Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Need hub advice for wheelbuilding

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Need hub advice for wheelbuilding

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-23, 08:31 PM
  #1  
praise dakinis
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
praise dakinis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 70

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Raleigh Sports, Gitane Tour de France

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Need hub advice for wheelbuilding

Hello, I’m building up an early ‘90s Schwinn Paramount 26” mtb including wheels, and the brakes will be cantilever, not disc. I got a beautiful vintage Phil Wood front hub, and what I’m thinking for the rear wheel is to run it single speed (I live in Chicago—no hills) but with the possibility of running it as a geared 1x in the future. So, does it make the most sense to build a rear wheel with a geared hub and convert it to run single speed when I want (using a chain tensioner), or to build two separate wheels—one SS and one geared—and swap them out?

With either solution—building one rear wheel or two—what 36h 135mm hubs would people recommend? (I have 36h Velocity Cliffhanger rims.)
praise dakinis is offline  
Old 07-18-23, 01:05 AM
  #2  
trashbiker
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Claremont, CA
Posts: 52

Bikes: Lemond Zurich Record 10spd, Klein Quantum Race r7000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Personally, I don't like converting multispeed freehubs to single speed. The freehub body looks super weird and your spoke tension drive side and non-drive side will be unnecessarily uneven. Realistically these aren't actual problems. Off the top of my head I can only think of Paul that has a 135mm single speed hub, although White Industries and Hope might have them as well.

I have a "tringle" speed, which is a front triple with rear single speed, friction shifted. If you are frequently switching between ss and geared, it totally works to leave the derailleur on and shifted to where the ss cog is. It'll save you the hassle of cabling everything and swaping chains everythime. However, if you are mostly set on ss and running a 24mm spindle crank, velo orange has an eccentric bb that fits in a bsa shell so you can eliminate the tensioner.
trashbiker is offline  
Likes For trashbiker:
Old 07-18-23, 11:23 AM
  #3  
praise dakinis
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
praise dakinis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 70

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Raleigh Sports, Gitane Tour de France

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by trashbiker;[url=tel:22956570
22956570[/url]]Personally, I don't like converting multispeed freehubs to single speed. The freehub body looks super weird and your spoke tension drive side and non-drive side will be unnecessarily uneven. Realistically these aren't actual problems. Off the top of my head I can only think of Paul that has a 135mm single speed hub, although White Industries and Hope might have them as well.

I have a "tringle" speed, which is a front triple with rear single speed, friction shifted. If you are frequently switching between ss and geared, it totally works to leave the derailleur on and shifted to where the ss cog is. It'll save you the hassle of cabling everything and swaping chains everythime. However, if you are mostly set on ss and running a 24mm spindle crank, velo orange has an eccentric bb that fits in a bsa shell so you can eliminate the tensioner.
Thanks for this. The White ENO is also 135mm ss and would be the best (if most expensive) option if I were to go just ss. Interesting 3x idea, tho I’m pretty sold on the 1x either way for this one. I agree that the freehub body with the ss kit and tensioner below is awkward, along with the unnecessary dishing, but if these aren’t really significant issues, it may make more sense to keep the versatility on the one wheel rather than build (and fork out for) two.
praise dakinis is offline  
Old 07-18-23, 04:17 PM
  #4  
PhilFo 
Tinker-er
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 450

Bikes: 1956 Rudge Sports; 1983 Univega Alpina Uno; 1981 Miyata 610; 1973 Raleigh Twenty; 1994 Breezer Lightning XTR; V4 Yuba Mundo aka "The Schlepper"; 1987 Raleigh "The Edge" Mountain Trials; 1952 R.O. Harrison "Madison"

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 267 Times in 183 Posts
Why not a Surly Ultra rear hub? The flip-flop is $75 at a few retailers. Ride it a while then save up to build up a new wheel and switch to a multi-speed system when you need to scratch that itch.
PhilFo is offline  
Likes For PhilFo:
Old 07-18-23, 09:04 PM
  #5  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,025 Times in 723 Posts
Unless you have 3 rims and the money to blow on building a spare wheel for whenever you decide to use it, I'd build up an XT hub and just use a single cog with a chain tensioner. Last year I figured out my gearing for cross season and bought a kit with a decent singlespeed cog with a wide base so it wouldn't cut into an aluminum freehub which came with a series of spacers that covered the rest of the freehub. Doesn't look as great as running a single speed hub would but still looked fine. And if you do have money to blow, then spend it on a rear phil hub to match the front.
Russ Roth is offline  
Likes For Russ Roth:
Old 07-18-23, 10:02 PM
  #6  
praise dakinis
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
praise dakinis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 70

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Raleigh Sports, Gitane Tour de France

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Russ Roth;[url=tel:22957460
22957460[/url]]Unless you have 3 rims and the money to blow on building a spare wheel for whenever you decide to use it, I'd build up an XT hub and just use a single cog with a chain tensioner. Last year I figured out my gearing for cross season and bought a kit with a decent singlespeed cog with a wide base so it wouldn't cut into an aluminum freehub which came with a series of spacers that covered the rest of the freehub. Doesn't look as great as running a single speed hub would but still looked fine. And if you do have money to blow, then spend it on a rear phil hub to match the front.
Wise words! Confirms what I’ve been leaning toward. Was also thinking to skip the tensioner and go with a Velo Orange Eccentric BB. Do you have any experience with those? Seems like a slightly more elegant setup…
praise dakinis is offline  
Old 07-19-23, 05:39 AM
  #7  
PhilFo 
Tinker-er
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 450

Bikes: 1956 Rudge Sports; 1983 Univega Alpina Uno; 1981 Miyata 610; 1973 Raleigh Twenty; 1994 Breezer Lightning XTR; V4 Yuba Mundo aka "The Schlepper"; 1987 Raleigh "The Edge" Mountain Trials; 1952 R.O. Harrison "Madison"

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 267 Times in 183 Posts
Why buy an eccentric bottom bracket only to use it with a hub designed to run a cassette? If you want to tension your single speed chain perfectly with vertical dropouts, you have a lot of room for adjustment using different cogs and a half link if necessary. Granted, the eccentric plus cassette hub gives you the most options in one bike but at greater expense and greater probability of creaking bottom bracket parts. If the plan is to swap to a cassette, then a cassette hub, like an M535 (easier to work on than XT) is definitely your best bet, but not with a $100 bottom bracket. You can get a decent amount of upgrade in rear derailleur for what you save between the cost of a standard square taper and the eccentric. Then you have the issue of once you decide to stick a cassette on that rear wheel, you're not going back at a whim to a no-frills single-speed bicycle. You'll be riding a 1xN with only one cog but all the other parts of a multi-speed bike, and it's almost never as simple as swapping wheels because that rear derailleur is going to need to be trimmed to guide to a single cog. This path only makes sense if you already have a wheel built (with a freehub) and want to ride now, but are saving up for a shifter and derailleur, which will be the permanent, end-stage of the bicycle. If that's the case, go for it, cassette hub, single cog, a little bit of math for gearing and chain tension with a half-link added. Then you have your single-speed with the clean lines and simplicity of a single-speed bike. Maybe add a chain tensioner for convenience. Eventually, you'll add the rear derailleur, the shifter, the housing and cable, and you'll have a multi-speed bike, which will never conveniently go back to a single-speed because there is no reason to ride with a working derailleur adjusted to sit over a lonely cog on a freehub.
In a nutshell, if you want a single-speed, build a single-speed. If you want a bike with multiple gearing options, build that.

Last edited by PhilFo; 07-19-23 at 09:00 AM.
PhilFo is offline  
Likes For PhilFo:
Old 07-19-23, 11:54 AM
  #8  
praise dakinis
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
praise dakinis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 70

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Raleigh Sports, Gitane Tour de France

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by PhilFo
Why buy an eccentric bottom bracket only to use it with a hub designed to run a cassette? If you want to tension your single speed chain perfectly with vertical dropouts, you have a lot of room for adjustment using different cogs and a half link if necessary. Granted, the eccentric plus cassette hub gives you the most options in one bike but at greater expense and greater probability of creaking bottom bracket parts. If the plan is to swap to a cassette, then a cassette hub, like an M535 (easier to work on than XT) is definitely your best bet, but not with a $100 bottom bracket. You can get a decent amount of upgrade in rear derailleur for what you save between the cost of a standard square taper and the eccentric. Then you have the issue of once you decide to stick a cassette on that rear wheel, you're not going back at a whim to a no-frills single-speed bicycle. You'll be riding a 1xN with only one cog but all the other parts of a multi-speed bike, and it's almost never as simple as swapping wheels because that rear derailleur is going to need to be trimmed to guide to a single cog. This path only makes sense if you already have a wheel built (with a freehub) and want to ride now, but are saving up for a shifter and derailleur, which will be the permanent, end-stage of the bicycle. If that's the case, go for it, cassette hub, single cog, a little bit of math for gearing and chain tension with a half-link added. Then you have your single-speed with the clean lines and simplicity of a single-speed bike. Maybe add a chain tensioner for convenience. Eventually, you'll add the rear derailleur, the shifter, the housing and cable, and you'll have a multi-speed bike, which will never conveniently go back to a single-speed because there is no reason to ride with a working derailleur adjusted to sit over a lonely cog on a freehub.
In a nutshell, if you want a single-speed, build a single-speed. If you want a bike with multiple gearing options, build that.
This is helpful -- I'd had the sense that the VO EBB was pretty excellently non-creaky, and would only be about $30 more than one of their other bb's + a good chain tensioner. If it really is not as good a bb with a cassette, then it seems like, as you say, it wouldn't be the best option either way.

Part of why I'd like to build the bike more versatile is to see which way I like it better, ss or geared. I'll definitely admit to being non-committal about it! I had even resolved to shell out for a White Ind ENO eccentric ss hub but then balked when I thought I might end up wanting to go geared 1x. So, seeing if there is a happy way to deal with indecision...
praise dakinis is offline  
Old 07-19-23, 11:57 AM
  #9  
praise dakinis
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
praise dakinis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 70

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Raleigh Sports, Gitane Tour de France

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by PhilFo
Why not a Surly Ultra rear hub? The flip-flop is $75 at a few retailers. Ride it a while then save up to build up a new wheel and switch to a multi-speed system when you need to scratch that itch.
This actually felt like a very convincing route to go but then it turned out (as far as I can tell) that Surly stopped making 36h ultra rear hubs! Looks to me like they're only 32h, which wouldn't work with the 36h rims I'd like to build up. Thinking to give Surly a call and see if there isn't just one old 36h hub lying around somewhere... If you find a link to one, please do share here!!
praise dakinis is offline  
Old 07-19-23, 09:31 PM
  #10  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,025 Times in 723 Posts
Originally Posted by praise dakinis
Wise words! Confirms what I’ve been leaning toward. Was also thinking to skip the tensioner and go with a Velo Orange Eccentric BB. Do you have any experience with those? Seems like a slightly more elegant setup…
I haven't though I'd considered one, came down to cost, a basic chain tensioner was 20 bucks and the eccentric BB was more and I already had a decent BB for the crank.
Russ Roth is offline  
Likes For Russ Roth:
Old 07-24-23, 03:34 PM
  #11  
bioVah
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am converting a wheel designed for a cassette to a single fixed gear, but am not sure exactly what adapter I need.
bioVah is offline  
Old 07-24-23, 04:04 PM
  #12  
praise dakinis
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
praise dakinis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 70

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Raleigh Sports, Gitane Tour de France

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by bioVah;[url=tel:22963007
22963007[/url]]I am converting a wheel designed for a cassette to a single fixed gear, but am not sure exactly what adapter I need.
I ordered a Reverse ss conversion kit, and if your bike’s got non-vertical dropouts you’ll need a chain tensioner (I went with the Surly Singleator).
praise dakinis is offline  
Old 07-24-23, 05:13 PM
  #13  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times in 2,557 Posts
Un-dished rear wheels are simply better - unless you simply have to have that dish. Now 2-4mm dish is not an issue but tons? Like the typical 10+ speed hub? Yeah, they work but compared to an un-dished wheel, they suck. Don't believe me? Take hard right turn corners on rough roads at speed with both and compare. (100,000 miles both dished and un-dished here. I speak from experience.)

I cannot speak for chain tensioners as I have never used them. Likewise eccentric BBs. I am a huge fan of horizontal dropouts for non-derailleur use. Simple., clean, work really well and are so versatile. But you've got what you've got. (To me, the gravitation to nearly all derailleur bikes having vertical dropouts is sad. Horizontal dropouts do everything vertical dropouts do and just as well except - resist the wheel from sliding forward; you gotta use a steel skewered asymmetrical QR and really short chainstayed bikes can make getting the rear wheel in and out hard. You "gotta have" vertical dropouts to locate modern derailleurs in the proper position relative to the cassette for indexing - or just set those little screw adjustments properly on your horizontal dropouts. Those screws also compensate for poor frame alignment whereas with vertical dropouts you are stuck or break out the file. Rant, rant.

A really nice double sided hub is the Ben's Cycling hub. High flange, traditional and gorgeous. I've bought two, built up one. What a joy to build! Spokes just want to be in those flanges! I haven't put it thorough its paces yet but it's hard to believe I'm going to be disappointed. Feels like quality all the way through. The price was quite reasonable and the online transaction fast.
79pmooney is online now  
Likes For 79pmooney:
Old 07-24-23, 06:50 PM
  #14  
praise dakinis
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
praise dakinis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 70

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Raleigh Sports, Gitane Tour de France

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney;[url=tel:22963122
22963122[/url]
A really nice double sided hub is the Ben's Cycling hub. High flange, traditional and gorgeous. I've bought two, built up one. What a joy to build! Spokes just want to be in those flanges! I haven't put it thorough its paces yet but it's hard to believe I'm going to be disappointed. Feels like quality all the way through. The price was quite reasonable and the online transaction fast.
79pmooney can you drop a link here to those Ben’s Cycling hubs?? They’re not presenting themselves clearly in a Google search…
praise dakinis is offline  
Old 07-25-23, 10:04 AM
  #15  
Senrab62 
It's the little things
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 781

Bikes: Too many, yet not enough

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 279 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times in 147 Posts
Originally Posted by praise dakinis
79pmooney can you drop a link here to those Ben’s Cycling hubs?? They’re not presenting themselves clearly in a Google search…
I believe he's speaking about the Milwaukee Bicycle Co track hubs. If that i79pmooney is referring to, I can attest as well. They are wonderful hubs and a good value. I have two sets with thousands of trouble free miles. They're pretty light, well finished, and spin well.
Senrab62 is offline  
Likes For Senrab62:
Old 07-26-23, 01:23 PM
  #16  
SkinGriz
Live not by lies.
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306

Bikes: BigBox bikes.

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 860 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times in 582 Posts
I agree with the horizontal dropout preference.

I don’t see what is “bad” about the old way of mounting derailer mounts with that clamp that fit inside the dropout.

It seems like you can (or factory can) make that clamp into any adjustment or position you would need for different RDs, while leaving all the options open for SS, IGH, flip flop hubs, coaster brakes, etc.

My guess is it was to make bikes more idiot proof.
SkinGriz is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 02:39 PM
  #17  
praise dakinis
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
praise dakinis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 70

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Raleigh Sports, Gitane Tour de France

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Senrab62
I believe he's speaking about the Milwaukee Bicycle Co track hubs. If that i79pmooney is referring to, I can attest as well. They are wonderful hubs and a good value. I have two sets with thousands of trouble free miles. They're pretty light, well finished, and spin well.
But I’m building up an old 26” mtb. Seems like they only make track hubs…
praise dakinis is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 04:30 PM
  #18  
SkinGriz
Live not by lies.
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306

Bikes: BigBox bikes.

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 860 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times in 582 Posts
Originally Posted by praise dakinis
But I’m building up an old 26” mtb. Seems like they only make track hubs…
I think a track hub is 120mm.

Maybe your MTB spacing is 135mm or less?

Then you can make up the difference with spacers or washers.
SkinGriz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.