478
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,377 Times in 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedofLite
Harder to find now than in the 1990s, but not difficult. Just a quick search of some of my favorite sites showed Tree Fort Bikes, Universal Cycles, and Bike Tires Direct all have Conti, Vittoria, and/or Kenda 650C road tires 23-28mm. I haven't thought about this era much until tonight or ridden my 650C bikes (Felt B2 Tri, Kestrel KM40, Slingshot Tri) in the last 15 years. So now you guys have me looking for 650C wheels with rims wider than 13mm. Dang you.
Thanks for the reminder... I realized that I need to order some 700C x 25 for the Hetchins, so I did go to biketiresdirect and found some (pricey) Veloflex tires.
I checked the 650C, and they had the Conti's (out of stock) and some Vittoria Rubino Pro's. I checked my parts box for spare 650C tires, and just had a Kenda Kwest ... possibly the world's cheapest and lousiest tire... so I put a Vittoria Rubino Pro in the shopping cart too.

I'm a little hesitant to keep too many spare tires around, as I had a Michelin tire on my 'bent fully delaminate and allow the tube to just escape around the different layers in the tire carcass. Really weird, and the tire wasn't more than 5 years old or so.

As for wider 650C tires or rims... there have been 28mm tires, I think. Not easy to find. That's why I built some 559 bsd wheels for the 'bent.. but it does require that you be able to move the brake pads lower in the calipers.

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Old 09-29-23, 10:12 AM
  #18  
VtwinVince
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 604
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 252 Times in 146 Posts
Cannondale produced these with both wheel size options. My wife has the R1000, this thing is extremely light and stiff.
VtwinVince is offline  
Old 09-29-23, 01:19 PM
  #19  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
Thanks for the reminder... I realized that I need to order some 700C x 25 for the Hetchins, so I did go to biketiresdirect and found some (pricey) Veloflex tires.
I checked the 650C, and they had the Conti's (out of stock) and some Vittoria Rubino Pro's. I checked my parts box for spare 650C tires, and just had a Kenda Kwest ... possibly the world's cheapest and lousiest tire... so I put a Vittoria Rubino Pro in the shopping cart too.

I'm a little hesitant to keep too many spare tires around, as I had a Michelin tire on my 'bent fully delaminate and allow the tube to just escape around the different layers in the tire carcass. Really weird, and the tire wasn't more than 5 years old or so.

As for wider 650C tires or rims... there have been 28mm tires, I think. Not easy to find. That's why I built some 559 bsd wheels for the 'bent.. but it does require that you be able to move the brake pads lower in the calipers.

Steve in Peoria
The tire choices for 650c is indeed miserable. But there is always Panaracer Pasela. They make a folding clincher (ProTite) in the 650c X 28 size, as well as wired clinchers in both 25 and 28 sizes. I seem to recall all the other choices for 650c are all 23mm tires.
icemilkcoffee is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.