THE definition of "carfree"
#1
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
THE definition of "carfree"
Since nobody else is willing to state a definition definitively (so to speak), I will offer one.
The definition of "living carfree":
No ownership of a car, and a car owned by somebody else is used infrequently.
The definition of "car":
A privately owned motor vehicle, used for non-commercial personal transport.
If everybody can live with that, the definition will be adopted. If there are objections, it won't be adopted.
Let us know what you think!
The definition of "living carfree":
No ownership of a car, and a car owned by somebody else is used infrequently.
The definition of "car":
A privately owned motor vehicle, used for non-commercial personal transport.
If everybody can live with that, the definition will be adopted. If there are objections, it won't be adopted.
Let us know what you think!
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#5
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
What would you prefer? I mainly wanted to exempt people who own and/or drive for a job or for their own business. Like a cake baker who never drives for her own personal needs, but delivers cakes with a car she owns strictly for her business. After all, the title of the forum is LIVING Carfree, not WORKING Carfree.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Since nobody else is willing to state a definition definitively (so to speak), I will offer one.
The definition of "living carfree":
No ownership of a car, and a car owned by somebody else is used infrequently.
The definition of "car":
A privately owned motor vehicle, used for non-commercial personal transport.
If everybody can live with that, the definition will be adopted. If there are objections, it won't be adopted.
Let us know what you think!
The definition of "living carfree":
No ownership of a car, and a car owned by somebody else is used infrequently.
The definition of "car":
A privately owned motor vehicle, used for non-commercial personal transport.
If everybody can live with that, the definition will be adopted. If there are objections, it won't be adopted.
Let us know what you think!
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,043
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,069 Times
in
4,475 Posts
Oh boy, I see this came from a 7 page thread about defining the term 'carfree'. I cant wait to read 150+ posts concerning this definition! I would say I am surprised that such a term couldnt be collectively defined within 1 thread and 150+ responses, but...
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#10
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,151
Bikes: Lots
Liked 601 Times
in
332 Posts
I object to there being a definition. I don't think one is necessary, and I think any definition will end up being used as a weapon.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#11
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,151
Bikes: Lots
Liked 601 Times
in
332 Posts
To quote myself from the other thread (and you can check the other thread for context if you so desire) ...
The trouble with agreeing upon a definition here is that it can then be used as a weapon.
Begone! You and your topic do not qualify according to our cast-in-stone definition of carfree.
If we have any interest at all in the LCF forum being a more welcoming place, we would not get hung up on definitions ... and who belongs and who doesn't.
I prefer to keep the definition loose.
So what if someone who defines themselves as "carfree" uses a taxi to get to the airport a couple times a year, or makes use of a delivery service to have their new television delivered, or walks to the grocery store to buy the food which is delivered there on a daily basis by motor vehicle. Maybe it might be pushing the line a little if a person defines themselves as "carfree" and uses a taxi to get to work 5 days a week. But I'd rather not have some cast-in-stone definition to pull out and whop people over the head with.
And for reference, this is the forum definition:
Begone! You and your topic do not qualify according to our cast-in-stone definition of carfree.
If we have any interest at all in the LCF forum being a more welcoming place, we would not get hung up on definitions ... and who belongs and who doesn't.
I prefer to keep the definition loose.
So what if someone who defines themselves as "carfree" uses a taxi to get to the airport a couple times a year, or makes use of a delivery service to have their new television delivered, or walks to the grocery store to buy the food which is delivered there on a daily basis by motor vehicle. Maybe it might be pushing the line a little if a person defines themselves as "carfree" and uses a taxi to get to work 5 days a week. But I'd rather not have some cast-in-stone definition to pull out and whop people over the head with.
And for reference, this is the forum definition:
"Do you live car free or car light? Do you prefer to use alternative transportation (bicycles, walking, other human-powered or public transportation) for everyday activities whenever possible? Discuss your lifestyle here."
Every time a person chooses to use human power to do something rather than a motor vehicle, it's a good thing ... and there is no need to define or categorise it.
Personally, I'm not about a carfree movement as a whole. I'm more about little steps. Choosing to walk to the grocery store this time, rather than drive. Choosing to park in a central location in town and walking or cycling from there rather than driving to each and every shop. Every little bit counts.
Every little bit of extra human-powered activity gets us just that little bit fitter.
Personally, I'm not about a carfree movement as a whole. I'm more about little steps. Choosing to walk to the grocery store this time, rather than drive. Choosing to park in a central location in town and walking or cycling from there rather than driving to each and every shop. Every little bit counts.
Every little bit of extra human-powered activity gets us just that little bit fitter.
And also ... how far do you want to go with it?
Is a person carfree because they themselves do not own a car?
But what about using cars? Are two trips/year to the airport in a taxi allowed ... but a third trip not allowed under the definition? What if a person rents a car for a two-week holiday? Does 2 weeks in a car cancel out 50 weeks of walking and cycling?
And how far does it go? Chances are someone turned up in a motor vehicle for one reason or another when the house you live in was being built ... therefore a car was used in the construction of something you use on a daily basis ... therefore you're not really carfree, are you? Or what about your groceries? Unless you grow/raise everything in your own back yard, I can almost guarantee that a motor vehicle was used somewhere in the process of getting that bag of carrots into your fridge ... even if you walked them there in the last leg of their journey. Oh, and speaking of your fridge ... how did it arrive in your house?
These days, almost no one is truly carfree ... not in an absolute sense. But where do you draw the line ... who do you include? who do you exclude?
IMO all trying to define carfree does is to produce a weapon to be wielded against others, and makes this subforum even less welcoming than it already is.
Is a person carfree because they themselves do not own a car?
But what about using cars? Are two trips/year to the airport in a taxi allowed ... but a third trip not allowed under the definition? What if a person rents a car for a two-week holiday? Does 2 weeks in a car cancel out 50 weeks of walking and cycling?
And how far does it go? Chances are someone turned up in a motor vehicle for one reason or another when the house you live in was being built ... therefore a car was used in the construction of something you use on a daily basis ... therefore you're not really carfree, are you? Or what about your groceries? Unless you grow/raise everything in your own back yard, I can almost guarantee that a motor vehicle was used somewhere in the process of getting that bag of carrots into your fridge ... even if you walked them there in the last leg of their journey. Oh, and speaking of your fridge ... how did it arrive in your house?
These days, almost no one is truly carfree ... not in an absolute sense. But where do you draw the line ... who do you include? who do you exclude?
IMO all trying to define carfree does is to produce a weapon to be wielded against others, and makes this subforum even less welcoming than it already is.
It's a scale ...
On the one end are the people who drive everywhere ... at the other end are the people who have built their houses with trees they've grown and felled, who grow their own food and who make their own clothes and who never make use of any sort of vehicle for any purpose.
The rest of us fall somewhere with in that range.
And where does carlight start?
Is a person car light when they drive to work or take a taxi 5 days a week? Probably not ... but maybe, if they don't use a car at all on weekends and if they walk/cycle to run all their errands.
But what if they only drive or take a taxi 3 days a week? Is that car light? Or 2 days a week?
And at the other end ... what if a person does not own a vehicle and does not take rides in a motor vehicle of any sort. Is that person carfree? Maybe. But what if that person gets deliveries a few times a year? Still carfree .... or not?
There will never be an agreed upon definition of carfree ... nor should their be.
On the one end are the people who drive everywhere ... at the other end are the people who have built their houses with trees they've grown and felled, who grow their own food and who make their own clothes and who never make use of any sort of vehicle for any purpose.
The rest of us fall somewhere with in that range.
And where does carlight start?
Is a person car light when they drive to work or take a taxi 5 days a week? Probably not ... but maybe, if they don't use a car at all on weekends and if they walk/cycle to run all their errands.
But what if they only drive or take a taxi 3 days a week? Is that car light? Or 2 days a week?
And at the other end ... what if a person does not own a vehicle and does not take rides in a motor vehicle of any sort. Is that person carfree? Maybe. But what if that person gets deliveries a few times a year? Still carfree .... or not?
There will never be an agreed upon definition of carfree ... nor should their be.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#12
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
Is this where the sub-committee on carfree definitions is meeting? Have you brought this meeting to order already? I really hope we can hash it out in this special session of the legislature.
#14
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,151
Bikes: Lots
Liked 601 Times
in
332 Posts
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#15
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,043
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,069 Times
in
4,475 Posts
#16
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,043
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,069 Times
in
4,475 Posts
It sure seemed like many posters in that other thread were both willing and able to state a definition. Many such offerings were given, actually. Did you not read all the responses in your own thread?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Why does Living Car Free need a definition? It's not a word. The meaning is right in front of your eyes if you understand English.
I'll give you a hint if your English skills are not strong. "Car free" means "in absence of a car". So Living Car Free means Living in Absence of a Car.
Does that help? If not then you fail the IQ test!
I'll give you a hint if your English skills are not strong. "Car free" means "in absence of a car". So Living Car Free means Living in Absence of a Car.
Does that help? If not then you fail the IQ test!
#18
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,151
Bikes: Lots
Liked 601 Times
in
332 Posts
I don't own a car. Because a car is defined as a privately owned motor vehicle, used for non-commercial personal transport, a taxi is not a car. Therefore, I can make use of a taxi every single day of the year ... and still be classed as "carfree"!
I don't own a car. The definition indicates I can use a car owned by someone else "infrequently". We haven't defined "infrequent" in this context. Does that mean that I can ride in our van on weekends? Is that infrequent? Or should I limit van rides to once a month? Or is it some percentage of my overall trips like if 10% of my trips are in the van, that's infrequent.
It's really a pointless exercise to try to define something like this seriously. We can have a bit of fun with it and throw ideas around because this is a forum for entertainment purposes ... but fortunately it is not like funding depends upon a definition.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Just for fun ... because that's all this is, isn't it ...
I don't own a car. Because a car is defined as a privately owned motor vehicle, used for non-commercial personal transport, a taxi is not a car. Therefore, I can make use of a taxi every single day of the year ... and still be classed as "carfree"!
I don't own a car. The definition indicates I can use a car owned by someone else "infrequently". We haven't defined "infrequent" in this context. Does that mean that I can ride in our van on weekends? Is that infrequent? Or should I limit van rides to once a month? Or is it some percentage of my overall trips like if 10% of my trips are in the van, that's infrequent.
It's really a pointless exercise to try to define something like this seriously. We can have a bit of fun with it and throw ideas around because this is a forum for entertainment purposes ... but fortunately it is not like funding depends upon a definition.
I don't own a car. Because a car is defined as a privately owned motor vehicle, used for non-commercial personal transport, a taxi is not a car. Therefore, I can make use of a taxi every single day of the year ... and still be classed as "carfree"!
I don't own a car. The definition indicates I can use a car owned by someone else "infrequently". We haven't defined "infrequent" in this context. Does that mean that I can ride in our van on weekends? Is that infrequent? Or should I limit van rides to once a month? Or is it some percentage of my overall trips like if 10% of my trips are in the van, that's infrequent.
It's really a pointless exercise to try to define something like this seriously. We can have a bit of fun with it and throw ideas around because this is a forum for entertainment purposes ... but fortunately it is not like funding depends upon a definition.
The definition I proposed said you could not "occupy" a car to get past this and other issues (but I agree we don't need no stinkin definition).
Last edited by Walter S; 01-05-16 at 05:10 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
What would you prefer? I mainly wanted to exempt people who own and/or drive for a job or for their own business. Like a cake baker who never drives for her own personal needs, but delivers cakes with a car she owns strictly for her business. After all, the title of the forum is LIVING Carfree, not WORKING Carfree.
#21
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,719
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Liked 2,496 Times
in
1,287 Posts
What difference does is make what some other persons definition of car-free is ??...Why even bother to argue and debate about something like that ??...Just live your life and stop arguing about stupid silly little definitions.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
Why does Living Car Free need a definition? It's not a word. The meaning is right in front of your eyes if you understand English.
I'll give you a hint if your English skills are not strong. "Car free" means "in absence of a car". So Living Car Free means Living in Absence of a Car.
Does that help? If not then you fail the IQ test!
I'll give you a hint if your English skills are not strong. "Car free" means "in absence of a car". So Living Car Free means Living in Absence of a Car.
Does that help? If not then you fail the IQ test!
#23
Prefers Cicero
We're of course re-hashing old discussion.
Ultimately there is no such thing as 'absolutely" car-free, just as there is no such thing as absolutely drug-free or sugar free, in that some tiny intrusion or arbitrary definition what is a car of what is a drug etc. or what the threshold is for allowed exceptions, is going to contaminate the situation. People call themselves "drug free" while Jonesing on cigarettes and caffeine, for example, because somehow these are not considered "drugs". "Sugar-free" as in food or chewing gum, actually means sugar levels are lower than a defined threshold.
So when we use a term like "car-free' we have to accept an imperfect definition: the intention is really "mostly car-free" - ie. don't own a car and hardly ever ride in one. To expect something more "pure' than this is just silly.
Ultimately there is no such thing as 'absolutely" car-free, just as there is no such thing as absolutely drug-free or sugar free, in that some tiny intrusion or arbitrary definition what is a car of what is a drug etc. or what the threshold is for allowed exceptions, is going to contaminate the situation. People call themselves "drug free" while Jonesing on cigarettes and caffeine, for example, because somehow these are not considered "drugs". "Sugar-free" as in food or chewing gum, actually means sugar levels are lower than a defined threshold.
So when we use a term like "car-free' we have to accept an imperfect definition: the intention is really "mostly car-free" - ie. don't own a car and hardly ever ride in one. To expect something more "pure' than this is just silly.
#24
Senior Member
I just sneak in under Roody's definition. I own a car, but it hasn't moved under its own power in years. I only keep it because I get a larger discount on my homeowners insurance by insuring it than it costs me. Also, on those rare instances when I rent a car, I can cheaply activate full coverage from the base policy.
That said, who cares? Drive less. Aspire to not drive at all. Help others do the same and things will get incrementally better, which is a reversal of the trend.
That said, who cares? Drive less. Aspire to not drive at all. Help others do the same and things will get incrementally better, which is a reversal of the trend.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
The problem with defining "car free" is that it's a state of being, not a course of action. Using it is making a statement about ourselves or others, but doesn't really demonstrate who we actually are. That's why I suggested a fairly strict definition similar to Roodys, it minimizes how much it can be interpreted and misused.