Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Being poor keeps me grounded😁

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Being poor keeps me grounded😁

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-24, 04:23 AM
  #1  
baj32161
Behind EVERYone!!!
Thread Starter
 
baj32161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burlington ON, Canada
Posts: 6,020

Bikes: 2010 Specialized Tricross Comp 105 Double

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 96 Times in 29 Posts
Being poor keeps me grounded😁

I've never had a particularly high paying job and I was raised to try to stay within my means

That being said, I have always WANTED the latest tech, be it in my love for home audio, photography or cycling.

As such, my cameras are all at least 11 years old, my bike is a 2010 Specialized Tricross Comp and my audio equipment is my smartphone and headphones.

Now, at 63 years old, I realize that I really have enjoyed the stuff 8 have. I am not a fast rider, never have been. I love riding the bike I have. I have won awards and sold photos taken with my 12 year old Nikon D7000s and love listening to my music.

All that that doesn't mean that I still don't WANT the newest fabulous tech.

I spend a lot of time sighing and wanting to run the lottery😁

More's the pity😁
__________________
“A good teacher protects his pupils from his own influence. ”

― Bruce Lee
baj32161 is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 05:40 AM
  #2  
ScottCommutes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 571
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 366 Post(s)
Liked 273 Times in 175 Posts
I've worked my way up to the lower end of six figures USD - not the highest paying job, but not the lowest. I have a house and family. My one bike and my one camera are a lot older and less fancy than yours (both pre-2000). My audio equipment is my Chromebook. Made a little money in photography back in the film days doing weddings and such, but didn't have the money/interest at the time to transition to all new digital equipment and workflow.
ScottCommutes is offline  
Likes For ScottCommutes:
Old 02-20-24, 06:59 AM
  #3  
Jughed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 884

Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 772 Times in 404 Posts
No matter what you make or how much you have/can afford - there will always be a product that is bigger/better faster and cost more than you can afford. (For the most part, Bezos and Musk types aside).

I make an OK living and take care of a family of 5. Up until recently I was the target customer for things like small boats, upgraded vehicles, higher end bikes - not a rich guy, but had some disposable income.

"Had" is the key word. Inflation and cost of living has sucked up just about all of the extra disposable income.

And - the prices of fancy stuff, like high end bikes or even basic boats, has outpaced inflation sometimes by a factor of 2x.

Say you were trying to save for a boat or bike, pay cash... The 5 year price target of the boat was 30k... you saved accordingly. Except the price ends up being 60k++.
Jughed is offline  
Likes For Jughed:
Old 02-20-24, 07:16 AM
  #4  
seypat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times in 1,510 Posts
Each of my eardrums had been perforated/burst/busted/etc at least 3 times by the time I was 18. That pretty much keeps me grounded. Very sensitive to pressure changes. I can't go very far down in water and have some trouble flying. That's life.
seypat is offline  
Likes For seypat:
Old 02-20-24, 07:43 AM
  #5  
Mojo31
-------
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Tejas
Posts: 12,795
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9653 Post(s)
Liked 6,365 Times in 3,505 Posts
Originally Posted by Jughed
No matter what you make or how much you have/can afford - there will always be a product that is bigger/better faster and cost more than you can afford. (For the most part, Bezos and Musk types aside).

I make an OK living and take care of a family of 5. Up until recently I was the target customer for things like small boats, upgraded vehicles, higher end bikes - not a rich guy, but had some disposable income.

"Had" is the key word. Inflation and cost of living has sucked up just about all of the extra disposable income.

And - the prices of fancy stuff, like high end bikes or even basic boats, has outpaced inflation sometimes by a factor of 2x.

Say you were trying to save for a boat or bike, pay cash... The 5 year price target of the boat was 30k... you saved accordingly. Except the price ends up being 60k++.
I've noticed the same thing. Plus, making less as one gets older is not as much fun.
Mojo31 is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 08:15 AM
  #6  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times in 3,012 Posts
I would say that you probably appreciate the things you do have more than those who can afford them more easily. Beyond a pretty low threshold, happiness is not significantly related to wealth. At least that has been my experience of increasing wealth over the years. Money doesn’t make you more happy in the long term, but it can cause plenty of stress!
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 02-20-24, 08:18 AM
  #7  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
Indeed. I saw a bloke drive his new Range Rover into his newly rebuilt house the other day and he was a miserable **** because he *****ed and moaned at us about fixing a puncture on the edge of his drive. On a narrow country road.
Plenty of cash, no idea how to enjoy life.

Last edited by choddo; 02-20-24 at 09:58 AM.
choddo is offline  
Likes For choddo:
Old 02-20-24, 08:24 AM
  #8  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times in 3,012 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
Indeed. I saw a bloke drive his new Range Rover into his newly rebuilt house the other day and he was a miserable **** because he *****ed and moaned at us about fixing a puncture on the edge of his drive. On a natrow country road.
Plenty of cash, no idea how to enjoy life.
Yep and those miserable types often appear to forget that health is far more important than wealth.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 02-20-24, 08:33 AM
  #9  
eduskator
Senior Member
 
eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,114

Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 989 Post(s)
Liked 586 Times in 440 Posts
Originally Posted by baj32161
I've never had a particularly high paying job and I was raised to try to stay within my means

That being said, I have always WANTED the latest tech, be it in my love for home audio, photography or cycling.

As such, my cameras are all at least 11 years old, my bike is a 2010 Specialized Tricross Comp and my audio equipment is my smartphone and headphones.

Now, at 63 years old, I realize that I really have enjoyed the stuff 8 have. I am not a fast rider, never have been. I love riding the bike I have. I have won awards and sold photos taken with my 12 year old Nikon D7000s and love listening to my music.

All that that doesn't mean that I still don't WANT the newest fabulous tech.

I spend a lot of time sighing and wanting to run the lottery😁

More's the pity😁
In the end, the importance is to look back at your life and feel satisfied about how you lived it. The rest, doesn't matter.
eduskator is offline  
Likes For eduskator:
Old 02-20-24, 08:46 AM
  #10  
bblair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 760

Bikes: Lynskey R230, Trek 5200, 1975 Raleigh Pro, 1973 Falcon ,Trek T50 Tandem and a 1968 Paramount in progress.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 380 Post(s)
Liked 395 Times in 234 Posts
You are just a few years younger than me. And I have come to the realization that now that I can afford all the "stuff," it just isn't as important to me. The 30-year-old me really wanted a Corvette. The 67 year-old me is just fine driving a 13 year old Honda.

But if I could buy my way into the A-Group with that $15,000 Pinarello, I'd do it tomorrow.
bblair is offline  
Likes For bblair:
Old 02-20-24, 09:15 AM
  #11  
baj32161
Behind EVERYone!!!
Thread Starter
 
baj32161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burlington ON, Canada
Posts: 6,020

Bikes: 2010 Specialized Tricross Comp 105 Double

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 96 Times in 29 Posts
Thanks for all of the input.

I'm finding that, at this point in my life, I like to use what money I can save on travel. As for my bike...I have never had more fun riding a bike than I've had with this old beast.
__________________
“A good teacher protects his pupils from his own influence. ”

― Bruce Lee
baj32161 is offline  
Likes For baj32161:
Old 02-20-24, 09:38 AM
  #12  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times in 3,012 Posts
Originally Posted by bblair
You are just a few years younger than me. And I have come to the realization that now that I can afford all the "stuff," it just isn't as important to me. The 30-year-old me really wanted a Corvette. The 67 year-old me is just fine driving a 13 year old Honda.

.
I got to that point before I was even 50. Now at 56 I don’t care about the material things I did in my 20s and 30s. I could buy a lot of expensive stuff now that I simply can’t be bothered with. That doesn’t mean that I don’t still like nice things. But I just realise that they are not worth obsessing over.

The OP is certainly not missing out on anything from what I have experienced with increasing wealth. Probably my happiest days were at Uni when I had almost no money at all. I still enjoyed riding my bike just as much.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 10:04 AM
  #13  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,535

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
As it is said, "The way to be happy is to make others so." For one thing, you are incredibly wealthy compared to historical norms, just because you are an American. I have close Muslim friends from Azerbaijan who just got their American citizenship. They say that for the first time in their lives, they feel safe. That's real wealth. None of us can say we're poor. I'm having a great time because I have a wonderful, amazing wife and many friends who care about me, all simply because I care about them. We're glad you're here and posting! Good for you and thanks for reminding us of our reality.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
Old 02-20-24, 10:08 AM
  #14  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,951

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,299 Times in 2,947 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
Money doesn’t make you more happy in the long term, but it can cause plenty of stress!
I would say it's actually the opposite. Many stressful events (family emergencies, health problems, job loss, etc.) can be made much less stressful if you have money.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 02-20-24, 10:48 AM
  #15  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,968 Times in 4,692 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
Beyond a pretty low threshold, happiness is not significantly related to wealth. At least that has been my experience of increasing wealth over the years. Money doesn’t make you more happy in the long term, but it can cause plenty of stress!
You mention wealth; much of the relevant research pertains to income -- which is related but obviously not equivalent to wealth. Regarding income, your general conclusion was the consensus for quite some time, but more recent research suggests that the relationship is more nuanced; specifically, that most people's happiness does rise with wealth even beyond some threshold, while a (significantly smaller) group of people reach a 'happiness plateau' at a certain level and then experience no more happiness from rising income.

Interestingly, there is substantial evidence (some from one of the researchers who authored the linked study) that, beyond some relatively low threshold, most people gain more happiness not from more money, but from having more than their peers. This is why the term "conspicuous consumption" is part of the lexicon.
Koyote is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 10:57 AM
  #16  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times in 3,012 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
I would say it's actually the opposite. Many stressful events (family emergencies, health problems, job loss, etc.) can be made much less stressful if you have money.
True, there's definitely a minimum income threshold for sure. I was thinking more about when you are well above the point of worrying about living expenses.

For me at this point more wealth would just be more hassle to deal with. If I can't even be bothered to spend the money I already have, then I don't see much point in having more. For example I could go to the bike shop today and splash out Ł12k on a super bike without putting a dent in our finances. But I know it won't make any difference to my riding enjoyment. So I don't even think about it. 20 year old me would have been straight down there if I had the cash available. I've already got several very expensive assets just sitting around gathering dust and they slightly irritate me when I actually think about them. It's just stuff.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 11:04 AM
  #17  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times in 3,012 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
You mention wealth; much of the relevant research pertains to income -- which is related but obviously not equivalent to wealth. Regarding income, your general conclusion was the consensus for quite some time, but more recent research suggests that the relationship is more nuanced; specifically, that most people's happiness does rise with wealth even beyond some threshold, while a (significantly smaller) group of people reach a 'happiness plateau' at a certain level and then experience no more happiness from rising income.

Interestingly, there is substantial evidence (some from one of the researchers who authored the linked study) that, beyond some relatively low threshold, most people gain more happiness not from more money, but from having more than their peers. This is why the term "conspicuous consumption" is part of the lexicon.
I guess it depends on how people view wealth relative to their peers. I used to be fairly conscious of what my peers had, but now I just don't care and am way more focused on my health and fitness relative to others. Maybe it's because I jumped off the working bandwagon at a relatively early age (mid 40s) and my peers now earn a LOT more. But I've done a hell of a lot more biking and skiing in the last decade than all of them combined!
PeteHski is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 11:10 AM
  #18  
ScottCommutes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 571
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 366 Post(s)
Liked 273 Times in 175 Posts
So this week a mom at our kid's school is getting kicked out of her lakefront house due to foreclosure after a nasty divorce from her cheating, gay, drug using husband. After his financial shell game fell apart, she finds herself poor and homeless, but with a lot of fancy stuff.

Don't be like her. Private communities, lakefront houses, and fancy stuff mean little. She is desperately moving many car and truck loads of stuff into my basement before the bank comes and changes the locks. I am personally torn between trying to help her and laughing at the fancy stuff that she will probably not have the opportunity to use again for quite some time - a new gas leaf blower, a tall pile of fancy mattresses, snow tires for a Tesla, a drum set for her daughter, giant exercise mats, etc.

If you knew that you were going to lose your home very soon, what would you try to save first, second, and last? That says something about you.

OP is also right about living within your means. Just because somebody has stuff, doesn't mean they can afford it.
ScottCommutes is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 11:21 AM
  #19  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,968 Times in 4,692 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
I would say it's actually the opposite. Many stressful events (family emergencies, health problems, job loss, etc.) can be made much less stressful if you have money.
This is why, for almost everyone, happiness (which, in some earlier studies, was essentially measured as a lack of unhappiness) does rise steadily up to a threshold for almost everyone. This is where the distinction between wealth and income becomes important: wealth allows one to weather those stressful events, while income may not help with all of them (job loss, in particular).

Originally Posted by PeteHski
True, there's definitely a minimum income threshold for sure. I was thinking more about when you are well above the point of worrying about living expenses.
Yes, this is the idea.

Originally Posted by PeteHski
I guess it depends on how people view wealth relative to their peers. I used to be fairly conscious of what my peers had, but now I just don't care and am way more focused on my health and fitness relative to others. Maybe it's because I jumped off the working bandwagon at a relatively early age (mid 40s) and my peers now earn a LOT more. But I've done a hell of a lot more biking and skiing in the last decade than all of them combined!
In an economic sense, your biking and skiing are consumption items, at least in the sense that you have sacrificed other goods and services (which you could purchase instead -- and which you could purchase in larger quantities if you were still working) in order to enjoy those activities. But I totally get your point. In fact, every time I read a post from someone who's trying to figure out how to afford a 'faster' bike, I think about how much faster that person could be if he stuck with his current bike and simply rode more, which could perhaps (for some people, whose jobs allow the flexibility) be done with less working time.
Koyote is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 11:39 AM
  #20  
ScottCommutes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 571
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 366 Post(s)
Liked 273 Times in 175 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
In fact, every time I read a post from someone who's trying to figure out how to afford a 'faster' bike, I think about how much faster that person could be if he stuck with his current bike and simply rode more, which could perhaps (for some people, whose jobs allow the flexibility) be done with less working time.
Interesting point, Koyote. Is it more sensible to get faster via spending money earned from hours at a job, or to get faster via the same hours riding on a bike?
ScottCommutes is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 12:57 PM
  #21  
Troul 
Senior Member
 
Troul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,394

Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times in 1,920 Posts
Originally Posted by Jughed
"Had" is the key word. Inflation and cost of living has sucked up just about all of the extra disposable income.
And - the prices of fancy stuff, like high end bikes or even basic boats, has outpaced inflation sometimes by a factor of 2x.
Say you were trying to save for a boat or bike, pay cash... The 5 year price target of the boat was 30k... you saved accordingly. Except the price ends up being 60k++.
I've noticed a lot of people do not understand/accept/reason with this, & it's a serious issue not just for themselves, but others around them.

If you set up 10 years ago to realistically payoff or save for a major purchase greater than 75K that it was then 10 years ago, it will be a pipedream now from the market shifts & strength in dollars.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
Troul is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 01:15 PM
  #22  
Troul 
Senior Member
 
Troul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,394

Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times in 1,920 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
I would say that you probably appreciate the things you do have more than those who can afford them more easily. Beyond a pretty low threshold, happiness is not significantly related to wealth. At least that has been my experience of increasing wealth over the years. Money doesn’t make you more happy in the long term, but it can cause plenty of stress!

Hard to find hard evidence on the following, but really, take it or leave it.
If a person gradually goes from a very low income to an upper middle income level, the stress/health likely will adapt resulting in little to no real major positive changes. The debt number increases as the budget slowly grows, the worries stack on with as you burden yourself with more responsibilities (go from renting to college debt & mortgage) & added liabilities (go from just having a pet to adding in kids & companionship).
Now if you suddenly go from lower income to an immediate upper middle income level (lets say in under six months time) then that might skip a lot of the in-between things that would have absorbed the growth in a slower rate & propped the person up to pursue & actually accomplish goals/dreams.
People with kids or just being with a companion might say, "I wouldnt give up where I am now, & I'll do anything for them"
You probably planned for that & set it as a dream to accomplish.
If not... well, you shouldn't ever give up on the responsibilities & liabilities that you've put yourself in.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
Troul is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 01:25 PM
  #23  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times in 3,012 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote

In an economic sense, your biking and skiing are consumption items, at least in the sense that you have sacrificed other goods and services (which you could purchase instead -- and which you could purchase in larger quantities if you were still working) in order to enjoy those activities. But I totally get your point. In fact, every time I read a post from someone who's trying to figure out how to afford a 'faster' bike, I think about how much faster that person could be if he stuck with his current bike and simply rode more, which could perhaps (for some people, whose jobs allow the flexibility) be done with less working time.
Skiing and biking certainly cost money, but it's not like I'm going to buy anything else if I saved that cash. We already have plenty of cash in the bank, plenty of assets and a decent income from my wife's business. If we suddenly had more money, it would make no difference to our lifestyle. Simply because we have no interest in buying a yacht, private jet or mansion. I can't even be bothered to spend more on bikes beyond mid-range spec.

Having worked in F1 motorsport for 2 decades I know plenty of rich people and many of them just worry constantly about tax, their assets and their peer status. There are a few who twig that "stuff" isn't really very important, but others just keep on spending with less and less return in satisfaction. Buying your first Porsche or Ferrari might seem very exciting, but eventually it just becomes the norm. Christmas every day would get boring after a while.

In my 20s and 30s I went through a phase of buying fancy watches, but after I got to about 10 of them I just lost interest. Haven't bought another since. Also bought a few Porsches along the way and eventually got bored with those too. Never did the Ferrari thing though, lol.

Anyway, my point is that the OP isn't really missing out on anything here. Living within his means and enjoying what he has is about as good as it gets.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 02-20-24, 01:36 PM
  #24  
Troul 
Senior Member
 
Troul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,394

Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times in 1,920 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
Simply because we have no interest in buying a yacht, private jet or mansion. I can't even be bothered to spend more on bikes beyond mid-range spec.
Everyone's relationship is unique, but experience has shown me eye opening things. Just because you get the vibes, verbal reassurances, & other accommodating support to live a certain lifestyle does not mean it's what the other person had or had in mind. Some bottle that up forever, others don't & show so with getting out of that relationship.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
Troul is offline  
Old 02-20-24, 02:00 PM
  #25  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,968 Times in 4,692 Posts
Originally Posted by Troul
Hard to find hard evidence on the following, but really, take it or leave it.
If a person gradually goes from a very low income to an upper middle income level, the stress/health likely will adapt resulting in little to no real major positive changes. The debt number increases as the budget slowly grows, the worries stack on with as you burden yourself with more responsibilities (go from renting to college debt & mortgage) & added liabilities (go from just having a pet to adding in kids & companionship).
Now if you suddenly go from lower income to an immediate upper middle income level (lets say in under six months time) then that might skip a lot of the in-between things that would have absorbed the growth in a slower rate & propped the person up to pursue & actually accomplish goals/dreams.
People with kids or just being with a companion might say, "I wouldnt give up where I am now, & I'll do anything for them"
You probably planned for that & set it as a dream to accomplish.
If not... well, you shouldn't ever give up on the responsibilities & liabilities that you've put yourself in.
You're just offering your guesses -- basically, making stuff up. I hope you realize that plenty of serious, well-educated people have studied (and continue to study) these phenomena empirically.
Koyote is offline  
Likes For Koyote:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.