Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

105 vs Ultegra. Is it worth $300 more for Ultegra?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

105 vs Ultegra. Is it worth $300 more for Ultegra?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-23, 04:30 PM
  #1  
jadmt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jadmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,767

Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times in 849 Posts
105 vs Ultegra. Is it worth $300 more for Ultegra?

all things being considered is ultegra worth $300 more than 105 (both mechanical). this on a carbon fiber or titanium frame that will be ridden ~4000-5000 miles a year mostly 50-100 mile rides.

Last edited by jadmt; 07-16-23 at 07:57 PM.
jadmt is offline  
Old 07-16-23, 04:43 PM
  #2  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,847

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,543 Posts
I can tell the difference between 105 5800 and ultegra 8000....slight but it it there both full mechanical with rim brakes
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Likes For squirtdad:
Old 07-16-23, 04:58 PM
  #3  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times in 933 Posts
The difference is mostly weight and other factors not related to functionality. All Shimano shifters work well enough. What I mean is much of the difference is how many carbon components or extra effort into fit & finish.

For myself, I like that carbon doesn't seem to transmit cold so much in colder weather. I also think that bearings are better than bushings. IMO $300 is worth the ~half a pound off the bike, smoother longer lasting longevity, and cold weather comfort. You might have different reasons.

I've felt some pretty sloppy high mileage shifters. Ultegra/Dura-Ace tend to live long enough the ratchet pawls fail long before they get so sloppy they get preemptively changed due to poor rider experience like on 105 & below.

YMMV. Mine is just one opinion among many. You'll never be sad you bought the better model.
base2 is offline  
Likes For base2:
Old 07-16-23, 05:05 PM
  #4  
TiHabanero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1746 Post(s)
Liked 1,376 Times in 721 Posts
The price difference isn't worth it anymore since it has gone electronic. In the old mechanical systems the difference in shift performance was noticeable, particularly for an experienced rider, but the electronic systems the shifting is very precise and quick for the both of them. As for bells and whistles I am sure there are enough people out there that are happy to pay up for software options Ultegra has that 105 has not.
TiHabanero is offline  
Likes For TiHabanero:
Old 07-16-23, 06:42 PM
  #5  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,885

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3242 Post(s)
Liked 2,086 Times in 1,181 Posts
About 2 generations ago, 105 got so good it was as good as Ultegra at the primary functions of shifting and braking, at least as far as I could tell on a rim brake system. I imagine that is still the case.
Steve B. is offline  
Likes For Steve B.:
Old 07-16-23, 06:53 PM
  #6  
jadmt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jadmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,767

Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times in 849 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
The difference is mostly weight and other factors not related to functionality. All Shimano shifters work well enough. What I mean is much of the difference is how many carbon components or extra effort into fit & finish.

For myself, I like that carbon doesn't seem to transmit cold so much in colder weather. I also think that bearings are better than bushings. IMO $300 is worth the ~half a pound off the bike, smoother longer lasting longevity, and cold weather comfort. You might have different reasons.

I've felt some pretty sloppy high mileage shifters. Ultegra/Dura-Ace tend to live long enough the ratchet pawls fail long before they get so sloppy they get preemptively changed due to poor rider experience like on 105 & below.

YMMV. Mine is just one opinion among many. You'll never be sad you bought the better model.
kind of how I am leaning. my last "good new bike" was 1993 ritchey road logic with dura ace and while I don't need the latest and greatest I probably won't be getting another bike for a long time. I got out of biking for years and then late last summer got back into it and have done about 4000 miles since Jan 1st this year and kind of hooked again.
jadmt is offline  
Old 07-16-23, 06:55 PM
  #7  
jadmt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jadmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,767

Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times in 849 Posts
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
The price difference isn't worth it anymore since it has gone electronic. In the old mechanical systems the difference in shift performance was noticeable, particularly for an experienced rider, but the electronic systems the shifting is very precise and quick for the both of them. As for bells and whistles I am sure there are enough people out there that are happy to pay up for software options Ultegra has that 105 has not.
I know I would probably love electronic shifting but really would rather have mechanical for some stupid reason.
jadmt is offline  
Likes For jadmt:
Old 07-16-23, 07:00 PM
  #8  
tempocyclist
Senior Member
 
tempocyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 824

Bikes: 2002 Trek 5200 (US POSTAL), 2020 Canyon Aeroad SL

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 682 Times in 328 Posts
I can't tell the difference in shifting or braking quality between the latest mechanical 105 and Ultegra groupsets. Both are great. The main difference is weight, appearance, and possibly some hood shape differences. Is that worth it? That's personal I guess and depends on what $300 is worth to you.

All that said, for a $300 difference I'd personally still go Ultegra because I am a bike snob... 😂
tempocyclist is offline  
Likes For tempocyclist:
Old 07-16-23, 07:11 PM
  #9  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,478 Times in 1,836 Posts
I have both and I Think I can tell the most minute improvements in shifting and braking with Ultegra over 105 ... but they could be placebo improvements.

If I were building a new bike which was going to be my main ride fro the ext several years I would spring for Ultegra because even if I only imagined it was better, it would be worth it amortized out to three cents per mile of smiles or whatever.
Maelochs is offline  
Likes For Maelochs:
Old 07-16-23, 07:28 PM
  #10  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by jadmt
all things being considered is ultegra worth $300 more than 105 (both mechanical). this on a carbon fiber frame that will be ridden ~4000-5000 miles a year mostly 50-100 mile rides.
Ultegra is better. Without seeing you financials, No one can tell if the improvement is worth the cost to you. So is it worth it? Who knows.
If your question really is will people make fun of you for buying one or the other, the answer is no.
asgelle is offline  
Old 07-16-23, 07:56 PM
  #11  
jadmt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jadmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,767

Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times in 849 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle
Ultegra is better. Without seeing you financials, No one can tell if the improvement is worth the cost to you. So is it worth it? Who knows.
If your question really is will people make fun of you for buying one or the other, the answer is no.
not concerned about being made fun of so that doesn’t factor in and both are in my budget on the bikes i am looking at ie lynsky 300 and canyon cf endurance. I just want to hear the opinion of people who have or have had both to see if they feel the difference in price was worth it to them.
jadmt is offline  
Old 07-16-23, 09:42 PM
  #12  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,478 Times in 1,836 Posts
If the budget supports it I cannot see nay reason not to go full Ultegra.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 07-17-23, 01:15 AM
  #13  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
You can definitely tell the difference when the Ultegra or Dura Ace crankset does this:
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
Old 07-17-23, 07:42 AM
  #14  
SpeedyBlueBiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Redmond, WA & Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 566

Bikes: 1999 Giant ATX MTB, 2002 Lemond Zurich, 2018 Fuji Transonic 2.3, 2019 Specialized Tarmac Disc Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 395 Times in 227 Posts
The differences are very small, and many people would never notice the differences. As they continue to improve the quality of both, today's 105 group set is probably equivalent to Ultegra from 7-8 years ago. There is a weight difference with 105 being a little heavier but it's just a little. For me, if I was building a $5000 bike I'd probably spring for the Ultegra group set. If you are refurbishing an older bike then I would just go with 105 as the differences are so minimal.

Last edited by SpeedyBlueBiker; 07-17-23 at 08:40 AM.
SpeedyBlueBiker is offline  
Old 07-17-23, 08:29 AM
  #15  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times in 3,318 Posts
Weight is the big difference. If you don't care about weight then don't worry. If you do care about weight, then go with the Ultegra. $300 will be worth it. Save a half a pound in a few places and it adds up quick to a lighter bike that lets you go get up hills with less effort and have more energy at the end of your ride to beat your friends to the line. DuraAce might save you a full pound of weight. But again, a pound doesn't matter if you aren't going to save a few pounds elsewhere with better wheels, bars and other stuff.

Last edited by Iride01; 07-17-23 at 08:33 AM.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 07-17-23, 08:49 AM
  #16  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,847

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,543 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
You can definitely tell the difference when the Ultegra or Dura Ace crankset does this:
not sure what the point is as current 105 is hollow tech also ?
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Likes For squirtdad:
Old 07-17-23, 08:58 AM
  #17  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times in 3,318 Posts
The point is fear mongering. Or someone just doesn't realize that plenty of solid cranks have broken also.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 07-17-23, 10:54 AM
  #18  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times in 3,012 Posts
Originally Posted by jadmt
all things being considered is ultegra worth $300 more than 105 (both mechanical). this on a carbon fiber or titanium frame that will be ridden ~4000-5000 miles a year mostly 50-100 mile rides.
It's a minor weight saving and a more prestigious badge. So it depends on how much you care about being a few seconds quicker up a climb, the better badge and the opportunity cost of $300. All personal decisions. They are functionally the same, so I wouldn't get hung up on that.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 07-17-23, 11:12 AM
  #19  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by squirtdad
not sure what the point is as current 105 is hollow tech also ?
They are all Hollowtech going back to the 7700/6500/5500 9 speed era. The problem is that the current Ultegra and Dura Ace are glued together and have a tendency to come unglued. The 105 is welded together. So were the older 9 and 10 speed Ultegra and Dura Ace cranks. Shimano started using glue (literally and figuratively) with the Dura Ace FC9000 and Ultegra FC8000.
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
Old 07-17-23, 11:15 AM
  #20  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,980

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10435 Post(s)
Liked 11,912 Times in 6,100 Posts
It depends on what you can afford. When I built up my Litespeed last year, I did a lot of thinking. I have R7000 105 on my Canyon and it works great. And I also considerered a mixed groupset, because I'd bought a 7410 Dura Ace crankset to complete a 7410 build on it originally (recreating the BIke Of My Dreams from the mid 90s) but I wanted/needed lower gears than 53/39 x 12-25. In the end I decided to go for a full R8000 Ultegra groupset because 1) I could afford it and 2) I wanted the best for the Litespeed. And it's been great! It shifts just a hair better than the R7000, and I don't have any "Gee, what if I'd gotten the Ultegra?" thoughts. If I hadn't gotten a bonus at work, I'd probably have gone for the 105 and been okay with it, but I did, and I'm happy with it. In fact I have to keep reminding myself to ride bikes OTHER THAN the Litespeed!
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is offline  
Old 07-17-23, 12:37 PM
  #21  
Calsun
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,280
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times in 288 Posts
Shimano is concerned about profits and it is easier to increase profits by selling a component for a higher price. In some rare instances there is actually a performance or reliability difference but I cannot think of any. I see the gain with better pedals and with stronger shift and brake cables and sealed bottombrackets and wheels.

I remember the tire shop insisting that the only legal tires for my Mercedes were ones rated for continuous speeds of 160 mph which was never going to occur in the United States. I paid double for these special tires which was great for the tire shop and for the tire manufacturer and that is what counts.
Calsun is offline  
Likes For Calsun:
Old 07-17-23, 02:44 PM
  #22  
Ogsarg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hollister, CA (not the surf town)
Posts: 1,737

Bikes: 2019 Specialized Roubaix Comp Di2, 2009 Roubaix, early 90's Giant Iguana

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 643 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times in 551 Posts
Given that you ride a fair amount and are looking to keep this bike for a while, I think you owe it to yourself to take a test ride on a bike with electronic shifting. In a couple of years, you're going to see a lot more of it out there and you may have regrets you didn't at least check it out.

If it's within the budget, I'd go that route for sure.
Ogsarg is offline  
Old 07-17-23, 03:17 PM
  #23  
Breezer1971
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had the same decision to face and in the end I went with a third alternative - Shimano 105 di2. I was already going to spend more to get the bike with Ultegra and after test driving both bikes I chose 105 di2 over the bike with the mechanical Ultegra.
Both bikes were the same price and had the same frame/ rims.
After test driving the bike with the Shimano 105 di2 I was sold. No going back to mechanical for me.
Breezer1971 is offline  
Old 07-17-23, 04:24 PM
  #24  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times in 4,160 Posts
Originally Posted by squirtdad
not sure what the point is as current 105 is hollow tech also ?
I believe Hollowtech refers to the hollow axle and not the crankarns.

Of course, I could be mistaken….
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Likes For datlas:
Old 07-17-23, 06:49 PM
  #25  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times in 4,189 Posts
Ultegra shifters and derailleurs.
Praxis crank.
TRP R879 brakes or Ultegra brakes.

Mix for the best setup.
mstateglfr is offline  
Likes For mstateglfr:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.