criterium geometry?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
criterium geometry?
Greetings. I need a road bike for 1 or two day trips. And I have a chance to buy a mid 80's cannondale roade bike with what is described as 'criterium geometry'. He refers to it as a Black Beauty, but I dont think that's a model name. Would this kind of setup work for what I have described? Thanks for any help, Harry O.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Edmond Oklahoma
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you mean 1 or 2 day tours, then stay away. Those mid 80's Cannondales were bone shakers, and the "crit" geometry is wrong as well.
Zagnut
Zagnut
Likes For zagnut:
Likes For Nessism:
#4
Senior Member
Buy a carbon fiber or touring bike
Hi, these guys are totally right.
I know, because I own one! Mine was a leftover from the canadian olympic team, that I got unused somewhere around 1985. I had selected it because in those years, I liked to do hills, and my Columbus-SL/SP Vicini was starting to fatigue, flex, and shift gears without my consent on the climbs. My previous CambioRino did the same (both new). I was a relatively tall and strong rider.
The Cannondale certainly is amazingly rigid, as I still own it. But this bike is hard on your back, very hard...
If you intend to do lots of hills, and you want a metal bike (as opposed to carbon-fibre), look for a bike with NON-aero downtube (structurally, a flattened tube is the poorest performing, teardrop almost as bad, in torsional rigidiity, with the clover cross-sections just as bad). Having a bent/S-curved seat stays (perhaps out of carbon fiber) would really help on bumpy roads (the seat stays don't contribute all that much during the pedal stroke to pedaling efficiency and are well suited for vibration-dampening design).
If you are a former racer and miss quick-handling bikes, this will give you the best of both worlds... stiffness for climbing those hills, yet comfort in riding.
An aluminum frameset is great for winter riding, not affected by salty slush. Do not ride carbon-fibre in winter conditions (where it's cold, snowy) - there is galvanic corrosion that can sometimes deteriorate some of the aluminum parts attached to it to the point of cracking or even disintegrating over time.
Also make sure you get yourself a GOOD seat. Do not under-estimate the importance of that. Padded gel seats can be pretty bad, if they are too wide because your leg will hit on the downstroke and there can be too little support in the nose versus the back cushion area... make sure you get something that fits for your gender. Also the nose has to point up slightly, so your body naturally slides back onto the cushioned area (or you will be applying extra weight on the handlebars to push yourself back onto the seat's cushioned area, thus potentially injuring the nerve in your palms (ulnar nerve I believe)).
A shockpost is OK but most don't dampen at the proper angle and just add a lot of weight, and some of them have side-flex, which is energy-robbing... carbonfiber seatposts might be a better idea as they can be found relatively cheap now.
There is a design by Canondale to be absolutely avoided, and which earned the company the nickname Crackondale, and that is, where the rear dropouts extend horizontally straight out far behind where the seat stays meet the chainstays. In more recent history, they renewed their subscription to their nickname, with reports of their aluminum forks breaking.
I know, because I own one! Mine was a leftover from the canadian olympic team, that I got unused somewhere around 1985. I had selected it because in those years, I liked to do hills, and my Columbus-SL/SP Vicini was starting to fatigue, flex, and shift gears without my consent on the climbs. My previous CambioRino did the same (both new). I was a relatively tall and strong rider.
The Cannondale certainly is amazingly rigid, as I still own it. But this bike is hard on your back, very hard...
If you intend to do lots of hills, and you want a metal bike (as opposed to carbon-fibre), look for a bike with NON-aero downtube (structurally, a flattened tube is the poorest performing, teardrop almost as bad, in torsional rigidiity, with the clover cross-sections just as bad). Having a bent/S-curved seat stays (perhaps out of carbon fiber) would really help on bumpy roads (the seat stays don't contribute all that much during the pedal stroke to pedaling efficiency and are well suited for vibration-dampening design).
If you are a former racer and miss quick-handling bikes, this will give you the best of both worlds... stiffness for climbing those hills, yet comfort in riding.
An aluminum frameset is great for winter riding, not affected by salty slush. Do not ride carbon-fibre in winter conditions (where it's cold, snowy) - there is galvanic corrosion that can sometimes deteriorate some of the aluminum parts attached to it to the point of cracking or even disintegrating over time.
Also make sure you get yourself a GOOD seat. Do not under-estimate the importance of that. Padded gel seats can be pretty bad, if they are too wide because your leg will hit on the downstroke and there can be too little support in the nose versus the back cushion area... make sure you get something that fits for your gender. Also the nose has to point up slightly, so your body naturally slides back onto the cushioned area (or you will be applying extra weight on the handlebars to push yourself back onto the seat's cushioned area, thus potentially injuring the nerve in your palms (ulnar nerve I believe)).
A shockpost is OK but most don't dampen at the proper angle and just add a lot of weight, and some of them have side-flex, which is energy-robbing... carbonfiber seatposts might be a better idea as they can be found relatively cheap now.
There is a design by Canondale to be absolutely avoided, and which earned the company the nickname Crackondale, and that is, where the rear dropouts extend horizontally straight out far behind where the seat stays meet the chainstays. In more recent history, they renewed their subscription to their nickname, with reports of their aluminum forks breaking.
Last edited by Timmi; 11-22-21 at 01:40 AM. Reason: more info
#5
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
Hi, these guys are totally right.
I know, because I own one! Mine was a leftover from the canadian olympic team, that I got unused somewhere around 1985. I had selected it because in those years, I liked to do hills, and my Columbus-SL+SP Vicini was starting to fatigue, flex, and shift gears without my conscent on the climbs.
The Cannondale certainly is amazingly rigid, as I still own it. But this bike is hard on your back, very hard...
If you intend to do lots of hills, look for an aluminum bike with NON-aero downtube (structurally, a flattenned tube is the poorest performing, with the triangular and clover cross-sections a close stupid behind), and it having a bent/S-curved seat stays (perhaps out of carbon fiber) would really help on bumpy roads (the seat stays don't contribute all that much during the pedal stroke to pedalling efficiency and are well suited for vibration-dampening design).
If you are a former racer and miss quick-handling bikes, this will give you the best of both worlds... stiffness for climbing those hills, yet comfort in riding.
If you go for a full carbon bike, be careful... too many models have too little material around the bottom bracket, and might not be suitable for a heavy, strong rider, riding hard or doing hills with a bunch of gear on the luggage racks.
Also make sure you get yourself a GOOD seat. Do not under-estimate the importance of that. Padded gel seats can be pretty bad, if they are too wide because your leg will hit on the downstroke and there can be too little support in the nose versus the back cushion area... make sure you get something that fits for your gender. Also the nose has to point up slightly, so your body naturally slides back onto the cushioned area (or you will be applying extra weight on the handlebars to push yourself back onto the seat's cushioned area, thus potentially injuring the nerve in your palms (ulnar nerve I believe)).
A shockpost probably isn't a bad idea... but it adds a lot of weight, and some of them have side-flex, which is energy-robbing... carbonfiber seatposts might be a better idea as they can be found relatively cheap now.
If any of you is interested in a super stiff Cannondale, I'm selling mine, as I have too many bikes... have just acquired a recumbent, and as I'm too old to race or do serious riding, as my knees and back wouldn't forgive me, so I'd part with the Cannondale. Ironically, these frames DID come with eyelets, so you'd be able to add luggage racks without damage to the frame. It is for tall strong riders (I am 6ft2, and would consider 6ft1 the minimum), and equipped with a collection of the lightest equipment that could be found in that day (LOL no not campy super, lighter than that!).
I know, because I own one! Mine was a leftover from the canadian olympic team, that I got unused somewhere around 1985. I had selected it because in those years, I liked to do hills, and my Columbus-SL+SP Vicini was starting to fatigue, flex, and shift gears without my conscent on the climbs.
The Cannondale certainly is amazingly rigid, as I still own it. But this bike is hard on your back, very hard...
If you intend to do lots of hills, look for an aluminum bike with NON-aero downtube (structurally, a flattenned tube is the poorest performing, with the triangular and clover cross-sections a close stupid behind), and it having a bent/S-curved seat stays (perhaps out of carbon fiber) would really help on bumpy roads (the seat stays don't contribute all that much during the pedal stroke to pedalling efficiency and are well suited for vibration-dampening design).
If you are a former racer and miss quick-handling bikes, this will give you the best of both worlds... stiffness for climbing those hills, yet comfort in riding.
If you go for a full carbon bike, be careful... too many models have too little material around the bottom bracket, and might not be suitable for a heavy, strong rider, riding hard or doing hills with a bunch of gear on the luggage racks.
Also make sure you get yourself a GOOD seat. Do not under-estimate the importance of that. Padded gel seats can be pretty bad, if they are too wide because your leg will hit on the downstroke and there can be too little support in the nose versus the back cushion area... make sure you get something that fits for your gender. Also the nose has to point up slightly, so your body naturally slides back onto the cushioned area (or you will be applying extra weight on the handlebars to push yourself back onto the seat's cushioned area, thus potentially injuring the nerve in your palms (ulnar nerve I believe)).
A shockpost probably isn't a bad idea... but it adds a lot of weight, and some of them have side-flex, which is energy-robbing... carbonfiber seatposts might be a better idea as they can be found relatively cheap now.
If any of you is interested in a super stiff Cannondale, I'm selling mine, as I have too many bikes... have just acquired a recumbent, and as I'm too old to race or do serious riding, as my knees and back wouldn't forgive me, so I'd part with the Cannondale. Ironically, these frames DID come with eyelets, so you'd be able to add luggage racks without damage to the frame. It is for tall strong riders (I am 6ft2, and would consider 6ft1 the minimum), and equipped with a collection of the lightest equipment that could be found in that day (LOL no not campy super, lighter than that!).
It’s a metallurgical fact that steel frames do NOT get soft with age such as you reference with your old Columbus frame. Not sure what was going on with it changing gears as you say but it had nothing to do with steel fatigue. Most likely one of the brazed joints was about to come apart or something to this effect.
Regarding comfort of a frame with “S shaped carbon seat stays”, carbon does help damp vibration but there needs to be motion/movement in the tubes for there to be damping. Reality is that the seat stays, even S shaped ones, don’t move very much at all, thus there is no movement to damp. Best the carbon can do is take out a little of the tingle in the ride, which while comforting, is nothing compared to a springy front triangle where there is more displacement in the vibrations.
Regarding the aero down tube comments…agree 100%. Tall oval down tubes are the worst possible shape to stiffen the bottom bracket area of the frame since the major axis of the tube is oriented in the wrong direction. Who ever came up with that idea, other than maybe for a time trial frame, was not taking account of the true loads in the tubes.
Likes For Nessism:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times
in
1,678 Posts
I hear you, regarding your metallurgical theories...
do you own the latest Machinery Handbook by any chance?
Because I do... and this was part of my studies actually. So I hope you're just not shooting off without the actual knowledge. Don't mean to offend you or anything, serious, just that you get a lot of that.
"Facts" and "theory" aside, you can talk to any pro rider from the 80's, 90's, and old school expert, and they will ALL testify that steel frames DO fatigue. Not in the sense of aluminum where aluminum fails... but in the sense that it DOES flex more.
Yes, I know that structurally it is a pipe... hence it's not "logical"... but if you take a piece of steel and bend it back and forth enough, it eventually becomes softer. Don't tell me you've NEVER broken a paperclip this way or other metal pbject. Extrapolate, and it becomes possible that a pipe as well, eventually gets softer with time.
BTW, you can read up in vintage cycling print about this phenomena... in back issues of bicycling magazine, Bike Tech, and a whole bunch of other cycling publications. It's a general knowledge in the cycling industry... of course, with the pros riding carbon since a decade now, and before that aluminum or titanium, we haven't heard talk about that in a long time.
do you own the latest Machinery Handbook by any chance?
Because I do... and this was part of my studies actually. So I hope you're just not shooting off without the actual knowledge. Don't mean to offend you or anything, serious, just that you get a lot of that.
"Facts" and "theory" aside, you can talk to any pro rider from the 80's, 90's, and old school expert, and they will ALL testify that steel frames DO fatigue. Not in the sense of aluminum where aluminum fails... but in the sense that it DOES flex more.
Yes, I know that structurally it is a pipe... hence it's not "logical"... but if you take a piece of steel and bend it back and forth enough, it eventually becomes softer. Don't tell me you've NEVER broken a paperclip this way or other metal pbject. Extrapolate, and it becomes possible that a pipe as well, eventually gets softer with time.
BTW, you can read up in vintage cycling print about this phenomena... in back issues of bicycling magazine, Bike Tech, and a whole bunch of other cycling publications. It's a general knowledge in the cycling industry... of course, with the pros riding carbon since a decade now, and before that aluminum or titanium, we haven't heard talk about that in a long time.
#7
Senior Member
OK whatever, dwell on words if you like.
Don't be a jerk. You know what I mean and what I'm talking about.
Don't be a jerk. You know what I mean and what I'm talking about.
#8
Wheelsuck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
People ride steel bikes with 100,000 miles on them. If fatigue was going affect stiffness, it'd be set in by then. Now if a steel bike is made from very thin walled tubing, it may be prone to fatigue failure (the same as aluminum), but that's a different thing entirely.
#9
ride lots be safe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
back to the topic at hand.
if you want to do tours like that, get a frame described as "sport touring" or "touring"
you'll be able to spot it by some or all of these features:
- brazed-on mounting eyelets for racks and/or fenders, ideally front and rear
- longer chainstays (bigger gap between rear tire and seat tube)
- larger clearance for larger tires (up to 32c width, or larger even)
- maybe cantilever brakes
- triple crankset
- able to get handlebar tops level with seat, or higher, without kludgy stem tricks.
- sold / described with terms like "touring", "relaxed", "comfortable"
if you want to do tours like that, get a frame described as "sport touring" or "touring"
you'll be able to spot it by some or all of these features:
- brazed-on mounting eyelets for racks and/or fenders, ideally front and rear
- longer chainstays (bigger gap between rear tire and seat tube)
- larger clearance for larger tires (up to 32c width, or larger even)
- maybe cantilever brakes
- triple crankset
- able to get handlebar tops level with seat, or higher, without kludgy stem tricks.
- sold / described with terms like "touring", "relaxed", "comfortable"
#10
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
I hear you, regarding your metallurgical theories...
do you own the latest Machinery Handbook by any chance?
Because I do... and this was part of my studies actually. So I hope you're just not shooting off without the actual knowledge. Don't mean to offend you or anything, serious, just that you get a lot of that.
"Facts" and "theory" aside, you can talk to any pro rider from the 80's, 90's, and old school expert, and they will ALL testify that steel frames DO fatigue. Not in the sense of aluminum where aluminum fails... but in the sense that it DOES flex more.
Yes, I know that structurally it is a pipe... hence it's not "logical"... but if you take a piece of steel and bend it back and forth enough, it eventually becomes softer. Don't tell me you've NEVER broken a paperclip this way or other metal pbject. Extrapolate, and it becomes possible that a pipe as well, eventually gets softer with time.
BTW, you can read up in vintage cycling print about this phenomena... in back issues of bicycling magazine, Bike Tech, and a whole bunch of other cycling publications. It's a general knowledge in the cycling industry... of course, with the pros riding carbon since a decade now, and before that aluminum or titanium, we haven't heard talk about that in a long time.
do you own the latest Machinery Handbook by any chance?
Because I do... and this was part of my studies actually. So I hope you're just not shooting off without the actual knowledge. Don't mean to offend you or anything, serious, just that you get a lot of that.
"Facts" and "theory" aside, you can talk to any pro rider from the 80's, 90's, and old school expert, and they will ALL testify that steel frames DO fatigue. Not in the sense of aluminum where aluminum fails... but in the sense that it DOES flex more.
Yes, I know that structurally it is a pipe... hence it's not "logical"... but if you take a piece of steel and bend it back and forth enough, it eventually becomes softer. Don't tell me you've NEVER broken a paperclip this way or other metal pbject. Extrapolate, and it becomes possible that a pipe as well, eventually gets softer with time.
BTW, you can read up in vintage cycling print about this phenomena... in back issues of bicycling magazine, Bike Tech, and a whole bunch of other cycling publications. It's a general knowledge in the cycling industry... of course, with the pros riding carbon since a decade now, and before that aluminum or titanium, we haven't heard talk about that in a long time.
First of all, I'm a mechanical engineer and have worked in the field for 23 years so far...
It is not a "theory", it is fact that the elasticity of steel does not change as it's used. The metal can eventually fatigue, after a LOT of cycles, and said fatigue typically shows up as a crack in the metal. Most typical frames from the days of SL, 531, etc, will last for tens of thousands of miles before any fatigue issues show up. Typically, when these frames fail it's not actually true fatigue of the metal, rather these frames typically fail in the heat effected zone of the tubes due to heat reducing the properties of the metal. At any rate, the frames do not "go soft" so forget about that.
The paper clip example is not appropriate here since bending the clip results in exceeding the metals YIELD point (the point where permanent deformation occurs). A frame will never see loads high enough to cause permanent bending.
Funny that these old urban legends won't go away. There is evidence on the internet if you want to read more. Found this post if you care to read. https://stason.org/TULARC/sports/bicy...oing-soft.html
Last edited by Nessism; 07-28-08 at 08:47 PM.
#11
Wheelsuck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I love the "Facts" and "theory" sentence. If we set "Facts" aside, it's easy to make some pretty wild claims. Now we don't want to actually verify those claims with real world testing, do we? Of course not! We would much rather take people's opinions who are 'willing to testify' to something they have never actually tested.
Really? You actually wrote that? Amazing.
#12
Senior Member
OK guys look, I was only trying to speak in cyclists terms... about the FEEL of the bike, damn it!
Using the same terms cycling pros and conoisseurs will use so they understand it... my intent was NEVER to satisfy metallurgists or mechanical engineers, but to speak with cyclists about cycling. If you want to know what the machinery handbook says, buy one, because if you don't have one you were obviously speaking way over your head.
I was talking about a frame starting to feel "soft and flexible"!!!
I don't give a flying *** about what is actually happening on the atomic structure level - that is not the topic of discussion here!
Remember, this is a cycling forum, not a metallurgy class. Do you understand the nuance???
Now stop being jerks and get back on topic!
Using the same terms cycling pros and conoisseurs will use so they understand it... my intent was NEVER to satisfy metallurgists or mechanical engineers, but to speak with cyclists about cycling. If you want to know what the machinery handbook says, buy one, because if you don't have one you were obviously speaking way over your head.
I was talking about a frame starting to feel "soft and flexible"!!!
I don't give a flying *** about what is actually happening on the atomic structure level - that is not the topic of discussion here!
Remember, this is a cycling forum, not a metallurgy class. Do you understand the nuance???
Now stop being jerks and get back on topic!
Last edited by Timmi; 08-04-08 at 02:43 PM.
Likes For Timmi:
#13
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
OK guys look, I was only trying to speak in cyclists terms... about the FEEL of the bike, damn it!
Using the same terms cycling pros and conoisseurs will use so they understand it... my intent was NEVER to satisfy metallurgists or mechanical engineers, but to speak with cyclists about cycling. If you want to know what the machinery handbook says, buy one, because if you don't have one you were obviously speaking way over your head.
I was talking about a frame starting to feel "soft and flexible"!!!
I don't give a flying *** about what is actually happening on the atomic structure level - that is not the topic of discussion here!
Remember, this is a cycling forum, not a metallurgy class. Do you understand the nuance???
Now stop being jerks and get back on topic!
Using the same terms cycling pros and conoisseurs will use so they understand it... my intent was NEVER to satisfy metallurgists or mechanical engineers, but to speak with cyclists about cycling. If you want to know what the machinery handbook says, buy one, because if you don't have one you were obviously speaking way over your head.
I was talking about a frame starting to feel "soft and flexible"!!!
I don't give a flying *** about what is actually happening on the atomic structure level - that is not the topic of discussion here!
Remember, this is a cycling forum, not a metallurgy class. Do you understand the nuance???
Now stop being jerks and get back on topic!
Simple FACT is that steel does not go soft with use, period. And it doesn’t start to “feel" soft either. Call Freud if you need an explanation as to what “cycling pros and connoisseurs” are experiencing since it’s all in their heads.
Last edited by Nessism; 08-04-08 at 09:10 PM.
Likes For Nessism:
#14
shut up and ride
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: noho
Posts: 1,947
Bikes: supersix hi-mod,burley duet tandem,woodrup track,cannondale cross,specialized road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
just wanted to thank you for all your posts on all topics, i enjoy reading them, even if others don't seem to get the same enjoyment and informative value out of them that i do
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Some of us are lovers of cycling who are also engineers and perhaps metallurgists, and are interested in understanding both how a frame feels and why it feels that way. There really isn't any room for setting aside truth and factual accuracy.
Likes For Road Fan:
#16
Senior Member
whatever.
I think there is a discussion forum regarding metallurgy on the internet somewhere... I'm sure...
my post was NOT for that audience... I know where I am, and I don't need a GPS for that!
I think there is a discussion forum regarding metallurgy on the internet somewhere... I'm sure...
my post was NOT for that audience... I know where I am, and I don't need a GPS for that!
#17
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I had an SL frame and I thought that I turned it into a wet noodle because it had started shifting under pressure. I found it was because the pivots and the bushings in my rear deraileur were way worn. I replaced the rear deraileur and viola.
Also rim flex is a big contributor to percieved rim flex. . . . . errr frame flex
Also rim flex is a big contributor to percieved rim flex. . . . . errr frame flex
Last edited by CurbDestroyer; 08-25-08 at 10:29 PM.
Likes For CurbDestroyer:
#18
Senior Member
I had an SL frame and I thought that I turned it into a wet noodle because it had started shifting under pressure. I found it was because the pivots and the bushings in my rear deraileur were way worn. I replaced the rear deraileur and viola.
Also rim flex is a big contributor to percieved rim flex.
Also rim flex is a big contributor to percieved rim flex.
Also, I build all my wheels... they never come tight enough for my liking when you buy them built. Mine are at the maximum tension a spoke+nipple can take. Definitely not a factor here.
Last edited by Timmi; 11-22-21 at 01:20 AM.
#19
Senior Member
You probably tell your dentist how to do his job when you go see him.
Because you have an engineer's-complex and don't believe that ordinary mortals can posess intelligence, which shows each time that you don't value anyone else's opinion, each time you discount the value of life experience and wisdom... the engineer is the know-all and end-all of all things, isn't he? He creates, thus it makes him better. (And the rest of us are stuck with your crappy flawed designs!)
Likes For Timmi:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Typical engineer arrogance and narcissism.
You probably tell your dentist how to do his job when you go see him.
Because you have an engineer's-complex and don't believe that ordinary mortals can posess intelligence, which shows each time that you don't value anyone else's opinion, each time you discount the value of life experience and wisdom... the engineer is the know-all and end-all of all things, isn't he? He creates, thus it makes him better. (And the rest of us are stuck with your crappy flawed designs!)
You probably tell your dentist how to do his job when you go see him.
Because you have an engineer's-complex and don't believe that ordinary mortals can posess intelligence, which shows each time that you don't value anyone else's opinion, each time you discount the value of life experience and wisdom... the engineer is the know-all and end-all of all things, isn't he? He creates, thus it makes him better. (And the rest of us are stuck with your crappy flawed designs!)
If you don't think metallurgy is a valid science, why hasn't the Golden Gate Bridge fallen down or gone noodly yet? Its materials are really really similar to those in your Vicini-built frame and it's much older.
Road Fan
Likes For Road Fan:
#21
Senior Member
Respect for your forefathers
People are trying to share their ideas. No body needs your negativity. Everyone wants your thoughts and experiences.
If you don't think metallurgy is a valid science, why hasn't the Golden Gate Bridge fallen down or gone noodly yet? Its materials are really really similar to those in your Vicini-built frame and it's much older.
Road Fan
If you don't think metallurgy is a valid science, why hasn't the Golden Gate Bridge fallen down or gone noodly yet? Its materials are really really similar to those in your Vicini-built frame and it's much older.
Road Fan
But what got us here, is total disrespect for wisdom from those older and more experienced than us.
I do believe that theory always has to be verified in the field.
In this case, we're not talking about the golden gate bridge, but of thin-walled bicycle tubing, and what experienced riders have as experience with them.
The day that Bernard Hinault or Gred Lemond or one of the old-school guys throws the book of metallurgy at me, I'll bow out gracefully. But it is those very professionals that report frames fatiguing... and they had access to illimited-budget frame-building.
And I know when to set aside theory and give a little respect to those who have gone farther than myself, who have more experience than myself, and who have perhaps experienced things that cannot be measured.
"Not everything that counts can be measured. And not everything that can be measured counts."
--Albert Einstein.
#22
Wheelsuck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Ok, maybe "noodly" is a stretch for the Golden Gate Bridge, but metallurgy of steels has been verified experimentally in the field and in the lab thousands of times for over the past 100 or more years. It's not new science, and it's not reasonable to treat it as such. It is important to realize that its not always trivial even for mechanical engineers to apply it to real-world problems.
It is reasonable to look for explanations for what you've experienced. I doubt that anyone intended to say you did not experience what you have. I have not experienced that as a degradation over time, but I'm not as strong a cyclist as you are, I think. I do have a frame that flexes and ghost shifts, but I think there are explanations for both phenomena that do not require my frame to be fatigueing. It gets worse toward teh end of summer, when I'm getting stronger each year.
Tony Oliver, in his real good book "Touring Bikes" talks about how he likes to orient conventional Columbus and 531 dB tube sets to maximize BB stiffness, minimizing ghost shifting and BB flex. In general he wants the longest length of unbutted seat tube to be bridging between the front derailleur bracket and the BB shell, and similar for the down tube. A physicist (so he understood metallurgy) and cycling fanatic, he made frames for local (Welsh mountains) club and performance riders, and for some serious competitors, selecting tubesets for each based on their size, weight, planned terrain and usage, and strengths as a cyclist. I think he knew what he was doing. This book is at least as good as Talbot's, but its not a builder's manual, more of a design manual.
It is reasonable to look for explanations for what you've experienced. I doubt that anyone intended to say you did not experience what you have. I have not experienced that as a degradation over time, but I'm not as strong a cyclist as you are, I think. I do have a frame that flexes and ghost shifts, but I think there are explanations for both phenomena that do not require my frame to be fatigueing. It gets worse toward teh end of summer, when I'm getting stronger each year.
Tony Oliver, in his real good book "Touring Bikes" talks about how he likes to orient conventional Columbus and 531 dB tube sets to maximize BB stiffness, minimizing ghost shifting and BB flex. In general he wants the longest length of unbutted seat tube to be bridging between the front derailleur bracket and the BB shell, and similar for the down tube. A physicist (so he understood metallurgy) and cycling fanatic, he made frames for local (Welsh mountains) club and performance riders, and for some serious competitors, selecting tubesets for each based on their size, weight, planned terrain and usage, and strengths as a cyclist. I think he knew what he was doing. This book is at least as good as Talbot's, but its not a builder's manual, more of a design manual.
Likes For Road Fan:
#24
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have heard the stories about people that have said there worr out frame till they shifted going up hill. I think that steel fatige is one component of that, but not the sole reason.
#25
Senior Member
It's not technically "fatigue" in the metallurgical sense since you never ever really stress a frame close enough to its yield-strength to do work-hardening anyway. I suspect what happens is that the tubing themselves are fine, but you end up with lugs and brass that ends up with microscopic cracks. I've cut apart old steel frames and have found a lot of corrosion in the lugged joint itself where there once was full-contact with brass.
So yeah, old steel frames do get softer from A LOT of empirical evidence. However, HOW that softness develops is arguable and certainly is not metal "fatigue". "Frame fatigue" is a more accurate way to describe it perhaps.
So yeah, old steel frames do get softer from A LOT of empirical evidence. However, HOW that softness develops is arguable and certainly is not metal "fatigue". "Frame fatigue" is a more accurate way to describe it perhaps.