Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Bottom Bracket Upgrade

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Bottom Bracket Upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-23, 01:04 PM
  #1  
Dominae
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Woodbridge VA
Posts: 268

Bikes: Trek Checkpoint; Cannondale Super X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 22 Posts
Bottom Bracket Upgrade

I am restoring a 1984 Trek 560. The bottom bracket is standard English threaded, 68x119. The ends of spindle a have "male" threads protruding from the square taper. The whole bottom bracket is old and worn and I was hoping to replace it with a more modern cartridge style. However, the cartridge style BBs that I have found all have threads recessed into the end of the square taper. Would I be able to use one of these new cartridge style BBs and just find new hardware (I assume a small bolt) to mount my crankset? Or am I better of just keeping the old bottom bracket?

If I purchased a 73 mm would the spindle length be the same as the one that is currently on the bike? (119 mm)

Last edited by Dominae; 02-07-23 at 10:49 AM.
Dominae is offline  
Old 02-06-23, 01:36 PM
  #2  
juvela
Senior Member
 
juvela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alta California
Posts: 14,265
Mentioned: 415 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 3,338 Times in 2,178 Posts
-----

the bottom bracket spindles with the male threads on the ends are known in the trade as "Type II" and also sometimes as "Maxy Type"

yes, you can mount your existing cranks on a spindle with recessed ends, not a problem

advantages of cartridges is that they are sealed, maintenance free and permit the fine tuning of chainline

at their introduction in the 1970's they were quite costly but have become a very good buy in today's market

-----
juvela is offline  
Likes For juvela:
Old 02-06-23, 01:48 PM
  #3  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 862
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 320 Times in 234 Posts
If going to a cartridge BB, check that the current spindle is asymmetrical or not. It could be longer on one side, usually the drive side. Most cartridge BB are symmetrical or really close to it. This may mean that you may need a longer spindle size in the cartridge BB to get the same position of the right crank. The left will then be out further.
KCT1986 is offline  
Old 02-06-23, 09:36 PM
  #4  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
As @juvela notes above, using your present crank on a modern bolt-type bottom bracket is possible, in principle. You may need to carefully measure ale offset to match with a new bottom bracket, and be prepared to tweak or replace parts as needed to achieve proper chainline and mounting.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 02-06-23, 10:56 PM
  #5  
Soody
Senior Member
 
Soody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,053

Bikes: Gunnar, Shogun, Concorde, F Moser, Pete Tansley, Rocky Mtn, Diamant, Krapf, Marin, Avanti, Winora, Emmelle, Ken Evans

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times in 218 Posts
Originally Posted by KCT1986
If going to a cartridge BB, check that the current spindle is asymmetrical or not. It could be longer on one side, usually the drive side. Most cartridge BB are symmetrical or really close to it. This may mean that you may need a longer spindle size in the cartridge BB to get the same position of the right crank. The left will then be out further.
To add to this, if your crank does require an asymmetric spindle, you can get a 73mm bottom bracket. Then you have 5mm of spacers to mimic that asymmetry.

I also recommend you look for the UN-55 cartridge units. They were recently discontinued but a lot of bike shops still have stock of them. They're quite a lot better than the tourney level UN300 which replaced them, or generic chinese ones, at practically the same price.

And don't be too obsessive about getting exactly the same size spindle. Generally narrower is better until it won't work.
Soody is offline  
Likes For Soody:
Old 02-07-23, 10:46 AM
  #6  
Dominae
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Woodbridge VA
Posts: 268

Bikes: Trek Checkpoint; Cannondale Super X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 22 Posts
The spindle on my bottom bracket is, in fact, asymmetrical. I didn't notice that when I removed it. Does the longer part of the spindle go on the drive side? I have seen the UN-55 cartridge bottom brackets for sale on line. Can you provide a little more detail how I would use a 73 mm instead of a (68 mm)? The spacers come standard with the bottom bracket?

If I purchased a 73 mm would the spindle length be the same as the one that is currently on the bike? (119 mm)

Last edited by Dominae; 02-07-23 at 10:50 AM.
Dominae is offline  
Likes For Dominae:
Old 02-07-23, 12:07 PM
  #7  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
Originally Posted by Dominae
The spindle on my bottom bracket is, in fact, asymmetrical. I didn't notice that when I removed it. Does the longer part of the spindle go on the drive side? I have seen the UN-55 cartridge bottom brackets for sale on line. Can you provide a little more detail how I would use a 73 mm instead of a (68 mm)? The spacers come standard with the bottom bracket?

If I purchased a 73 mm would the spindle length be the same as the one that is currently on the bike? (119 mm)
Yes, you would shoot for the same overall then use spacers to get the same offset you have. Or you could go to a local bike shop and estimate by trying a few different bbs mocked up with your frame and crank. Just use the cheap brand they have on hand and when u find the right length you can order whatever kind you want. Honestly for me, the modern shimanos work well and are cheap. They come in about 4 common sizes, one of which will be close enough for your purpose.
52telecaster is offline  
Old 02-07-23, 03:53 PM
  #8  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times in 866 Posts
Originally Posted by Soody
To add to this, if your crank does require an asymmetric spindle, you can get a 73mm bottom bracket. Then you have 5mm of spacers to mimic that asymmetry.

I also recommend you look for the UN-55 cartridge units. They were recently discontinued but a lot of bike shops still have stock of them. They're quite a lot better than the tourney level UN300 which replaced them, or generic chinese ones, at practically the same price.

And don't be too obsessive about getting exactly the same size spindle. Generally narrower is better until it won't work.

Soody makes a good point that a slightly shorter spindle (as in one with no offset) usually works better in terms of pedal stance and chain line.
Until it doesn't that is.
Look for how much clearance exists between the current mounted chainring and the frame's chainstay. Only 2-3mm is needed there, but it's really needed.
If a chosen length of bottom bracket doesn't give sufficient chainring clearance, a "fixed cup spacer" can boost the spindle outward on the driveside unless the left side cup has a flange that bottoms out (though such a flange can be filed off if needed).
And be aware that front derailers only pull in so far, even with the lo-limit screw backed out. Too short of a spindle on the drive side just might cause hesitant shifting down to the small chainring.

I often take chances with this, just to get the shortest possible spindle to work. I have a pile of them (cartridge bottom brackets) to test with however, so most people might be a little more conservative than myself in terms of what they will want to order.

A 73mm bottom bracket sticks out by 2.5mm on each side, so allows one to position the bottom bracket laterally 2.5mm in either direction to adjust chainline. Spacers may or may not be needed, usually it's best to add a spacer on the driveside for the "cup" flange to bottom on, thus stabilizing the cup and allowing bottoming torque to keep it tight.

Most bottom brackets come with the necessary bolts, Shimano supplies nice 8mm socket head bolts with theirs.

Last edited by dddd; 02-07-23 at 04:35 PM.
dddd is offline  
Old 02-07-23, 04:07 PM
  #9  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,807

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2439 Post(s)
Liked 3,128 Times in 1,967 Posts
Measure from the cup to the taper end when installed. That is basically about what you need in clearance to make the chain line roughly the same. Problem is that you will have a bit more on the NDS. That’s where the suggestion for the LBS comes in handy. They might let you see some BBs and measure that.

My guess is you can probably get away with close to the same length as others have said unless the crank arm clearance on both sides is tight.

Be sure you know if it is JIS or ISO tapered.

Last edited by jdawginsc; 02-07-23 at 04:11 PM.
jdawginsc is online now  
Old 02-07-23, 05:01 PM
  #10  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times in 866 Posts
Originally Posted by jdawginsc
Measure from the cup to the taper end when installed. That is basically about what you need in clearance to make the chain line roughly the same. Problem is that you will have a bit more on the NDS. That’s where the suggestion for the LBS comes in handy. They might let you see some BBs and measure that.

My guess is you can probably get away with close to the same length as others have said unless the crank arm clearance on both sides is tight.

Be sure you know if it is JIS or ISO tapered.
The only thing I have to add to all this is that when measuring and comparing the driveside spindle extensions of two different bottom brackets, the point of measurement should begin at the back or "inner" side of the driveside cup flange (where the flange will contact the frame's bottom bracket shell).

Measurement of the original cup/cone bottom bracket's driveside spindle extension will need to be done with bearings in place, and with the cup held squarely perpendicular to the spindle axis without any rocking of the cup.
dddd is offline  
Old 02-07-23, 05:55 PM
  #11  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,807

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2439 Post(s)
Liked 3,128 Times in 1,967 Posts
Originally Posted by dddd
The only thing I have to add to all this is that when measuring and comparing the driveside spindle extensions of two different bottom brackets, the point of measurement should begin at the back or "inner" side of the driveside cup flange (where the flange will contact the frame's bottom bracket shell).

Measurement of the original cup/cone bottom bracket's driveside spindle extension will need to be done with bearings in place, and with the cup held squarely perpendicular to the spindle axis without any rocking of the cup.
Good addition. Better said than I did.

The bigger problem would then be the tapers which can funky it up.

As said above, more often than not the same length in cartridge brackets usually works fine since there is a bit of room for error and likely the difference in a mm for actual purposes.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super












jdawginsc is online now  
Old 02-16-23, 07:11 AM
  #12  
fjifu
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 19

Bikes: 76 Fuji Gran Tourer, 80 Gran Tourer SE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
https://www.bikeforums.net/newreply....ply&p=22792916

Originally Posted by Soody
To add to this, if your crank does require an asymmetric spindle, you can get a 73mm bottom bracket. Then you have 5mm of spacers to mimic that asymmetry.

I also recommend you look for the UN-55 cartridge units. They were recently discontinued but a lot of bike shops still have stock of them. They're quite a lot better than the tourney level UN300 which replaced them, or generic chinese ones, at practically the same price.

And don't be too obsessive about getting exactly the same size spindle. Generally narrower is better until it won't work.
I was recently trying to replace a 1980 fuji touring bottom bracket with sealed cartridge and got a Shimano that had like measurements - 68 / 122.5 (my original spindle came at 122mm). It came with two chainrings by default. After disassembly I found the spindle indeed to be asymmetrical, and the chainline (didn't even know this phrase before this, first time ever doing this) to be visibly shifted leftward on the new, symmetrical Shimano. Besides this, left hand crank side fastening cup of the Shimano cartridge BB would not thread in no matter how delicately I tried to engage it with my BB, so I returned it. It stopped at about 1cm in and just would not take.

The spindle, quite nastily pitted (I think? silver, palpable damage and holes; grinds when play is removed) had 3SS stamped on it; looks like this
https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Botto.../dp/B000BMT32S

and the cups1.37"x24t as seen identically here https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...m-bracket.html - also seem to be sunline replacements for these on amazon, any opinion on these (sunline parts)?

per your suggestion, would this + a spacer work? Shimano Sealed Cartridge Square Taper Bottom Bracket BB BB-UN55 68 x 122 https://www.ebay.com/itm/385311447332
and any idea why the left fastening cup of the shimano cartrdige BB would not? The drive side went in OK and I couldn't see damage in my frame's BB threads; old cup goes in fine.

Sorry if this is hijacking your thread, I will remove if so. I was going to post about this with pics included but it seems answered here
fjifu is offline  
Old 02-16-23, 07:15 AM
  #13  
fjifu
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 19

Bikes: 76 Fuji Gran Tourer, 80 Gran Tourer SE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
https://www.bikeforums.net/newreply....ply&p=22792916

Originally Posted by Soody
To add to this, if your crank does require an asymmetric spindle, you can get a 73mm bottom bracket. Then you have 5mm of spacers to mimic that asymmetry.

I also recommend you look for the UN-55 cartridge units. They were recently discontinued but a lot of bike shops still have stock of them. They're quite a lot better than the tourney level UN300 which replaced them, or generic chinese ones, at practically the same price.

And don't be too obsessive about getting exactly the same size spindle. Generally narrower is better until it won't work.
I was recently trying to replace a 1980 fuji touring bottom bracket with sealed cartridge and got a Shimano that had like measurements - 68 / 122.5 (my original spindle came at 122mm). The bike/spindle came with two chainrings by default. After disassembly I found the spindle indeed to be asymmetrical, and the chainline (didn't even know this phrase before this, first time ever doing this) to be visibly shifted leftward on the new, symmetrical Shimano. Besides this, left hand crank side fastening cup of the Shimano cartridge BB would not thread in no matter how delicately I tried to engage it with my BB, so I returned it. It stopped at about 1cm in and just would not take.

The spindle, quite nastily pitted (I think? silver, palpable damage and holes; grinds when play is removed) had 3SS stamped on it; looks like this
https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Botto.../dp/B000BMT32S

and the cups1.37"x24t as seen identically here https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...m-bracket.html - also seem to be sunline replacements for these on amazon, any opinion on these (sunline parts)?

per your suggestion, would this + a spacer work? Shimano Sealed Cartridge Square Taper Bottom Bracket BB BB-UN55 68 x 122 https://www.ebay.com/itm/385311447332
and any idea why the left fastening cup of the shimano cartrdige BB would not? The drive side went in OK and I couldn't see damage in my frame's BB threads; old cup goes in fine.

Sorry if this is hijacking your thread, I will remove if so. I was going to post about this with pics included but it seems answered here
fjifu is offline  
Old 02-16-23, 08:14 AM
  #14  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Originally Posted by fjifu
left hand crank side fastening cup of the Shimano cartridge BB would not thread in no matter how delicately I tried to engage it with my BB, so I returned it. It stopped at about 1cm in and just would not take.

[…]

and any idea why the left fastening cup of the shimano cartrdige BB would not? The drive side went in OK and I couldn't see damage in my frame's BB threads; old cup goes in fine.
Is there perhaps a tube end or cable guide retaining bolt obstructing the cartridge? Failing that, perhaps the threads need to be chased a little deeper into the shell.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 02-16-23, 06:21 PM
  #15  
Soody
Senior Member
 
Soody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,053

Bikes: Gunnar, Shogun, Concorde, F Moser, Pete Tansley, Rocky Mtn, Diamant, Krapf, Marin, Avanti, Winora, Emmelle, Ken Evans

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times in 218 Posts
Originally Posted by fjifu
Besides this, left hand crank side fastening cup of the Shimano cartridge BB would not thread in no matter how delicately I tried to engage it with my BB, so I returned it. It stopped at about 1cm in and just would not take.
any idea why the left fastening cup of the shimano cartrdige BB would not? The drive side went in OK and I couldn't see damage in my frame's BB threads; old cup goes in fine.


After disassembly I found the spindle indeed to be asymmetrical, and the chainline (didn't even know this phrase before this, first time ever doing this) to be visibly shifted leftward on the new, symmetrical Shimano.
per your suggestion, would this + a spacer work? Shimano Sealed Cartridge Square Taper Bottom Bracket BB BB-UN55 68 x 122 https://www.ebay.com/itm/385311447332
Sometimes it can just be tricky to catch the thread, but nothing is wrong.
You could make some chasing tools:

sun-etc parts are usually fine but it's just cheap chinese stuff and it's never gonna be smooth. I usually only bother with loose ball bbs with high end vintage ones in good condition, esoteric standards, or for bikes worth nothing.
The cartridge unit is better. That one is not what you want though. You want a 73mm one if you're gonna space it. That is a good idea imo.
Soody is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.