The beginning of end... automotive industry?
#76
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
#77
☢
The Borg may not have been the best example since their connectivity is designed in the pursuit of perfection. I highly doubt the majority of phone owners bought them to enhance their intelligence. Rather, most of the use is dedicated to finding out who's sleeping with whom, or trading other irrelevant and useless gossip.
That's sad, since the device has the potential to make us the smartest generation that ever lived. Maybe that's should be a thread topic: Are we smarter today than we were 30 years ago? You probably can already guess what my answer would be.The phone may be smart but that's not the case with the people that use them. The truly smart people I know are rarely seen with cell phones.
That's sad, since the device has the potential to make us the smartest generation that ever lived. Maybe that's should be a thread topic: Are we smarter today than we were 30 years ago? You probably can already guess what my answer would be.The phone may be smart but that's not the case with the people that use them. The truly smart people I know are rarely seen with cell phones.
#78
Senior Member
Once driverless cars are legit, there will indeed be less call for regular cars... but I fail to see how demand for cars in general -- driverless or otherwise -- will diminish. Instead, you'll have major car companies making a shift from cars which people drive, to autonomous vehicles, just as there's a current shift away from gas-powered cars to hybrid and electric vehicles.
Anti-transit forces are now using autonomous vehicles as another avenue to oppose public transit projects. This is hardly anti-car...
If you have an autonomous car parked in your driveway, are you LCF?
Aston Martin is right in some respects -- car manufacturers are going to have to make the jump to autonomous vehicles as the tide changes, or fail. Also, that there will always be a niche market for those who want to and actually like to drive, no matter how much manufacture of autonomous cars takes over mass market production and increases percentage of presence on the road.
Anti-transit forces are now using autonomous vehicles as another avenue to oppose public transit projects. This is hardly anti-car...
If you have an autonomous car parked in your driveway, are you LCF?
Aston Martin is right in some respects -- car manufacturers are going to have to make the jump to autonomous vehicles as the tide changes, or fail. Also, that there will always be a niche market for those who want to and actually like to drive, no matter how much manufacture of autonomous cars takes over mass market production and increases percentage of presence on the road.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Once driverless cars are legit, there will indeed be less call for regular cars... but I fail to see how demand for cars in general -- driverless or otherwise -- will diminish. Instead, you'll have major car companies making a shift from cars which people drive, to autonomous vehicles, just as there's a current shift away from gas-powered cars to hybrid and electric vehicles.
Anti-transit forces are now using autonomous vehicles as another avenue to oppose public transit projects. This is hardly anti-car...
If you have an autonomous car parked in your driveway, are you LCF?
Aston Martin is right in some respects -- car manufacturers are going to have to make the jump to autonomous vehicles as the tide changes, or fail. Also, that there will always be a niche market for those who want to and actually like to drive, no matter how much manufacture of autonomous cars takes over mass market production and increases percentage of presence on the road.
Anti-transit forces are now using autonomous vehicles as another avenue to oppose public transit projects. This is hardly anti-car...
If you have an autonomous car parked in your driveway, are you LCF?
Aston Martin is right in some respects -- car manufacturers are going to have to make the jump to autonomous vehicles as the tide changes, or fail. Also, that there will always be a niche market for those who want to and actually like to drive, no matter how much manufacture of autonomous cars takes over mass market production and increases percentage of presence on the road.
#80
Senior Member
just wondering about people that camp, hunt, fish, off road motorcycle, UTVs, snow sports, or even just tour the US will feel about not owning their own vehicle. Not sure about skin diving or surfing. Then there are the construction workers, electricians, farmers, plumbers and real estate people.
Not sure how a shared rental vehicle would feel about a dead animal in the trunk or strapped over the hood. If any of those people had the option of owning a personal vehicle just how long before a we’ll to do business man wanted a stretch self driving luxury car?
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
so people are going to decide they only need to buy what they need? And they aren’t doing that now because?
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1015 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Nope. Simple supply and demand. And reducing car ownership is not a goal that most of society embraces as a goal in and of itself. It would more be a side effect or not.
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
This issue is disturbingly complex and I get tired of discussing it with people who just deny the monumental effort that was put into making car demand as inelastic as possible for the sake of using people as money printers.
#84
Senior Member
Money, saving money spent on private car ownership and doing other things with it will move things along, and also the hassle of parking, or two Hrs of "driving" moving at 10 MPH will get people out of owning and driving their own vehicles if and when thing are to the point of driverless cars operate like Taxis/12 passenger vans that are on demand but are cheaper... That is the way I see things unfolding but who knows... I have been wrong before... New York City seems to exemplify my thoughts on how and why it would go that way in the bigger centers.
Last edited by 350htrr; 06-23-18 at 01:06 PM. Reason: add stuff
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
They kind of need a car today, but things can change because of...
Money, saving money spent on private car ownership and doing other things with it will move things along, and also the hassle of parking, or two Hrs of "driving" moving at 10 MPH will get people out of owning and driving their own vehicles if and when thing are to the point of driverless cars operate like Taxis/12 passenger vans that are on demand but are cheaper... That is the way I see things unfolding but who knows... I have been wrong before... New York City seems to exemplify my thoughts on how and why it would go that way in the bigger centers.
Money, saving money spent on private car ownership and doing other things with it will move things along, and also the hassle of parking, or two Hrs of "driving" moving at 10 MPH will get people out of owning and driving their own vehicles if and when thing are to the point of driverless cars operate like Taxis/12 passenger vans that are on demand but are cheaper... That is the way I see things unfolding but who knows... I have been wrong before... New York City seems to exemplify my thoughts on how and why it would go that way in the bigger centers.
You will need a fundelmental change in how people perceive ease of use and what they spend their money on I believe. As long as people see worth on owning their own gadget rather than sharing a gadget with others people seem to prefer their own Gadget.
I am not saying you are wrong, what I am saying I have seen no evidence of people giving up what they want for what they need.
I looked up traffic in China and more specifically Shanghai with a population three times what the have in New York City. They are expecting a 5 percent increase in car sales this year. That even after attempts by the government to slow down the sales of personal cars over the last few years.
With an automated car you don’t need to park it close to where you are. You could send it to a lot outside of the shopping district after it dropped you off and tell it to pick you up whenever you want. You wouldn’t have to wait for one to be available.
So my thought is there really is little ldifference between calling a shared car to get you or your own car. And you can have a nicer car with a better sound and video system than what a rental car would come with. Just like we have now with cars people already drive. So there will need to be some major change in society to get people to want to share.
#86
☢
Car ownership isn't going away anytime soon for two fundamental reasons:
1) People in the U.S. consider their cars an extension of their homes.
2) No viable alternative exists. Public transit in major cities outside of NY is abysmal.
Unless and until you can change the public's mindset and infrastructure, all other factors are irrelevant.
1) People in the U.S. consider their cars an extension of their homes.
2) No viable alternative exists. Public transit in major cities outside of NY is abysmal.
Unless and until you can change the public's mindset and infrastructure, all other factors are irrelevant.
Last edited by KraneXL; 06-23-18 at 07:32 PM.
#87
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#88
Senior Member
Car ownership isn't going away anytime soon for two fundamental reasons:
1) People in the U.S. consider their cars an extension of their homes.
2) No viable alternative exists. Public transit in major cities outside of NY is abysmal.
Unless and until you an change the public's mindset and infrastructure, all other factors are irrelevant.
1) People in the U.S. consider their cars an extension of their homes.
2) No viable alternative exists. Public transit in major cities outside of NY is abysmal.
Unless and until you an change the public's mindset and infrastructure, all other factors are irrelevant.
#89
Senior Member
e
you may have a point but the same conditions exist now for regular cars and rentals.
You will need a fundelmental change in how people perceive ease of use and what they spend their money on I believe. As long as people see worth on owning their own gadget rather than sharing a gadget with others people seem to prefer their own Gadget.
I am not saying you are wrong, what I am saying I have seen no evidence of people giving up what they want for what they need.
I looked up traffic in China and more specifically Shanghai with a population three times what the have in New York City. They are expecting a 5 percent increase in car sales this year. That even after attempts by the government to slow down the sales of personal cars over the last few years.
With an automated car you don’t need to park it close to where you are. You could send it to a lot outside of the shopping district after it dropped you off and tell it to pick you up whenever you want. You wouldn’t have to wait for one to be available.
So my thought is there really is little ldifference between calling a shared car to get you or your own car. And you can have a nicer car with a better sound and video system than what a rental car would come with. Just like we have now with cars people already drive. So there will need to be some major change in society to get people to want to share.
People with money will ALWAYS find a way to show they "have money" and.... cars " are, have been a way of doing that for the last 100 years or so, even with people with just "normal" amount of money... My point is "most" people are not moneyed... so the "next best "way of getting around is "good enough" for most people... . and we are talking of lets say 80% of the people. IMO and... it's only that high because "they" are willing to go into debt over their heads to show how "prosperous" they are even tho "they" just aren't... IMO
you may have a point but the same conditions exist now for regular cars and rentals.
You will need a fundelmental change in how people perceive ease of use and what they spend their money on I believe. As long as people see worth on owning their own gadget rather than sharing a gadget with others people seem to prefer their own Gadget.
I am not saying you are wrong, what I am saying I have seen no evidence of people giving up what they want for what they need.
I looked up traffic in China and more specifically Shanghai with a population three times what the have in New York City. They are expecting a 5 percent increase in car sales this year. That even after attempts by the government to slow down the sales of personal cars over the last few years.
With an automated car you don’t need to park it close to where you are. You could send it to a lot outside of the shopping district after it dropped you off and tell it to pick you up whenever you want. You wouldn’t have to wait for one to be available.
So my thought is there really is little ldifference between calling a shared car to get you or your own car. And you can have a nicer car with a better sound and video system than what a rental car would come with. Just like we have now with cars people already drive. So there will need to be some major change in society to get people to want to share.
Last edited by 350htrr; 06-23-18 at 07:37 PM.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
e
People with money will ALWAYS find a way to show they "have money" and.... cars " are, have been a way of doing that for the last 100 years or so, even with people with just "normal" amount of money... My point is "most" people are not moneyed... so the "next best "way of getting around is "good enough" for most people... . and we are talking of lets say 80% of the people. IMO and... it's only that high because "they" are willing to go into debt over their heads to show how "prosperous" they are even tho "they" just aren't... IMO
People with money will ALWAYS find a way to show they "have money" and.... cars " are, have been a way of doing that for the last 100 years or so, even with people with just "normal" amount of money... My point is "most" people are not moneyed... so the "next best "way of getting around is "good enough" for most people... . and we are talking of lets say 80% of the people. IMO and... it's only that high because "they" are willing to go into debt over their heads to show how "prosperous" they are even tho "they" just aren't... IMO
They could save money by taking the bus and spending it on other things. Like new phones at $1000.00 a pop when they used to have one in the house.
What will turn people into sharing saving citizens then that hasn’t worked so far?
Does anyone believe the new auto industry will toss in the towel and just walk away from Madison Avenue?
What better way to integrate a new technology than to sell it to the public? Selling it to the government has to be cumbersome I would think. If a driverless car is the same percentage of your income why not own? At least you have something to sell if things go south?
I just want to know what is going to change in the marketplace?
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Does anyone believe the new auto industry will toss in the towel and just walk away from Madison Avenue?
What better way to integrate a new technology than to sell it to the public? Selling it to the government has to be cumbersome I would think. If a driverless car is the same percentage of your income why not own? At least you have something to sell if things go south?
I just want to know what is going to change in the marketplace?
What better way to integrate a new technology than to sell it to the public? Selling it to the government has to be cumbersome I would think. If a driverless car is the same percentage of your income why not own? At least you have something to sell if things go south?
I just want to know what is going to change in the marketplace?
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
That still brings you back to what will be different if the car drives itself then as opposed to now? People could take mass transit or Uber but they don’t. As you said it has been like this for a very long time.
They could save money by taking the bus and spending it on other things. Like new phones at $1000.00 a pop when they used to have one in the house.
What will turn people into sharing saving citizens then that hasn’t worked so far?
Does anyone believe the new auto industry will toss in the towel and just walk away from Madison Avenue?
What better way to integrate a new technology than to sell it to the public? Selling it to the government has to be cumbersome I would think. If a driverless car is the same percentage of your income why not own? At least you have something to sell if things go south?
I just want to know what is going to change in the marketplace?
Currently most people don't really have an alternative to owning their own motor vehicle - mass transit only goes to certain destinations, has long wait times and frequently doesn't run at all during some hours and Uber/taxis are pretty expensive since you have to pay enough to make it worthwhile for the driver. And once you're already paying the fixed costs of owning a car for the trips where it's the only reasonable option you may as well use it for many of your other trips as well. An Uber or similar system using autonomous vehicles could offer a much more economical alternative that operates at all hours, shows up within minutes, and goes to almost all destinations (I expect off-road enthusiasts will still want to drive their own vehicles).
#93
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
But I still have six bikes.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
It's going to take awhile given the current high cost of the sensors and other extra hardware required for autonomous vehicles, But I expect those costs to come down with improved technology and economies of scale. When that happens people will be able to enjoy major savings by using the autonomous vehicle instead of investing in an expensive car of their own that sits idle in a driveway or parking lot ~90% of the time just deteriorating and depreciating.
Currently most people don't really have an alternative to owning their own motor vehicle - mass transit only goes to certain destinations, has long wait times and frequently doesn't run at all during some hours and Uber/taxis are pretty expensive since you have to pay enough to make it worthwhile for the driver. And once you're already paying the fixed costs of owning a car for the trips where it's the only reasonable option you may as well use it for many of your other trips as well. An Uber or similar system using autonomous vehicles could offer a much more economical alternative that operates at all hours, shows up within minutes, and goes to almost all destinations (I expect off-road enthusiasts will still want to drive their own vehicles).
Currently most people don't really have an alternative to owning their own motor vehicle - mass transit only goes to certain destinations, has long wait times and frequently doesn't run at all during some hours and Uber/taxis are pretty expensive since you have to pay enough to make it worthwhile for the driver. And once you're already paying the fixed costs of owning a car for the trips where it's the only reasonable option you may as well use it for many of your other trips as well. An Uber or similar system using autonomous vehicles could offer a much more economical alternative that operates at all hours, shows up within minutes, and goes to almost all destinations (I expect off-road enthusiasts will still want to drive their own vehicles).
So who will own the vehicles and who will make them? Who other than the auto industry will have to tooling to make the millions of vehicles necessary to get people to and from work every day. And then what about weekends and vacations? Uber only works because someone else because someone has already assumed the fixed costs. Can a Company like Uber replace 268 million cars on the road in the US today. And can they do it without cooperation from the Auto Industry? I am rather doubtful. Still I don't see if cost isn't the deciding force for most people today it will be that great once they don't have to drive. If people are willing to drop 50 60k for a BMW in Newport Beach now. Or Like my new neighbor who got a Tesla S, 75k to 135K depending on options to go with his Fiat and GM SUV. Or and two Italian style scooters.
Yes I know it is all wool gathering but I don't see a great spirit of sharing in the country right now. I also don't see a big decrease in vehicles if people are still covering as many miles as we do today. If that driver less car will be there in a few minutes there will have to be millions of them cruising around waiting to be called. If Uber and Lift and Tesla and Google are all looking to make a profit off of these cars there will have to be a lot of cars to cover the needs of almost 350 million people.
It will be interesting to see how these things work out. I just don't see Americans becoming frugal just because they "could" save a few bucks by sharing a vehicle. They tried it with car pooling and after a good start it fell flat in just a few years.
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Can a Company like Uber replace 268 million cars on the road in the US today. And can they do it without cooperation from the Auto Industry? I am rather doubtful. Still I don't see if cost isn't the deciding force for most people today it will be that great once they don't have to drive. If people are willing to drop 50 60k for a BMW in Newport Beach now. Or Like my new neighbor who got a Tesla S, 75k to 135K depending on options to go with his Fiat and GM SUV. Or and two Italian style scooters.
I agree that quite a few people pay way more than they would need to for decent reliable transportation - our neighbor across the street has two Tesla X's. But I see far more Civics, Corollas, Focus's, etc. compared to the $50+K vehicles. So most people do pay some attention to the cost of their transportation. There's already some evidence that the young generation is less concerned with driving and the status symbol value of cars - I expect that this trend will rapidly accelerate when autonomous fleet vehicles become commonplace.
#96
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Even in places where public transit is very good, private vehicle ownership still dominates and will continue to dominate...There is just no alternative to the freedom that cars offer, public transit will never offer the same freedom and convenience as cars no mater how good public transit gets.
#97
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Car dealers are going to stop making obnoxious in-your-face TV commercials about cash-back offers, etc. and car companies are going to stop bullishly defining trends and steering people into fitting into the trends. They're also going to stop trying to make you a trade-in deal whenever you bring your vehicle in for service in order to lengthen your contract. The auto industry is just going to back off and let people come to them when they want a car. They'll save a lot of money in marketing costs that way, which they will need to keep their prices affordable for those people who continue to seek out cars in the absence of pushy bull marketing campaigns.
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Basically you just think in terms of defining your enemies as 'unrealistic' and then ridiculing them using psychology concepts like dreams/nightmares and obsessions. Got it.
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
I'd note that the autonomous vehicle service providers don't have to replace all 268 million cars, but only the number that are ever in actual use at any one time. I have three cars but none have moved out of my driveway in weeks. Even at rush hour I suspect that it's a fairly small fraction of cars that are in simultaneous use. And I'm sure that the transition will take place over an extended time period so the number of autonomous vehicles required would ramp up gradually.
I agree that quite a few people pay way more than they would need to for decent reliable transportation - our neighbor across the street has two Tesla X's. But I see far more Civics, Corollas, Focus's, etc. compared to the $50+K vehicles. So most people do pay some attention to the cost of their transportation. There's already some evidence that the young generation is less concerned with driving and the status symbol value of cars - I expect that this trend will rapidly accelerate when autonomous fleet vehicles become commonplace.
I agree that quite a few people pay way more than they would need to for decent reliable transportation - our neighbor across the street has two Tesla X's. But I see far more Civics, Corollas, Focus's, etc. compared to the $50+K vehicles. So most people do pay some attention to the cost of their transportation. There's already some evidence that the young generation is less concerned with driving and the status symbol value of cars - I expect that this trend will rapidly accelerate when autonomous fleet vehicles become commonplace.
Once the ice is broken if the economy is good wants creep in front of needs.
#100
☢
do you see the option of privately owned vehicles? Because if they do I would imagine nothing much will change. Yes business owned services can flourish but as 350 indicated the people with the means will more than likely still want their own vehicle with options not offered by publicly owned vehicles.
Once the ice is broken if the economy is good wants creep in front of needs.