Compact Crankset compatibility
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 591
Bikes: Fiori Roma, Currently building a Bianchi, Trek 330, formerly Monshee Nomad, Favorit, Bianchi Sport SX, Frankenbike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Compact Crankset compatibility
I'm a older Clyde, getting back into cycling and not yet in great shape.
I bought an old beater, a 1990 Trek 330. It was a bit of a frankenbike, but its tuned and rideable with upgraded wheels.
It was a six speed bike with Shimano light action, but a 7 speed freewheel is on the newer rear wheel (14-28). It shifts ok but occasionally a hestitation or skip.
I'd like a lower gear. Yes, I should be able to handle it with that wide a range, but I'm not there yet, and I may not get there.
I've been looking at compact cranksets, and it would seem to be a better solution than trying a triple.
But I've seen compatibility statements about compact cranksets online, saying they are 9 or 10 or 11 speed compatible.
Any issues using one of those with a 7 speed freewheel in back?
I bought an old beater, a 1990 Trek 330. It was a bit of a frankenbike, but its tuned and rideable with upgraded wheels.
It was a six speed bike with Shimano light action, but a 7 speed freewheel is on the newer rear wheel (14-28). It shifts ok but occasionally a hestitation or skip.
I'd like a lower gear. Yes, I should be able to handle it with that wide a range, but I'm not there yet, and I may not get there.
I've been looking at compact cranksets, and it would seem to be a better solution than trying a triple.
But I've seen compatibility statements about compact cranksets online, saying they are 9 or 10 or 11 speed compatible.
Any issues using one of those with a 7 speed freewheel in back?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
There won't be any problems with the 7-speed freewheel but the wider chain may cause shifting problems with a 9-speed or narrower crank.
#3
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 36
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, Gary Fisher Mamba, winter commuter, rigid 26" mtb
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe you need to double check the derailleur capacity. The derailleur capacity dictates whether you would need a long cage or short cage rear derailleur. It is pretty easy to calculate to make sure you won't need to replace the rear derailleur.
#4
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 591
Bikes: Fiori Roma, Currently building a Bianchi, Trek 330, formerly Monshee Nomad, Favorit, Bianchi Sport SX, Frankenbike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well I can take it to my local bike shop, but I prefer to do my homework first.
Here is my model of Derailleur, from my model's description in the old catalogue it is a light action, but as a frankenbike, it could be anything, as all it says is Shimano SIS. So I am having a challenge finding the max capacity online. Can't find this exact one in Velobase or Disreali Gears.
Here is my model of Derailleur, from my model's description in the old catalogue it is a light action, but as a frankenbike, it could be anything, as all it says is Shimano SIS. So I am having a challenge finding the max capacity online. Can't find this exact one in Velobase or Disreali Gears.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
24x28 (the smallest chain ring you can get on a 130/74mm BCD road triple) is like 34x40 which is impractically large.
Where similar ranges are possible the road triple will give you gears that are closer together and mean less front shifting.
But I've seen compatibility statements about compact cranksets online, saying they are 9 or 10 or 11 speed compatible.
Any issues using one of those with a 7 speed freewheel in back?
Any issues using one of those with a 7 speed freewheel in back?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,100
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4212 Post(s)
Liked 3,883 Times
in
2,318 Posts
I agree with Drew's take on this. The whole move to compact gearing is so riders don't have to learn how to shift with thought and skill. The "new" (actually been done way before) 1x10(11) systems are a further extension of this movement.
Being a retro type i feel that every rider should not be allowed to use SIS shifting, ramped rings, HG type cogs for a number of miles/years. Like learning to drive with a manual transmission car. This way every one will need to learn how to soft pedal at the moment of the shift and not depend on an app to do the skilled stuff for them. Andy.
Being a retro type i feel that every rider should not be allowed to use SIS shifting, ramped rings, HG type cogs for a number of miles/years. Like learning to drive with a manual transmission car. This way every one will need to learn how to soft pedal at the moment of the shift and not depend on an app to do the skilled stuff for them. Andy.
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 591
Bikes: Fiori Roma, Currently building a Bianchi, Trek 330, formerly Monshee Nomad, Favorit, Bianchi Sport SX, Frankenbike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not sure I need a total granny gear, I would think the difference between a 52/42 and a 50/34 would be significant for me. I don't have mountains around here, but there are some hills.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The problem is that sure the 34 would be easier than the 42 but you lose the 42. My main bike is a 50-39-28 triple. My other bikes are usually 52-42-28. With that said, I generally keep my front gear in the middle ring (39 or 42) and only shift out to the 50 or 52 when descending a good sized hill or shift in to the 28 when going up trouble hills.
If I only had a 34, I would be running out of gears to shift to and being forced to shift to the 52 which would then require shifting the rear back down. Going to a triple allows you to keep your 42 which you probably stay in 90 percent of the time but gives you the bail out gear needed for hills and you still have your descending gears.
I'm also a large clyde which means triples are much easier for me.
#9
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 591
Bikes: Fiori Roma, Currently building a Bianchi, Trek 330, formerly Monshee Nomad, Favorit, Bianchi Sport SX, Frankenbike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well I hate to tell you Andy, but I have put more miles on non SIS bike than SIS ones. Mind you it was in the 70s and 80s. I actually toured with a rack, panniers and handlebar bag on week long solo tours on a bike that had 10 speeds. (2 x5) And that trip included some mountains. At that point I had two bikes, one for touring and a racer for fun. Neither of those were indexed.
And I can in fact drive a manual car.
For me the move to compact isn't to shift less or more, it is to have a wider range for the hills. I do realize that many of my peers are driving hybrids with triples, but that might mean a whole new bike would be the better option. I'd rather see if I can make this bike work for me, because in the other ways, it fits well.
And I can in fact drive a manual car.
For me the move to compact isn't to shift less or more, it is to have a wider range for the hills. I do realize that many of my peers are driving hybrids with triples, but that might mean a whole new bike would be the better option. I'd rather see if I can make this bike work for me, because in the other ways, it fits well.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
For me the move to compact isn't to shift less or more, it is to have a wider range for the hills. I do realize that many of my peers are driving hybrids with triples, but that might mean a whole new bike would be the better option. I'd rather see if I can make this bike work for me, because in the other ways, it fits well.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
i would just look at getting a different chainring or two and/or a new cassette. should minimize DR issues.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,530
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,789 Times
in
639 Posts
A basic modern compact double and 7 speed freewheel should work fine with a nicer 8 or 9 speed chain and likely be fine with the current component if there in good shape.
#13
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,735
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,406 Times
in
1,206 Posts
^This.
You'd be surprised at how much flexibility you'd have with a compact crank and wide range cogs. Your RD will accept up to 28 according to Shimano, but mine works well up to 32 in friction. A 34/32 combo is pretty easy on most hills, but even a 34/28 is great unless you have super steep hills to deal with.
Rule of thumb: use a chain that matches the highest number of gears in. Your combo. So with a 9/10 speed crank, use a 9/10 speed chain. Works fine.
You'd be surprised at how much flexibility you'd have with a compact crank and wide range cogs. Your RD will accept up to 28 according to Shimano, but mine works well up to 32 in friction. A 34/32 combo is pretty easy on most hills, but even a 34/28 is great unless you have super steep hills to deal with.
Rule of thumb: use a chain that matches the highest number of gears in. Your combo. So with a 9/10 speed crank, use a 9/10 speed chain. Works fine.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#14
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 591
Bikes: Fiori Roma, Currently building a Bianchi, Trek 330, formerly Monshee Nomad, Favorit, Bianchi Sport SX, Frankenbike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When I say I'm a Clyde, I'm a 220 lbs 6' guy. Realistically I'd like to be down to 200. I am still able to spin a pretty fast cadence and I can stand if I need to.
So while hills are a challenge during the first part of the season, my fitness will improve. I went to one of the gear calculators and compared the two setups, and I think the compact will do it for me.
So while hills are a challenge during the first part of the season, my fitness will improve. I went to one of the gear calculators and compared the two setups, and I think the compact will do it for me.
#15
Banned
Compact IE a 110 bolt circle crank is an old design .. any thing from 34t upward would bolt up ..
past 8 the chain had to get thinner, to pack in more speeds. so the spread between the chainrings thinned ,as well ..
past 8 the chain had to get thinner, to pack in more speeds. so the spread between the chainrings thinned ,as well ..
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Detroit, Michigan USA
Posts: 61
Bikes: 1988 Schwinn Prologue Frankin-Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've changed from 50/40 to 46/34
Perhaps you could just change the chain wheels to a 50/34 combination, or as I've done 46/34. I still use an 8 speed chain and the same crank that are on the original bicycle. I believe you can get a seven speed back cog 13-28 also. This will give you a wider range of gears.
(Yes I also own triple front chain wheel bicycle and yes I have to mentally divide the compact double into an upper range and an over lapping lower range. When I approach a hill I have learned to shift to the 30 chain wheel and immediately afterwords up shift my back cog set to approximate a similar gear ratio. But then I use to double clutch my TR-7 to down shift.)
I feel that you should do what you want cause you'll never satisfy everyone.
(Yes I also own triple front chain wheel bicycle and yes I have to mentally divide the compact double into an upper range and an over lapping lower range. When I approach a hill I have learned to shift to the 30 chain wheel and immediately afterwords up shift my back cog set to approximate a similar gear ratio. But then I use to double clutch my TR-7 to down shift.)
I feel that you should do what you want cause you'll never satisfy everyone.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,100
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4212 Post(s)
Liked 3,883 Times
in
2,318 Posts
Well I hate to tell you Andy, but I have put more miles on non SIS bike than SIS ones. Mind you it was in the 70s and 80s. I actually toured with a rack, panniers and handlebar bag on week long solo tours on a bike that had 10 speeds. (2 x5) And that trip included some mountains. At that point I had two bikes, one for touring and a racer for fun. Neither of those were indexed.
And I can in fact drive a manual car.
For me the move to compact isn't to shift less or more, it is to have a wider range for the hills. I do realize that many of my peers are driving hybrids with triples, but that might mean a whole new bike would be the better option. I'd rather see if I can make this bike work for me, because in the other ways, it fits well.
And I can in fact drive a manual car.
For me the move to compact isn't to shift less or more, it is to have a wider range for the hills. I do realize that many of my peers are driving hybrids with triples, but that might mean a whole new bike would be the better option. I'd rather see if I can make this bike work for me, because in the other ways, it fits well.
I am also glad that you are strong enough to not need the gear range that a triple crank can offer. I am not. I once thought I was (loaded touring through thr Finger Lakes on sew ups and a 42/52x14/28 5 speed freewheels bike) but my knees say otherwise now a days.
When i started out in this business there were touring set ups with 36/50 and 14/28 5 speed freewheels. But no one called then "compact". We just called them the gearing the riders needed. Like so many ideas that were actually pretty good BITD they are being rehashed, but with new catch phrases to appeal to the masses.
The reference to learning to drive a manual transmission car was only to make a point that we are a society that is expecting less basic knowledge from drivers and are relying more and more on the decisions of others to keep us on the road. Another example of this is the assumption that 4 wheel drive (oh, I mean "all wheel drive") will let drivers not crash or slide out of sloppy/snow covered roads.
As i have said many times before, my posts are often more for the other readers then directed at the OPs. If i had a beef with you i would have used your name and been even more direct. Again sorry if i ruffled your feathers. Andy.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Incheon, South Korea
Posts: 2,835
Bikes: Nothing amazing... cheap old 21 speed mtb
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I swapped out the road group 8 speed on my 2300 groupset with an altus 11-34 megarange cassette. Took some adjusting but the derailler with a slightly shorter chain (tension is ok not great but it works) actually works! with 53-39 up front and 11-34 at the back I have enough range to climb a steep hill but still go fast on the flat. Spaced out the gears a bit compared to tourer running 9 speed deore 12-32 with a 28-38-49 triple but it beats the heck out of 39-25 as the lowest knee destroying gear. No problems with fitness or muscles but my knees can't take the stress.